CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121Accounting and Organizational ManagementAccounting Theory and Financial ReportingManagement and Organizational Studies

The dilemma of implementing controls: The case of managerial accounting

Argyris, Chris·1990·Accounting, Organizations and Society
DOI 10.1016/0361-3682(90)90031-o
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0361-3682(90)90031-o

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sellers engage in gaming activities such as 'shrilling' and 'feedback bombing', and initial negative feedback increases the chances of receiving subsequent negative feedback.

    “Consistent with the accounting literature, sellers engage in gaming activities (Argyris, 1990) such as “shrilling” and “feedback bombing”, as well as getting caught up in self-fulfilling prophecies, whereby initial negative feedback increases the chances of receiving subsequent negative feedback (Cabral & Hortacsu, 2004: Saeedi et al, 2013).”

    From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Argyris, 1990

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Argyris, C.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Argyris, Chris
Venue
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
503-511
ISSN
0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0361-3682(90)90031-o
OpenAlex
W2005711634
Cited by
121
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Accounting Organizations and Society (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
management accounting, control theory, organizational control, management control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review