Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Open accessAbstract
Multiphoton interference reveals strictly nonclassical phenomena. Its applications range from fundamental tests of quantum mechanics to photonic quantum information processing, where a significant fraction of key experiments achieved so far comes from multiphoton state manipulation. The progress, both theoretical and experimental, of this rapidly advancing research is reviewed. The emphasis is given to the creation of photonic entanglement of various forms, tests of the completeness of quantum mechanics (in particular, violations of local realism), quantum information protocols for quantum communication (e.g., quantum teleportation, entanglement purification, and quantum repeater), and quantum computation with linear optics. The scope of the review is limited to ``few-photon'' phenomena involving measurements of discrete observables.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys theoretical and experimental progress in multi-photon entanglement and interferometry, focusing on few-photon discrete-variable photonic systems. It covers entanglement generation, foundational tests of local realism, and applications in quantum communication and linear-optics quantum computing.
Key findings
- Multi-photon interference produces non-classical effects beyond classical wave or particle descriptions; three-photon GHZ tests reached visibility of 71 ± 4%, above the 50% threshold, and later work observed up to eight entangled photons and ten qubits using multiple degrees of freedom.
- Quantum communication milestones include teleportation with average fidelity 0.81(1), above the 2/3 classical threshold; entanglement swapping visibilities of 0.65(2) and later about 0.84; purification improving fidelity from 0.75 to 0.92 ± 0.01 and from 0.80 to 0.94 ± 0.01; and 144-km free-space CHSH violation by more than 5 standard deviations.
- Linear-optics quantum computing demonstrations include cluster states up to six photons, Shor factoring of 15 with success probability about 0.99, dense coding reaching 1.630(6) bits per photon and beating the 1.58-bit linear-optics limit, and a six-photon singlet visibility of 85%.
- Spontaneous parametric down-conversion remains the main photon-pair source, but higher-order emission and partial distinguishability limit fidelity; newer sources such as quantum dots, atomic ensembles, and photonic crystal fibers are discussed as alternatives.
Methods
- Review article synthesizing theoretical and experimental literature over roughly two decades, limited to few-photon regimes with discrete-variable measurements.
- Draws on experiments and proposals involving SPDC, linear optics, Bell and GHZ tests, teleportation, entanglement swapping, purification, quantum memory, and cluster-state computing.
- Analysis is narrative and technical rather than a systematic meta-analysis or new primary data collection.
Limitations
- Stated: the review excludes continuous-variable experiments and concentrates on few-photon discrete observables.
- Stated experimental limitations include probabilistic SPDC pair creation, unwanted multi-pair emission, partial photon indistinguishability, low collection and detection efficiency, and phase-stabilization challenges, all of which constrain scalability and fidelity.
- Evident: as a review, it presents no new experimental data, and its coverage reflects literature available up to its 2012 publication.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
99 of 499 cited sources checked · 65 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Optical quantum computing proposals based on the one-way model reduce the computational resource overhead by three orders of magnitude compared to the KLM scheme.
“Optical quantum computing proposals (Browne and Rudolph, 2005) based on the one-way model reduce the computational resource overhead by three orders of magnitudes compared to the KLM scheme.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Browne and Rudolph, 2005 source
The Introduction (p. 1) describes a cluster-state optical computing scheme and estimates resource savings of “many orders of magnitude over KLM.” It does not specify three orders of magnitude for resource overhead; its explicit three-orders figure concerns reduced sensitivity to phase instability, not computational resources. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Together with additional phase shifters in the input and output ports, a Mach-Zehnder interferometer can perform an arbitrary SU(2) unitary transformation on a qubit encoded in two spatial modes.
“Together with additional phase shifters in the input and output ports, the Mach-Zehnder interferometer can perform an arbitrary SU(2) unitary transformation on a qubit encoded in the two spatial modes (see, e.g., Englert et al. (2001)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Englert et al. (2001) source
- Premisecitation
A linear optical Bell-state analyzer suggested by Weinfurter and by Braunstein and Mann is based on two-photon interference at a 50:50 beamsplitter and via coincidence analysis can distinguish two of the four Bell states.
“A linear optical Bell-state analyzer was suggested by Weinfurter (1994) and by Braunstein and Mann (1995).It is based on the two-photon interference effect at a 50:50 BS and via a coincidence analysis can distinguish two of the four Bell states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Because photons are produced coherently along the entire length of the crystal, one can completely compensate for the longitudinal walk-off.
“Fortunately, because the photons are produced coherently along the entire length of the crystal, one can completely compensate for the longitudinal walk-off (Rubin et al., 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rubin et al., 1994 source
- Premisecitation
The standard method to produce polarization-entangled photons is the noncollinear type-II SPDC process.
“Currentlythe standard method to produce polarization-entangled photons is the noncollinear type-II SPDC process (Kwiat et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kwiat et al., 1995 source
The paper describes producing polarization-entangled photon pairs by noncollinear type-II parametric down-conversion (Abstract; page not given). It presents the technique as novel, however, and does not establish that it is currently the standard method. It says that, at the time of publication, most down-conversion experiments had used type-I phase matching. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A pulsed-pump version of Franson interferometry uses time-bin entanglement.
“A pulsed-pump version of Franson-interferometry uses so-called time-bin entanglement (Brendel et al., 1999;Marcikic et al., 2002;Gisin et al., 2002) (see Fig. 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Findingcitation
A pulsed and narrow-band (0.15 nm), wavelength tunable entangled photon source based on such a configuration with spectral brightness up to 273000 pairs (s·mW·nm)^-1 has been reported.
“A pulsed (Kuzucu and Wong, 2008), and narrow-band (0.15nm), wavelength tunable entangled photon source based on such a configuration with a spectral brightness up to 273000 pairs (s•mW•nm) -1 has been reported (Fedrizzi et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Fedrizzi et al. 2007 source
The Conclusion (p. 10) reports a wavelength-tunable, narrowband entangled-photon source with spectral brightness of 273000 pairs (s·mW·nm)^-1. However, the performance section (p. 9) gives a measured FWHM bandwidth of 0.3 nm, not 0.15 nm. The citing sentence attaches “pulsed” to Kuzucu and Wong, so that descriptor is not assessed against Fedrizzi et al. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
An operational method to swap entanglement of two pairs of particles has been used in many experiments, including the pioneering Innsbruck teleportation.
“We shall show in detail an operational method to swap entanglement of two pairs of particles ( Żukowski, Zeilinger, and Weinfurter, 1995), which has been used in many experiments (the pioneering one was the Innsbruck teleportation, Bouwmeester et al. 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Żukowski, Zeilinger, and Weinfurter, 1995 source
- cites Bouwmeester et al. 1997 source
The opening section (p. 1) identifies this as an experimental demonstration of quantum teleportation, supporting the citation’s identification of the Innsbruck experiment. But THE NEXT STEPS (p. 6) describes transferring entanglement by teleporting a member of an entangled pair as a possibility, not as what this experiment demonstrated. The paper therefore does not support calling the experiment a demonstrated use of entanglement swapping between two pairs. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
If one chooses a non-factorizable function S(s1,s2)=1/2(1+s1+s2-s1s2), the CHSH inequality is recovered.
“If one chooses a non-factorizable function S(s 1 , s 2 ), say, 1 2 (1 + s 1 + s 2 -s 1 s 2 ), the famous CHSH (Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt, 1969) inequality is recovered”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt, 1969 source
- Premisecitation
The data from Bouwmeester et al. (1997), together with similar results for other polarizations, constitute a positive result of a test for teleportation of an arbitrary state.
“The data, together with similar results for other polarizations, constitute a positive result of a test for teleportation of an arbitrary state.(Bouwmeester et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bouwmeester et al., 1997 source
- Interpretationcitation
When particle 1 is a member of an entangled pair, the teleportation leads to entanglement swapping.
“This is the case when, as already remarked by Bennett et al. (1993), particle 1 itself is a member of an entangled pair, ultimately leading to entanglement swapping ( Żukowski et al., 1993;Bose et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Findingcitation
In the Bouwmeester et al. experiment, if Alice obtains a coincidence count in detectors f1 and f2, implying collapse into |ψ-12, Bob knows his photon 3 is in the original polarization state of photon 1.
“In the case of receiving a classical information indicating that Alice obtained a coincidence count in detectors f1 and f2, which implies a collapse into |ψ - 12, Bob knows that his photon 3 is in the original polarization state of photon 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bouwmeester et al., 1997 source
- Premisecitation
Marcikic et al. (2003) realized teleportation of qubits at telecommunication wavelengths over a fiber length of 2 km.
“Marcikic et al. (2003) realized a teleportation of qubits at telecommunication wavelengths over a fiber length of 2 km.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Marcikic et al. (2003) source
- Interpretationcitation
Entanglement swapping provides a method of entangling two particles that never interacted or even have no common past.
“Entanglement swapping ( Żukowski et al., 1993) provides a method of entangling two particles that never interacted or even have no common past.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Żukowski et al., 1993 source
- Premisecitation
Entanglement distillation, concentration and purification are important tools to overcome noise in the quantum communication channel.
“An important tool to overcome the noise in the quantum communication channel is entanglement distillation, concentration and purification, proposed by Bennett et al. (1996aBennett et al. ( , 1996bBennett et al. ( , 1996c) ) and Deutsch et al. (1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bennett et al. (1996a, 1996b, 1996c)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Deutsch et al. (1996) source
The Abstract (p. 1) describes an entanglement-purification procedure in a cryptographic scheme secure over a noisy quantum channel; the discussion on p. 4 explains how it produces nearly pure, maximally entangled pairs from mixed pairs. This supports purification as a way to address channel noise, but our copy does not establish entanglement concentration as a separate tool proposed by Deutsch et al. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
The original KLM scheme was only very recently implemented in a sophisticated setup using polarization encoding, and Sagnac-interferometers for increased stability, by Okamoto et al., (2010).
“The original KLM scheme was only very recently implemented in a sophisticated setup up using polarization encoding, and Sagnac-interferometers for increased stability, by Okamoto et al., (2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Okamoto et al., 2010 source
- Findingcitation
Politi et al. (2008) reported a high-fidelity silica-on-silicon integrated optical realizations of key quantum photonic circuits.
“More recently, Politi et al. (2008) reported a high-fidelity silica-on-silicon integrated optical realizations of key quantum photonic circuits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Politi et al., 2008 source
- Interpretationcitation
Consider a detection of a pair of photons at the output modes 3 and 4, only one photon at each output (the four mode case). Depending on the registered polarizations, up to a specific unitary transformation, a non-destructive CNOT gate operation is then performed on |χ 2 5.
“Consider a detection of a pair of photons at the output modes 3 and 4 , only one photon at each output (the four mode case).Depending on the registered polarizations, up to a specific unitary transformation, a non-destructive CNOT gate operation is then performed on |χ 2 5 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pittman et al., 2001 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Koashi et al., 2001, and Pittman et al., 2001, showed that by using entangled pairs of photons as ancilla, the success of the gate operation can be inferred by the detection of photons in ancilla-outputs.
“In a separate development, Koashi et al., 2001, andPittman et al., 2001, showed that by using entangled pairs of photons as ancilla, the success of the gate operation can be inferred by the detection of photons in ancilla-outputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation
Such gates, assisted by entangled or unentangled photon pairs, were reported using four or five photons, see Gasparoni et al., (2004), Zhao et al., (2005b), Bao et al., (2007), Tokunaga et al., (2008) and Gao et al., (2010b).
“Such gates, assisted by entangled or unentangled photon pairs, were reported using four or five photons, see Gasparoni et al., (2004), Zhao et al., (2005b), Bao et al., (2007), Tokunaga et al., (2008) and Gao et al., (2010b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Nielsen showed that efficiency can be greatly enhanced by building photonic cluster states using easy non-deterministic gates.
“Nielsen showed that efficiency can be greatly enhanced by building photonic cluster states using easy non-deterministic gates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Nielsen, 2004 source
- Findingcitation
Following proposals by Han et al. (2007) and Pachos (2007), four- and six-qubit graph states were created to mimic the ground state of the Kitaev spin-lattice model.
“Following proposals by Han et al (2007) and Pachos (2007), four-and six-qubit graph states were created to mimic the ground state of the Kitaev spin-lattice model (Kitaev, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Findingcitation
A compiled version of Shor's algorithm has been demonstrated using four photonic qubits by Lu et al. (2007) and Lanyon et al. (2007).
“Recently, a compiled version of Shor's algorithm has been demonstrated using four photonic qubits by Lu et al. (2007) and Lanyon et al. (2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Lu et al. (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Lanyon et al. (2007) source
- Findingcitation
Later optical implementations of Shor's algorithm moved into an integrated photonic chip device.
“Later optical implementations of Shor's algorithm later moved into an integrated photonic chip device (Politi et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Politi et al. 2009 source
- Findingcitation
Quantum teleportation became an experimental reality with four-photon interferometries.
“Quantum teleportation-the transfer and reconstruction of quantum states over arbitrary distances became an experimental reality with four-photon interferometries (Bouwmeester et al. 1997, Marcikic et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Bouwmeester et al. 1997 source
The paper reports the first experimental verification of quantum teleportation (p. 1). But it describes the method as two-photon interferometry (p. 1), not four-photon interferometry; its four-fold coincidence measurements (Results, pp. 5–6) are a different detail. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Marcikic et al. 2003 source
The Conclusion (p. 6) reports an experimental demonstration of quantum teleportation. But the Experimental Realization (pp. 3–4) describes removing one photon from a generated pair and counting the laser pulse in its four-fold coincidences; it does not describe the demonstration as a four-photon interferometry experiment. The experimental-teleportation part is supported, but that specific characterization is not. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
New generations of single-photon sources have been developed based on solid-state devices, atoms, molecules and ions.
“New generations of single-photon sources have been developed: they are based on solid-state devices, atoms, molecules and ions etc. (see Lounis and Orrit, (2005) for a recent review).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lounis and Orrit, (2005) source
- Findingcitation
O'Brien et al. (2005) demonstrated a two-qubit code for correction of a Z-measurement error.
“O'Brien et al. (2005) demonstrated a two-qubit code for correction of a Zmeasurement error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites O'Brien et al. (2005) source
- Premisecitation
The type-I fusion operation allows one to efficiently generate arbitrarily long linear cluster states.
“the type-I fusion operation allows one to efficiently generate arbitrarily long linear cluster states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Browne and Rudolph, 2005 source
- cites Duan and Raussendorf, 2005 source
The paper states on p. 2 that 1D cluster states of arbitrary length can be created efficiently. But its construction uses probabilistic controlled phase-flip (CPF) gates, as described on pp. 1–2; our copy does not identify these as type-I fusion operations or establish the claim specifically for type-I fusion. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The data, together with similar results for other polarizations, constitute a positive result of a test for teleportation of an arbitrary state.
“The data, together with similar results for other polarizations, constitute a positive result of a test for teleportation of an arbitrary state.(Bouwmeester et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bouwmeester et al., 1997 source
- Findingreasoning
In a two-photon EPR interferometer, the coincidence detection probabilities for same detector pairs (1c,2c and 1d,2d) are 1/4[1−cos(φ1−φ2)].
“p 1c,2c (φ 1 , φ 2 ) = p 1d,2d (α, φ 2 ) = 1 4 [1 -cos(φ 1 -φ 2 )].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A central source emits two photons in the entangled state |ψ12 = 1/√2(|a1|a2 + |b1|b2).
- Findingreasoning
In a two-photon EPR interferometer, the coincidence detection probabilities for opposite detector pairs (1c,2d and 1d,2c) are 1/4[1+cos(φ1−φ2)].
“p 1c,2d (φ 1 , φ 2 ) = p 1d,2c (φ 1 , φ 2 ) = 1 4 [1 + cos(φ 1 -φ 2 )]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A central source emits two photons in the entangled state |ψ12 = 1/√2(|a1|a2 + |b1|b2).
- Findingreasoning
In a three-photon GHZ interferometer, the three-fold coincidence detection probability for output modes (1c,2c,3c) is 1/8[1+sin(φ1+φ2+φ3)].
“p 1c,2c,3c (φ 1 , φ 2 , φ 3 ) = 1 8 [1 + sin(φ 1 + φ 2 + φ 3 )]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In a three-photon GHZ interferometer, the three-fold coincidence detection probability for output modes (1d,2c,3c) is 1/8[1−sin(φ1+φ2+φ3)].
“p 1d,2c,3c (φ 1 , φ 2 , φ 3 ) = 1 8 [1 -sin(φ 1 + φ 2 + φ 3 )]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
For two spectrally identical photons of the same polarization each entering opposite input ports of a 50:50 beamsplitter at the same moment, the terms describing each photon exiting by a different port cancel.
“We have a cancellation of the two terms, ĉ ddĉ = 0, which describe the cases in which each photon exits by a different exit port.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: In a simplified theory of beamsplitters, the beamsplitter acts identically for every relevant frequency.
- Findingreasoning
The cancellation of the different-exit-port terms occurs if the two photons are perfectly indistinguishable in all their other degrees of freedom such as frequency, time, or polarization.
“This cancellation occurs if the two photons are perfectly indistinguishable in terms of all their other degrees of freedom such as frequency, time, or polarization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
If two incident photons have opposite polarizations, they always go out along the same direction, so there are two photons in one output and none in the other.
“If the two incident photons have opposite polarizations, they will always go out along the same direction, so there will be two photons in one of the two outputs and none in the other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The probability of finding a coincidence count at exits c and d is (1/2)|β|^2, where β denotes the degree of distinguishability between photons 1 and 2.
“The probability of finding a coincidence count at exits c and d, which is given by the square of the norm of 1 2 (ĉ † 1 d † 2 -d † 1 ĉ † 2 )|Ω , is (1/2)|β| 2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
If the photons are at least partially distinguishable, the terms that contribute to cases in which each photon exits by a different port do not cancel.
“Since ĉ1 = ĉ2 and d1 = d2 , the terms that contribute to the cases in which each photon exits by a different exit port, namely 1 2 (ĉ † 1 d † 2 -d † 1 ĉ † 2 )|Ω , do not cancel with each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The three-particle GHZ interferometer does not exhibit any two-particle fringes.
“Second, this three-particle interferometer does not exhibit any two-particle fringes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In a symmetric 50:50 beamsplitter, an outgoing particle can be found with equal probability (50%) in either output mode c or d, no matter through which single input beam it came.
“In such a case, an outgoing particle can be found with equal probability (50%) in either of the output modes c and d, no matter through which single input beam it came.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: In a simplified theory of beamsplitters, the beamsplitter acts identically for every relevant frequency.
- Findingreasoning
For incident state 1/√2(|Ha|Hb+|Va|Vb), one always observes a coincidence either between detectors DH1 and DH2 or DV1 and DV2.
“Specifically, for the incident state 1 √ 2 (|H a |H b + |V a |V b ) we always observe a coincidence either between detectors D H1 and D H2 or D V 1 and D V 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Two spectrally identical photons enter the Bell-state analyzer by modes a and b and arrive at PBS ab simultaneously, so their wavefunctions overlap behind it.
- Findingreasoning
The other two Bell states would lead to no coincidence at detectors in modes 1 and 2.
“The other two Bell states would lead to no coincidence at detectors in modes 1 and 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Two spectrally identical photons enter the Bell-state analyzer by modes a and b and arrive at PBS ab simultaneously, so their wavefunctions overlap behind it.
- Findingcitation
For a color entangled state at frequencies ω1 and ω2, one can observe spatial quantum beating, where two-photon detection exhibits modulation of the form cos(ω1−ω2)τ.
“For a color (at frequency ω 1 and ω 2 ) entangled state, one can further observe”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ou and Mandel, 1988b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
For proper path length, one has a coincidence peak instead of a dip.
“For proper path length, one has a coincidence peak (instead of a dip) (Mattle et al. 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mattle et al. 1996 source
- Findingreasoning
For incident state 1/√2(|Ha|Hb−|Va|Vb), one observes coincidence at detectors DH1 and DV2 or DV1 and DH2.
“On the other hand, if the incident state is 1 √ 2 (|H a |H b -|V a |V b ) we observe coincidence at detectors D H1 and D V 2 or D V 1 and D H2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Two spectrally identical photons enter the Bell-state analyzer by modes a and b and arrive at PBS ab simultaneously, so their wavefunctions overlap behind it.
- Findingreasoning
In the modified Bell-state analyzer, properties of a PBS and a coincidence detection in modes 1 and 2 allow one to distinguish |φ+12 and |φ−12 polarization Bell states.
“The properties of a PBS depicted in Fig. 4, and a coincidence detection in modes 1 and 2, allow one to distinguish |φ + 12 and |φ - 12 polarization Bell states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Two spectrally identical photons enter the Bell-state analyzer by modes a and b and arrive at PBS ab simultaneously, so their wavefunctions overlap behind it.
- Findingnone given
By superposing two (H+V) polarized photons at a PBS, one can observe an entangled state |Hc|Hd + |Vc|Vd in the post-selected coincidence counts.
“In a similar way, by superposing two (H + V ) polarized photons at a PBS, one can observe an entangled state |H c|H d + |V c|V d in the post-selected coincidence counts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The entanglement quality is sensitive to optical path length changes of the order of the photons' coherence length.
“As in the case of the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, the entanglement quality is sensitive to optical path length changes of the order of the photons' coherence length.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
In a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, the electromagnetic field emerging from the beamsplitter associated with the pair of photons is in an entangled NOON state [(c†)^2+(d†)^2]|Ω = |2c0d + |0c2d with N=2.
“Note first, that according to Eq. ( 30), in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, the electromagnetic field emerg-ing from the BS associated with the pair of photons is in an entangled state [(ĉ † ) 2 + ( d † ) 2 ]|Ω = |2 c 0 d + |0 c 2 d , a so-called NOON state (see Section IV.C), with N = 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
As the polarization state |Ψ− is antisymmetric, it results in a coincidence detection at the outputs of the beamsplitter.
“As the polarization state |Ψ -is antisymmetric, it results in a coincidence detection at the outputs of the BS (i.e., a coincidence at detectors DH1 and DV2 or at DH2 and DV1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For the remaining three Bell states, both photons exit via the same output port of the beamsplitter.
“For the remaining three states, both photons exit via the same output port of the BS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In noncollinear type-II SPDC, the state emerging through beams A and B is a superposition of |H|V and |V|H with relative phase α due to birefringence.
“The state emerging through the two beams A and B is a superposition of |H |V and |V |H , namely, 1 √ 2 (|H A |V B + e iα |V A |H B )(36) where the relative phase α is due to the birefringence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The success probability of the GHZ analyzer is 1/4.
“The success probability of the GHZ analyzer is thus 1/4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
By pumping two BBO crystals with optical axes aligned in perpendicular planes, a two-photon (2⊗2)⊗(3⊗3)⊗(2⊗2)-dimensional hyperentangled state was produced, approximately described by Eq. (41).
“By pumping two BBO crystals with optical axes aligned in perpendicular planes, a twophoton (2 ⊗ 2) ⊗ (3 ⊗ 3) ⊗ (2 ⊗ 2)-dimensional hyperentangled state was produced, approximately described by (|HH + |V V ) polarization ⊗ (|1, -1 LG + α|0, 0 LG + | -1, 1 LG ) spatial ⊗ (|EE + |LL ) energy-time .(41)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Torres et al., 2003 source
- Findingcitation
In an experiment by Barreiro et al. (2005), photon pairs from a single nonlinear crystal were entangled in polarization, energy, and orbital angular momentum.
“In an experiment by Barreiro et al (2005), besides the entanglement in polarization and in energy, photon pairs from a single nonlinear crystal were also entangled in orbital angular momentum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barreiro et al (2005) source
- Findingcitation
Later, twin-beam entanglement of up to 12 photons was experimentally observed.
