Benzodiazepines block long-term potentiation in slices of hippocampus and piriform cortex
Abstract
The effects of two benzodiazepines, diazepam and triazolam, on long-term potentiation were tested in slices of hippocampus and piriform cortex. The drugs had little influence on baseline synaptic responses but both were very effective in blocking LTP elicited by theta pattern stimulation. The effects were fully reversible upon washout. Diazepam reduced the increase in burst responses that occurs during theta stimulation and thus appears to interfere with the initial triggering events for long-term potentiation. This may reflect the enhancing action of the drug on GABA-mediated inhibitory potentials. Triazolam did not detectably change the burst responses elicited by theta pattern stimulation. Experiments with slices of piriform cortex indicated that triazolam also failed to disrupt the development of long-term potentiation but instead caused the potentiation to decay back to baseline in 15-30 min. Triazolam thus seems to act on the mechanisms that stabilize long-term potentiation. These results provide a possible explanation for the amnestic effects of benzodiazepines in humans and animals and support the hypothesis that long-term potentiation contributes to memory encoding.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GABAergic agonists like benzodiazepines impair LTP and LTP-related plasticity in glutamatergic synapses via activation of GABA A receptor.
“GABAergic agonists, like benzodiazepines that are also used clinically to improve sleep, were consistently revealed to impair LTP as well as LTP-related plasticity in glutamatergic synapses via activation of the ionotropic GABA A receptor (e.g., Refs. 225, 277, 549, 575, 633, 1008Refs. 225, 277, 549, 575, 633, , 1270)).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [277]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- del Cerro, S., Jung, M., & Lynch, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056060189
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD24236, P01HD024236)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- benzodiazepines, diazepam, triazolam, long-term potentiation, hippocampus, piriform cortex, GABAergic inhibition, amnesia, memory encoding
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Diazepam, Evoked Potentials, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Hippocampus, Male, Organ Specificity, Time Factors, Triazolam, Rats, Wistar, Rats, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review