The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Carlsson, C. (1983) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1983.216 · Cited by 2,459
Geoffrion, A. M., Dyer, J. S., & Feinberg, A. (1972) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.19.4.357 · Cited by 887
The Analysis and Use of Financial Ratios: A Review Article
Barnes, P. (1987) · Journal of Business Finance & Accounting · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.1987.tb00106.x · Cited by 324
Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organization
GLOBERSON, S. (1985) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207548508904734 · Cited by 263
Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM
Bouyssou, D. (1986) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90167-0 · Cited by 231
Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid
Mareschal, B. (1988) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(88)90254-8 · Cited by 218
On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach)
Vansnick, J.-C. (1986) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90051-2 · Cited by 198
A method for determining the weights of criteria: The centralized weights
Solymosi, T., & Dombi, J. D. (1986) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90157-8 · Cited by 151
A Time-Sharing Computer Program for the Solution of the Multiple Criteria Problem
Dyer, J. S. (1973) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.19.12.1379 · Cited by 119
A multicriteria approach for evaluating the performance of industrial firms
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1992) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(92)90021-x · Cited by 80
Self-citation
Cited by
Weighting methods for multi-criteria decision making technique
Odu, G. O. (2019) · Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management · doi:10.4314/jasem.v23i8.7 · Cited by 536
Effects of normalization on the entropy-based TOPSIS method
Chen, P. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.035 · Cited by 404
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University, U., & Mukhametzyanov, I. (2021) · Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering · doi:10.31181/dmame210402076i · Cited by 343
“…entropy weighting method (EWM) (Lotfi & Fallahnejad, 2010; Wu et al., 2011; He et al., 2016), CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) (Diakoulaki et al., 1995), standard deviation (SD) and their modifications (Jahan et al., 2012; Žižović et al., 2020; Alosta et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodAlemi-Ardakani, M., Milani, A. S., Yannacopoulos, S., & Shokouhi, G. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.003 · Cited by 230
Paramanik, A. R., Sarkar, S., & Sarkar, B. (2022) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108138 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L.
- Venue
- Computers & Operations Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 763-770
- ISSN
- 0305-0548 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066495914
- Cited by
- 3,413
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-h
- The paper
- Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
