Cited by 94Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Help seeking in elementary classrooms: An observational study

Gall, Sharon Nelson-Le, Glor-Scheib, Susan·1985·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0361-476x(85)90006-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gall, S. N.-L., & Glor-Scheib, S.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Gall, Sharon Nelson-Le
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
58-71
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975507967
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
help-seeking, elementary school students, problem solving, academic support, reading instruction, mathematics education, gender differences, ability levels, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review