Cited by 853Community and Sustainable DevelopmentParticipatory Visual Research MethodsRural Development and Agriculture

Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm

Open access
Chambers, Robert·1994·World Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0305-750x(94)90030-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chambers, R.
Affiliations
Institute of Development Studies (GB)
Corresponding author
Chambers, Robert
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-10
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1437-1454
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046251591
Cited by
853
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 32
FWCI
28.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Community and Sustainable Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
Keywords
participatory rural appraisal, quality assurance, monitoring and evaluation, empowerment of the poor, policy review, paradigm shift, organizational culture change, decentralization, local diversity, participatory development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review