The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A controlled study of the effects of an early intervention on acute musculoskeletal pain problems
Abstract
Current conceptions of chronic pain clearly suggest that proper care at the acute stage should prevent the development of chronic problems. Patients (198) seeking help for acute musculoskeletal pain (MSP), e.g., back and neck pain participated in two studies of the effects of an Early Active intervention which underscored 'well' behavior and function compared to a Treatment as usual control group. The quantity of the Early Active treatment was a median of 1 doctor's appointment and 3 meetings with a physical therapist. Study I concerned patients with a prior history of sick-listing for MSP, while study II involved patients with no prior history of MSP. Treatment satisfaction, pain experience, activities and sickness absenteeism were assessed before, after and at a 12-month follow-up. In study I (patients with a history of MSP), the results showed significant improvements for both groups, but virtually no differences between the groups. Similarly, in study II (no history of MSP) both groups demonstrated significant improvements, e.g., for pain intensity and activity levels. However, the Early Active treatment resulted in significantly less sick-listing relative to the control group. Moreover, the risk of developing chronic (> 200 sick days) pain was 8 times lower for the Early Activation group. This investigation shows that relatively simple changes in treatment result in reduced sickness absenteeism for 'first-time' sufferers only. Consequently, the content and timing of treatment for pain appear to be crucial. Properly administered early intervention may therefore decrease sick leave and prevent chronic problems, thus saving considerable resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rosenstiel, A. K., & Keefe, F. J. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90125-2 · Cited by 2,314
Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review.
Flor, H., Fydrich, T., & Turk, D. C. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90145-2 · Cited by 1,227
Cited by
Krause, N., Frank, J. W., Dasinger, L. K., Sullivan, T. J., & Sinclair, S. J. (2001) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.1116 · Cited by 475
Lundberg, M. K. E., Styf, J., & Carlsson, S. G. (2004) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593980490453002 · Cited by 295
Linton, S. J., Boersma, K., Jansson, M., Sv??rd, L., & Botvalde, M. (2005) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200503000-00001 · Cited by 196
A 3-year follow-up of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for back and neck pain
Jensen, I. B., Bergström, G., Ljungquist, T., & Bodin, L. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.005 · Cited by 188
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for fibromyalgia and musculoskeletal pain in working age adults
Karjalainen, K. A., Malmivaara, A., van Tulder, M. W., Roine, R., Jauhiainen, M., Hurri, H., & Koes, B. W. (1999) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001984 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Linton, S. J., Hellsing, A.-L., & Andersson, D.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-359
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085679243
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A controlled study of the effects of an early intervention on acute musculoskeletal pain problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(93)90037-p
- The paper
- Linton, S. J., Hellsing, A.-L., & Andersson, D. (1993). A controlled study of the effects of an early intervention on acute musculoskeletal pain problems. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(93)90037-p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.