Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Back pain in primary care: predictors of high health-care costs

Engel, Charles C., Von Korff, Michael, Katon, Wayne J.·1996·Pain

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the health care utilization and prospective predictors of high-cost primary-care back pain patients. In the primary-care clinics of a large, staff model health maintenance organization in western Washington State, 1059 subjects were selected from consecutive patients presenting for back pain. The design was a 1-year prospective cohort study. Patients' were interviewed 1 month after an index primary-care back pain visit. Costs (back pain and total) and utilization (back pain primary-care follow-up visits, back pain specialty visits, back pain hospitalizations, back pain radiologic procedures, and pain medicine fills) were tracked over the next 11 months. Predictors assessed at 1 month were back pain diagnosis (disc disorder/sciatica, arthritis, vs. other), chronic pain grade (measure of pain intensity and related dysfunction), pain persistence (days with pain in prior 6 months), depressive symptomatology, and back pain-related disability compensation (ever/never). For the sample, 21% of patients with back pain costs > or = $600 (high back pain costs) accounted for 66% of back pain costs, 42% of total costs, 55% of primary-care follow-up visits for back pain, 91% of back pain specialty visits, 100% of back pain hospitalizations, 51% of back pain radiologic procedures, and 52% of pain medicine fills. The 21% with total costs > or = $2700 (high total costs) accounted for 67.7% of total costs, 52% of back pain costs, 29% of primary-care follow-up visits for back pain, 66% of back pain specialty visits, 100% of back pain hospitalizations, 39% of back pain radiologic procedures, and 42% of pain medicine fills. Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that increasing chronic pain grade, more persistent pain, and disc disorder/sciatica were strong independent predictors of high total and high back pain costs. Increasing depressive symptoms significantly predicted high total but not high back pain costs. Back pain disability compensation predicted high back pain but not high total costs. A minority of primary-care back pain patients accounted for a majority of health-care costs. Patients with high back pain costs accounted for more back pain-related health-care utilization than did patients with high total costs. Factors predicting subsequent high costs suggest behavioral interventions targeting dysfunction, pain persistence, and depression may reduce health-care utilization and prevent accumulation of high health-care costs among primary-care back pain patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00164-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Engel, C. C., Von Korff, M., & Katon, W. J.
Venue
Pain
Published
1996-05
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
197-204
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982207092
Cited by
292
References
1
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Back pain in primary care: predictors of high health-care costs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00164-6
The paper
Engel, C. C., Von Korff, M., & Katon, W. J. (1996). Back pain in primary care: predictors of high health-care costs. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00164-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.