Cited by 18Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Definite values for observables versus quantum predictions: a “GHZ-like” test

Żukowski, Marek·1991·Physics Letters A

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0375-9601(91)90051-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A GHZ-type argument involving non-contextuality can be applied in a two-particle scheme by encoding three two-state quantum systems in distinct degrees of freedom of two photons.

    “One option is to encode three two-state quantum systems in distinct degrees of freedom of only two photons.Thereby a GHZ-type argument, now also necessarily involving non-contextuality 44 , can be applied in this two-particle scheme (Zukowski 1991, Michler et al. 2000a).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Zukowski 1991

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Żukowski, M.
Affiliations
University of Gdańsk (PL)
Corresponding author
Żukowski, Marek
Venue
Physics Letters A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-07
Volume
157
Issue
4-5
Pages
198-202
ISSN
0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081319595
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
GHZ states, quantum predictions, quantum foundations, hidden variables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review