Cited by 32Logic, programming, and type systemsLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAdvanced Algebra and Logic

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sound and complete partial deduction with unfolding based on well-founded measures

Open access
Martens, Bern, De Schreye, Danny, Horváth, Tamás·1994·Theoretical Computer Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3975(94)90203-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Aravindan, 1992, Partial deduction of logic programs w.r.t. well-founded semantics, Vol. 632, 384
  2. Barbuti, 1990, A transformational approach to negation in logic programming, J. Logic Programming, 8, 201, 10.1016/0743-1066(90)90023-X · DOI
  3. Bruynooghe, 1992, A general criterion for avoiding infinite unfolding during partial deduction, New Generation Comput., 11, 47, 10.1007/BF03037527 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gallagher, 1986, Transforming logic programs by specialising interpreters, Proc. ECAI '86, 109
  5. Levi, 1988, Partial evaluation of metaprograms in a multiple worlds logic language, New Generation Comput., 6, 227, 10.1007/BF03037139 · DOI
  6. Lloyd, 1991, Partial evaluation in logic programming, J. Logic Programming, 11, 217, 10.1016/0743-1066(91)90027-M · DOI · Paper page
  7. Plotkin, 1970, A note on inductive generalization, Vol. 5, 153
  8. Reynolds, 1970, Transformational systems and the algebraic structure of atomic formulas, Vol. 5, 135
  9. Sterling, 1989, Metainterpreters for expert system construction, J. of Logic Programming, 6, 163, 10.1016/0743-1066(89)90034-4 · DOI
  10. Venken, 1988, A partial evaluation system for Prolog: some practical considerations, New Generation Comput., 6, 279, 10.1007/BF03037142 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Martens, B., De Schreye, D., & Horváth, T.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Martens, Bern
Venue
Theoretical Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
122
Issue
1-2
Pages
97-117
ISSN
0304-3975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1512183835
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Theoretical Computer Science (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Future Generation Computer Systems
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
Keywords
partial deduction, logic programs, unfolding, termination, soundness, completeness, definite programs, program specialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review