Cited by 90Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Eating behavior, personality traits and body mass in women

Open access
Van Strien, Tatjana, Frijters, Jan E.R., Roosen, RenéG.F.M., Knuiman-Hijl, Wil J.H., Defares, Peter B.·1985·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

In an exploratory study in women, the relationships between scales of emotional eating, external eating, and restrained eating, and body mass index (BMI = weight/height2) were studied, as well as the interrelationships between these three eating behavior components. In addition, the relationships between the three eating behavior scales and 19 personality scales were examined. Finally, differences between obese and latent obese women with respect to eating behavior and personality were investigated. Significant relationships were found between BMI and emotional eating, and between BMI and external eating/perceived hunger, but not between BMI and Restrained Eating. Also, restrained eating was found not to be related to the other two eating behavior components. Of the three eating behavior components, emotional eating was shown to have the clearest relationships with a number of personality traits. No difference was observed between the eating behavior of latent obese and obese women, but these groups differed as to a number of personality traits. These results are discussed in terms of consequences for prevalent theories on restrained, external, and emotional eating.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4603(85)90029-2

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emotional eating measure used by van Strien et al. (1985) was a shortened 7-question measure including 5 DEBQ-E items.

    “Furthermore, the emotional eating measure used by van Strien et al. (1985) was a shortened 7-question measure, including 5 items of the DEBQ-E.”

    From Emotional Appetite Questionnaire. Construct validity and relationship with BMI (2010) · cites this paper as van Strien et al., 1985

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E. R., Roosen, R. F. M., Knuiman-Hijl, W. J. H., & Defares, P. B.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-01
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
333-343
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019303668
Cited by
89
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
dietary habits, emotional eating, external eating, dietary restraint, body mass index, obesity, personality traits, perceived hunger, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Weight, Cues, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Hunger, Internal-External Control, Models, Psychological, Obesity, Personality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review