Cited by 951Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesTopological Materials and Phenomena

A no-go theorem for regularizing chiral fermions

Nielsen, H.B., Ninomiya, M.·1981·Physics Letters B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0370-2693(81)91026-1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nielsen, H. B., & Ninomiya, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (GB)
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-10
Volume
105
Issue
2-3
Pages
219-223
ISSN
0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027639150
Cited by
951
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
Keywords
chiral fermions, no-go theorem, regularization, lattice regularization, chiral anomaly, chiral fermion doubling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review