The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of a rat model of incisional pain
Abstract
In this study, we developed a rat model of incisional pain. A 1-cm longitudinal incision was made through skin, fascia and muscle of the plantar aspect of the hindpaw in halothane-anesthetized rats. Withdrawal responses were measured using von Frey filaments at different areas around the wound before surgery and for the next 6 days. A cumulative pain score based on the weight bearing behavior of the animals was also utilized. The results of tests for withdrawal responses and scores based on weight bearing suggest that a surgical incision of the rat foot causes a reliable and quantifiable mechanical hyperalgesia lasting for several days after surgery. An incision that only included skin and fascia but not muscle in the foot caused less severe hyperalgesia during the initial postoperative period. Distinct areas around the wound had different withdrawal thresholds during the study period. Even remote sites as much as 10 mm from the wound showed persistent mechanical hyperalgesia. Selective denervations of the rat hindpaw prior to foot incision revealed both the sural and tibial nerves were responsible for transmitting input from the incision that produces hyperalgesia. This model should allow us to understand mechanisms of sensitization caused by surgery and investigate new therapies for postoperative pain in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ho Kim, S., & Mo Chung, J. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90041-9 · Cited by 3,069
Cited by
Le Bars, D., Gozariu, M., & Cadden, S. W. (2001) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01514-x · Cited by 1,459
Models and Mechanisms of Hyperalgesia and Allodynia
Sandkühler, J. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00025.2008 · Cited by 1,148
Animal models of pain: progress and challenges
Mogil, J. S. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2606 · Cited by 1,120
Transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain: risk factors and protective factors
Katz, J., & Seltzer, Z. (2009) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.09.20 · Cited by 782
Jarvis, M. F., Burgard, E. C., McGaraughty, S., Honore, P., Lynch, K., Brennan, T. J., Subieta, A., van Biesen, T., Cartmell, J., Bianchi, B., et al. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252537299 · Cited by 470
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brennan, T. J., Vandermeulen, E. P., & Gebhart, G. F.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 493-502
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072968157
- Cited by
- 1,093
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of a rat model of incisional pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(95)01441-1
- The paper
- Brennan, T. J., Vandermeulen, E. P., & Gebhart, G. F. (1996). Characterization of a rat model of incisional pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(95)01441-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.