“Later, twin-beam entanglement of up to 12 photons (Eisenberg et al., 2004) was experimentally observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eisenberg et al., 2004 source
- Findingreasoning
The state |ψ is a superposition of the states |ψ^-_n of n indistinguishable photon pairs.
“The state |ψ is a superposition of the states |ψ - n of n indistinguishable photon pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
These experiments demonstrated that the effective de Broglie wavelength of the multiphoton state is by 1/N shorter than the wavelength of the single photon.
“These experiments demonstrated an interesting feature of NOON states: the effective de Broglie wavelength of the multiphoton state is by 1/N shorter than the wavelength of the single photon (Jacobson et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jacobson et al., 1995 source
- Findingcitation
It can be shown that the visibility is reduced below 50% if |z|^2 > (√17 - 3)/8 ≈ 0.140.
“It can be shown ( Żukowski et al., 1999) that the visibility is reduced below 50% if |z| 2 > ( √ 17 -3)/8 ≈ 0.140.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Żukowski et al., 1999 source
- Findingnone given
The average photon pair number is n = 2 sinh^2 τ.
“The average photon pair number is n = 2 sinh 2 τ .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In control experiments with the polarizer in front of detector D1 set at 0°, projecting the GHZ state into a separable state |V2>|H3>, the results show no correlation.
“In this case, the results in Fig. 16(c) show no correlation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The obtained data are consistent with the prediction that a result + at detector D1 projects the state of the other photons to 1/√2(|+2>|+3> - |-2>|-3>).
“The obtained data are consistent with this prediction, as can be seen from Fig. 16(b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The filtering process stretched the coherence time so that it was substantially larger than the pump pulse duration (~200 fs).
“The filtering process stretched the coherence time so that it was substantially larger than the pump pulse duration (∼ 200fs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The observed Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, conditioned on a joint detection event of two idlers, had a raw visibility of 76.1%.
“The observed interference, conditioned on a joint detection event of two idlers, had a raw visibility of 76.1%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The intensity ratio between the desired events (HHV and VVH) and the six other undesired ones was about 12:1.
“The results showed that the intensity ratio between the desired events (HHV and V V H) and the six other undesired ones was about 12 : 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
In actual SPDC experiments, due to the absence of perfect pair sources and perfect single photon detectors, both three- and four-photon entanglement are observed only under the condition that there is one and only one photon in each of the four outputs.
“Due to the absence of perfect pair sources and perfect single photon detectors, in the experiments both three-and four-photon entanglement”
- Also stated in: § 3. First proposals · plain
“is observed only under the condition that there is one and only one photon in each of the four outputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bouwmeester et al., 1999a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pan et al., 2001a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhao et al., 2003a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 3. First proposals · plain
- Findingown data
A typical observed value of S_Bell was 2.73 ± 0.02.
“A typical observed value of S Bell , the right side of inequality (54), was as high as 2.73 ± 0.02.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The actual orientation for local polarization analysis was determined independently by a quantum physical random number generator.
“The actual orientation for local polarization analysis was determined independently by a quantum physical random number generator (Jennewein et al. 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jennewein et al. 2000 source
- Findingnone given
The individual measurements were finished within a time much shorter than 1.3 μs, which is the distance of the two observation stations in light seconds.
“The individual measurements were finished within a time much shorter than 1.3 µs, which is the distance of the two observation stations in light seconds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 10 s, 14700 coincidence events were collected.
“In 10 s 14700 coincidence events were collected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In Pan et al. (2000), the measured values for x1ŷ2ŷ3, ŷ1x2ŷ3, and ŷ1ŷ2x3 followed quantum predictions in a fraction 0.85 ± 0.04 of all cases.
“In the experiment by Pan et al. (2000) the measured values for x1 ŷ2 ŷ3 , ŷ1 x2 ŷ3 , and ŷ1 ŷ2 x3 followed the values predicted by quantum physics in a fraction of 0.85 ± 0.04 of all cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2000) source
- Findingcitation
The data from Pan et al. (2000), in the form of imperfect GHZ correlations, violated local realism.
“The obtained data in the form of the (necessarily imperfect) GHZ correlations was shown to violate local realism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2000) source
- Findingcitation
The experimental results of Pan et al. (2000) confirmed quantum predictions within experimental uncertainty.
“The experimental results confirmed the quantum predictions, within an experimental uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2000) source
- Findingcitation
The Irvine et al. experiment gave results agreeing with the quantum prediction that joint detection in the right exit ports is possible.
“Using a similar realistic reasoning as before this leads to the conclusion that no joint detection in the right exit ports of the two interferometers is possible.The quantum prediction is different, and the experiment gave results agreeing with it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Irvine et al. 2005 source
- Findingcitation
A proposal by Hardy (1992) was implemented using a pair of Mach-Zehnder interferometers coupled via bosonic photon bunching at a beam splitter (Irvine et al. 2005).
“Another proposal suggested by Hardy (1992) was implemented using a pair of Mach-Zehnder interferometers that couple via the bosonic photon bunching effect at a beam splitter (Irvine et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation
Experimental demonstrations of the two-photon hyper-entanglement protocol were done by Yang et al. 2005 and Cinelli et al. (2005).
“Experimental demonstrations of such a protocol were done by Yang et al. 2005 andCinelli et al. (2005) 45 using a two-photon hyper-entangled state in Eq. ( 40) (for hyperentanglement see section IV.B.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation
The fourth experiment measuring x1x2x3 in Pan et al. (2000) also agreed with quantum mechanics for the same fraction of events.
“The fourth experiment, measuring x1 x2 x3 , also was performed, and yielded results as shown in Fig. 18.The data again agree with quantum mechanics for the same fraction of events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2000) source
- Findingcitation
The results of Pan et al. (2000) are in clear disagreement with a local realistic prediction range made from the first three measurements.
“The results are in a clear disagreement with a prediction range that can be made with the data of the three first measurements using a local realistic model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2000) source
- Findingcitation
The Leggett-type inequality was experimentally tested by Gröblacher et al. (2007) using a SPDC source with visibilities ∼99.0±1.2% (H/V), ∼99.2±1.6% (±45°), and ∼98.9±1.7% (R/L).
“The Leggett-type inequality valid for nonlocal realistic theories of the discussed type was experimentally tested by Gröblacher et al. (2007).In the experiment a SPDC source of high-fidelity two-photon entangled states was used, with visibilities ∼ 99.0 ± 1.2% in the H/V basis, ∼ 99.2 ± 1.6% in the ±45 • basis and ∼ 98.9 ± 1.7% in the R/L basis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gröblacher et al. (2007) source
- Findingcitation
The observed S_NLHV = 3.8521 ± 0.0227 violates inequality (68) by 3.2 standard deviations.
“The observed S N LHV = 3.8521 ± 0.0227 violates inequality (68) by 3.2 standard deviations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gröblacher et al. (2007) source
- Findingcitation
A proposal by Klyachko (2008) for a single qutrit contextuality experiment was experimentally realized for photons in superposition of three modes (Lapkiewicz, 2011).
“Most recently, a proposal by Klyachko (2008) for a single qutrit contextuality experiment involving only six different measurements was experimentally realized for photons prepared in superposition of three modes (Lapkiewicz, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Klyachko (2008)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Lapkiewicz, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Inequality (69) was violated in an experiment by Amselem et al. (2009).
“This inequality was violated in an experiment by Amselem et al. (2009), where the chosen observables had the form”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Amselem et al. (2009) source
- Findingcitation
Schuck et al. (2006) realized a complete linear-optical Bell-state analyzer able to distinguish all four Bell states provided the initial pair is hyper-entangled.
“Schuck et al. (2006) realized a complete linear-optical Bell-state analyzer which is able to distinguish all four Bell states , provided the initial pair is entangled in two degrees of freedom, called hyper-entangled, here polarization entanglement plus the intrinsic time-energy correlation in SPDC (Kwiat and Weinfurter (1998)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation
The first experimental realization of quantum dense coding was reported by the Innsbruck group (Mattle et al., 1996).
“The first experimental realization of quantum dense coding was reported by the Innsbruck group (Mattle et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mattle et al., 1996 source
- Findingown data
For each initial mixed state the purification scheme worked.
“For each initial mixed state the purification scheme worked.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2003b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
An experimental demonstration of the entanglement purification scheme has been reported by Pan et al. (2003b).
“An experimental demonstration of the entanglement purification scheme has been reported by Pan et al. (2003b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2003b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The measured entanglement fidelity after purification for the first experiment was F=0.92±0.01.
“The measured results in Fig. 30(c) and Fig. 30(d) show a significant improvement of entanglement fidelity to the value of F = 0.92 ± 0.01 for the purified subensemble.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2003b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
In the first purification experiment, a mixed state with fidelity F=0.75 was prepared.
“In the first purification experiment, a mixed state as in (82) with fidelity of F = 0.75 was prepared.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2003b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
The total channel loss of 64 dB corresponded to the estimated attenuation regime for a two-photon satellite quantum communication scenario.
“The total channel loss of 64 dB corresponded to the estimated attenuation regime for a two-photon satellite quantum communication scenario.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Another weakness of this experiment is that due to double pairs emission events in SPDC, a phase stabilization was required.
“another weakness of this experiment is that due to double pairs emission events in SPDC, a phase stabilization was required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The probabilistic nature of SPDC causes two photon pairs to be emitted into one mode pair with a probability of the same order of magnitude.
- Findingcitation
The final photon states were found to preserve excellent, noise-limited fidelity, even though they experienced extreme attenuation due to mainly turbulent atmospheric effects.
“The final photon states were found to preserve excellent, noise-limited fidelity, even though they experienced extreme attenuation due to mainly turbulent atmospheric effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingreasoning
The photon-pair flight time of ~0.5 ms represents the longest lifetime of photonic Bell states reported so far.
“The photon-pair flight time of ∼ 0.5 ms represents the longest lifetime of photonic Bell states reported so far.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The entanglement of the received two-photon states was confirmed by violating the CHSH inequality by more than 5 standard deviations.
“The entanglement of the received two-photon states was confirmed by violating the CHSH inequality by more than 5 standard deviations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingreasoning
The resulting projected state of the ensembles L and R is nearly maximally entangled.
“The resulting projected state of the ensembles L and R is nearly maximally entangled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DLCZ, 2001, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Crespi et al. (2011) reported the first probabilistic logic gates on integrated circuits also for polarization qubits.
“Crespi et al. (2011) reported the first probabilistic logic gates on integrated circuits also for polarization qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crespi et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Few-photon cluster states were created in several recent experiments (Zhang et al., 2006a; Walther et al., 2005b; Kiesel et al., 2005a; Lu et al., 2007; Tokunaga et al., 2008).
“Few-photon cluster states were created in several recent experiments (Zhang et al., 2006a;Walther et al., 2005b;Kiesel et al., 2005a;Lu et al., 2007;Tokunaga et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2006a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Walther et al., 2005b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kiesel et al., 2005a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Biexciton radiative decay in a self-assembled quantum dot was demonstrated as a triggered entangled photon source in Stevenson et al. (2006).
“This was demonstrated in Stevenson et al. (2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stevenson et al. (2006) source
- Findingcitation
In the experiment of Walther et al. (2005b), a four-photon polarization-entangled cluster state was created via SPDC with fidelity F = 0.63 ± 0.02.
“In the experiment of Walther et al. (2005b), via a SPDC a four-photon polarization-entangled cluster state was created (with a fidelity of F = 0.63 ± 0.02)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walther et al. (2005b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
In long-lived quantum memory based on atomic ensembles, storage times were reported to reach up to 8 ms.
“In the case of a long-lived quantum memory based on atomic ensembles storage times were reported to reach up to 8 ms (Zhao et al. 2009), with potential improvements when using cavities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhao et al. 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
With continuous variable encoding, Aoki et al. (2009) realized a nine-qubit Shor's code able to correct an arbitrary single-qubit error.
“With a continuous variable encoding, Aoki et al. (2009) realized a nine-qubit Shor's code, which is able to correct an arbitrary single-qubit error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aoki et al. (2009) source
- Findingcitation
Single photons and entangled photons have been generated from self-assembled quantum dots embedded in a microcavity, with extraction efficiency up to 80%.
“For instance, single photons and entangled photons have been generated from self-assembled quantum dots embedded in a microcavity, with extraction efficiency up to 80% (Dousse et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dousse et al. 2010 source
- Findingreasoning
The probability of joint detection of two SPDC photons depends on the difference of the detection times.
“i.e., the probability depends on the difference of the detection times.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The detectors see only photons of a specified direction of propagation, which is a good assumption if the detectors are far from the crystal and the apertures are narrow.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The maxima of the filter-detector response functions agree with the frequencies given by the phase-matching conditions.
- Findingreasoning
For Gaussian filters, as σ → ∞ the detection probability approaches δ(t - t'), giving perfect time correlation.
“As σ → ∞ the expression (A18) approaches δ(t -t ).We have a perfect time correlation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The maxima of the filter-detector response functions agree with the frequencies given by the phase-matching conditions.
- Premisecitation
The GHZ theorem shows that the concept of EPR's elements of reality is self-contradictory.
“The Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) theorem (Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger, 1989;Greenberger et al., 1990;Mermin, 1990a) showed that the concept of EPR's elements of reality is selfcontradictory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger, 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Greenberger et al., 1990 source
- cites Mermin, 1990a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Interference patterns involving single photons or light intensity do not reveal strictly non-classical phenomena.
“The interference patterns involving single photons or, equally well, the light intensity does not reveal strictly non-classical phenomena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Bell's inequalities reveal that two-particle correlations for the two spin-1/2 singlet disagree with any local realistic model.
“Bell (1964) derived his remarkable inequalities which revealed that two-particle correlations for the two spin-1 2 singlet disagree with any local realistic model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bell (1964) source
- Premisecitation
KLM showed that scalable quantum computation is in principle possible with linear optics, single photon sources and detectors.
“Remarkably, by exploiting the nonlinearity induced by measurement, Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn (KLM) showed that scalable quantum computation is in principle possible with linear optics, single photon sources and detectors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn (KLM)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
There are situations for which local realism and quantum mechanics make completely opposite predictions, even for perfectly correlated results.
“That is, there are situations for which local realism and quantum mechanics make completely opposite predictions, even for perfectly correlated results -which were the starting point of the EPR argumentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger, 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Greenberger et al., 1990 source
- cites Mermin, 1990a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A quantum repeater would allow in principle an efficient long-distance high-fidelity transmission of entanglement.
“A quantum repeater (Briegel et al. 1998) would allow in principle an efficient long distance high-fidelity transmission of entanglement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Briegel et al. 1998 source
- Interpretationreasoning
For fields with fluctuating phase differences, the visibility of intensity correlations is never full, maximally 50%.
“Thus, the visibility of intensity correlations for fields with fluctuating phase differences is never full, maximally 50%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
There is no bound on visibility in the quantum case.
“As we shall see, there is no bound on visibility in the quantum case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By simultaneously monitoring detectors on both sides of the two-photon EPR interferometer while varying the phase shifts, interference fringes are observed as sinusoidal terms.
“Thus, by simultaneously monitoring the detectors on both sides of the interferometer, while varying the phase shifts φ 1 andφ 2 , the interference fringes will be observed as shown by the sinusoidal terms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A central source emits two photons in the entangled state |ψ12 = 1/√2(|a1|a2 + |b1|b2).
- Premisecitation
The distinguishability was tuned in the original Hong-Ou-Mandel experiments with the temporal delay between the two photons.
“The distinguishability was tuned in the original experiments with the temporal delay between the two photons (Fig. 5(b)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hong, Ou and Mandel, 1987 source
- Premisecitation
Rarity et al. observed interference between independent photons, one a triggered single photon from a down-converted pair and the other in an attenuated beam from pumping laser light.
“Rarity et al. (1996) observed the interference between independent photons, one of which was a triggered single photon from a down-converted pair, and the other one was in an attenuated beam 17 derived from the pumping laser light.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rarity et al. (1996)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The Hong-Ou-Mandel effect depends critically on the distinguishability of photons.
“Therefore, the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect depends critically on the distinguishability of photons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The three-fold coincidence rates in the GHZ interferometer display sinusoidal oscillations depending on the sum φ1+φ2+φ3.
“The three-fold coincidence rates given in Eq. ( 20) display sinusoidal oscillations depending on the sum φ 1 +φ 2 +φ 3 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
No single-particle fringes can be observed in the three-particle GHZ interferometer.
“Finally, a similar argument shows that, of course, no single-particle fringes can be observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Quantum interference may occur entirely due to indistinguishability of particles.
“Quantum interferencefoot_6 may occur also entirely due to indistinguishability of particles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Hong-Ou-Mandel interference provides a powerful tool to estimate the degree of indistinguishability of two separately emitted photons.
“The Hong-Ou-Mandel interference provides a powerful tool to estimate the degree of indistinguishability of two separately emitted photons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Shih and Alley and Ou and Mandel were the first to achieve effects characteristic for a maximally entangled polarization state.
“Shih and Alley (1988), and Ou and Mandel (1988a) were the first to achieve this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shih and Alley (1988) source
- cites Ou and Mandel (1988a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
A coincident detection at the two outputs c and d can occur only due to the entangled |ψ−cd component of the total state.
“A coincident detection at the two outputs, c and d, can occur only due the entangled |ψ - cd component of the total state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The minus sign in |Ψ− leads to a cancellation of the photon bunching amplitudes, that is to a fermionic-like behavior.
“The minus sign in |Ψ -leads to a cancellation of the photon bunching amplitudes, that is to a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Such interferometers play a crucial role in creation, manipulation and projection of various multiphoton entangled states.
“Such interferometers play a crucial role in creation, manipulation and projection of various multiphoton entangled states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
A deterministic CNOT gate would make Bell-state measurement possible.
“A deterministic CNOT gate 19 would make such a the Bellstate measurement possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The experimental results confirmed that the quantum interference can be revived.
“The experimental results confirmed that the quantum interference can be indeed revived.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pittman et al. (1996) source
- Interpretationcitation
One can construct a GHZ-state analyzer with which one can identify two out of the 2^N maximally entangled GHZ states.
“One can construct a GHZ-state analyzer (Pan and Zeilinger, 1998), with which one can identify two out of the 2 N maximally entangled GHZ states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan and Zeilinger, 1998 source
- Premisenone given
CNOT gates are difficult to realize with linear optics and single photons.
“However, CNOT gates are difficult to realize with linear optics and single photons (see section VII).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A modified Bell-state analyzer introduced by Pan and Zeilinger can directly be generalized to the N-particle case.
“A modified version of a Bell-state analyzer, which can directly be generalized to the N -particle case was introduced by Pan and Zeilinger (1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan and Zeilinger (1998) source
- Interpretationreasoning
This makes Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometers very stable.
“This makes the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometers very stable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By exploiting quantum interference effects due to the bosonic nature of photons, photonic Bell-state and GHZ-state analyzers can be realized in a probabilistic way.
“Nevertheless, by exploiting quantum interference effects due to the bosonic nature of photons discussed in the above section, photonic Bell-state and GHZ-state analyzers can be realized in a probabilistic way.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Later experiments evolved into observations of a Hong-Ou-Mandel dip for photons originating from two sources that were progressively more independent of each other.
“Later experiments of this kind evolved into observations of a Hong-Ou-Mandel dip for photons originating from two sources, which were progressively more and more independent of each other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
This kind of post-selected entanglement was used to violate Bell's inequality in experiments of Shih and Alley and Ou and Mandel.
“This kind of post-selected entanglement was used to violate Bell's inequalityfoot_8 , both in experiments of Shih and Alley (1988), and Ou and Mandel (1988a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shih and Alley (1988) source
- cites Ou and Mandel (1988a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
By taking advantage of hyper-entanglement, one can implement a complete Bell-state analysis.
“Finally, let us mention that by taking the advantage of the properties of hyper-entanglement one can implement a complete Bell-state analysis (Kwiat and Weinfurter, 1998;Walborn et al., 2003b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kwiat and Weinfurter, 1998 source
- cites Walborn et al., 2003b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The origin of Hong-Ou-Mandel interference is due to the indistinguishability of two-photon amplitudes describing the various alternatives leading to a coincidence count.
“However, it is important to note that essentially, the origin of this interference is due to the indistinguishability of two-photon amplitudes describing the various alternatives leading to a coincidence count.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Bell state measurement schemes can be generalized to the N-particle case.
“Bell state measurement schemes can be generalized to the N -particle case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The GHZ analyzer setup with three photons entering modes a, b and c and polarization beam splitters transmitting H and reflecting V can filter out two GHZ states |Φ±0 = (|HHH ± |VVV) from the eight.
“Consider now the setup of Fig. 7 and suppose that three photons enter the GHZ analyzer by modes a, b and c.The polarization beam splitters transmit H and reflect V polarizations, thus a coincidence detection at the three outputs can only originate from either the case that all photons are transmitted (this corresponds to the input state |H |H |H ) or all reflected (|V |V |V ).The two cases are ful”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Kim et al. (2006) proposed and implemented a polarization Sagnac interferometric configuration with bidirectional pumping of a type-II phase-matched periodically poled KTiOPO4 crystal.
“Kim et al. (2006) proposed and implemented a polarization Sagnac interferometric configuration with bidirectional pumping of a type-II phase-matched periodically poled KTiOPO 4 (PPKTP) crystal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim et al. (2006) source
- Interpretationreasoning
After compensation, interference occurs pairwise between processes in which the photon pair is created at distances ±x from the middle of the crystal.
“After the compensation, interference occurs pairwise between processes in which the photon pair is created at distances ±x from the middle of the crystal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
If d is larger than the coherence width, the terms can become partially labeled by their spatial location.
“Similarly, if d is larger than the coherence width, the terms can become partially labeled by their spatial location.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The compensation method also provides reasonable compensation for the transverse walk-off effect.
“The method also provides reasonable compensation for the transverse walk-off effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Early Bell-test experiments used entangled photons from atomic cascades.
“The early Bell-test experiments used entangled photons from atomic cascades, see Clauser and Shimony (1978).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Clauser and Shimony (1978) source
- Interpretationreasoning
Because the pulses are separated on the order of a few nanoseconds, much shorter than the timescale of any phase drifts in the fiber, the drifts do not affect the quality of entanglement.
“Note that because the pulses are only separated on the order of a few nanoseconds, and this is much shorter than the timescale of any phase drifts in the fiber, the drifts do not affect the quality of entanglement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
It is possible to produce entangled states involving large numbers of photons, approaching the macroscopic domain, via twin-beam multi-photon entanglement.
“It is also possible to produce entangled states involving large numbers of photons, approaching the macroscopic domain.Such entanglement is related to experiments on twin beams (Smithey et al., 1992) and could be called a twin-beam multi-photon entanglement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smithey et al., 1992 source
- Premisecitation
Polarization-path entanglement can be generated by a double pass of a pump laser through a BBO crystal.
“Polarization-path entanglement: Polarization-path entanglement can be generated by a double pass of a pump laser through a BBO crystal (Chen et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2003 source
- Premisereasoning
Due to phase-matching, idler and signal photons of given frequencies are correlated in emission directions.
“Due to the phase-matching relation, idler and signal photons of given frequencies are correlated in emission directions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
An advantage of time-bin entanglement is that it is insensitive to polarization fluctuations.
“An advantage of the time-bin entanglement is that it is insensitive to polarization fluctuations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Using reference laser pulses to actively lock the phase, time-bin entanglement can be robustly distributed over long distances in optical fibers.
