The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients
Abstract
The physical performance of chronic pain patients is of major concern both for their assessment and for treatment evaluation. However, there are few widely used physical tests, a shortage of reliability and validity data on published tests, and an over-reliance on self-report or on clinical measures of dubious generalisability. A set of tests was designed to cover speed and endurance in walking, stair climbing, standing up from a chair, sit-ups, arm endurance, grip strength, and peak flow. Standard instructions and testing conditions were used by a trained tester on a population of chronic pain patients before and after a cognitive-behavioural chronic pain management programme. Reliability, validity, and acceptability of each test was examined, and recommendations made for their relative utility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Fairbank, J. C. T., Couper, J., Davies, J. B., & O'Brien, J. P. (2020) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t04205-000 · Cited by 2,033
Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review.
Flor, H., Fydrich, T., & Turk, D. C. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90145-2 · Cited by 1,227
Cited by
Acceptance and Values-Based Action in Chronic Pain: A Study of Treatment Effectiveness and Process
Vowles, K. E., & McCracken, L. M. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.3.397 · Cited by 500
Inpatient vs. outpatient pain management: results of a randomised controlled trial
de Williams, C. A. C., Richardson, P. H., Nicholas, M. K., Pither, C. E., Harding, V. R., Ridout, K. L., Ralphs, J. A., Richardson, I. H., Justins, D. M., & Chamberlain, J. H. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)02996-x · Cited by 199
Morley, S., Williams, A., & Hussain, S. (2008) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.025 · Cited by 194
Vowles, K. E., Witkiewitz, K., Sowden, G., & Ashworth, J. (2014) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.002 · Cited by 201
Patient Functioning and Catastrophizing in Chronic Pain: The Mediating Effects of Acceptance
Vowles, K. E., McCracken, L. M., & Eccleston, C. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(suppl.).s136 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Harding, V. R., de C Williams, A. C., Richardson, P. H., Nicholas, M. K., Jackson, J. L., Richardson, I. H., & Pither, C. E.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-375
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125338034
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90131-7
- The paper
- Harding, V. R., de C Williams, A. C., Richardson, P. H., Nicholas, M. K., Jackson, J. L., Richardson, I. H., & Pither, C. E. (1994). The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90131-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
