On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Estimation of a non-neutral stochastic frontier production function
Huang, C. J., & Liu, J.-T. (1994) · Journal of Productivity Analysis · doi:10.1007/bf01073853 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Efficiency Analysis of Developing Country Agriculture: A Review of the Frontier Function Literature
Bravo-Ureta, B. E., & Pinheiro, A. E. (1993) · Agricultural and Resource Economics Review · doi:10.1017/s1068280500000320 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: a meta‐analysis
Thiam, A., Bravo‐Ureta, B. E., & Rivas, T. E. (2001) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00204.x · Cited by 297 · see citing works
“Subsequent work by Jondrow et al. (1982) provided an approach for calculating individual firm efficiency using the stochastic frontier model.”
MethodEndogeneity in stochastic frontier models
Amsler, C., Prokhorov, A., & Schmidt, P. (2016) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.013 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Self-citationDynamics of productivity and technical efficiency in Russian agriculture
Bokusheva, R., Hockmann, H., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2012) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbr059 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Van Nguyen, Q., Pascoe, S., Coglan, L., & Nghiem, S. (2021) · Journal of Productivity Analysis · doi:10.1007/s11123-020-00592-8 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jondrow, J., Knox Lovell, C. A., Materov, I. S., & Schmidt, P.
- Affiliations
- Center for Naval Analyses (US)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Michigan State University (US)
- ORCID
- Schmidt, Peter
- Venue
- Journal of Econometrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-08
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 233-238
- ISSN
- 0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060646203
- Cited by
- 3,447
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 172 · 2021: 161 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 126 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 139 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 147
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Keywords
- technical inefficiency, stochastic frontier analysis, pure technical inefficiency, half-normal distribution, exponential distribution, conditional expectation, efficiency estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