“Using reference laser pulses to actively lock the phase, it can be robustly distributed over long distances in optical fibers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
A more robust distribution of hyper-entanglement is possible with photon pairs entangled both in time (time-bin) and in polarization.
“Polarization-time entanglement: A more robust distribution of hyper-entanglement is possible with photon pairs which are entangled both in time (i.e., time-bin entanglement) and in polarization (Genovese and Novero, 2002;Schuck et al., 2006;Chen et al., 2006d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
The visibility of four-particle fringes can be impaired by the statistical properties of the emission process.
“The influence of photon statistics.-Thevisibility of the four-particle fringes in the set-up of Fig. 14 can be impaired by the statistical properties of the emission process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
To ensure that the source of photons is unknowable, the photons should be detected behind a narrow band filtering system whose inverse bandwidth (coherence time) clearly exceeds the pulse duration τ.
“To ensure that the source of photons is unknowable, the (initially spectrally broadband) photons should be detected behind a narrow band filtering system (to be called later simply a filter) whose inverse of the bandwidth (coherence time) clearly exceeds the pulse duration τ (e.g., by an order of magnitude).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Depending on phase shifts, detection at c(+) and d(+) acts like a Bell-state measurement, projecting the two photons into state 1/√2(|c|d + e^{i(φc+φd)}|c'|d').
“Note that depending on the phase shifts the detection at, e.g., c(+) and d(+), acts like a Bell-state measurement, projecting the two photons into the state 1 √ 2 |c |d + e i(φc+φ d ) |c |d .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The original motivation to observe entanglement of more than two particles stems from the observation by GHZ that three-particle entanglement leads to a dramatic conflict between local realism and EPR's ideas with predictions of quantum mechanics.
“The original motivation to observe entanglement of more than two particles, with measurements on the particles performed at spatially separated stations, stems from the observation by GHZ that three-particle entanglement leads to a dramatic conflict between local realism and EPR's ideas with predictions of quantum mechanics (GHZ, 1989;Greenberger et al., 1990;Mermin, 1990a), see section V.B.1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites GHZ, 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Greenberger et al., 1990 source
- cites Mermin, 1990a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The basic principle of stimulated entanglement creation was first experimentally demonstrated in the few-photon regime.
“The basic principle of 22 It is interesting to note that this simplified Hamiltonian H sim SPDC and the state generated thereby [Eq.( 42)] are closely related to squeezing and continuous-variable entanglement, see Braunstein and van Loock (2005) for a review.a stimulated entanglement creation was first experimentally demonstrated in the few-photon regime (Lamas-Linares et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lamas-Linares et al., 2001 source
- Premisenone given
Twin-beam multi-photon entanglement can be generated via standard SPDC with a strong pump pulse.
“The twin-beam multi-photon entanglement can be generated via standard SPDC, but with a strong pump pulse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By going to higher values of τ, bipartite entangled states consisting of large numbers of photons are generated.
“By going to higher values, bipartite entangled states constituting of large numbers of photons are generated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
To have high visibility, the ratio of the probability of each pulse to produce a single down converted pair to the probability of not producing anything must be less than 14%.
“Thus, to have high visibility the ratio of the probability of each pulse to produce a single down converted pair to the probability of not producing anything must be less than 14%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Yurke and Stoler (1992a, 1992b) showed that in theory multiparticle entanglement effects should be in principle observable for particles originating from independent sources.
“Yurke andStoler (1992a, 1992b) showed that in theory multiparticle entanglement effects should be in principle observable for particles originating from independent sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yurke and Stoler (1992a, 1992b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Simultaneous firings of four detectors can exhibit interference effects provided the two contributing processes are indistinguishable.
“Simultaneous firings of the four detectors can exhibit interference effects provided the two contributing processes are indistinguishable: detection of the particles from source A in d(+) and a(+), and detection of the particles from B in c(+) and b(+); detection of the particles from source A in c(+) and a(+), and detection of the particles form B in d(+) and b(+).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the four-particle interference setup, if it cannot be determined which source produced the particle activating detectors d(+) and c(+), then four-particle interference effects may occur.
“If it cannot be determined, even in principle, which source produced the particle which activated the detectors, say d(+) and c(+), then four-particle interference effects may occur.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The state of the four particles after passage of photons 2 and 3 via PBS1, provided the photons are indistinguishable, reads as Eq. (49).
“The state of the four particles, after the passage of 2 and 3 via PBS1, and provided the photons are indistinguishable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Sources A and B simultaneously emit a photon pair each.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Pairs in beams x, y (1, 3, and 2, 4) are in identical polarization states 1/√2(|Hx,Hy> + |Vx,Vy>).
- The authors state this as an assumption: The photons are indistinguishable.
- Interpretationreasoning
These processes erase the possibility of distinguishing the photons from different pairs by their arrival time or spatial modes.
“These processes erase the possibility of distinguishing the photons from different pairs by their arrival time or spatial modes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Five-photon entanglement was demonstrated by interfering a four-photon GHZ state with a source of pseudo-single photons from an attenuated laser light.
“Later on five-photon entanglement was demonstrated by interfering a four-photon GHZ state (Pan et al., 2001a) with a source of pseudo-single photons from an attenuated laser light (Zhao et al. 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pan et al., 2001a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhao et al. 2004 source
- Interpretationcitation
The scheme in Fig. 15 also allows one to generate unconditional three-particle GHZ states via a method based on entangled entanglement.
“The scheme in Fig. 15 also allows one to generate unconditional three-particle GHZ statesfoot_12 via a method based on the notion of entangled entanglement (Krenn and Zeilinger, 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Krenn and Zeilinger, 1996 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Four-fold coincidences can reveal four-particle GHZ correlations.
“Therefore, four-fold coincidences can reveal four-particle GHZ correlations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The number of GHZ-like entangled qubits climbed up to ten by entangling both the polarization and momentum degrees of freedom of five photons.
“The number of GHZ-likeentangled qubits climbed up to ten by entangling both the polarization and momentum degrees of freedom of five photons (Gao et al. 2010a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gao et al. 2010a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The dominance of the two terms is a necessary but not yet sufficient condition for demonstrating a GHZ entanglement, as there could be just a statistical mixture of the two states.
“The dominance of the two terms is a necessary but not yet sufficient condition for demonstrating a GHZ entanglement, as there could, in principle, be just a statistical mixture of the two states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The resulting counts originate from a superposition between |H1H2V3> and |V1V2H3>, that is, the three-photon GHZ state.
“Thus the resulting counts originate from a superposition between |H 1 H 2 V 3 and |V 1 V 2 H 3 , that is, the three-photon GHZ state:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Only the superposition |H1,H2,H3,H4> + |V1,V2,V3,V4>, which is a GHZ state, leads to four-fold coincidence.
“Only the superposition |H 1 , H 2 , H 3 , H 4 +|V 1 , V 2 , V 3 , V 4 , which is a GHZ state, leads to four-fold coincidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The generic idea of observing photonic GHZ entanglement, later put into practice, was given by Zeilinger et al. (1997).
“The generic idea of observing photonic GHZ entanglement, later put into practice, was given by Zeilinger et al. (1997)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeilinger et al. (1997) source
- Premisecitation
With further improvements in high-power pump source and photon collection efficiency, GHZ entanglement among six photons and eight photons was also observed.
“With further improvements in high-power pump source and photon collection efficiency, GHZ entanglement among six photons (Lu et al. (2007)) and eight photons (Yao et al. (2011)) were also observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lu et al. (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Yao et al. (2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Engineering phase-matching conditions in photonic crystal fibers allowed creation of photon pairs at 597 nm and 860 nm in an intrinsically factorable state of frequencies.
“Engineering of the phase matching conditions in the fibers allowed creation of photon pairs at 597 nm and 860 nm in an intrinsically factorable state of frequencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Such a photon-pair source has almost no spectral correlations.
“Thus there were almost no spectral correlations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A GHZ-type entanglement among three spatially distributed photons, using the above methods of entanglement construction, was first observed by Bouwmeester et al. (1999a).
“A GHZ-type entanglement among three spatially distributed photons, using the above methods of entanglement construction, was first observed by Bouwmeester et”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bouwmeester et al. (1999a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
By further developing the ideas of Yurke and Stoler (1992a), Żukowski (2000) showed that the above procedure indeed permits a valid GHZ test.
“By further developing the ideas of Yurke and Stoler (1992a), Żukowski (2000) showed that the above procedure indeed permits a valid GHZ test.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Yurke and Stoler (1992a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Żukowski (2000) source
- Premisecitation
Femtosecond pulse pumped SPDC shows relatively poor quantum interference visibilities.
“Unfortunately, femtosecond pulse pumped SPDC shows relatively poor quantum interference visibilities (Keller and Rubin, 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keller and Rubin, 1997 source
- Premisecitation
All the above states can be observed also by a single, tunable setup.
“Finally, all the above states can be observed also by a single, tunable setup.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wieczorek et al., 2008 source
- cites Lanyon et al., 2009b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The symmetric Dicke state can be obtained by using collinear type-II SPDC and splitting the four (six) photons into four (six) output modes.
“Another important multipartite entangled state, the symmetric Dicke state, can be obtained by using collinear type-II SPDC and splitting the four (six) photons into four (six) output modes (Kiesel et al. 2007;Wieczorek et al. 2009a;Prevedel et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
Detection of genuine multiparticle entanglement with appropriate witnesses usually requires an experimental effort that increases only polynomially with the number of qubits.
“Detection of a genuine multiparticle entanglement with appropriate witnesses usually requires an experimental effort that increases only polynomially with the number of qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This enables a decoherence-free communication of a qubit encoded in four-photon states.
“This enables a decoherence free communication of a qubit encoded in four-photon states (Bourennane et al. 2004b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bourennane et al. 2004b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The GHZ theorem was the initial motivation for experimental efforts to produce entanglement of more than two particles.
“This result was the initial motivation for experimental efforts to produce entanglement of more than two particles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Violations of Bell's inequality also occur for a wide range of mixed states.
“This is also the case for a wide range of mixed states (Horodecki, Horodecki and Horodecki, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Horodecki, Horodecki and Horodecki, 1995 source
- Interpretationcitation
The high symmetry of the Dicke state makes it an ideal resource to synthesize a number of different multipartite entangled states by projection.
“The high symmetry of this state makes it an ideal resource to synthesize a number of different multipartite entangled states by projection as shown above for the GHZ-states (Wieczorek et al. 2009b) but also for entanglement enhanced sub shot-noise measurements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wieczorek et al. 2009b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Quantum information processing is able to perform tasks impossible with classical methods.
“That is why quantum information processing is able to perform tasks impossible with the classical methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because any classical information processing or communication has a local realistic model, theorems and experiments that reveal phenomena impossible to describe by such formalism indicate the existence of a different method of processing and transferring information.
“Note that, as any classical information processing, or communication, has a local realistic model, the theorems and experiments that reveal phenomena impossible to describe by such formalism, clearly indicate existence of a different method of processing and transferring information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Bell (1964) proved that there is a deep conflict between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories.
“Bell (1964) proved, that despite the hopes of Einstein at al., there is a deep conflict between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bell (1964) source
- Premisecitation
For the spin-1/2 singlet, S_Bell can acquire the maximal value 2√2 allowed by quantum mechanics, known as the Cirel'son bound.
“For example the predictions for the spin-1/2 singlet give correlations for which S Bell can acquire the maximal value 2 √ 2 allowed by quantum mechanics, known as the Cirel'son 37 bound (Cirel'son, 1980;Landau, 1987).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Some quantum processes involving entangled states violate the Bell inequality.
“Some quantum processes involving entangled states violate the inequality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The conflict between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories leads to drastically different predictions concerning two-particle interference phenomena.
“but one which straightforwardly leads to drastically different predictions concerning two-particle interference phenomena.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
After beam-splitting of these two modes into four modes and conditioning on detection of one photon in each of the four modes, the observed state can be written as a superposition of a four-photon GHZ state and a product of two EPR pairs.
“After beam-splitting of these two modes into four modes and again conditioning on detection of one photon in each of the four modes, the observed state can be written as a superposition of a four-photon GHZ state and a product of two EPR pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The method of entanglement witnesses allows detection of entanglement in a given state.
“Themethod of entanglement witnesses (Horodecki et al., 1996;Terhal, 2000;Lewenstein et al., 2000;Bruß et al., 2002) allows to detect the entanglement in a given state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Predictions for any pure, nonfactorisable two-system state lead to violations of Bell's inequality.
“In fact, predictions for any pure, nonfactorisable (i.e., not necessarily maximally entangled) two-system state lead to violations (Gisin and Peres, 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gisin and Peres, 1992 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Equation (56) indicates that one can predict with certainty the result of measuring the observable pertaining to one of the particles by choosing to measure suitable observables for the other two.
“Equation ( 56) indicates that we can predict with certainty the result of measuring the observable pertaining to one of the particles (say, C) by choosing to measure suitable observables for the other two.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Although the settings in Aspect's experiments were quickly varying, they were derived from independent function generators with certain correlation times and thus not fully random as assumed in the derivation of Bell inequalities.
“Although the settings were quickly varying, they were derived from independent function generators with certain correlation times and thus not fully random as it is assumed in the derivation of Bell inequalities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If φa + φb + φc = π/2 + kπ (where k is an integer), one has perfect correlations and perfect predictability of the common measurement result.
“Therefore, if φ a + φ b + φ c = π/2 + kπ (where k is an integer), one has perfect correlations and perfect predictability of the common measurement result.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
One can find many ad hoc local realistic models that violate the fair sampling assumption.
“One can find many ad hoc local realistic models that violate it, see e.g.Cabello and Santos (1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cabello and Santos (1996)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Fair sampling: whether a detector registers a particle or not is statistically independent of all other processes in the experiment.
- Interpretationreasoning
This is in full contradiction with the quantum mechanical prediction A_n(π/2)B_n(π/2)C_n(π/2) = -1.
“This, however, is in a full contradiction with the quantum mechanical prediction obtained from (55) which reads:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Independent randomness was experimentally realized by Weihs et al. (1998).
“This independent randomness was experimentally realized by Weihs et al. (1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weihs et al. (1998) source
- Interpretationreasoning
For φa = π/2, φb = 0, and φc = 0, whatever the results of local measurements for the n-th triple represented by the GHZ state, they satisfy A_n(π/2)B_n(0)C_n(0) = 1.
“For instance, for φ a = π/2, φ b = 0 and φ c = 0, whatever may be the results of local measurements of the observables for, say, the particles belonging to the n-th triple represented by the GHZ quantum state, they have to satisfy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In a local realistic model, from Eqs. (56)-(58) one can deduce A_n(π/2)B_n(π/2)C_n(π/2) = 1.
“Now, in a local realistic model, from these results we can deduce a further correlation by simply multiplying Eqs.(56-58).Since X n (0) 2 = +1, regardless of whether X n (0) = +1 or -1, we obtain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The noise resistance of violations of such inequalities by N-qubit GHZ states grows exponentially with N.
“The noise resistance 42 of violations of such inequalities by N -qubit GHZ states is growing exponentially with N .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The reasoning leading to inequality (62) is trivially generalizable to an arbitrary number of parties.
“The reasoning is trivially generalizable to an arbitrary number of parties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The detection loophole was first closed in an ion-trap experiment by Rowe et al. (2001) utilizing the nearly perfect detection efficiency of fluorescence detection of single ions.
“It was first closed in an ion-trap experiment by Rowe et al. (2001) utilizing the nearly perfect detection efficiency of fluorescence detection of single ions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rowe et al. (2001) source
- Premisecitation
The later experiment and the subsequent ones were done with moving reference frames.
“The later experiment and the subsequent ones (Stefanov et al., 2002;2003) were done with moving reference frames.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Inequality (62) is the necessary and sufficient condition for the correlation functions E(A_k, B_l, C_m) involved in it to have a local realistic model.
“which is the necessary and sufficient condition for correlation functions involved in it, E(A k , B l , C m ), to have a local realistic model [for proofs see Werner and Wolf (2001), Żukowski and Brukner (2002)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Instead of purely statistical reasoning for deriving Bell's inequality, one can follow the spirit of the EPR paper and first define elements of reality based on specific perfect correlations of the entangled state, then show contradicting predictions between local realistic theories and quantum mechanics.
“More remarkably, instead of purely statistical reasoning for deriving Bell's inequality, one can fully follow the spirit of the EPR paper, and first try to define “elements of reality” based on specific perfect correlations of the entangled state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Bell experiments were also performed using fiber-based entangled photon sources, from which two photons were distributed over a distance of more than 10 km apart.
“The Bell experiments were also performed using fiber-based entangled photon sources, from which two photons were distributed over a distance of more than 10 km apart, see, e.g., (Tittel et al., 1998;Zbinden et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Hence, in a local realistic model the values X_n(φ) for the angles specified in the equality are EPR's elements of reality.
“Hence, in a local realistic model the values X n (φ) for the angles specified in the equality are EPR's elements of reality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Locality assumption forces X_n(φ) to depend solely on the local phase.
- Interpretationnone given
The efficiency loophole emerges due to low collection and detection efficiency of the particles.
“The efficiency loophole emerges due to low collection and detection efficiency of the particles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Non-classicality of GHZ correlations can be significant even for many particles.
“Thus non-classicality of the GHZ correlations can be significant even for many particles (Mermin, 1990b;Klyshko, 1993;Roy and Singh, 1991;Żukowski 1993;Gisin and Bechmann-Pasquinucci, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mermin, 1990b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Klyshko, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Roy and Singh, 1991 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The falsification of Bell's inequalities by those experiments was up to certain loopholes due to experimental imperfections, which still allow local realistic models for the measurement results.
“However, this falsification was up to certain loopholes, which are due to experimental imperfections, and still allow to build local realistic models for the measurement results obtained in the experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This corresponds to a violation of the local realistic threshold of 2 by 30 standard deviations.
“This corresponds to a violation of the local realistic threshold of 2 by 30 standard deviations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Eberhard (1993) lowered this threshold to 67% by employing Clauser and Horne (1974) inequalities, albeit for non-maximally entangled states only.
“Eberhard (1993) managed to lower this threshold to 67% by employing, effectively, the Clauser and Horne (1974) inequalities, albeit for non-maximally entangled states, only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Violation of Bell's inequality was also demonstrated using Josephson phase qubits with deterministic entangled-state preparation and single-shot readout.
“Violation of Bell's inequality was also demonstrated using Josephson phase qubits with deterministic entangled-state preparation and single-shot readout (Ansmann, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ansmann, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
If there are N > 2 maximally entangled quantum systems (qubits), and measurements are performed in N mutually spatially separated regions by N independent observers, the correlations violate bounds imposed by local realism much more strongly than in the two-particle case.
“If there are N > 2 maximally entangled quantum systems (qubits), and if measurements on them are performed in N mutually spatially separated regions by N independent observers, the correlations in such an experiment violate bounds imposed by local realism much stronger than in the two-particle case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For an efficiency lower than about 83%, one cannot derive a generalized CHSH-type inequality that is violated by quantum predictions.
“For an efficiency lower than about 83% one can show that one cannot derive a (generalized) CHSH-type inequality that is violated by quantum predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Garg and Mermin, (1987) source
- Interpretationreasoning
Thus the EPR elements of reality program breaks down, because it leads to a 1 = -1 contradiction.
“Thus the EPR elements of reality program breaks down, because it leads to a 1 = -1 contradiction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In Hardy's thought experiment the two particles are nonmaximally entangled.
“A crucial distinguishing feature in Hardy's thought experiment is that the two particles are nonmaximally entangled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hardy 1993 source
- Interpretationcitation
The GHZ reasoning can be reduced to a two-party case while retaining its all-versus-nothing feature.
“Interestingly, the GHZ reasoning can be reduced to a two-party (thus two space-like separated regions) case while its all-versus-nothing feature is still retained.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Hardy's thought experiment provides an alternative way to demonstrate a violation of local realism without inequalities for two spin-half particles or photon polarizations.
“Hardy's thought experiment (Hardy 1993) provides an alternative way to demonstrate a violation of local realism without inequalities for two spin-half particles, or equivalently for polarizations of two photons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hardy 1993 source
- Premisenone given
The three-photon GHZ state (63) satisfies the eigenequations (64).
“The GHZ state (63) satisfies the following eigenequations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
An all-versus-nothing violation of local realism can be shown for two-particle four-dimensional entangled systems.
“Later, after a considerable debate (Cabello, 2001a(Cabello, , 2001b(Cabello, , 2003;;Lvovsky, 2002;Marinatto, 2003;Chen et al., 2003), it was shown that an all versus nothing violation of local realism can be shown for two particle four-dimensional entangled systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Leggett (2003) discussed a broad class of nonlocal hidden-variable theories that provide an explanation for all existing Bell-type experiments.
“In a novel approach, Leggett (2003) discussed a broad class of nonlocal hidden-variable theories, which, based on a very plausible type of realism, provide an explanation for all existing Bell-type experiments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leggett (2003) source
- Premisecitation
The first laboratory test of the GHZ-type paradox was done by Pan et al. (2000).
“The first laboratory test of the GHZ-type paradox was done by Pan et al. (2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2000) source
- Interpretationcitation
A GHZ-type argument involving non-contextuality can be applied in a two-particle scheme by encoding three two-state quantum systems in distinct degrees of freedom of two photons.
“One option is to encode three two-state quantum systems in distinct degrees of freedom of only two photons.Thereby a GHZ-type argument, now also necessarily involving non-contextuality 44 , can be applied in this two-particle scheme (Zukowski 1991, Michler et al. 2000a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zukowski 1991 source
- cites Michler et al. 2000a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
If two indistinguishable photons enter a shared 50-50 beamsplitter from different input ports, they exit randomly via just one port.
“Instead of annihilation, they relied on the Hong-Ou-Mandel bunching effect: if two indistinguishable photons enter the shared beamsplitter, such that each enters by a different input port, they exit randomly via just one port (see section III.C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With the settings of Eq. (64) one can obtain a GHZ paradox falsifying elements of reality.
“With these settings one can get a GHZ paradox falsifying the elements of reality of the form described in the previous subsection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Violation of local realism implies that either locality, realism, or both cannot provide a foundational basis for quantum theory, provided the freedom assumption holds.
“Violation of local realism implies that either locality, or realism, or both, cannot provide a foundational basis for quantum theory (provided the freedom assumption of randomness and independence of setting choices holds).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The freedom assumption of randomness and independence of setting choices holds.
- Interpretationcitation
In Hardy's ideal situation, quantum mechanics predicts that approximately 9% of photon pairs give coincidence counts absolutely not allowed by local realism.
“In such a case, in the ideal situation, for a specific set of measurements quantum mechanics predicts that approximately 9% of the pairs of photons must give measurement results in a form of coincidence counts absolutely not allowed by local realism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hardy 1993 source
- Interpretationcitation
A third two-observer GHZ-like protocol uses two-photon hyper-entanglement, in which nine variables for each party can be regarded as simultaneous EPR elements of reality.
“A third protocol of the two-observer GHZ-like theorem uses a two-photon hyper-entanglement (Chen et al., 2003).Due to the specific properties of the hyperentanglement, nine variables for each party can be regarded as simultaneous EPR elements of reality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2003 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Quantum theory violates inequality (68).
“Quantum theory violates inequality (68).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The Leggett-type inequality (68) follows from identity (67) plus assumptions (L1)-(L3).
“This, plus the above assumptions, implies a Leggett-type inequality (for details of the derivation see Groblacher et al., 2007) of the following form:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groblacher et al., 2007 source
- The authors state this as an assumption: Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
- Premisecitation
Cabello (2008) showed that nine observables with predefined noncontextual outcomes ±1 must satisfy inequality (69).
