The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Formalin-evoked activity in identified primary afferent fibers: systemic lidocaine suppresses phase-2 activity
Abstract
Formalin injected subcutaneously into the paw is a frequently used pain assay; it evokes an initial period of licking and flinching followed by a period of quiescence and last by a second period of intense and protracted licking and flinching. The prominent second phase is believed to reflect the development of a central (spinal cord) facilitation. This conclusion is based on the assumption that formalin evokes an initial burst of activity in fine afferent fibers, followed by prolonged low levels of activity in C fibers. Detailed reports substantiating this essential assumption have not been published. Thus, we recorded in situ from single sural nerve fibers, identified by their conduction velocity and modality, in the barbiturate anesthetized rat. Following formalin (2.5%, 50 microliters) injection into their receptive fields, phase-1 activity was prominent in A beta and A delta fibers as well as in high-threshold C nociceptive afferent fibers. Phase-2 activity was observed in A delta fibers with receptive fields in hairy skin and in all mechanically sensitive C fibers. Mean phase-2 activity in these fibers was 1/2-2/3 of the magnitude achieved in phase 1. Mechanically insensitive fibers and A delta and C fibers with receptive field centers outside of the injection zone began firing 15 min or more post-injection and would contribute to phase-2, but not phase-1, behavioral activity. Intravenous infusion of low doses of lidocaine yielding plasma levels of 3.6-7.9 micrograms/ml administered during phase 2 blocked formalin-evoked activity in primary afferent fibers in a dose-related fashion without blocking either electrically or mechanically evoked activity. Effective plasma doses were comparable to those found to relieve neuropathic pain. These data indicate that phase 2 in the formalin test is more closely related to ongoing afferent input than had previously been thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Le Bars, D., Gozariu, M., & Cadden, S. W. (2001) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01514-x · Cited by 1,459
Models and Mechanisms of Hyperalgesia and Allodynia
Sandkühler, J. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00025.2008 · Cited by 1,148
Tumour necrosis factor-α induces ectopic activity in nociceptive primary afferent fibres
Sorkin, L. S., Xiao, W.-H., Wagner, R., & Myers, R. R. (1997) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00147-4 · Cited by 503
Self-citationThe Endocannabinoid System and Pain
Guindon, J., & Hohmann, A. (2009) · CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/187152709789824660 · Cited by 476
Guindon, J., & Hohmann, A. G. (2008) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707531 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Puig, S., & Sorkin, L. S.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 345-355
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046761549
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formalin-evoked activity in identified primary afferent fibers: systemic lidocaine suppresses phase-2 activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00121-2
- The paper
- Puig, S., & Sorkin, L. S. (1996). Formalin-evoked activity in identified primary afferent fibers: systemic lidocaine suppresses phase-2 activity. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00121-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.