Cited by 66Plant tissue culture and regenerationBerry genetics and cultivation researchFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

Anatomical changes in persistent leaves of tissuecultured strawberry plants after removal from culture

Fabbri, Andre, Sutter, Ellen, Dunston, Sheryl K.·1986·Scientia Horticulturae

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-4238(86)90107-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fabbri, A., Sutter, E., & Dunston, S. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Sutter, Ellen
Venue
Scientia Horticulturae
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-05
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
331-337
ISSN
0304-4238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299312585
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scientia Horticulturae (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Berry genetics and cultivation research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
strawberry, leaf anatomy, epicuticular wax, palisade cells, airspace, stomata, leaf size, leaf surface structure, acclimatization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review