The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interaction of goldstone particles in two dimensions. Applications to ferromagnets and massive Yang-Mills fields
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with the fact that the circle reduced theory (keeping only zero KK modes), namely the O(N ) vector model in d = 2 (equivalent to the O(N ) σ-model in the IR) famously has a mass gap for N ≥ 3 [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59].”
From Casimir energy and modularity in higher-dimensional conformal field theories (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kogut, 1974, Phys. Rep., 12, 75, 10.1016/0370-1573(74)90023-4 · DOI
- Berezinsky, 1973, Zhetf, 64, 725
Cited by
An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems
Kogut, J. B. (1979) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.51.659 · Cited by 2,029
Non-perturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics
Berges, J., Tetradis, N., & Wetterich, C. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00098-9 · Cited by 1,548
The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications
Dupuis, N., Canet, L., Eichhorn, A., Metzner, W., Pawlowski, J. M., Tissier, M., & Wschebor, N. (2021) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.01.001 · Cited by 660
Brézin, E., & Zinn-Justin, J. (1976) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.36.691 · Cited by 381
Casimir energy and modularity in higher-dimensional conformal field theories
Luo, C., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)028 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Polyakov, A. M.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-10
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-81
- ISSN
- 0370-2693
- Cited by
- 959
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