“Recently Cabello (2008) showed that if nine observables A, B, C, a, b, c, α, β, and γ have predefined noncontextual outcomes ±1, they must satisfy the following inequality:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cabello (2008)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
For inequality (68) to be applicable, vectors a1 and b1 must lie in a plane orthogonal to the plane defined by a2 and b2.
“For the inequality to be applicable, the vectors a 1 and b 1 necessarily have to lie in a plane orthogonal to the one defined by a 2 and b 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
No-go theorems for non-contextual hidden variables show a drastic difference between classical and quantum.
“Another class of theorems, which show the drastic difference between the classical and the quantum, are the no-go theorems for non-contextual hidden variables (NCHV) interpretations of quantum mechanics [Specker, 1960;Bell, 1966;Kochen and Specker, 1967;Mermin, 1990c; for a survey, see (Mermin, 1993)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Theories based on assumptions (L1)-(L3) deliver predictions different from quantum ones for certain other measurement outcomes.
“Nevertheless, theories based on assumptions (L 1 )-(L 3 ) deliver predictions different from the quantum ones for certain other measurement outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
- Premisecitation
Non-contextual hidden variable models of quantum mechanics are impossible already in the lowest dimension of 3.
“It is interesting that already in the lowest dimension of 3, for which a degenerate observable can exist (only such observables can be measurable in different contexts) non-contextual hidden variable models of quantum mechanics are impossible (Kochen and Specker, 1967).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kochen and Specker, 1967
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The Gröblacher et al. experiment excluded a broad class of nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
“This way, Gröblacher et al. experiment excluded a broad class of nonlocal hidden-variable theories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gröblacher et al. (2007) source
- The authors state this as an assumption: Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
- Interpretationcitation
For any four-dimensional quantum system, one can find observables for which quantum mechanics predicts S = 6 irrespective of state.
“For any fourdimensional quantum system, one can find a set of observables for which the prediction of quantum mechanics is S = 6, irrespectively of the actual state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cabello (2008)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The quantum repeater protocol is an efficient method for beating decoherence and photon losses in creating long-distance high-quality entanglement.
“As a combination of the ideas of entanglement purification and swapping, the quantum repeater protocol (Briegel et al., 1998), see section VI.F, is an efficient method for beating decoherence and photon losses in attempts to create long-distance high-quality entanglement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Briegel et al., 1998 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Once particles 1 and 2 are projected into one of the four entangled states, the polarization state of particle 3 is instantaneously projected into one of four pure states related one-to-one with the original state.
“However, once particles 1 and 2 are projected into one of the four entangled states, the polarization state of particle 3 is instantaneously projected into one of the four pure states appearing in Eq. ( 71).They can be rewritten in the following form”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: In the teleportation theory, the original polarization state of particle 1 is assumed to be |χ1 = α|H1 + β|V1.
- Interpretationcitation
The state |χ1 can be quantum mechanically completely undefined at the time the Bell-state measurement takes place.
“Here, a fascinating case is that |χ 1 could even be quantum mechanically completely undefined at the time the Bell-state measurement takes place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In Pan et al. (2003a), the post-selection problems of the Innsbruck experiment were basically removed by a scheme in which a coincident registration at the Bell measurement station heralds that with high probability a propagating photon carries the teleported state.
“In the experiment of Pan et al., (2003a) such problems were basically removed.The scheme was such, that a coincident registration of photons at the Bell measurement station was heralding that with a high probability one has a propagating photon carrying the teleported state, see Fig. 21(b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al., 2003a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The transfer of quantum information from particle 1 to particle 3 can happen over arbitrary distances.
“The transfer of quantum information from particle 1 to particle 3 can happen over arbitrary distances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In quantum teleportation, if Alice performs a Bell-state measurement on her two particles, the four outcomes are equally likely regardless of the unknown state.
“Now, if Alice performs a polarization Bell-state measurement on her two particles then the four possible outcomes are equally likely, regardless of the unknown state |χ 1 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: In the teleportation theory, the original polarization state of particle 1 is assumed to be |χ1 = α|H1 + β|V1.
- Interpretationreasoning
For sufficiently low γ, it is not necessary in a very good approximation to detect photon 3 to be certain that teleportation occurred.
“Thus, for a sufficiently low γ it is not necessary anymore in a very good approximation to actually detect the photon 3 to be certain that teleportation occurred.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the Rome protocol, the measurement of photon 1 with respect to the single-photon Bell basis can in principle be achieved with 100% success rate.
“The measurement of photon 1 with respect to this basis can in principle be achieved with 100% success rate”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premiseown data
The average fidelity for unconditional teleportation for three mutually unbiased bases was ∼0.80(2).
“The average fidelity for the unconditional teleportation for three mutually unbiased bases was ∼ 0.80(2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Zhang et al. (2006b) demonstrated teleportation of two-qubit states with a six-photon interferometer.
“Zhang et al., (2006b) demonstrated a teleportation of two-qubit states with a six-photon interferometer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. (2006b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Open-destination teleportation was experimentally demonstrated for N = 3 by Zhao et al. (2004).
“Such a teleportation scheme was experimentally demonstrated, for N = 3, by Zhao et al. (2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhao et al. (2004) source
- Premisecitation
Bao et al. (2008) realized a bright narrow-band entangled photon source with a linewidth of 9.6 MHz.
“A recent experiment (Bao et al., 2008) realized such a source with a linewidth of 9.6 MHz.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bao et al., 2008 source
- Premisecitation
The efficiency of this entanglement purification scheme (Pan et al. 2001b) is in theory 1/4.
“Although the efficiency of this entanglement purification scheme (Pan et al. 2001b) is in theory 1/4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. 2001b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The same purification method applies to arbitrary mixed states ρ_ab provided they contain a sufficiently large fraction F>1/2 of photon pairs in a maximally entangled state.
“the same method actually applies to the arbitrary mixed states ρ ab , provided that they contain a sufficiently large fraction F > 1/2 of photon pairs in a maximally entangled state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
With linear optics the accuracy of single photon operations on polarization and spatial degrees of freedom can be extremely high (typical accuracy of commercial products ~10^-3).
“With linear optics the accuracy of single photon operations on polarization and spatial degrees of freedom can be extremely high (a typical accuracy of commercial products is ∼ 10 -3 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The increased visibility is well above the threshold to violate a Bell inequality.
“This is well above the threshold to violate a Bell inequality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These facts, together with high-fidelity teleportation (Pan et al. 2003a), imply that the threshold of tolerable error rates for quantum repeaters could be achieved.
“These facts, together with the experimental realization of high-fidelity teleportation (Pan et al., 2003a), imply that the threshold of tolerable error rates for quantum repeaters could be achieved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al., 2003a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
This phase stabilization is unfeasible in long-distance quantum communication.
“This is unfeasible in long-distance quantum communication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These two problems can be solved by using entangled photon pairs deterministically generated using quantum dots or other emitters.
“these two problems can be solved by using entangled photon pairs deterministically generated using quantum dots or other emitters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
From a fundamental point of view, this means that the photons are subject to virtually no decoherence during their 0.5 ms long flight through air.
“From a fundamental point of view, this means that the photons are subject to virtually no decoherence during their 0.5 ms long flight through air.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
At a certain fiber length the signal-to-noise ratio is so low that secure keys cannot be generated.
“At a certain fiber length the signal-to-noise ratio is so low that secure keys cannot be generated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The quantum repeater protocol (Briegel et al., 1998; Dür et al., 1999) provides a blueprint of a general framework to remedy this problem by nesting entanglement purification and swapping steps.
“The quantum repeater protocol (Briegel et al., 1998;Dür et al., 1999) provides a blueprint of a general framework to remedy this problem by nesting entanglement purifiaction and swapping steps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Briegel et al., 1998 source
- cites Dür et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
A major drawback of schemes for communication between distant nodes is the exponential scaling of the error probability with the length of the connecting channels.
“Still, a major drawback of schemes for communication between distant nodes is the exponential scaling of the error probability with the length of the connecting channels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
For real life applications of fiber-based quantum communication one has to face several major limiting factors including photon loss and photon detection noise (mainly dark counts).
“For real life applications of fiber-based quantum communication one has to face several major limiting factors including photon loss and photon detection noise (mainly dark counts).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Therefore, the signal-to-noise ratio decreases exponentially with the length of the fiber.
“Therefore, the signal-to-noise ratio decreases exponentially with the length of the fiber.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Entanglement purification enables one to overcome the degradation of the quality of photon entanglement.
“Above we have shown that entanglement purification enables one to overcome the degradation of the quality of photon entanglement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
A promising way to realize long-distance quantum communication is to exploit satellite-based free-space distribution of single photons, or entangled photon pairs (Aspelmeyer et al., 2003b).
“A promising way to realize long-distance quantum communication is to exploit satellite-based free-space distribution of single photons, or entangled photon pairs (Aspelmeyer et al., 2003b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aspelmeyer et al., 2003b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The present-day technology puts a strong limitation on the distance for practical fiber-based quantum communication.
“In summary, the present-day technology puts a strong limitation on the distance for practical fiberbased quantum communication 65 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The average preparation time is given by T_0 ∼ t_∆/p_c.
“The average preparation time is given by T 0 ∼ t ∆ /p c .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
A quantum memory for single photons, with the ability of interconverting between stationary and flying qubits, is a crucial element in the quantum repeater scheme.
“Further, a quantum memory for single photons, with the ability of interconverting between stationary and flying qubits (see section VI.F.2) is a crucial element in the quantum repeater scheme.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The setup enables one to generate entanglement between two distant ensembles L and R using the configuration shown in Fig. 32.
“This setup enables one to generate entanglement between two distant ensembles L and R using the configuration shown in Fig. 32.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DLCZ, 2001, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Duan, Lukin, Cirac and Zoller (DLCZ, 2001, 2002) proposed a scheme for physical realizations of a quantum repeater using atomic ensembles as local memory qubits.
“Exemplarily, here we will describe a scheme for the physical realizations of a quantum repeater which has been proposed by Duan, Lukin, Cirac and Zoller 67 (DLCZ, 2001, 2002).They suggested atomic ensembles as local memory qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DLCZ, 2001, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The quantum repeater proposal (Briegel et al., 1998; Dür et al., 1999) is a cascaded entanglement purification protocol for communication systems.
“In analogy to faulttolerant quantum computing (Nielson and Chuang, 2000;Preskill, 1998), the quantum repeater proposal (Briegel et al., 1998;Dür et al., 1999) is a cascaded entanglement purification protocol for communication systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Briegel et al., 1998 source
- cites Dür et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Thus, scalability of this approach is questionable.
“Thus, scalability of this approach is questionable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The quantum repeater protocol comprises entanglement purification, even with imperfect means.
“Entanglement purification, even with imperfect means.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Briegel et al., 1998 source
- cites Dür et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Atomic ensembles have a collectively enhanced coupling to light, even without the aid of high-finesse cavities.
“They have a collectively enhanced coupling to light, even without the aid of highfinesse cavities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DLCZ, 2001, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The fluctuations of the relative phase φ caused by the environment would wash out the coherence (i.e., entanglement) in Eq. (85).
“The fluctuations of the relative phase ϕ caused by the environment would wash out the coherence (i.e., entanglement) in Eq. ( 85).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Once constructed, the quantum repeater would enable one to establish high-quality long-distance entanglement with resources increasing only polynomially with transmission distance.
“Once constructed it would enable one to establish high-quality long-distance entanglement with resources increasing only polynomially with transmission distance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Briegel et al., 1998 source
- cites Dür et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
By adiabatically changing Ω(t) between the two limiting cases (Ω(t) ≫ g√N or Ω(t) ≪ g√N) one can coherently map dark-state polariton states onto either purely atom-like states where the photons are stored, or purely photon-like states, which corresponds to the release of the stored photons.
“By adiabatically changing Ω(t) between the two limiting cases (Ω(t) g √ N , or Ω(t) g √ N ) one can coherently map dark-state polariton states onto either purely atom-like states where the photons are stored, or purely photon-like states, which corresponds to the release of the stored photons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Knill et al. (2001) showed that the success rate of the logic gates can be arbitrarily close to one by using more ancilla photons and detectors.
“Knill et al. (2001) showed that the success rate of the logic gates can be arbitrarily close to one by using more ancilla photons and detectors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Knill et al., 2001 source
- Premisecitation
In 2001 Knill, Laflamme and Milburn (KLM) proved that scalable optical quantum computing is possible using only single-photon sources, linear optical elements, and photon-number resolving detectors.
“However, in 2001 Knill, Laflamme and Milburn (KLM) proved that scalable optical quantum computing is possible using only single-photon sources, linear optical elements, and photon-number resolving detectors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Knill et al., 2001 source
- Premisecitation
A robust implementation of a quantum repeater using atomic ensembles was proposed by Chen et al., (2007), Jiang et al., (2007), and Zhao et al., (2007).
“A robust implementation of a quantum repeater using atomic ensembles was proposed by Chen et al., (2007;Jiang et al., (2007); and Zhao et al., (2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisereasoning
The weak interaction between photons, which is of a significant benefit in quantum communication, turns to be a drawback where non-trivial two-qubit quantum gates are essential.
“The weak interaction between photons, which is of a significant benefit in quantum communication, turns to be a drawback where non-trivial two-qubit quantum gates are essential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By measuring the forward signal mode with a single-photon detector, under the condition that the detector clicks, the collective atomic mode is projected to a single-excitation state.
“By measuring the forward signal mode with a single-photon detector, under the condition that the detector clicks, the collective atomic mode is projected to a single-excitation state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
When the atom number is much larger than the photon number, the dark states represent elementary excitations of bosonic quasiparticles, i.e., the dark-state polaritons.
“When the atom number is much larger than the photon number, the dark states represent elementary excitations of bosonic quasiparticles, i.e., the dark-state polaritons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lukin et al., 2000 source
- cites Fleischhauer and Lukin, 2000, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
This makes atoms strong candidates for localized photonic information carriers.
“This makes atoms strong candidates for localized photonic information carriers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
With the help of two-photon interference it eliminates the stringent requirement of long-distance phase stabilization.
“With the help of two-photon interference it eliminates the stringent requirement of long-distance phase stabilization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
A novel aspect of this protocol is that, despite the lack of the photon-photon interaction, quantum measurements with photon number resolving detectors can induce effective nonlinearity sufficient for the realization of two-qubit gates.
“A novel aspect of this protocol is that, despite the lack of the photonphoton interaction, quantum measurements with photon number resolving detectors can induce effective nonlinearity sufficient for the realization of two-qubit gates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Two atomic ensembles can be entangled by storage of two entangled light fields (Lukin et al., 2000).
“However, two atomic ensembles can be entangled by storage of two entangled light fields (Lukin et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lukin et al., 2000 source
- Interpretationnone given
On demand the single-atomic excitation can be transferred to a single photon (still within the storage time) with a method described in the next section.
“On demand the single-atomic excitation can be transferred to a single photon (still within the storage time) with a method described in the next section.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Essentially a single two-photon interference is enough, together with a state-dependent filtering, to perform probabilistic CNOT-operations.
“Essentially a single two-photon interference is enough, together with a state-dependent filtering, to perform probabilistic CNOT-operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The physical mechanism of type-I fusion is two-photon interference at the PBS, used as a parity check.
“The physical mechanism of type-I fusion is again two-photon interference at the PBS, which is used as a parity check”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
This enables one to perform the gate operation in a nondestructive manner.
“This enables one to perform the gate operation in a nondestructive manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Sliwa et al. (2003) proposed a scheme of generating triggered photon pairs that does not need true single photon sources but relies on SPDC.
“Another scheme of generating triggered photon pairs, which does not need true single photon sources but totally tests upon SPDC, was proposed by Sliwa et al. (2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sliwa et al. (2003) source
- Premisenone given
Type-I fusion fails with probability 50% when either zero or two photons of either polarization are detected.
“The type-I fusion operation fails (also with a probability of 50%) when either zero or two photons of either polarization are detected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Rudolph proposed a way to generate one pair of event-ready entangled photons from four single photons, requiring only linear optics and photon-number-discriminating detectors.
“Rudolph proposed a way to generate one pair of eventready entangled photon from four single photons, with a method that requires only linear optics and photonnumber-discriminating detectors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rudolph
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Most schemes of optical quantum computation, including nondestructive CNOT gates and scalable fusion of cluster states, require photon pairs to be created in an event-ready (heralded) way.
“However, most schemes of optical quantum computation, including the nondestructive CNOT gates, scalable fusion of cluster states, require that the photon pairs should be created in an “event-ready” (or heralded) way.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
If type-I fusion is applied to the end qubits of linear clusters of lengths n and m, successful outcomes with probability 50% generate a linear cluster of length n+m-1.
“If the Type-I fusion is applied to the endqubits of linear (i.e., one-dimensional) clusters of lengths n and m, successful outcomes (with a probability of 50%) generate a linear cluster of length (n + m -1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Failure outcomes of type-I fusion measure both input qubits in the σz eigenbasis, leaving remaining qubits in a cluster state of the same layout but with all bonds broken to the measured qubit.
“The failure outcomes have the effect of measuring both input qubits in the σ z -eigenbasis, which leaves the remaining qubits in a cluster state of the same layout as before the measurement, but now with all the bonds broken to the measured qubit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Due to intrinsic limitations of parametric down-conversion, there is a bottleneck with regard to the attainable brightness and fidelity of multiphoton states based on it.
“However, due to its intrinsic limitations, there is a bottleneck with regard to the attainable brightness and fidelity of multiphoton states based on it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Chip-scale waveguide circuits are a step toward integrated optics architecture for improved performance, miniaturization, and scalability.
“This is a step toward integrated optics architecture for improved performance, miniaturization, and scalability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
The threshold theorem has established that if the noise is below some value, an arbitrarily long quantum computation can be realized.
“The thresh-old theorem has established that if the noise is below some value, an arbitrarily long quantum computation can be realized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Entanglement swapping, together with entanglement purification and quantum memory, are essential components of quantum repeaters necessary for quantum networking and long-distance quantum communication.
“A variation of teleportation, entanglement swapping (Pan et al. 1998), which together with entanglement purification (Pan et al. 2003) and quantum memory (e.g.Yuan et al. 2008) are the essential components of quantum repeaters necessary for quantum networking and long distance quantum communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pan et al. 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pan et al. 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Yuan et al. 2008 source
- Premisenone given
Optical quantum computing makes critical use of sources of on-demand single photons which are indistinguishable and can be collected efficiently.
“Optical quantum computing makes critical use of sources of on-demand single-photons which are indistinguishable and can be collected efficiently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
The frequencies of emissions in SPDC satisfy the relation ω0 = ω + ω'.
“and the frequencies of the emissions satisfy the relation 73 ω 0 = ω + ω .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If the pump pulse is too short, the SPDC photons are less tightly correlated directionally.
“Since the frequency of the pulse and the wave vector are not strictly defined, if the pulse is too short the SPDC photons are less tightly correlated directionally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The principal term of the field-crystal interaction Hamiltonian H_int is proportional to ∫_V p(x, t) • E(x, t) d^3x.
“the principal term of the field-crystal interaction Hamiltonian, H int , is proportional to V p(x, t) • E(x, t)d 3 x”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: E(x, t) interacts with p(x, t) only at the point x.
- The authors state this as an assumption: χ(2)ijk(x) has the same value for all points within the crystal.
- Interpretationreasoning
For realistic final bandwidths, the degree of time correlation of detection of SPDC photons depends entirely on the frequency response of the detectors (plus interference filters, if any).
“For a realistic case of final bandwidths, the degree of time correlation of the detection of the SPDC photons depends entirely on the frequency response of the detectors (plus interference filters, if any, before them).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The maxima of the filter-detector response functions agree with the frequencies given by the phase-matching conditions.
- Interpretationreasoning
If the detectors move with respect to each other and the source, the detection events cease to be simultaneous in the rest reference frames of respective detectors.
“However if the detectors move with respect to each other and the source, the detection events cease to be simultaneous in the rest reference frames of respective detectors, etc..”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
If the results of the CNOT and measurement are the same, the remaining pair will have a higher degree of entanglement than the original two pairs.
“If the results are the same, then the remaining pair will have a higher degree of entanglement than the original two pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al. 1996a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A comparison of the fractions in (a) and (b) with the results shown in (c) and (d) indicates entanglement purification.
“A comparison of the fractions in (a) and (b), with the results shown in (c) and (d) indicates entanglement purification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al., 2003b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
This method precludes the possibility of inferring the source of the photon from the frequency correlations.
“This method also precludes the possibility of inferring the source of the photon from the frequency correlations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Emission of photon pairs in SPDC is possible only for directions for which the condition k0 ≈ k + k' is met.
“Thus, emission of the photon pairs is possible only for the directions for which the condition k 0 ≈ k + k is met.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The nonlinear crystal is a cube of side L, and for L → ∞ the phase-matching function approaches a delta function.
- Premisecitation
By repeating the purification procedure, always starting from the pairs produced in the former purification step, it is possible to distill pairs of arbitrarily high entanglement quality.
“By repeating the same procedure, always starting from the pairs produced in the former purification step, it is possible to distill pairs of arbitrarily high entanglement quality (for more details seeBennett et al. 1996a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al. 1996a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 212
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 105
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIn the Pan et al. (2003a) scheme, the entangled ancillary pair was provided much more frequently than the photon to be teleported, so when a qubit arrived the teleportation machinery was almost always ready.
“The basic idea of this experimental method is that the entangled ancillary pair was provided much more frequently than the photon to be teleported [a similar idea was also used in the teleportation experiment using time-bin entanglement carried out by Marcikic et al. (2003)].Thus, when a qubit which was to be teleported arrived the teleportation machinery was almost always ready.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Marcikic et al. (2003) source
The Experimental Realization section (p. 4) says the experiment decreased the probability of creating entangled qubits relative to the probability of creating the qubit to be teleported. That is the opposite of providing the ancillary pair much more frequently so it would almost always be ready when a qubit arrived. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe phase-stability problem can be overcome by interfering two photons, one coming from each remote ion or atom in a cavity (Bose et al., 1999; Browne et al., 2003; Feng et al., 2003; Simon and Irvine, 2003), which was experimentally implemented by Moehring et al., (2007) and Maunz et al., (2007).
“The phase-stability problem can be overcome by interfering two photons, one coming from each remote ion or atom in a cavity (Bose et al., 1999;Browne et al., 2003;Feng et al., 2003;Simon and Irvine, 2003), which was experimentally implemented by Moehring et al., (2007) and Maunz et al., (2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Bose et al., 1999 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Browne et al., 2003 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Feng et al., 2003 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationNielsen and Dawson (2005) have shown that the thresholds are respectively <3×10^-3 and <10^-4 for photon loss and depolarizing noise.
“Nielsen and Dawson (2005) have shown that the thresholds are respectively < 3 × 10 -3 and < 10 -4 for photon loss and depolarizing noise (see also Dawson et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Nielsen and Dawson (2005) source
The noise-model discussion (p. 22) explicitly says photon loss is omitted and that the results apply only to noise without leakage. The conclusion (p. 26) says the paper proves that finite thresholds exist, rather than providing precise numerical evaluations; it does not establish the two thresholds attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Dawson et al. 2006 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing primary two-photon entanglement, by entanglement swapping, one can entangle particles that were independent of each other without any direct interaction, or construct entanglement of higher order.
“It turned out that using the primary two-photon entanglement, by a procedure which is called entanglement swapping, one can entangle without any direct interaction particles which were independent of each other, or what is more important for us, construct entanglement of higher order ( Żukowski et al, 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Żukowski et al, 1993 source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningPractical versions of entanglement swapping are the basis of all experiments with three or more entangled photons, as well as of many realizations of quantum information protocols, up to measurement-based quantum computation.
