The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The 1993 atomic mass evaluation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation
Audi, G., Wang, M., Wapstra, A. H., Kondev, F. G., MacCormick, M., Xu, X., & Pfeiffer, B. (2012) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/002 · Cited by 580
Self-citationEvaluated nuclear structure data file
Tuli, J. K. (1996) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(96)80040-4 · Cited by 332
Nagy, S., Fritioff, T., Suhonen, M., Schuch, R., Blaum, K., Björkhage, M., & Bergström, I. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.163004 · Cited by 46
DeltaMS: a tool to track isotopologues in GC- and LC-MS data
Baumeister, T. U. H., Ueberschaar, N., Schmidt-Heck, W., Mohr, J. F., Deicke, M., Wichard, T., Guthke, R., & Pohnert, G. (2018) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-018-1336-x · Cited by 25
Isotopic compositions of the elements 2009 (IUPAC Technical Report)
Berglund, M., & Wieser, M. E. (2011) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac-rep-10-06-02 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Audi, G., & Wapstra, A. H.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 565
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-65
- ISSN
- 0375-9474 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2776388158
- Cited by
- 880
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 1993 atomic mass evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90024-r
- The paper
- Audi, G., & Wapstra, A. H. (1993). The 1993 atomic mass evaluation. Nuclear Physics A. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90024-r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
