CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 86Income, Poverty, and InequalityChild Nutrition and Water AccessPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Socioeconomic stratification by wealth ranking: Is it valid?

Adams, Alayne M., Evans, Timothy G., Mohammed, Rafi, Farnsworth, Jennifer·1997·World Development
DOI 10.1016/s0305-750x(97)00024-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0305-750x(97)00024-7

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wealth ranking methods have been specifically critiqued.

    “Wealth ranking methods have been specifically critiqued (Adams et al., 1997).”

    From Livelihood Change in Rural Zimbabwe over 20 Years (2012) · cites this paper as Adams et al., 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Adams, A. M., Evans, T. G., Mohammed, R., & Farnsworth, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-07
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
1165-1172
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0305-750x(97)00024-7
OpenAlex
W2071206993
Cited by
86
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
wealth ranking, socioeconomic stratification, construct validity, generalizability, socioeconomic status, rural households, rapid rural appraisal, household surveys, rural Bangladesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review