“Practical versions of this technique (Zukowski et al, 1995;Rarity, 1995;Zeilinger et al, 1997) are thus the basis of all experiments with three or more entangled photons, as well as of many realizations of quantum information protocols, up to measurement based quantum computation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Zukowski et al, 1995 source
The Introduction and Concluding Remarks describe entanglement-swapping methods for producing three-photon GHZ states and discuss their application to quantum teleportation. They do not establish that these methods underpin all experiments with three or more entangled photons, many realizations of quantum information protocols, or measurement-based quantum computation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Rarity, 1995 source
- cites Zeilinger et al, 1997 source
- Rests on an assumption: Photons basically do not interact with each other.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQuantum teleportation enables a faithful transfer of an unknown quantum state from one location to another, using entangled states as a quantum channel.
“Quantum teleportation (Bennett et al., 1993) enables a faithful transfer of an unknown quantum state from one location to another, using entangled states as a quantum channel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al., 1993 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn SPDC, photons from a pump laser beam within a nonlinear crystal can spontaneously be converted into pairs that are momentum and frequency entangled, and in the type-II process can also be polarization entangled.
“In SPDC photons from a pump laser beam, within a nonlinear crystal, can spontaneously be converted into pairs that are momentum and frequency entangled, and in the so-called type-II process can be also polarization entangled (Kwiat et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kwiat et al., 1995 source
The paper’s Abstract describes spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a nonlinear crystal and says noncollinear type-II phase matching produces polarization-entangled photon pairs. It also discusses momentum correlations, but does not establish that the pairs described are momentum-entangled; it treats momentum-entangled states as distinct states into which its polarization-entangled states can be transformed. No passage found establishes the claimed frequency entanglement. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningA hermitian operator W is an entanglement witness if for all separable states Tr(W sep) ≥ 0, whereas there exists an entangled state for which Tr(W ent) < 0; thus via measurement of a suitably chosen witness operator one can detect entanglement.
“A hermitian operator Ŵ is an entanglement witness if for all separable states one has Tr( Ŵ sep ) ≥ 0, whereas there exists an entangled state for which one has Tr( Ŵ ent ) < 0. Thus, via measurement of a suitably chosen witness operator one can detect entanglement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe full set of separable mixed states is a bounded convex set in a multidimensional real space of hermitian operators, and any entangled state is separated from the set of separable states by a hyperplane.
“The full set of separable mixed states is a bounded convex set in a multidimensional real space of hermitian operators.Thus, any entangled state is separated from the set of separable states by a hyperplane.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Horodecki et al., 1996 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFor two three-dimensional systems, or more complicated ones, one can find states which are entangled but from which no maximally entangled state can be distilled (bound entangled).
“An interesting feature of the theory of entanglement of mixed states is that for two three dimensional systems, or for more complicated ones, one can find states which are entangled, but from which no maximally entangled state can be distilled 10 (Horodecki, Horodecki and Horodecki, 1998).Such states are called bound entangled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Horodecki, Horodecki and Horodecki, 1998 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Horodecki family extended PPT to a fully general necessary and sufficient condition for separability, namely that a density matrix after any positive map on one subsystem should remain a density operator.
“This was extended by Horodecki Family to a fully general necessary and sufficient condition for separability, which is that a density matrix after any positive transformation (map) on one of the subsystems should remain a density operator 9 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Horodecki et al. (1996) source
Theorem 2 (p. 7) gives the fully general necessary and sufficient condition: applying any positive map to one subsystem must leave the operator positive. But the paper defines a density operator (state) as also having trace one (p. 3); Theorem 2 does not require the transformed operator to retain that normalization. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBasic structural criteria for deciding whether a density operator represents an entangled state were first given by Peres and in full form by Horodecki et al.
“Basic structural criteria, which decide whether a given density operator represents an entangled state, were first given by Peres (1996) and in the full form by Horodecki et al. (1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe projection of two photons into a Bell state lies at the heart of many quantum information processing protocols, such as quantum dense coding, quantum teleportation, and entanglement swapping.
“The projection of two photons into a Bell state lies at the heart for many quantum information processing protocols, such as quantum dense coding (Bennett and Wiesner, 1992), quantum teleportation (Bennett et al., 1993), and entanglement swapping ( Żukowski et al., 1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationInterference of indistinguishable photons enables entanglement swapping and teleportation.
“The interference of indistinguishable photons enables a process called entanglement swapping and teleportation (Zukowski et al. 1993, see Section VI.C), which in turns opens up prospects of distributing of entanglement between distant matter qubits such as ions (Moehring et al. 2007) and atoms (Yuan et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Zukowski et al. 1993 source
The discussion of entanglement swapping (page unavailable in our copy) explains that coincident detection of idler photons entangles previously independent signal photons; its discussion of distinguishability links path information to reduced interference. The paper mentions subcoherence-time coincidence as a requirement for quantum teleportation, but does not say that its proposed interference process enables teleportation. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Moehring et al. 2007 source
- cites Yuan et al. 2008 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn atomic-cascade sources, the entanglement is only perfect for photons that are emitted back to back, a loophole that could allow local hidden-variable models to explain experimental data.
“Moreover, the entanglement is only perfect for photons that are emitted back to back, a loophole that could allow local hidden-variable model to explain the experimental data (Santos, 1991(Santos, , 1992)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Santos, 1991 source
- cites Santos, 1992 source
In the indexed Abstract (page not specified), Santos says poor angular correlation makes atomic-cascade experiments unsuitable for distinguishing local hidden-variable theories from quantum mechanics, and describes a local hidden-variable model agreeing with measurable predictions. The copy does not say that entanglement is perfect only for photons emitted back to back. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPolarization entanglement in type-II SPDC was discovered by Kwiat et al. (1995).
“Polarization entanglement in type-II process was discovered by Kwiat et al. (1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kwiat et al. (1995) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExamples of Hong-Ou-Mandel interference include single photons from independent trapped atoms, remote cold atomic ensembles, and independent tunable quantum dots.
“Other examples include single photons from independent trapped atoms (Beugnon et al. 2006;Maunz et al. 2007), and from remote cold atomic ensembles (Yuan et al. 2007) or independent, tunable quantum dots (Patel et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Beugnon et al. 2006 source
- cites Maunz et al. 2007 source
The paper reports single-photon generation and two-photon interference from trapped atomic ions (p. 1). But its account of the interference experiment says the two ions were in the same trap (p. 2), so it does not support describing its example as photons from independently trapped atoms. The other examples in the citing sentence have separate citations. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Yuan et al. 2007 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA general method for making such interference observable, and also to swap entanglement, was given by Żukowski et al. (1993), Żukowski et al. (1995), Rarity (1995) and Zeilinger et al. (1997).
“A general method for making such an interference observable, and also to swap entanglement, was given by Żukowski et al. (1993), Żukowski et al. (1995), Rarity (1995) and Zeilinger et al. (1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe NOON state was experimentally realized for N=3 and N=4.
“It was experimentally realized for N = 3 (Mitchell, Lundeen, and Steinberg, 2004) and N = 4 (Walther et al., 2004) (see also other related experiments, Rarity et al., 1990b;Edamatsu et al., 2002;Sun et al., 2006;Nagata et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Mitchell, Lundeen, and Steinberg, 2004 source
- cites Walther et al., 2004 source
Only the N=4 attribution is at issue here; the N=3 experiment is cited to a different paper. Walther et al. demonstrate four-photon interference, but describe their nonlocal four-photon state as “similar to” a NOON state, not as a NOON state itself (p. 7). (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecently, several experiments were performed to identify and quantify experimental imperfections that contribute error to produced multi-photon states.
“Recently, several experiments were performed to identify and quantify the experimental imperfections that contribute error to the produced multi-photon states (see Barbieri et al. 2009;Weinhold et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Barbieri et al. 2009 source
- cites Weinhold et al. 2008 source
The Error Model section (pp. 4–5) identifies and quantifies experimental imperfections, including higher-order photon terms, loss, and mode mismatch. This paper measures their effects on a photonic quantum-logic gate, however, rather than directly quantifying errors in produced multi-photon states. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationSource indistinguishability can in principle also be achieved with an ultra-coincidence technique, which does not require a pulsed pump but an extremely good detection time resolution ∆T much sharper than the coherence time of filtered SPDC radiation, and rejection of events at c(+) and d(+) detected with time difference higher than 2∆T.
“Note that source indistinguishability in principle can also be achieved with an ultra-coincidence technique, which does not require a pulsed pump, but an extremely good detection time resolution, ∆T , much sharper that the coherence time of the filtered SPDC radiation, and rejection of all events at c(+) and d(+) which are detected with time difference higher than, say, 2∆T [see Żukowski et al. (”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Żukowski et al. (1993) source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQuantum state tomography is a tool to fully reconstruct the density matrix of a quantum system.
“It is a tool to fully reconstruct the density matrix of a quantum systemfoot_13 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites James et al. 2001 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInitial experiments using photon pairs produced in an atomic cascade to test Bell's inequalities falsified Bell's inequalities and thus challenged the local realistic world-view.
“The initial experiments using photon pairs produced in an atomic cascade to test Bell's inequalities (Freedman and Clauser, 1972;Aspect et al., 1982aAspect et al., , 1982b, see also Clauser and Shimony 1978 for more experiments) falsified Bell's inequalities, and thus challenged the local realistic world-view.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Freedman and Clauser, 1972 source
- cites Aspect et al., 1982a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Aspect et al., 1982b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA toolbox for efficient witness operator construction has been created for some multi-particle states (GHZ, cluster, and W) and applied in a number of multi-photon experiments.
“A toolbox for efficient witness operator construction has been created for some multi-particle states (such as GHZ, cluster, and W state, see e.g.Gühne et al. 2007), and applied in a number of multi-photon experiments (see e.g.Bourennane et al. 2004a;Kiesel et al. 2005a;Lu et al. 2007a;Wieczorek et al. 2009a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Gühne et al. 2007 source
- cites Bourennane et al. 2004a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kiesel et al. 2005a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExperimentally, quantum state tomography was used for two-, three-, four-photon polarization states and also hyperentangled photon pairs.
“Experimentally, this technique was used for two-, three-, four-photon polarization states and also hyperentangled photon pairs (White et al. 1999;Resch et al. 2005;Walther et al. 2005b;Barreiro et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe original Hardy proposal was experimentally demonstrated by Torgerson et al. (1995) and White et al. (1999), with results fed into inequalities derived for imperfections under the fair sampling assumption.
“The original proposal was experimentally demonstrated by Torgerson et al. (1995) and White et al.(1999)); as in the GHZ-type experiments, the results of the experiments were fed into specific inequalities, specially derived to take into account experimental imperfections (under the fair sampling assumption, of course).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Torgerson et al. (1995) source
- cites White et al. (1999) source
On p. 3, White et al. describe an experimental test of Hardy’s proposal, give the inequality used, and report a Hardy fraction 122σ above the local-realistic bound. Footnote [16] on p. 4 says experimental realizations require inequalities because measurements have uncertainties. The copy does not specify the fair-sampling assumption or say that the inequality was specially derived to account for experimental imperfections. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- The authors state this as an assumption: In Hardy-type experiments, the fair sampling assumption is made.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy exploiting entanglement one can efficiently encode classical messages, transfer quantum information to a remote location, entangle remote particles with no common past, and purify less entangled ensembles.
“By exploiting entanglement one can efficiently encode classical messages (Bennett and Wiesner, 1992; section VI.A), transfer quantum information to a remote location (Bennett et al., 1993; section VI.B), entangle two remote particles that have no common past ( Żukowski et al., 1993; section VI.C), and purify a large ensemble in a less entangled states into a smaller ensemble with higher”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQuantum teleportation was discovered by Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa, Peres, and Wootters (1993).
“The fascinating possibility of quantum teleportation was discovered by Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa, Peres, and Wootters (1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa, Peres, and Wootters (1993) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBob can convert the state of particle 3 into the original state of particle 1 by applying one of the unitary transformations, but only if he receives two bits of classical information.
“In the other three cases, Bob can apply one of the unitary transformations of Eq. ( 72) to convert the state of particle 3 into the original one of particle 1.However, all this is possible only if he additionally receives via a classical communication channel a two-bit information on the (Bouwmeester et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bouwmeester et al., 1997 source
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the teleportation theory, the original polarization state of particle 1 is assumed to be |χ1 = α|H1 + β|V1.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe Bell-state analysis relies on interference of two independently created photons, requiring that information about which photon came from which source is completely erased behind the beam splitter.
“The Bell-state analysis relies on the interference of two independently created photons.Therefore, one has to guarantee that behind the BS the information which photon came from which source is completely erased.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Żukowski et al. 1995 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA protocol of the emulation kind was proposed by Popescu (1995) and experimentally realized in Rome (Boschi et al., 1998) with a teleportation fidelity of 0.85(1).
“A protocol of this kind has been proposed by Popescu (1995) and was experimentally realized in Rome (Boschi et al., 1998) with a teleportation fidelity of 0.85 (1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Popescu (1995) source
- cites Boschi et al., 1998 source
The main text (page unavailable) says the Rome experiment used a two-photon approach first suggested by Popescu and reports teleportation results that exceeded the classical limit. However, the measured value appears only in a formula that is not decoded in our copy, so the stated fidelity of 0.85(1) cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Procrustean method requires photon pairs all in a pure non-maximally entangled state with known amplitudes and involves only local filtering operations on single pairs.
“The first is the so-called Procrustean method (Bennett et al., 1996a).It requires that the photon pairs are all in a pure non-maximally entangled state, say, |Ψ nonmax = α|H |V + β|V |H , where α and β are two known amplitudes.In this case, the scheme only in-volves local filtering operations (Gisin, 1996;Horodecki et al., 1996) on single pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Bennett et al., 1996a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gisin, 1996 source
- cites Horodecki et al., 1996 source
The paper describes separability criteria for mixed states (p. 3), not the Procrustean method. Searches for local filtering, single-pair operations, and known amplitudes found no passage describing those features; the reference to Bennett et al. (References, p. 14) does not establish them. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA more feasible purification scheme proposed by Pan et al. (2001) showed that purification does not have to entirely rely on CNOT operations; in some cases a polarizing beam splitter suffices.
“A more feasible purification scheme was proposed by Pan et al. (2001).They showed that purification does not have to entirely rely on CNOT operations.In some cases a simple linear optical element, a polarizing beam splitter, suffices (see Fig. 28b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2001) source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHofmann and Takeuchi, (2002) and independently Ralph et al., (2002a, 2002b) developed quantum gates under the restriction of a two, or four-mode case, that is the successful operation of the gate can be verified if the two photons involved are detected in certain outputs.
“Hofmann and Takeuchi, (2002) and independently Ralph et al., (2002aRalph et al., ( , 2002b) ) developed quantum gates under the restriction of what is here called a two, or four-mode case, that is the successful operation of the gate can be verified if the two photons involved are detected in certain outputs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Hofmann and Takeuchi, 2002 source
- cites Ralph et al., 2002a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ralph et al., 2002b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs suggested by Pittman et al., (2001), the success of the gate can be detected by measurement of ancilla photons and this information is classically feed-forwardable.
“As suggested by Pittman et al., (2001), the success of the gate can be detected by measurement of ancilla photons and this information is classically feed-forwardable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pittman et al., 2001 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent theoretical proposals combining the one-way model with linear optical quantum computing require much less resources and effectively replace the original KLM scheme.
“By combing the one-way model with linear optical quantum computing, recent theoretical proposals require much less resources and effectively replace the original KLM scheme”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Nielsen, 2004 source
The paper’s description of its approach (p. 1) says it combines cluster-state computation with KLM gates and is substantially simpler than the original KLM scheme; the Conclusion (p. 4) likewise calls it less demanding. It does not establish that the proposal effectively replaces KLM: it retains KLM components and presents an alternative scheme, not a replacement of KLM altogether. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Browne and Rudolph, 2005 source
- cites Bodiya and Duan, 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIt was recently shown that an efficient preparation of cluster states is possible with probabilistic two-qubit controlled phase flip gates (Duan and Raussendorf, 2005; Chen et al., 2006a).
“It was recently shown that an efficient preparation of cluster states is possible with probabilistic two-qubit controlled phase flip gates (Duan and Raussendorf, 2005;Chen et al., 2006a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Duan and Raussendorf, 2005 source
- cites Chen et al., 2006a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnother significant step is the discovery of cluster-state quantum computing (Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001; Raussendorf et al., 2003; Briegel et al., 2009), which is based on the preparation of highly entangled multi-qubit states, the so-called cluster states (Briegel and Raussendorf, 2001) and adaptive one-qubit measurements.
“Another significant step is the discovery of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy introducing two linear-optical fusion operations, Browne and Rudolph (2005) achieved greater efficiency (about 10^2) and a simpler scheme than previous proposals.
“Furthermore, by introducing two linearoptical fusion operations, Browne and Rudolph (2005) achieved a greater degree of efficiency (∼ 10 2 ) and in a simpler scheme than the previous proposals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Browne and Rudolph, 2005 source
The Introduction (p. 1) introduces two fusion mechanisms, and the opening summary (p. 1) says the scheme is more efficient and simpler than previous proposals. The specific figure of approximately 10² is not supported: the Introduction (p. 1) estimates efficiency gains of several orders of magnitude over Nielsen’s proposal and many orders over KLM. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCluster states can be created by a controllable Ising-type interaction (Briegel and Raussendorf, 2001; Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001; Raussendorf et al., 2003).
“Cluster states can be created by a controllable Ising-type interaction (Briegel and Raussendorf, 2001;Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001;Raussendorf et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe resource overhead for a reliable entangling gate in Nielsen's scheme is about 10^3, about two orders of magnitude less than the original KLM protocol.
“The resource overhead (Bell states, operations, etc.) for a reliable entangling gate in Nielsen's scheme is ∼ 10 3 , and thus about two orders of magnitude less than the original KLM protocol.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Nielsen, 2004 source
On pp. 1 and 4, Nielsen estimates about 24 successful CZ₄/₉ operations per entangling gate, versus about 300 CZ₉/₁₆ operations and tens of thousands of optical elements for KLM. The p. 3 component counts make an overhead on the order of 10³ plausible, but the paper does not establish the claimed two-orders-of-magnitude reduction; its stated gate and element comparisons imply a smaller ratio. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAn even simpler set-up becomes possible with polarization encoding (Kiesel et al., 2005b; Langford et al., 2005; Okamoto et al., 2005) which in turn could be already applied, e.g., to observe cluster states for one-way quantum computing (Kiesel et al., 2005a).
“An even simpler set-up becomes possible with polarization encoding (Kiesel et al., 2005b;Langford et al., 2005;Okamoto et al., 2005) which in turn could be already applied, e.g., to observe cluster states for one-way quantum computing (see below, Kiesel et al., 2005a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Browne-Rudolph scheme requires stable interferometry only over the coherence length of the photons, with path length differences kept constant to within tens of microns, not fractions of a wavelength.
“It requires stable interferometry over only the coherence length of the photons, i.e., the interferometer path lengths differences only need to be kept constant to within tens of microns, not fractions of a wavelength.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Browne and Rudolph, 2005 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBrowne and Rudolph showed that one can prepare a square-lattice cluster of N qubits with temporal overhead scaling logarithmically with N and operational overhead scaling as about N ln N.
“Browne and Rudolph (2005) also showed that one can finally prepare a square-lattice cluster of N qubits with a temporal overhead scaling logarithmically with N , and with an operational overhead (i.e., number of fusion operations) scaling as ∼ N ln N (Chen et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Browne and Rudolph (2005) source
The Introduction (pp. 3–4) describes building two-dimensional clusters by fusion, supporting that part of the attribution. But the paper says it concentrates on a more compact layout rather than the square lattice (p. 2), and its resource calculation gives Bell pairs and fusion attempts per L-shaped unit (p. 4), not logarithmic temporal overhead or approximately N ln N fusion operations. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Chen et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn these optical experiments during the computation, genuine multi-particle entanglement and multi-path interference were observed, which did not appear in previous implementations using nuclear magnetic resonance.
“It is notable that in these optical experiments during the computation genuine multi-particle entanglement and multi-path interference were observed, which did not appear in the previous implementations using nuclear magnetic resonance (Vandersypen et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Vandersypen et al. 2001 source
The description of the NMR experiment (p. 3) says its effective pure state remained separable under unitary transformations, supporting the absence of genuine multi-particle entanglement. The Fig. 1 caption (p. 12) describes interference in Shor’s algorithm, but our copy does not establish whether multi-path interference was observed in this NMR experiment or compare it with the optical experiments. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRalph et al. (2005) and Varnava et al. (2006, 2008) designed loss-tolerant quantum computer schemes within the circuit-model and one-way model; the latter scheme can tolerate an overall optical loss, including source inefficiency and collection loss, up to 33%.
“For photon loss alone, Ralph et al. (2005) and Varnava et al. (2006) and(2008) have designed loss-tolerant quantum computer schemes within the circuit-model and one-way model; the latter scheme can tolerate an overall optical loss, including source inefficiency and collection loss, up to an impressive 33%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe majority of experimental demonstrations so far have relied on SPDC photons, which suffer from undesired higher-order photon emission, large bandwidth, and probabilistic photon pair emission.
“The majority of experimental demonstrations so far have relied on the SPDC photons, which suffers from undesired higherorder photon emission (Weinhold et al. 2008, this has been considered as the major source of error for most experiments reviewed here, see Section IV.D.1), large bandwidth, and the probabilistic manner of photon pair emission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Weinhold et al. 2008 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationParametric down-conversion has been serving as the main workhorse for the multiphoton experiments reviewed here; up to eight entangled photons have been observed.
“Parametric down-conversion (Kwiat et al. 1995;White et al. 1999) has been serving as the main workhorse for the multiphoton experiments reviewed here; up to eight entangled photons have been observed (Yao et al. 2007a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Kwiat et al. 1995 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites White et al. 1999 source
- cites Yao et al. 2007a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationChip-scale waveguide quantum circuits have been created recently and used to demonstrate high-visibility Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, CNOT gates, an instance of Shor's algorithm, and quantum walk.
“Finally, it is worth mentioning that chip-scale waveguide quantum circuits have been created recently, and used to demonstrate high-visibility Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, CNOT gates, an instance of Shor's algorithm (Politi et al. 2008(Politi et al. , 2009)), and quantum walk (Peruzzo et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Politi et al. 2008 source
The paper reports silica-on-silicon waveguide circuits and high-visibility two-photon interference (p. 2), as well as a CNOT gate (pp. 1, 3). It does not report an instance of Shor’s algorithm; the citing sentence also cites a separate 2009 paper for that claim. Quantum walk is attributed to Peruzzo et al. (2010), not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Politi et al. 2009 source
- cites Peruzzo et al., 2010 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA similar technique, called quantum process tomography, has been used to fully characterize the quantum controlled-NOT gates (O'Brien et al. 2004).
“A similar technique, called quantum process tomography, has been used to fully characterize the quantum controlled-NOT gates (O'Brien et al. 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites O'Brien et al. 2004 source
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor any single detector in the two-photon EPR interferometer, the count rate shows no interference; p1c = 1/2 independent of φ1 and φ2.
“In contrast, for any single detector the count rate shows no interference at all.For example, p 1c = p 1c,2c (φ 1 , φ 2 ) + p 1c,2d (φ 1 , φ 2 ) = 1 2 , independent of φ 1 andφ 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A central source emits two photons in the entangled state |ψ12 = 1/√2(|a1|a2 + |b1|b2).
