Cited by 593Efficiency Analysis Using DEAEconomic Growth and ProductivityGlobal trade and economics

Estimation of a non-neutral stochastic frontier production function

Huang, Clief J., Liu, Jin-Tan·1994·Journal of Productivity Analysis

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01073853

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, C. J., & Liu, J.-T.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Venue
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Published
1994-06
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
171-180
ISSN
  • 0895-562X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0441
OpenAlex
W1965874904
Cited by
593
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Productivity Analysis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
Keywords
stochastic frontier analysis, truncated regression, production efficiency, firm characteristics, firm age, export ratio, R&D investment, electronics industry, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review