Cited by 1,311Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesSoil and Environmental StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Strontium Isotopes from the Earth to the Archaeological Skeleton: A Review

Alexander Bentley, R.·2006·Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10816-006-9009-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander Bentley, R.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
Published
2006-07-29
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
135-187
ISSN
  • 1072-5369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7764
OpenAlex
W2011044715
Cited by
1,311
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 58
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
strontium isotopes, archaeological human remains, human migration, human mobility, spatial heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review