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIf two photons incident onto a PBS have identical polarization, they always go out along different directions, so there is one photon in each output mode.
“If the two photons incident onto the PBS have identical polarization, then they will always go out along different directions, so there will be one photon in each of the two output modes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pan and Zeilinger, 1998 source
- cites Pan et al., 2001b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIf |β|=1 (photons fully distinguishable), the coincidence probability is 1/2; if β=0 (photons indistinguishable), it vanishes.
“Thus, if |β| = 1 (the photons â and b are fully distinguishable), this probability reads 1/2; if β = 0 (the photons are indistinguishable), it vanishes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenHong-Ou-Mandel interference is sensitive to path length changes on the order of the coherence length of the photons, while a Mach-Zehnder interferometer has sub-wavelength sensitivity.
“A characteristic feature of the Hong-Ou-Mandel interference is that it is sensitive to path length changes on the order of the coherence length of the photons, while in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer one has a sub-wavelength sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe state |Ψ+ can be distinguished from the other two by the fact that the emerging photons have different polarizations, resulting in coincidence counts at DH1 and DV1 or at DH2 and DV2.
“The state |Ψ + can be distinguished from the other two by the fact that the emerging photons have different polarizations 20 .This results in a coincidence counts at detectors DH1 and DV1 or at DH2 and DV2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe visibility of polarization interference is reduced once the photons are partially distinguishable; the full effect occurs for perfect overlap.
“As in the case of the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, the visibility of this polarization interference is reduced once the photons are partially distinguishable.E.g., by varying the relative optical paths before the photons reach the BS the overlap of the photon wave packets behind the beam splitter may be controlled, up to a total distinguishability.The full effect occurs for perfect overlap.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe states |Φ+ and |Φ− both lead to a two-photon event at a single detector, and thus cannot be distinguished.
“states |Φ + and |Φ -both lead to a two-photon event at a single detector, and thus cannot be distinguished.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAltepeter, Jeffrey, and Kwiat (2005) reported an entangled photon pair source with a count rate of over one million per second and a fidelity of 97.7%.
“For instance, Altepeter, Jeffrey, and Kwiat (2005) have reported an entangled photon pair source with an impressive count rate of over one million per second and a fidelity of 97.7%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Altepeter, Jeffrey, and Kwiat (2005) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHigh dimensional entangled qudits have been created by transverse spatial correlations of two SPDC photons, or using transverse momentum and position entanglement in pixel entanglement.
“High dimensional entangled qudits have also been created by transverse spatial correlations of two SPDC photons (Neves et al., 2005), or using transverse momentum and position entanglement of photons emitted in SPDC, in a form called pixel entanglement (O'Sullivan-Hale et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn time-bin entanglement, a short UV pump pulse sent through an unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer creates two mutually coherent pump pulses, and after SPDC in BBO the pair is in state α|short1|short2 + β|long1|long2.
“A short, ultraviolet pump pulse is sent first through an unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer (the pump interferometer) creating two mutually coherent pump pulses α|short p + β|long p , and next through a BBO crystal.Then, if via SPDC a pump photon is converted into a pair, the latter is in the state α|short 1 |short 2 + β|long 1 |long 2 .(38)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe polarization of each beam is completely undetermined, but the polarizations of the two beams are always anti-correlated.
“The polarization of each beam is completely undetermined, but the polarizations of the two beams are always anti-correlated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationNagata et al. measured the reduced de Broglie wavelength of four-entangled photons and showed a visibility that exceeds the threshold to beat the standard quantum limit.
“Nagata et al. have not only measured the reduced de Broglie wavelength of four-entangled photons, but also shown a visibility that exceeds the threshold to beat the standard quantum limit (see the original paper for details).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nagata et al.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAfter interaction time t, the resulting photon state is |ψ = e^{-itH0}|0, and in number state representation reads Eq. (42).
“After the interaction time t the resulting photon state is given by |ψ = e -itH0 |0 (Kok and Braunstein, 2000;Lamas-Linares et al., 2001;Simon and Bouwmeester, 2003), and in the number state representation reads |ψ = 1 cosh 2 τ ∞ n=0 √ n + 1 tanh n τ |ψ - n , |ψ - n = n m=0 (-1) m √ n + 1 |n -m, m; m, n -m .(42)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe consistency with the prediction holds only within a short interval of delay between the photons, while for path length differences larger than the coherence length of the detected photons the coherence between the two GHZ terms vanishes.
“This is so only within a short interval of delay between the photons, while for path length differences larger than the coherence length of the detected photons the coherence between the two GHZ-terms vanishes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe probability per pulse to create a single pair in the desired modes was on the order of a few 10^-4, with a correspondingly smaller probability to create four photons and negligible probability for three pair events.
“The probability per pulse to create a single pair in the desired modes was on the order of a few 10 -4 with a correspondingly smaller probability to create four photons and negligible for three pair events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe observers Alice and Bob were spatially separated by 400 m across the Innsbruck university science campus.
“The observers “Alice” and “Bob” were spatially separated by 400 m across the Innsbruck university science campus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn that ion-trap experiment, the two entangled ions were separated by approximately 3 μm, so the locality loophole was left widely open.
“However, as the two entangled ions were separated by approximately 3µm, the locality loophole was left widely open.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenStill the experiment had a detection efficiency well below the required minimum allowing avoidance of the fair sampling assumption.
“Still the experiment had a detection efficiency well below the required minimum allowing to avoid the fair sampling assumption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Fair sampling: whether a detector registers a particle or not is statistically independent of all other processes in the experiment.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFour-photon entanglement was demonstrated by Pan et al. (2001a) and Eibl et al. (2003) and used for multi-photon falsification of local realism.
“Four-photon entanglement was later demonstrated by Pan et al., 2001a, andEibl et al., 2003), and used for a corresponding multi-photon falsification of local realism (see also Zhao et al. (2003a)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pan et al., 2001a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Eibl et al., 2003 source
- cites Zhao et al. (2003a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHardy's scheme was scaled up so that (50 - h)% of photon pairs lead to coincidence events prohibited by local realism, demonstrated by Boschi et al. 1997.
“Hardy's scheme was later scaled up, so that (50 -h)% of photon pairs lead to coincidence events prohibited by local realism (where h is any small finite number).The effect was demonstrated in an experiment by Boschi et al. 1997.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boschi et al. 1997 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationTheories based on assumptions (L1)-(L3) are in conflict with quantum predictions, as shown theoretically by Leggett (2003) and experimentally by Gröblacher et al. (2007).
“Nevertheless, they are in conflict with quantum predictions as shown theoretically by Leggett (2003), and experimentally by Göblacher et all (2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Leggett (2003) source
- cites Göblacher et all (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe same experiment gave S_Bell = 2.178 ± 0.0199, violating the CHSH inequality by ∼9 standard deviations.
“At the same time measurements gave S Bell = 2.178 ± 0.0199, which violates the CHSH inequality by ∼9 standard deviations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gröblacher et al. (2007) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFree-space distribution of entangled photon pairs over 10 km was achieved in 2005, and over 144 km more recently.
“In section VI.E we discuss steps on the road toward satellite-based quantum communication and its first step, i.e., free-space distribution of entangled photon pairs over a distance of 10 km achieved in 2005 (Resch et al., 2005;Peng et al., 2005) and, more recently, over 144 km (Ursin et al., 2007;Fedrizzi et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationWith this ability, dense coding was implemented for all four Bell states in polarization, achieving overall channel capacity of 1.18(3) bits per photon.
“With this ability, the dense coding protocol was implemented for all four Bell-states in the polarization degree-of-freedom, achieving an overall channel capacity of 1.18(3) bits per photon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schuck et al. (2006) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationBarreiro et al. (2008) achieved a channel capacity of 1.630(6) bits using photons entangled in spin and orbital angular momentum, beating the 1.58-bit limit of conventional linear-optics implementations.
“Barreiro et al. (2008) exploited pairs of photons simultaneously entangled in spin and orbital angular momentum and achieved a channel capacity of 1.630(6) bits, finally beating the channel capacity limit of 1.58 bits of the conventional linear-optics implementations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barreiro et al. (2008) source
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn the Innsbruck experiment, three different messages could be operationally encoded by manipulating a single qubit, giving an increase of channel capacity to log2 3 ≈ 1.58 bits, but observed signal-to-noise reduced actual capacity to on average 1.13 bit for successful transfers.
“Thus three different messages could be operationally encoded by manipulating a single qubit only.53 Thus an increase of channel capacity to log 2 3 1.58 bits was possible-the highest value achievable using linear optics and classical communications, see Vaidman et al. (1999) andLutkenhaus et al. (1999).However, the observed signal-to-noise ratio reduced the actual channel capacity to on average 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe actual success probability in the experiment (Pan et al. 2003b) was much lower than 1/4 because it relied on SPDC to probabilistically create two pairs of entangled photons, so only a small fraction of photons went through the purification system.
“the actual success probability in the experiment (Pan et al. 2003b) was much lower as it relied on the SPDC to probabilistically create two pairs of entangled photons, thus only a small fraction of photons actually went through the purification system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. 2003b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The probabilistic nature of SPDC causes two photon pairs to be emitted into one mode pair with a probability of the same order of magnitude.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two-photon interference visibility of the original mixed states was 50% and 60%, and in a single purification step it increased to 84% and 88%.
“The two-photon interference visibility of the original mixed states was 50% and 60%, respectively.In a single purification step it was increased to 84% and 88%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2003b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn a second experiment, initial F=0.80 and after purification observed entanglement fidelity about 0.94±0.01.
“In a second experiment entanglement purification was performed for a mixed state with F = 0.80.After purification, the observed entanglement fidelity for the sub-ensemble in the modes a3 and b3 was about 0.94 ± 0.01.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2003b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn a subsequent Bell experiment with purified states (Walther et al. 2005a), S_Bell = 2.29 ± 0.13 was measured, violating the Bell-CHSH inequality by 2.2 standard deviations.
“After a purification, S Bell = 2.29 ± 0.13 was measured.This violates the inequality by 2.2 standard deviations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walther et al. (2005a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationExperimental progress has been made in free-space distribution of entangled photon pairs over 600 m (Aspelmeyer et al., 2003a), over 7.8 km (Resch et al., 2005), over 13 km (Peng et al., 2005), and over 144 km (Ursin et al., 2007; Fedrizzi et al., 2009).
“and of entangled photon pairs [over 600 m, see (Aspelmeyer et al., 2003a); over 7.8 km, see (Resch et al., 2005); over 13 km, see (Peng et al., 2005); and over 144 km, see (Ursin et al., 2007;Fedrizzi et al., 2009), see table I for a summary].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationA 144-km free-space link was built between two Canary Islands and used for distribution of one photon of an entangled pair (Ursin et al., 2007), and later, both photons (Fedrizzi et al., 2009).
“More recently, a 144-km free-space link was built between two Canary Islands and used for distribution of one photon of an entangled pair (Ursin et al., 2007), and later, both photons (Fedrizzi et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenSo far, the majority of the reported multiphoton interferometry experiments face the problem of random arrivals of SPDC photon pairs.
“So far, the majority of the reported multiphoton interferometry experiments face the problem of random arrivals of SPDC photon pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationLong lifetimes for relevant coherences in atomic ensembles have been observed both in a room-temperature dilute atomic gas (Phillips et al., 2001) and in a sample of cold trapped atoms (Liu et al., 2001).
“Long lifetimes for relevant coherences in such systems have been observed both in a room-temperature dilute atomic gas (Phillips et al., 2001), and in a sample of cold trapped atoms (Liu et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationRecent experiments achieved single quantum excitation memory times of 1 ms using cold atomic ensembles (Zhao et al., 2009a), 6 ms using atomic rubidium confined in a one-dimensional optical lattice (Zhao et al., 2009b), and 0.1 s using quantum memory confined in an optical lattice with laser compensation of the lattice light shifts (Radnaev et al. 2010).
“Recent experiments achieved single quantum excitation memory times of 1 ms using cold atomic ensembles (Zhao et al., 2009a), 6 ms using atomic rubidium confined in a one-dimensional optical lattice (Zhao et al., 2009b), and 0.1s using quantum memory confined in an optical lattice with laser compensation of the lattice light shifts (Radnaev et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Zhao et al., 2009a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhao et al., 2009b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Radnaev et al. 2010 source
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThese experiments are currently limited by the relatively short coherence time (~20 μs) of the memory qubits and the low conversion efficiency (~15%) between photonic and atomic states.
“These experiments are currently limited by the relatively short coherence time (∼ 20 µs ) of the memory qubits and the low conversion efficiency (∼ 15%) between photonic and atomic states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe KLM scheme subsequently spurred new experiments demonstrating probabilistic controlled two-photon gates.
“The KLM scheme subsequently spurred new experiments demonstrating probabilistic controlled two-photon gates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationLaing et al. (2010) reported a two-photon quantum interference visibility of 99.5(4)%, a CNOT gate (the obtained average fidelity of logical basis was 96.9(2)%) and a path-entangled two-photon state (with fidelity of > 92%).
“Laing et al. (2010) reported a two-photon quantum interference visibility of 99.5(4)%, a CNOT gate (the obtained average fidelity of logical basis was 96.9(2)%) and a path-entangled two-photon state (with fidelity of > 92%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laing et al., 2010 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe original proposal used dual-rail encoding and was first implemented by O'Brien et al., (2003).
“The original proposal used dual-rail encoding and was first implemented by O'Brien et al., (2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites O'Brien et al., 2003 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationDousse et al. (2010) used a carefully fabricated cavity to increase collection efficiency and created a source of polarization entangled photon pairs with state fidelity 0.67 and rate 0.12 per excitation pulse.
“Very recently, Dousse et al. (2010) used carefully fabricated cavity to increase the collection efficiency, and created a source of polarization entangled photon pairs with a state fidelity of 0.67 and a rate of 0.12 per an excitation pulse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dousse et al. (2010) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMohseni et al. (2003) and Tame et al. (2007) demonstrated the two-qubit Deutsch-Josza algorithm in a circuit and a one-way model.
“For example, Mohseni et al. (2003) and Tame et al. (2007) demonstrated the two-qubit Deutsch-Josza algorithm in a circuit and a one-way model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mohseni et al. (2003) source
- cites Tame et al. (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationUsing photonic graph states to simulate creation and braiding of anyons in the Kitaev model, a phase shift of π related to anyon braiding was observed, confirming predictions for fractional statistics of Abelian 1/2 anyons.
“Using the photonic graph states to simulate the creation and braiding of the anyons in the Kitaev model, a phase shift of π related to the anyon braiding was observed, confirming the predictions for the fractional statistics of Abelian 1/2 anyons (Lu et al. 2009;Pachos et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lu et al. 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pachos et al. 2009 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationLanyon et al. (2010) employed a photonic quantum computer to solve a quantum chemistry problem, calculating the energies of the hydrogen molecule; the iterative phase estimation quantum algorithm was performed in full, and with classical computer assistance the complete energy spectrum was calculated up to 20 bits of precision.
“Recently, Lanyon et al. (2010) employed a photonic quantum computer to solve a quantum chemistry problem: calculation of the energies of the hydrogen molecule.In their experiment, the iterative phase estimation quantum algorithm was performed in full.With an assistance of a classical computer, it was possible to calculate the complete energy spectrum, up to 20 bits of precision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lanyon et al. (2010) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationUsing the cluster state |Φc, a universal set of quantum logic operations, single-qubit rotations and non-trivial two-qubit gates were demonstrated.
“Using the cluster state |Φ c , a universal set of quantum logic operations, single-qubit rotations and non-trivial two-qubit gates were demonstrated (see Fig. 37).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walther et al., 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWagenknecht et al. (2010) and Barz et al. (2010) demonstrated heralded generation of photon states that are maximally entangled in polarization.
“Following this proposal, in two experiments, Wagenknecht et al. (2010) and Barz et al. (2010), have demonstrated heralded generation of photon states, that are maximally entangled in polarization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationWalther et al. implemented a two-qubit Grover's quantum search algorithm using the box cluster |Φ4; the measured probability of determining the correct outcome was about 90%.
“In addition, Walther et al. also implemented a two-qubit Grover's quantum search algorithm using the box cluster |Φ 4 .The measured probability of the quantum computer to determine the correct outcome was about 90%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walther et al.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationPrevedel et al. (2007b) incorporated active fast feed-forward so that earlier measurement outcomes could change the setting of a future measurement in real time; the feed-forward cycle could be operated in less than 150 ns using electrooptical modulators.
“An improved experiment done by Prevedel et al. (2007b) incorporated active fast feed-forward, so that the earlier measurement outcomes could change the setting of a future measurement in real time.Particularly, the computational step (i.e., the individual feed-forward cycle) could be operated in less than 150 ns using electrooptical modulators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Prevedel et al. (2007b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationA quantum dot can emit a single pair of entangled photons on demand, with probability near close to one, but has very low extraction efficiency.
“A quantum dot can emit a single pair of entangled photons on demand, with a probability near close to one.However, it has a very low extraction efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stevenson et al. (2006) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationMa et al. (2011) used polarization states of four photons to simulate a frustrated Heisenberg spin system: a spin-1/2 tetramer.
“Ma et al. (2011) used polarization states of four photons to simulate a frustrated Heisenberg spin system: a spin-1/2 tetramer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ma et al. (2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationA drawback of the Walther et al. experiment is that no feed-forward was used, reducing the success rate of the computation by a factor of two for every measurement.
“A drawback of the experiment is that no feed-forward was used.This reduced the success rate of the computation by a factor of two, for every measurement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walther et al.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationRudolph's scheme was experimentally simulated using four photons from SPDC by Zhang et al. (2008a).
“This was experimentally simulated using four photons from SPDC by Zhang et al., (2008a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., (2008a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationGrover's search algorithm has been realized by Kwiat et al. (2000) by designing an optical implementation.
“The Grover's search algorithm (Grover, 1997) has been realized by Kwiat et al. (2000) by designing an optical”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kwiat et al. (2000) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationDecoherence-free subspaces have been experimentally realized using two photons by Kwiat et al. (2000) and four photons by Bourennane et al. (2004b).
“Decoherence-free subspaces, a type of passive error-preventing codes, have been experimentally realized using two photons by Kwiat et al. (2000) and four photons by Bourennane et al. (2004b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kwiat et al. (2000) source
- cites Bourennane et al. (2004b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationCurrently mostly used room-temperature silicon single-photon detectors can be operated at 10 MHz with peak efficiency 65%, dark count rate about 100 Hz, and timing jitter typically 500 ps.
“Currently, mostly used room temperature silicon single-photon detectors can be operated at 10MHz with a peak efficiency of 65%, a dark count rate of about 100 Hz, and a timing jitter of typically 500ps; work is in progress to improve these parameters (see e.g.Kardyna et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kardyna et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe topological cluster-state quantum computing proposal achieved a high error threshold of 0.75×10^-3, the highest known for a local architecture.
“The latter proposal achieved a high error threshold of 0.75 × 10 -3 , the highest known for a local architecture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raussendorf et al. 2006;2007;Raussendorf and Harrington, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSignificant progress has been made on superconducting detectors capable of resolving photon number, with ultra-low dark count rate (0.15 Hz at 1.3 μm) and high efficiency up to 95%.
“Significant progress (Rosenberg et al., 2005;Lita, Miller and Nam, 2008;Divochiy et al., 2008) has been made on superconducting detectors capable of resolving photon-number, with an ultra low dark count rate (0.15 Hz at the wavelength of 1.3 µm), and high efficiency up to 95%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationLoss-tolerant codes tend to amplify depolarizing errors; the tradeoff has been discussed and new schemes have been designed that tolerate both errors.
“Moreover, unfortunately, these loss-tolerant codes tend to amplify the depolarizing errors (e.g.bit flips and phase flips); the tradeoff has been discussed and new schemes have been designed which tolerates both errors in Rohde et al. (2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rohde et al. (2007) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe decoherence-free subspace approach was applied in an optical demonstration of the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm and for reliable measurement-based one-way information transfer.
“Furthermore, decoherence-free subspace approach was applied in an optical demonstration of the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm (Mohseni et al., 2003), and for reliable measurementbased one-way information transfer (Prevedel et al., 2007a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mohseni et al., 2003 source
- cites Prevedel et al., 2007a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenCurrent silica waveguide circuits have dimensions of about one centimeter per logic gate.
“Current silica waveguide circuits have dimensions of about one centimeter per logic gate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationGong et al. (2010) proposed a new scheme where the efficiency threshold for loss tolerance requires the product of source and detector efficiencies to be >50%.
“Gong et al. (2010) proposed a new scheme where the efficiency threshold for loss tolerance requires the product of source and detector efficiencies to be > 50%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gong et al. (2010) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationLu et al. (2008) demonstrated a four-qubit Grassl erasure correction code and a tree-shaped graph state.
“To fight against the qubit-loss error, an especially serious problem for photonic qubits, Lu et al. (2008) demonstrated a four-qubit Grassl erasure correction code (for the theoretical proposals see Grassl (1997) and Ralph (2005)), and a tree-shaped graph state (Vanara et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lu et al. (2008)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Grassl (1997)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ralph (2005)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMulti-photon interference reveals strictly non-classical phenomena.
“Multi-photon interference reveals strictly non-classical phenomena.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCluster states up to six entangled photons have been realized and applied to demonstrate elementary quantum gates and algorithms.
“Cluster states up to six entangled photons have been realized (Walther et al., 2005b;Kiesel et al., 2005a;Lu et al., 2007), and applied to demonstrate elementary quantum gates and algorithms (Walther et al., 2005b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Walther et al., 2005b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kiesel et al., 2005a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Lu et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQuantum key distribution with photons has advanced beyond first few-meter laboratory demonstrations to free-space or fiber-based distributions over hundred kilometers, and is rapidly commercialized into real-life inter-city cryptographic networks.
“Thanks to this property, quantum key distribution with photons has now went long beyond first few-meter laboratory demonstrations, to free-space or fiber-based distributions over hundred kilometers (see e.g.Ursin et al, 2007;Rosenberg et at., 2007), and is rapidly commercialized into real life inter-city cryptographic networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ursin et al, 2007 source
- cites Rosenberg et at., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe standard source of entangled photon pairs is spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC).
“The standard source of entangled photon pairs is nowadays the nonlinear optical process of spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC; for a pioneering observation see Burnham and Weinberg, 1970), the inverse of frequency doubling and up-conversion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burnham and Weinberg, 1970 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral ingredients of the quantum repeater scheme have already been demonstrated: entanglement swapping, purification, and quantum memory.
“Several ingredients of this scheme have been already demonstrated: entanglement swapping (Pan et al. 1998), purification (Pan et al. 2003), quantum memory (e.g., Yuan et al. 2008), etc.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pan et al. 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pan et al. 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Yuan et al. 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPhotons are the fastest information carriers, have a very weak coupling to the environment, and are thus best suited for quantum communication tasks.
“Photons are the fastest information carriers, have a very weak coupling to the environment, and are thus best suited for quantum communication tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn quantum cryptography, complementary measurements on quantum systems are used to establish a secret key shared by two partners, thus enabling provably secure communication.
“In quantum cryptography [Wiesner, 1983;Bennett and Brassard, 1984;Ekert, 1991; for a review see (Gisin et al., 2002)] complementary measurements on quantum systems are used to establish a secret key shared by two partners, thus enabling for the first time a provably secure communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe joint property of the singlet is that the two spins, if measured with respect to the same direction, will be found opposite.
“The joint property can be put as follows: the two spins, if measured with respect to the same direction, will be found opposite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPositivity of a partial transposition (PPT) of a density matrix is a necessary condition for a state to be separable.
