The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An empirical examination of information, differences of opinion, and trading activity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Is All That Talk Just Noise? The Information Content of Internet Stock Message Boards
Antweiler, W., & Frank, M. Z. (2004) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00662.x · Cited by 2,373
The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure
Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2672910 · Cited by 2,370
The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure
Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1999) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.171975 · Cited by 2,101
Model Uncertainty and Option Markets with Heterogeneous Beliefs
BURASCHI, A., & JILTSOV, A. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01006.x · Cited by 346
IAS versus US GAAP: Information-Asymmetry Based Evidence from Germany's New Market
Leuz, C. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.275348 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Bessembinder, H., Chan, K., & Seguin, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Financial Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-134
- ISSN
- 0304-405X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970804135
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical examination of information, differences of opinion, and trading activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-405x(95)00839-7
- The paper
- Bessembinder, H., Chan, K., & Seguin, P. J. (1996). An empirical examination of information, differences of opinion, and trading activity. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(95)00839-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
