The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Close-meshed prevalence rates of different stages as a tool to uncover the rate of Alzheimer's disease-related neurofibrillary changes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123
Self-citationMANN, D. M. A., TUCKER, C. M., & YATES, P. O. (1987) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.1987.tb00176.x · Cited by 80
Cited by
Braak, H., Alafuzoff, I., Arzberger, T., Kretzschmar, H., & Del Tredici, K. (2006) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z · Cited by 3,172
Self-citationStages of the Pathologic Process in Alzheimer Disease: Age Categories From 1 to 100 Years
Braak, H., Thal, D. R., Ghebremedhin, E., & Del Tredici, K. (2011) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e318232a379 · Cited by 2,194
Self-citationNelson, P. T., Alafuzoff, I., Bigio, E. H., Bouras, C., Braak, H., Cairns, N. J., Castellani, R. J., Crain, B. J., Davies, P., Tredici, K. D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e31825018f7 · Cited by 2,050
Self-citationFrequency of Stages of Alzheimer-Related Lesions in Different Age Categories
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1997) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00056-0 · Cited by 1,656
Self-citationMCGEER, P., & MCGEER, E. (1995) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(95)00011-9 · Cited by 1,287
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohm, T. G., Müller, H., Braak, H., & Bohl, J.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 209-217
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985985118
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