“The original idea of Peres was the observation that positivity of a partial transposition (PPT) of a density matrix (i.e. its transposition for just one subsystem) is a necessary condition for a state to be separable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peres (1996) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe two reduced density matrices of the Schmidt decomposition are endowed with the same spectrum; this does not hold for three or more particle subsystems.
“It is easy to show that the two reduced density matrices of Eq. ( 16) are endowed with the same spectrum.This does not hold for three or more particle subsystems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs soon as Alice measures the value of a spin projection along some axis, new information is gained, and for her the state of Bob's particle is a well-defined pure one, independent of the spatial separation between them.
“As soon as Alice measures the value of a spin projection along some axis, new information is gained, and for her the state of Bob's particle is a well defined pure one.This is independent of the spatial separation between them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn two-particle quantum interference, if the phase relation between the two amplitudes is stable, one can have absolutely noiseless interference with 100% visibility, while there is no single-particle interference.
“Thus, if the phase relation between the two amplitudes is stable one can have absolutely noiseless interference with 100% visibility, while there is no single particle interference:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAll information contained in the singlet state defines only joint properties.
“All information contained in the state in Eq. ( 15) defines only joint properties (Schrödinger, 1935).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schrödinger, 1935 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe singlet state describes a coherent superposition of the two product states, and there is no information in the whole Universe on which of the two possibilities will be detected at the measurement stage.
“The state describes a coherent superposition of the two product states: there is no information in the whole Universe on which of the two possibilities will be detected at the measurement stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenEvery pure state of two spins 1/2 can be put into the form cos α |↑1|↑2 + sin α |↓1|↓2.
“Every pure state of two spins 1/2 can be put into the following form: cos α |↑ 1 |↑ 2 + sin α |↓ 1 |↓ 2 ,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEntanglement can manifest itself in strictly quantum interference phenomena that can neither be explained by a classical wave nor by a classical particle picture.
“Entanglement can manifest itself in strictly quantum interference phenomena, that is, these phenomena can neither be explained by a classical wave nor by a classical particle picture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFor any pure state of a pair of subsystems, one can find preferred bases such that the state is a sum of biorthogonal terms (Schmidt decomposition).
“For any pure state, |Ψ , of a pair of subsystems, one described by a Hilbert space of dimension N , the other by a space of dimension M , say N ≤ M , one can find preferred bases, one for the first system, the other one for the second, such that the state is a sum of biorthogonal terms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peres (2002) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQuantum d-level systems can be realized using orbital angular momentum states of photons or using simultaneously two or more degrees of freedom.
“Quantum d-level (high-dimensional) systems (”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mair et al., 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKeller et al. used photons generated by two mutually coherent but time-separated pulses from the same mode-locked laser.
“With a similar method of triggering, Keller et al., (1998) used photons generated by two mutually coherent but timeseparated pulses from the same mode-locked laser (Keller et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWeihs et al. realized an all-fiber three-path Mach-Zehnder interferometer based on symmetric unbiased multiport beamsplitters.
“Weihs et al. (1996) realized an all-fiber three-path Mach-Zehnder interferometer, which is based on the idea of symmetric unbiased multiport BSs (Zeilinger et al., 1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Weihs et al. (1996) source
- cites Zeilinger et al., 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenPolarization qubits can easily be created and manipulated with high precision by simple linear-optical elements such as polarizing beam splitters, polarizers and wave plates.
“The advantage of using polarization qubits stems from the fact that they can easily be created and manipulated with high precision by simple linear-optical elements such as polarizing beam splitters (PBS), polarizers and wave plates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe factor i in the 50:50 beamsplitter transformation is a consequence of unitarity and describes a phase jump upon reflection.
“The factor i in Eq. ( 28) is a consequence of unitarity.It describes a phase jump upon reflection (Zeilinger, 1981).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeilinger, 1981 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe coherence between spatial qubit states |a and |b is sensitive to the relative phase between paths a and b, and this is difficult to control in long-distance cases.
“A disadvantage of using spatial qubits is that the coherence between |a and |b is sensitive to the relative phase between the paths a and b, and this is difficult to control in long-distance cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn N-port interferometer proposed by Reck et al. can realize any U(N) transformation for N optical spatial modes using beamsplitters, phase shifters and mirrors.
“an N -port interferometer was proposed by Reck et al. (1994), which can realize any U (N ) transformation for N optical spatial modes by using an arrangement of BS, phase shifters and mirrors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reck et al. (1994) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenPhotons have only two eigenvalues of their spin along the direction of propagation, ±, corresponding to right-handed and left-handed circular polarization.
“Photons, massless spin 1 particles, have only two eigenvalues of their spin along the direction of their propagation (wave vector), ± .These two spin values correspond to righthanded and left-handed circular polarization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenSimilar interference effects can be observed using any of the photon's degrees of freedom, e.g. polarization.
“However, similar interference effects can be observed using any of the photon's degrees of freedom, e.g.polarization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo single photons successively emitted from a single quantum dot were overlapped on a beamsplitter and the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect was observed.
“For instance, two single photons successively emitted from a single quantum dot were overlapped on a BS and the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect was observed (Santori et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Santori et al. 2002 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAn n-particle interferometer generalized along the above reasoning will only exhibit n-particle fringes, but no (n−1)-, (n−2)-, ..., single-particle fringes.
“Actually, an n-particle interferometer generalized along the above reasoning will only exhibit nparticle fringes, but no (n-1)-, (n-2)-,..., single-particle fringes (Greenberger et al., 1990).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greenberger et al., 1990 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe two photons exit the beamsplitter paired via only one random output port; this is a bunching effect due to the bosonic character of photons.
“The two photons exit the BS paired via only one (random) output port.This is a bunching effect due to the bosonic character of photons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe original Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment used the two photons of the same signal-idler pair from parametric down-conversion.
“The original Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment used the two photons of the same signal-idler pair from parametric down-conversion (see Section IV.A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hong, Ou and Mandel, 1987 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenEntangled states such as Bell states serve as a central physical resource in various quantum information protocols like quantum cryptography, quantum teleportation, entanglement swapping and tests aimed at excluding hidden variable models.
“As we shall see in the following chapters, such entangled states serve as a central physical resource in various quantum information protocols like quantum cryptography, quantum teleportation, entanglement swapping and in tests aimed at excluding hidden variable models of quantum mechanics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe photon's coherence length can range from a few hundred micrometers in pulsed parametric down-conversion to a few meters for trapped ions.
“The photon's coherence length can range from a few hundred micrometers, in pulsed parametric down-conversion, to a few meters for trapped ions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe state |Ψ− can be encoded with any degree of freedom and can be pinpointed by a two-channel coincidence behind a beamsplitter.
“In fact, the state |Ψ - can be encoded with any degree of freedom (e.g., color encoding, see Moehring et al. 2007) and can be pinpointed by a two-channel coincidence behind a BS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moehring et al. 2007 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn a PBS setup, a coincidence detection between the two outputs can originate only if either both photons are transmitted (|HH) or both are reflected (|VV); the two cases are quantum mechanically indistinguishable if the photons are indistinguishable, so an entangled state |φ−cd can be generated using postselection.
“As a PBS customarily transmits H and reflects V polarization, a coincidence detection between the two outputs can originate only if either both photons are transmitted (resulting in a |HH case) or both are reflected (|V V case).The two cases are quantum mechanically indistinguishable, if the photons are indistinguishable.Thus again, an entangled state |φ - cd can be generated using postselection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPittman et al. performed a postponed compensation two-photon Shih-Alley type experiment; interference was observed even though the photons arrived at the beamsplitter at different times.
“To dispel a misconception that the photons must arrive at the BS at the same time for some type of classical local”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pittman et al. (1996) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA complete Bell-state analysis scheme was experimentally realized and used to beat the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding.
“Such a scheme was experimentally realized (Schuck et al., 2006) and was used to beat the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding (Barreiro, Wei, and Kwiat, 2008, see Section VI.A for more details on dense coding).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf the coherence time τ_c of the down-converted light is shorter than δT, the terms in Eq. (36) become distinguishable, and no two-photon polarization interference, and thus no entanglement, is observable.
“If the coherence time, τ c , of the down-converted light is shorter than δT , the terms in Eq. ( 36) become, in principle, distinguishable, and no two-photon polarization interference, and thus no entanglement is observable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn temporal entanglement, when the crystal is pumped by a CW laser with coherence time ∆L_c, the time at which pair emission happens is undefined and phase stable within ∆L_c.
“Temporal entanglement.-Whenthe crystal is pumped by a CW laser with a coherence time of ∆L c , the time at which pair emission happens is undefined and phase stable within ∆L c .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPeriodic poling of nonlinear crystals greatly relaxes the phase-matching conditions for SPDC and allows more efficient exploitation of the material's nonlinear properties compared to bulk crystals.
“Periodic poling of nonlinear crystals greatly relaxes the phase-matching conditions for SPDC and thus allows to exploit the material's nonlinear properties more efficiently compared to bulk crystals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn SPDC, shining strong laser light on a nonlinear crystal gives pump photons some probability to split into correlated pairs of lower energy.
“If one shines strong laser light on a nonlinear crystal, the pump photons have some probability to split into correlated pairs of lower energy.This is called spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFulconis et al. (2007) developed a bright, pulsed source of photon pairs via four-wave mixing in a photonic crystal fiber.
“In a further development, via four-wave mixing in a photonic crystal fiber Fulconis et al. (2007) have developed a bright, pulsed source of photon pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fulconis et al. (2007) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenToday, essentially all entangled photon sources employ the second order optical nonlinearity leading to SPDC or more recently also the third order Kerr nonlinearity in four-wave mixing in optical fibers.
“Today, essentially all entangled photon sources employ the second order optical nonlinearity leading to SPDC or more recently also the third order Kerr nonlinearity in four-wave mixing (FWM) in optical fibers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPhase matching governs the directional correlations of the emissions and implies the emerging photon pairs have entangled frequencies and linear momenta.
“It governs the directional correlations of the emissions.It also implies the emerging photon pairs have entangled frequencies and linear momenta.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThere are two types of SPDC: type I where signal and idler photons share the same polarization, and type II where they have perpendicular polarizations.
“There are two different types of the process: either signal and idler photons share the same polarization (type I) or they have perpendicular polarizations (type II).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe predicted strong quantum correlations between photon pairs created in SPDC were first experimentally observed by Burnham and Weinberg (1970).
“The predicted strong quantum correlations between the photon pairs created in SPDC were first experimentally observed by Burnham and Weinberg (1970).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burnham and Weinberg (1970) source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningBirefringence of the nonlinear crystal causes ordinary and extraordinary photons to have different velocities and propagate along different directions, resulting in longitudinal and transverse walk-offs between the two terms in the state.
“The birefringence of the nonlinear crystal introduces complications.Since the ordinary and extraordinary photons have different velocities, and propagate along different directions, the resulting longitudinal and transverse walk-offs between the two terms in the state (36) are maximal for pair creation near the entrance face.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBy using an additional birefringent phase shifter or rotating the down-conversion crystal, α can be set to 0 or π, allowing production of any of the four Bell states.
“Using an additional birefringent phase shifter (or even slightly rotating the down-conversion crystal itself), the value of α can be set as desired, e.g., to 0 or π.A net phase shift of π may be obtained by a 90 • rotation of a quarter wave plate in one of the paths.A half wave plate in one path can be used to change horizontal polarization to vertical and vice versa.One can thus produce any of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mattle et al. 1996 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIdeal compensation for longitudinal walk-off is to use two crystals, one in each path, identical with the down-conversion crystal but half as long; if polarizations are rotated by 90°, temporal indistinguishability is restored.
“The ideal compensation is therefore to use two crystals, one in each path, which are identical with the down-conversion crystal, but only half as long.If the polarizations are rotated by 90 • (e.g., with a half wave plate), the retardations of the o and e components are exchanged and temporal indistinguishability is restored.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQuantum interference of type-I SPDC photons was used to violate Bell's inequality first by Shih and Alley (1988), and Hong, Ou, and Mandel (1987).
“Quantum interference of (type-I) SPDC photons was used to violate Bell's inequality first by Shih andAlley (1988), andHong, Ou, andMandel (1987).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSPDC allows pairs of entangled photons to be collected in clearly specified directions, with reasonable intensity and with very high purity.
“Meanwhile it was discovered that the process of spontaneous parametric down-conversion allows pairs of entangled photons to be collected in clearly specified directions, with reasonable intensity and with very high purity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSPDC was shown to be a ready source of path entangled pairs by Horne, Shimony and Zeilinger (1989), and this was demonstrated independently by Rarity and Tapster (1990a).
“The process was shown to be a ready source of (path) entangled pairs by Horne, Shimony and Zeilinger (1989).This was demonstrated independently by Rarity and Tapster (1990a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Horne, Shimony and Zeilinger (1989) source
- cites Rarity and Tapster (1990a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPhotonic entanglement in higher dimensions can in principle be generated by SPDC processes as a generalization of path or temporal entanglement into more than two conjugate pairs of beams or time-bins, and analyzed with N-port beamsplitters.
“Photonic entanglement in higher dimensions can in principle be generated by SPDC processes in a form of generalization of path or temporal entanglement into more than two conjugate pairs of beams or time-bins, respectively (Zeilinger et al., 1993), and analyzed with Nport beamsplitters (Reck et al., 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zeilinger et al., 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Reck et al., 1994 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOrbital angular momentum eigenstates of photons are states of the electromagnetic field with phase singularities and can be utilized for observation of higher dimensional entanglement.
“Orbital angular momentum eigenstates of photons are states of the electromagnetic field with phase singularities.They can be utilized for observation of higher dimensional entanglement (Mair et al., 2001;Vaziri et al., 2002Vaziri et al., , 2003)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningBy varying the parameters of the beamsplitters and phases in the pump interferometer, all two-qubit entangled time-bin states can be generated.
“By varying the parameters of the beamsplitters and phases in the pump interferometer, all two-qubit entangled time-bin states can be generated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBehind the beamsplitters, upper and lower paths cannot be distinguished, leading to two-photon interference depending on the difference of relative phase shifts in a and b modes.
“Behind the BSs upper and lower paths cannot be distinguished, leading to two-photon interference, which depends on the difference of the relative phase shifts in a and b modes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis polarization-path entanglement was independently realized by Barbieri et al. (2005) using type-I nonlinear crystals, and by Yang et al. (2005) using a type-II nonlinear crystal.
“It was independently realized by Barbieri et al (2005) using type-I nonlinear crystals, and by Yang et al (2005) using a type-II nonlinear crystal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationŻukowski, Zeilinger and Horne (1997) showed such configuration can lead to new types of EPR correlations and can be used for tests of local realism more discriminating than two-qubit tests.
“As it was shown by Żukowski, Zeilinger and Horne (1997) such configuration can lead to new types of EPR correlations, and can be used for tests of local realism (which are more discriminating than two qubit tests, see [Kaszlikowski et al. (2000)]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Żukowski, Zeilinger and Horne (1997)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kaszlikowski et al. (2000) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe technique of erasing which-source information can be applied in many other configurations and works even for totally independent emissions provided they are synchronized.
“The technique of essentially erasing which-source information, can be applied in many other configurations, e.g., in the case of a double pair emission from a single source, etc.It works even for totally independent emissions (provided they are synchronized).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis threshold is at quite high pump powers and puts a strong limitation on how many particles can be entangled using such methods.
“This threshold is at quite high pump powers.Nevertheless, this puts a strong limitation as how many particles can be entangled using such methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOnce one is able to entangle two photons that never interacted, one can construct very many types of entanglement, which in turn can be utilized in many ways.
“Once one is able to entangle two photons that never interacted, one can construct very many types of entanglement (Zeilinger et al., 1997), which in turn can be utilized in many ways (Bose et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe other two photons are, due to this event, in state 1/√2(|b|a + e^{-i(φc+φd)}|b'|a'). This process is called entanglement swapping.
“The other two photons are, due to this event, in state: 1 √ 2 |b |a + e -i(φc+φ d ) |b |a . This process is called en- tanglement swapping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFiltering is necessary only in modes c and d, while no filtering is required in front of detectors a(±) and b(±).
“Note that filtering is necessary only in modes c and d, while no filtering is required in front of the detectors a(±) and b(±).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn 1989 no ready sources of three or more particle entanglement were available.
“However, in 1989 no ready sources of three or more particle entanglement were available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNarrow filters in paths a, a' and b, b' are not necessary to obtain high visibility; the other filters, for detectors which observe radiation from both sources, should always be sufficiently narrow.
“Namely, narrow filters in paths a, a and b, b are not necessary to obtain high visibility.The other filters, for detectors which observe radiation from both sources, should be always sufficiently narrow.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe statistics of a single beam of a down converter is thermal-like.
“The statistics of a single beam of a down converter is thermal-like.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenTo avoid multi-pair emission events, most SPDC experiments are restricted to τ ≤ 0.1.
“To avoid multi-pair emission events most SPDC experiments are restricted to τ 0.1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEach |ψ^-_n is an analog of a singlet state of two spin-n/2 particles, thus |ψ is invariant under joint rotations of the polarization bases of both modes.
“Each |ψ - n is an analog of a singlet state of two spin-n/2 particles, thus |ψ is invariant under joint rotations of the polarization bases of both modes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe first two methods reduce the intensity of entangled photon pairs significantly and cannot achieve perfect overlap of the two-photon amplitudes.
“The first two methods reduce the intensity of the entangled photon pairs significantly and cannot achieve perfect overlap of the two-photon amplitudes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Yao et al. 2011, the collection efficiency was reported to be about twice as high as in measurements using 3 nm filters.
“where the collection efficiency was reported to be about twice as high than in measurements using 3nm filters”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yao et al. 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMethods used to increase quantum interference visibility include: (i) a thin nonlinear crystal, (ii) narrow-band spectral filters in front of detectors, or (iii) an interferometric technique without spectral and amplitude post-selection.
“The following methods are used to increase the quantum interference visibility: (i) a thin nonlinear crystal (Sergienko et al., 1999), (ii) narrow-band spectral filters in front of detectors, as shown above (Grice and Walmsley, 1997;Grice et al., 1998;Di Giuseppe et al., 1997), or (iii) an interferometric technique (Branning et al., 1999(Branning et al., , 2000) ) without spectral and amplitude”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe methods described above require a femtosecond pulsed laser pump.
“The methods described above require a femtosecond pulsed laser pump.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe scheme works only with photon-number discriminating detectors, and if both EPR sources emit only a pair each without double pair (or more) emission events.
“However, the scheme works only with photon-number discriminating detectors, and if both EPR sources emit only a pair each without double pair (or more) emission events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFour-photon GHZ state was first observed by Pan et al. (2001a), and its genuine entanglement was confirmed by Zhao et al. (2003a).
“Four-photon GHZ state was first observed by Pan et al., (2001a) and its genuine entanglement was confirmed by Zhao et al., (2003a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pan et al., (2001a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhao et al., (2003a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause narrowband filtering is unnecessary for such sources, one can achieve a higher collection efficiency than with passive filtering.
“Since narrowband filtering is unnecessary in case of such sources, one can achieve a higher collection efficiency than in the case of using passive filtering”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kim et al., 2001 source
- cites Yao et al. 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCreation of entanglement for many particles requires more and more initial entangled pairs, thus one pumps stronger; however, strong pump leads to lower visibility of quantum interference, which may prohibit observing correlations due to desired multi-photon entanglement.
“Simply, creation of entanglement for many particles requires more and more initial entangled pairs, thus one pumps stronger.However, strong pump leads to lower visibility of quantum interference, which may prohibit to observe the correlations due to the desired multi-photon entanglement (Laskowski et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laskowski et al. 2009 source
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe GHZ theorem pertains to three or more particle systems and reveals a contradiction between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories, even for definite predictions.
“An important line of research was opened with the discovery of the GHZ theorem, which pertains to three or more particle systems, and reveals a contradiction between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories, even for definite predictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmission of two photons into each of two modes gives a highly entangled state and is significantly different from simply emitting two pairs.
“Emission of two photons into each of two modes gives already a highly entangled state and is significantly different from simply emitting two pairs (Weinfurter and Żukowski 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weinfurter and Żukowski 2001 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis state, first observed by Eibl et al. (2003), is the extension of the singlet state |Ψ-> to four photons and is invariant under equal unitary transformations in the four output modes.
“This state, first observed by Eibl et al. (2003), is the extension of the singlet state |Ψ -to four photons and is thus invariant under equal unitary transformations in the four output modes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eibl et al. (2003) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenA disadvantage of quantum state tomography is that the number of measurements grows exponentially with the number of photons, so reconstruction of an n-photon state necessitates 4^n n-fold coincidence measurements.
“A disadvantage of such method, however, is that the number of measurements grows exponentially with the number of photons, thus the reconstruction of a n-photon state necessitates 4 n n-fold coincidence measurements which is experimentally demanding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy splitting the two emission modes into three output modes, the six-photon singlet was observed by Radmark et al. (2009), with visibility of the six-photon interference as high as 85%.
“By splitting the two emission modes into three output modes also the six-photon singlet was observed recently by Radmark et al. (2009), with visibility of the six photon interference as high as 85%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Radmark et al. (2009) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe high visibility is possible because the scheme does not involve interferometric overlaps; only beamsplitting is necessary.
“The high visibility is possible because the distinctive feature of this scheme is that it does not involve interferometric overlaps; only beamsplitting is necessary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAny test of local realism based on GHZ correlations must use Bell-type inequalities because perfect correlations cannot be expected in a laboratory and any finite sample has non-zero uncertainty.
“In a laboratory one cannot expect perfect correlations, and even if they were possible any necessarily finite sample would be endowed with a finite, non-zero uncertainty.Thus, any test of local realism based on the GHZ correlations has to resort to some Bell-type inequalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEntanglement has been distributed over long distances: over 10.5 km free space in Hefei by Peng et al. (2005), and in an asymmetric arrangement one photon was sent over 144 km between the islands of La Palma and Teneriffe by Ursin et al. (2007).
“For example, over 10.5 km free space in Hefei by Peng et al. (2005), or in an asymmetric arrangement, in the case of which one photon is sent over 144 km between the islands of La Palma and Teneriffe (Ursin et al 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThese Bell tests in relativistic configurations stress the oddness of quantum correlations.
“These Bell tests in “relativistic configurations” stress the oddness of quantum correlations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWe have a Bell theorem without inequalities, which thrashes any hopes to derive realism from locality and perfect correlations of the EPR type.
“We have a “Bell theorem without inequalities” (Greenberger et al., 1990), which thrashes any hopes to derive realism from locality and perfect correlations of the EPR type”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greenberger et al., 1990 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAspect's experiments were the first to use fast but periodic switching of the local polarization analyzers.
“Aspect's experiments were the firs to use fast but periodic switching of the local polarization analyzers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent experiment by Matsukevich et al. (2008) involved two separate ion traps (one meter distance) and an entanglement-swapping procedure involving photons emitted by the ions; the detection loophole was again perfectly closed.
“A recent experiment by Matsukevich et al. (2008) involved two separate ion traps (one meter distance) and an entanglement-swapping procedure involving the photons emitted by the ions.The detection loophole was again perfectly closed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Matsukevich et al. (2008) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe locality loophole is present in experiments that do not have independent, space-time separated measurement settings.
“The locality loophole is present in experiments which do not have independent, i.e. space-time separated measurement settings, as can be guaranteed only with random and fast switching of the local measurement settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPhotons are the fastest information carrier and, due to weak environmental coupling, are an obvious choice for quantum communication, especially long-distance.
