The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Back pain in primary care: predictors of high health-care costs
Abstract
The objective of this study was to describe the health care utilization and prospective predictors of high-cost primary-care back pain patients. In the primary-care clinics of a large, staff model health maintenance organization in western Washington State, 1059 subjects were selected from consecutive patients presenting for back pain. The design was a 1-year prospective cohort study. Patients' were interviewed 1 month after an index primary-care back pain visit. Costs (back pain and total) and utilization (back pain primary-care follow-up visits, back pain specialty visits, back pain hospitalizations, back pain radiologic procedures, and pain medicine fills) were tracked over the next 11 months. Predictors assessed at 1 month were back pain diagnosis (disc disorder/sciatica, arthritis, vs. other), chronic pain grade (measure of pain intensity and related dysfunction), pain persistence (days with pain in prior 6 months), depressive symptomatology, and back pain-related disability compensation (ever/never). For the sample, 21% of patients with back pain costs > or = $600 (high back pain costs) accounted for 66% of back pain costs, 42% of total costs, 55% of primary-care follow-up visits for back pain, 91% of back pain specialty visits, 100% of back pain hospitalizations, 51% of back pain radiologic procedures, and 52% of pain medicine fills. The 21% with total costs > or = $2700 (high total costs) accounted for 67.7% of total costs, 52% of back pain costs, 29% of primary-care follow-up visits for back pain, 66% of back pain specialty visits, 100% of back pain hospitalizations, 39% of back pain radiologic procedures, and 42% of pain medicine fills. Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that increasing chronic pain grade, more persistent pain, and disc disorder/sciatica were strong independent predictors of high total and high back pain costs. Increasing depressive symptoms significantly predicted high total but not high back pain costs. Back pain disability compensation predicted high back pain but not high total costs. A minority of primary-care back pain patients accounted for a majority of health-care costs. Patients with high back pain costs accounted for more back pain-related health-care utilization than did patients with high total costs. Factors predicting subsequent high costs suggest behavioral interventions targeting dysfunction, pain persistence, and depression may reduce health-care utilization and prevent accumulation of high health-care costs among primary-care back pain patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McFarland, B. H., Freeborn, D. K., Mullooly, J. P., & Pope, C. R. (1985) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198511000-00001 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Depression and Pain Comorbidity: A Literature Review
Bair, M. J., Robinson, R. L., Katon, W., & Kroenke, K. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.20.2433 · Cited by 3,463
Self-citationA review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain
Linton, S. J. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200005010-00017 · Cited by 1,776
Pincus, T., Burton, A. K., Vogel, S., & Field, A. P. (2002) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017 · Cited by 1,633
“USA 1024 Disability and cost *** ** *** H Engel et al.(20) Dionne et al.”
BackgroundThe Economic Burden of Depression in the United States: How Did It Change Between 1990 and 2000?
Greenberg, P. E., Kessler, R. C., Birnbaum, H. G., Leong, S. A., Lowe, S. W., Berglund, P. A., & Corey-Lisle, P. K. (2003) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v64n1211 · Cited by 1,280
Fear-Avoidance Model of Chronic Pain: The Next Generation
Crombez, G., Eccleston, C., Van Damme, S., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Karoly, P. (2012) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e3182385392 · Cited by 960
Metadata
- Authors
- Engel, C. C., Von Korff, M., & Katon, W. J.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-204
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982207092
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Back pain in primary care: predictors of high health-care costs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00164-6
- The paper
- Engel, C. C., Von Korff, M., & Katon, W. J. (1996). Back pain in primary care: predictors of high health-care costs. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00164-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.