Cited by 1,459Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsAnimal testing and alternativesVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Animal models of nociception

Le Bars, Daniel, Gozariu, Manuela, Cadden, Samuel W.·2001·Pharmacological Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01514-x

Cites

627 of 627 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le Bars, D., Gozariu, M., & Cadden, S. W.
Venue
Pharmacological Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-12
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
597-652
ISSN
0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406058850
Cited by
1,459
References
621
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 87
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
animal models of pain, nociception, animal pain assessment, nociceptive stimuli, thermal pain, mechanical pain, chemical pain, electrical pain, nociceptive threshold, spinal reflexes, inflammation, homeostatic mechanisms
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Nerve Fibers, Pain, Pain Measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review