Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Approaches to dietary reconstruction in the western Cape: Are you what you have eaten?

Parkington, John·1991·Journal of Archaeological Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0305-4403(91)90069-2

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Grindley, 1970, Red water and mussel poisoning at Elands Bay, December 1966, Fisheries Bulletin South Africa, 6, 36
  2. Hough, 1988, The Osteoporosis syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management, South African Journal of Continuing Medical Education, 6, 39
  3. Moll, 1987, Review of some new concepts in “Fynbos” ecology, 332, 120
  4. Parkington, 1977, Soagua: hunter fisher gatherers of the Olifants River Valley, W. Cape, South African Archaeological Bulletin, 33, 89
  5. Parkington, 1986, Comment on Judith C. Sealy & Nikolaas J. van der Merwe. Isotope assessment and the seasonal mobility hypothesis in the south-western Cape of South Africa, Current Anthropology, 27, 145
  6. Schwarcz, 1986, Comment on Sealy J.C. & N. J. van der Merwe, Current Anthropology, 27, 146

Cited by

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Parkington, J.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-05
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
331-342
ISSN
0305-4403
Cited by
40
References
22
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Approaches to dietary reconstruction in the western Cape: Are you what you have eaten? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0305-4403(91)90069-2
The paper
Parkington, J. (1991). Approaches to dietary reconstruction in the western Cape: Are you what you have eaten? Journal of Archaeological Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(91)90069-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.