The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation
Abstract
This paper is the first of two articles (Part I and Part II) that presents the results of the new atomic mass evaluation, Ame2012. It includes complete information on the experimental input data (including not used and rejected ones), as well as details on the evaluation procedures used to derive the tables with recommended values given in the second part. This article describes the evaluation philosophy and procedures that were implemented in the selection of specific nuclear reaction, decay and mass-spectrometer results. These input values were entered in the least-squares adjustment procedure for determining the best values for the atomic masses and their uncertainties. Calculation procedures and particularities of the Ame are then described. All accepted and rejected data, including outweighed ones, are presented in a tabular format and compared with the adjusted values (obtained using the adjustment procedure). Differences with the previous Ame2003 evaluation are also discussed and specific information is presented for several cases that may be of interest to various Ame users. The second Ame2012 article, the last one in this issue, gives a table with recommended values of atomic masses, as well as tables and graphs of derived quantities, along with the list of references used in both this Ame2012 evaluation and the Nubase2012 one (the first paper in this issue).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ame2003 atomic mass evaluation
Audi, G., Wapstra, A. H., & Thibault, C. (2003) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003 · Cited by 4,796
Self-citationHagiwara, K., Hikasa, K., Nakamura, K., Tanabashi, M., Aguilar-Benitez, M., Amsler, C., Barnett, R. M., Burchat, P. R., Carone, C. D., Caso, C., et al. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.010001 · Cited by 3,099
Weizs�cker, C. F. V. (1935) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01337700 · Cited by 2,241
The 1995 update to the atomic mass evaluation
Audi, G., & Wapstra, A. H. (1995) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/0375-9474(95)00445-9 · Cited by 1,462
Self-citationNuclear Physics A. Stationary States of Nuclei
Bethe, H. A., & Bacher, R. F. (1936) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.8.82 · Cited by 1,111
Nordheim, L. W. (1970) · Nuclear Science and Engineering · doi:10.13182/nse70-a19345 · Cited by 942
The 1993 atomic mass evaluation
Audi, G., & Wapstra, A. H. (1993) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/0375-9474(93)90024-r · Cited by 880
Self-citationRecent trends in the determination of nuclear masses
Lunney, D., Pearson, J. M., & Thibault, C. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.1021 · Cited by 759
The 1986 adjustment of the fundamental physical constants
Cohen, E. R., & Taylor, B. N. (1987) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.59.1121 · Cited by 748
Huang, K.-N., Aoyagi, M., Chen, M. H., Crasemann, B., & Mark, H. (1976) · Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables · doi:10.1016/0092-640x(76)90027-9 · Cited by 538
Cited by
The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references*
Wang, M., Huang, W. J., Kondev, F. G., Audi, G., & Naimi, S. (2021) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf · Cited by 2,915
Self-citationThe AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures*
Huang, W. J., Wang, M., Kondev, F. G., Audi, G., & Naimi, S. (2021) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddb0 · Cited by 436
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Audi, G., Wang, M., Wapstra, A. H., Kondev, F. G., MacCormick, M., Xu, X., & Pfeiffer, B.
- Venue
- Chinese Physics C
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1287-1602
- ISSN
- 1674-1137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3144182485
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 29.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/002
- The paper
- Audi, G., Wang, M., Wapstra, A. H., Kondev, F. G., MacCormick, M., Xu, X., & Pfeiffer, B. (2012). The Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation. Chinese Physics C. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.