“Photons are the fastest information carrier, and due to their very weak coupling to the environment, are an obvious choice for quantum communication, especially for long-distances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTheories based on assumptions (L1)-(L3) can explain some features of two-particle entangled states: they do not allow faster-than-light information, reproduce perfect anti-correlations, and model all Bell-type experiments violating CHSH.
“It can be shown that such theories can explain some important features of entangled states of two particles: first, by assumption (L 3 ), they do not allow information to be transmitted faster than at the speed of light; second, they are capable to reproduce perfect anti-correlations, a fundamental feature of the Bell singlet state; and third, they provide a model for all Bell type experiments in”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor the polarization singlet state, the quantum correlation function E_kl = -cos φ, and the left-hand side of inequality (68) reads |2(cos φ + 1)|.
“The quantum correlation function for the local measurements defined by a k and b l depends only on the relative angles between the vectors: E kl = -a k • b l = -cos ϕ.Thus, the left hand side of inequality (68), for quantum predictions, reads |2(cos ϕ + 1)|.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Bohm's theory, non-local correlations are a consequence of the nonlocal quantum potential, which exerts torque on particles leading to results compliant with quantum mechanics.
“There the non-local correlations are a consequence of the nonlocal quantum potential, which exerts suitable torque on the particles leading to experimental results compliant with quantum mechanics (Dewdney et al., 1987).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bohm, 1951
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Dewdney et al., 1987 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe maximal violation of inequality (68) occurs at φ_max = 18.8°, where the bound is 3.792 and the quantum value is 3.893.
“The maximal violation of inequality (68) is for ϕ max = 18.8 • : the bound given by inequality (68) equals 3.792 whereas the quantum value is 3.893.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe discrepancy between the ideal quantum value 6 and the observed value was due to imperfections in the interferometers and effective observables deviating from the ideal ones.
“The discrepancy between the ideal quantum value 6 was due to imperfections in the complicated interferometers (note, each one had eight exit ports), and the effective observables were slightly deviating from the ideal ones considered in the theoretical reasoning of Cabello.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn the Leggett-type model, there exist subensembles of definite polarizations independent of measurements, and predictions for the subensembles agree with Malus' law.
“It is a very important trait of this model that there exist subensembles of definite polarizations (independent of measurements) and that the predictions for the subensembles agree with Malus' law.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningQuantum dense coding doubles the information capacity of the transmission channel, sending only one qubit.
“The quantum dense coding doubles the information capacity of the transmission channel: what is actually sent is only one qubit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQuantum teleportation is a critical ingredient for many quantum communication protocols and quantum computation, and its experimental realization allows new studies of fundamentals.
“Quantum teleportation is indeed not only a critical ingredient for many more quantum communication protocols and for quantum computation (Gottesman and Chuang, 1999;Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn, 2001)-its experimental realization allows new studies of the fundamentals of quantum theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gottesman and Chuang, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn, 2001 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe projection postulate makes it impossible to fully determine the state of a single quantum system, and the no-cloning principle excludes creating additional high-fidelity replicas.
“The projection postulate makes it impossible to fully determine the state of a single quantum system, or, from another point of view, the no-cloning principle (Wootters and Zurek, 1982) excludes the possibility to create additional high-fidelity replicas of the original state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wootters and Zurek, 1982 source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAn experiment on a qubit can give only one bit of information, insufficient to reconstruct the actual state; infinitely many measurements on identical copies would be needed.
“The trivial idea, i.e., that Alice performs certain measurements on |χ 1 by which she would obtain all the information necessary for Bob to reconstruct the state is ruled out: an experiment on a qubit can give only one bit of information.This only suffice to determine which state can be ruled out, but is insufficient to reconstruct the actual state.To this end we need infinitely many measurements”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQuantum dense coding allows encoding two bits of classical information by manipulating only one of two particles in a Bell state.
“The idea of quantum dense coding, introduced by Bennett and Wiesner (1992) is that, by manipulating only one of the two particles in a Bell state, one can also encode two bits of information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett and Wiesner (1992) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEntanglement allows circumventing the Holevo theorem and encoding information entirely in the correlations of a pair of qubits.
“Entanglement, a property of pairs of qubits, allows to circumvent this theorem and to encode information entirely in the relative properties of the pair, i.e. in their correlations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holevo theorem (1973)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningQuantum teleportation circumvents the no-cloning theorem because the Bell-state measurement irrecoverably erases the original state and reveals no information about the particles prior to the measurement.
“The original state of Alice's particle 1 is irrecoverably erased by the Bell-state measurement, as the Bell-state measurement does not reveal any information on the properties of any of the particles prior to the measurement.This is why quantum teleportation circumvents the no-cloning theorem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Innsbruck experiment, because of probabilistic SPDC, a pf1f2 coincidence could occur due to unwanted two-pair emission with no photon propagating to Bob, so successful teleportation had to be confirmed by a detection event at Bob's side.
“In the Innsbruck experiment, however, owing to the probabilistic nature of SPDC, there was also the chance to register a pf1f2 coincidence (Fig. 21b), seemingly indicating the preparation of a single photon and the identification of a |ψ - 12 , which could occur unfortunately due to an unwanted event of two-pair emission during the second passage of the UV-pulse, with no emission in the first pass”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningQuantum teleportation works equally well for mixed states or entangled states because it is a linear operation applied to |χ1; the initial state can be completely unknown to anyone.
“Furthermore, as quantum teleportation is a linear operation applied to |χ 1 , it works for mixed states, or entangled states, equally well; the initial state |χ 1 can be completely unknown not only to Alice but to anyone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIt is not necessary for Alice to know where Bob is, although they need to share some reference frame information for the protocol to work.
“It is not necessary for Alice to know where Bob is (although they do need to share some reference frame information in order for the protocol to work).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenQuantum teleportation does not violate causality because a transfer of two bits of classical information is absolutely necessary to conclude the process.
“Quantum teleportation does not violate causality: a transfer of two bits of classical information is absolutely necessary to conclude the process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOpen-destination teleportation allows transfer of a state to one of several potential recipients, and the recipient can be decided even after the initial to-be-teleported state is wiped out in a Bell-state measurement.
“The so-called open-destination teleportation, of Karlsson and Bourennane (1998), is a protocol allowing to transfer a state to one of several potential recipients.It can be decided who gets the state even after the initial to-be-teleported state, |χ , is wiped out in a Bell-state measurement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karlsson and Bourennane (1998) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the Pan et al. (2003a) experiment, the probability of successful teleportation conditioned on an f1-f2-p three-fold coincidence increases with decreasing filter transmission γ; observed probability was 0.138 ± 0.002 for γ = 0.05.
“To demonstrate a non-conditional teleportation, a series of neutral filters were inserted in mode 1, showing that the probability of a successful teleportation conditioned on an f1-f2-p three-fold coincidence increases with decreasing filter transmission γ (e.g., the observed probability of success was 0.138 ± 0.002 for γ = 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al., 2003a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf a photon carries two qubits, any two-qubit measurement can be performed, including a Bell state measurement involving states of two different photon degrees of freedom.
“Thus if the photon carries two qubits, any two qubit measurement can be performed, including a Bell state measurement, involving states of two different photon”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenQuantum teleportation using nuclear magnetic resonance or trapped atoms has the advantage that the input quantum state can be teleported with 100% efficiency, but it is difficult if not impossible to implement over long distances.
“Quantum teleportation using nuclear magnetic resonance (Nielsen et al., 1998) or trapped atoms (Riebe et al., 2004;Barrett et al., 2004) has an obvious advantage in that the input quantum state can be teleported with an efficiency of 100%.Yet, it is difficult (if not impossible) to implement it over long distances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Nielsen et al., 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Riebe et al., 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Barrett et al., 2004 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEmulating one particle by using two degrees of freedom of a single photon does not allow teleportation of a qubit state of an independently arriving particle, and makes it difficult to imagine entanglement swapping leaving two spatially separated independently emitted qubits in a maximally entangled state.
“However, the fact that one of the particles is emulated does not allow one to teleport a qubit state of an independently arriving particle, and it is difficult to imagine an entanglement swapping process which leaves as a result two spatially separated qubits, previously independently emitted, in a maximally entangled state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationQuantum teleportation of continuous-variable states has the advantage that full Bell-state analysis is possible with linear optics within the experimental bandwidth, but it is hard to extend to long-distance because squeezed-state entanglement degrades during longer-distance transfers.
“Quantum teleportation of continuous-variable states (Furusawa et al., 1998;Braunstein and van Loock, 2005) has the advantage that full Bell-state analysis is possible with linear optics (within the experimental bandwidth).Yet, it is hard to extend to a long-distance case.The unavoidable degradation of squeezed-states sets in during longer-distance transfers.This consequently leads to a rapid”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationJin et al. (2010) emulated free-space quantum teleportation over 16 km.
“Adopting Boschi et al.'s protocol, Jin et al. (2010) emulated free-space quantum teleportation over 16km.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jin et al. (2010) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Rome protocol avoids many difficulties because it does not involve interference of photons from two separate emissions and manipulates only one EPR pair; it needs just one SPDC source and works with just a one pair-emission process.
“As the protocol does not involve interference of photons from two separate emissions, and as only one EPR pair is manipulated, it avoids many difficulties.Just one SPDC source is needed, and it works with just a one pair-emission process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the Pan et al. (2003a) scheme, attenuating beam 1 by factor γ while leaving modes 2-3 unchanged makes a three-fold coincidence f1-f2-p occur with probability γp^2 for successful teleportation and spurious coincidences with probability (γp)^2.
“This was accomplished by attenuating the beam 1 by a factor of γ, while leaving the intensity in modes 2-3 unchanged.With such an arrangement a three-fold coincidence f1-f2-p occurs with probability γp 2 for a successful teleportation (p is the probability of having a single pair creation during a SPDC process).With a significantly lower probability (γp) 2 one has a spurious coincidences without a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn open-destination teleportation, after the encoding operation the destination is left open until a polarization measurement on two of the remaining three photons, so one can choose which particle finally carries the teleported state even if photons 3, 4 and 5 are far apart, and no prior agreement on the final destination is necessary.
“In contrast to the original teleportation scheme, after the encoding operation the destination of teleportation is left open until we perform a polarization measurement (”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the Pan et al. (1998) experiment, the observed sinusoidal behavior of coincidence rates had a visibility of 0.65(2), clearly surpassing the 0.5 limit for classical interference.
“The observed sinusoidal behavior (the interference pattern) of the coincidence rates had a visibility of 0.65(2), which clearly surpasses the 0.5 limit for a classical interference for coincidence measurements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (1998)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the Zhang et al. (2006b) two-qubit teleportation experiment, measured fidelities for |X_A, |X_B, and |X_C were 0.86(3), 0.75(2), and 0.65(3), respectively, all well beyond the state estimation limit of 0.40 for a two-qubit system.
“The measured fidelity for |X A , |X B , and |X C was 0.86(3), 0.75(2) and 0.65(3), respectively.All the measured fidelities were well beyond the state estimation limit of 0.40 for a two-qubit system (for a derivation of the limit see Hayashi et al. (2005)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. (2006b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hayashi et al. (2005) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn entanglement swapping, a Bell-state measurement on photons 2 and 3 always projects photons 1 and 4 onto a Bell state; for example, if the result is |ψ-, the resulting state for photons 1 and 4 is also |ψ-.
“this measurement always projects photons 1 and 4 also onto a Bell state.For example, if the result of the Bellstate measurement of photons 2 and 3 is |ψ -, then the resulting state for photons 1 and 4 is also |ψ -.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Each EPR source emits a pair of entangled photons in the state |ψ-, so the total state of four photons is |Ψ1234 = |ψ-12|ψ-34.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA later experiment by Pan et al. (2001a) achieved a visibility of ∼0.84, sufficient for violating a Bell inequality (threshold 0.71) for photons 1 and 4.
“A later experiment (Pan et al., 2001a) achieved a visibility of ∼ 0.84, which is sufficient for violating a Bell inequality (the threshold is 0.71) for photons 1 and 4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. (2001a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the Zhao et al. (2004) experiment, five-fold coincidence was detected at a rate of 12 per hour and teleportation fidelities from photon 1 to photon 5 and from photon 1 to photon 4 for +/- linear and R/L circular polarization states were ∼0.80(4).
“The authors detected five-fold coincidence with a rate of 12 per hour and measured fidelities of teleportation from photon 1 to photon 5 and from photon 1 to photon 4. For +/-linear and R/L circular polarization states these were ∼ 0.80(4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhao et al. (2004) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMoehring et al. (2007) entangled two trapped atomic ions separated one meter apart using entanglement swapping exploiting interference of photons emitted by the ions, and Yuan et al. (2008) did so in atomic ensembles.
“Proof-of-principle experiments have been performed by Moehring et al. (2007) who entangled two trapped atomic ions separated one meter apart using entanglement swapping exploiting interference of photons emitted by the ions, and by Yuan et al. (2008) in atomic ensembles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese matter-qubit entanglement experiments still suffer from low success probability and imperfect state fidelity; Moehring et al. (2007) had success probability 3.6×10^-9 and fidelity 0.63(3), and Matsukevich et al. (2008) improved ion-ion entanglement fidelity to 0.81.
“These experiments still suffer from low success probability and imperfect state fidelity.For instance, the Moehring et al. (2007) experiment had a success probability of 3.6 × 10 -9 and the fidelity of the states of the entangled ions was 0.63(3).The ion-ion entanglement fidelity was improved to be 0.81 in a later experiment by Matsukevich et al. (2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationKwiat et al. (2001) used the Procrustean method to demonstrate experimentally distillation of maximally entangled states from non-maximally entangled inputs, using partial polarizers to maximize entanglement of pure polarization-entangled photon pairs generated by SPDC; after filtering, distilled states violate Bell's inequality while initial states do not.
“Kwiat et al., (2001) used the Procrustean method to demonstrate experimentally distillation of maximally entangled states from non-maximally entangled inputs.Using partial polarizers, they performed a filtering process to maximize the entanglement of pure polarizationentangled photon pairs generated by SPDC.The method was also applied to initial states that were partially mixed.After filtering, t”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kwiat et al., 2001 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHalder et al. (2007) achieved entanglement swapping by precise time measurement using a niobium nitride superconducting single photon detector with time resolution 74 ps and 10 pm-bandwidth filters corresponding to coherence time 350 ps, well above temporal resolution.
“Halder et al. (2007) took a different approach to achieve entanglement swapping by a precise time measurement.The photon detector used in the experiment was a niobium nitride superconducting single photon detector with a time resolution of 74ps 62 .The photons were filtered using 10pm-bandwidth filters, which corresponds to a coherence time of 350ps well above the temporal resolution of the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Halder et al. (2007) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSignificant experimental progress has been achieved in small-scale realizations of quantum information processing, but bringing it to technologically useful scales faces challenges primarily due to unavoidable decoherence from coupling between the quantum system and the environment.
“So far, significant experimental progress has been achieved in small-scale realizations of quantum information processing.However, interesting challenges arise in bringing quantum information processing to technologically useful scales.This is primarily due to the unavoidable decoherencefoot_19 caused by a coupling between the quantum system and the environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationJennewein et al. (2002) implemented a 2-state Bell-analyzer, obtained ideal spatial mode-overlap using a fiber coupler, and violated a Bell inequality for measurements on photons 1 and 4 by the factor 1.211(45), i.e., by 4.6 standard deviations.
“Further advancements were achieved by Jennewein et al. (2002) by implementing a 2-state Bell-analyzer.Using a fiber coupler an ideal spatial mode-overlap was obtained.A Bell-inequality, for measurements on photons 1 and 4, was violated by the factor of 1.211(45), i.e., by 4.6 standard deviations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jennewein et al. (2002)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe underlying idea of entanglement purification is to use LOCC only to extract from multiple copies of imperfect states fewer copies of entangled state asymptotically to near-unity fidelity.
“The underlying idea of entanglement purification is that, by using local operations and classical communication (LOCC) only, to extract from multiple copies of imperfect states (arbitrary mixed states) fewer copies of entangled state asymptotically to near-unity fidelity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe entanglement purification scheme produces a new ensemble with fidelity F' = F^2/[F^2+(1-F)^2] for F>1/2, larger than before purification.
“with a larger fidelity F = F 2 /[F 2 + (1 -F ) 2 ] (for F > 1/2) of pairs in the desired state than before the purification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPhase errors can be transformed into bit-flip errors by a 45° polarization rotation and treated in a subsequent purification step.
“phase errors can then be easily transformed into bit-flip errors by a 45 • polarization rotation and treated in a subsequent purification step.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf one estimates the accuracy of local operations at the used PBSs, theoretical values of fidelity better than 98% for the process itself are obtained, equivalently an error probability of at most 2%.
“used PBSs, one obtains theoretical values of fidelity better than 98% for the process itself, or equivalently an error probability of at most 2%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningFor quantum key distribution, the rate for dark counts etc. for a given photon detector is constant, while the key rate decreases with increasing fiber length.
“For quantum key distribution, the rate for dark counts etc. for a given photon detector is constant, while the key rate decreases with increasing fiber length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSince the effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while the outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible, with the help of satellites one can achieve global free-space quantum communication, provided the quantum states survive the passage through the aerosphere.
“Since the effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while the outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible, with the help of satellites one can achieve global free-space quantum communication, provided the quantum states survive the passage through the aerosphere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis underlines the necessity of developing quantum repeaters.
“This underlines the necessity of developing quantum repeaters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningQuantum memories have applications not only in long-distance quantum communication, but they also provide a route to a more efficient multi-photon entanglement or linear optics quantum computing.
“We emphasize that quantum memories have applications not only in long-distance quantum communica- tion, but they also provide a route to a more efficient multi-photon entanglement (see Sec.IV.D) or linear optics quantum computing (see Sec.VII).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFor each round the probability for getting a click is given by p_c; thus, we need to repeat the process about 1/p_c times to warrant a successful preparation of entanglement.
“For each round the probability for getting a click is given by p c .thus, we need to repeat the process about 1/p c times to warrant a successful preparation of entanglement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningGiven a quantum repeater, ideally with long storage time, high writing and retrieval efficiencies, the randomly generated SPDC photon pairs can be stored and synchronized with the arrival of other photon pairs.
“Given a quantum repeater, ideally with long storage time, high writing and retrieval efficiencies 66 , the randomly generated SPDC photon pairs can be stored and synchronized with the arrival of other photon pairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe entanglement generation (as well as entanglement connection) in the DLCZ scheme is based on single-photon interference at photodetectors, which requires a stable long-distance interferometric stability.
“The entanglement generation (as well as entanglement connection) in the DLCZ scheme is based on singlephoton interference at photodetectors 68 , which requires a stable long-distance interferometric stability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn classical communication, the problem of exponential attenuation can be overcome by using repeaters at certain points in the channel.
“In classical communication, the problem of exponential attenuation can be overcome by using repeaters at certain points in the channel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis would enable efficient generation of multiphoton states in a time which increases only polynomially with number of involved qubits.
“This would, for instance, enable efficient generation of multiphoton states in a time which increase only polynomially with number of involved qubits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe quantum repeater protocol comprises a protocol for which the time needed for entanglement creation scales polynomially, whereas the required material resources per connection point grow only logarithmically with the distance.
“A protocol for which the time needed for entanglement creation scales polynomially, whereas the required material resources per connection point grow only logarithmically with the distance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Briegel et al., 1998 source
- cites Dür et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe quantum repeater protocol comprises a method for creation of entanglement between particles at distant nodes, which uses auxiliary particles at intermediate connection points and a nested purification protocol.
“A method for creation of entanglement between particles at distant nodes, which uses auxiliary particles at intermediate”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Briegel et al., 1998 source
- cites Dür et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA similar conclusion has been independently obtained by Koashi et al., (2001) using entangled ancilla photons.
“A similar conclusion has been independently obtained by Koashi et al., (2001) using entangled ancilla photons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Koashi et al., 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningIn such applications the matter itself should be endowed with a long storage time.
“In such applications the matter itself should be endowed with a long storage time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenSuch excitations can be stored for a reasonably long time in metastable states of the atoms.
“Such excitations can be stored for a reasonably long time in metastable states (the so-called ground-state manifold) of the atoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe emitted single-photon pulse is directed forward; the emission time is controllable by the repumping time; and the pulse shape is controllable by varying the time dependence of the Rabi frequency of the repumping pulse.
“This is with fully controllable properties: the emitted single-photon pulse is directed forward; the emission time is controllable by the repumping time; and the pulse shape is controllable by varying the time dependence of the Rabi frequency of the repumping pulse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThough the DLCZ scheme does not meet all the criteria for long-distance quantum communication, it provides a promising approach to a fully controllable single-photon source based on atomic ensembles, which seems to be much easier for experimental demonstrations.
“Though the DLCZ scheme does not meet all the criteria for long-distance quantum communication, it provides a promising approach to a fully controllable singlephoton source based on atomic ensembles, which seems to be much easier for experimental demonstrations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSeveral improvements of this protocol, particularly those based on cluster states or error encoding, have dramatically reduced this worrying resource overhead, and started to bridge the gap between the theoretical scalability and practical implementations.
“Several improvements of this protocol, particularly those based on cluster states or error encoding, have dramatically reduced this worrying resource overhead, and started to bridge the gap between the theoretical scalability and practical implementations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnder the two-photon resonance, the classical driving field can induce transparency for the quantized light field and a substantial group-velocity reduction, and even the complete stopping of the light.
“Under the two-photon resonance (i.e., the two detunings for the two transitions shown in the inset of Fig. 33 are both equal to ∆), the classical driving field can induce transparency for the quantized light field and a substantial group-velocity reduction, and even the complete stopping of the light”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe technique of quantum state transfer between matter and photons is indispensable for both long-distance quantum communication and large-scale optical quantum computing.
“The technique of quantum state transfer between matter and photons is indispensable for both long-distance quantum communication and large-scale optical quantum computing (see section VII).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe basic idea of quantum light memory is in transferring a photonic state to the excitations of atomic internal states, where it can be stored, and after some controllable time, transferring back the excitations to photons restoring the original quantum state.
“The basic idea of quantum light memory is in transferring a photonic state to the excitations of atomic internal states.In such a way it can be stored.After some controllable time, it should be possible to transfer back the excitations to photons restoring the original quantum state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs there is no excited atomic state in the dark-state subspace, the storage time can be very long.
“As there is no excited atomic state in the dark-state subspace, the storage time can be very long.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe atomic ensemble generates a correlated state in Eq. (84), which is an exact analog of the SPDC radiation.
“The atomic ensemble generates a correlated state in Eq. ( 84), which is an exact analog of the SPDC radiation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe photon, thanks to its high transmittance through air and glass fibers and its extremely long decoherence time, has arguably been the best candidate for quantum communication.
“As we have seen in the above section, the photon, thanks to its high transmittance through air and glass fibers and its extremely long decoherence time, has arguably been the best candidate for quantum communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe restriction does not allow further operations on the two photons involved and thus limits the depth of calculations.
“The restriction does not allow further operations on the two photons involved and thus limits the depth of calculations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis is an important feature for both circuit-model, and one-way model of scalable optical quantum computing.
“This is an important feature for both circuit-model, and one-way model of scalable optical quantum computing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIn scenarios in which quantum gates can be performed directly in, at best, a non-deterministic fashion, the one-way model is particularly useful.
“In scenarios in which quantum gates can be performed directly in, at best, a non-deterministic fashion, the oneway model is particularly useful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenShor's quantum algorithm provides a way of factoring large integers in polynomial time, a task for which no efficient classical method is known.
“Shor's quantum algorithm provides a way of factoring large integers in polynomial time, a task for which no efficient classical method is known.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn SPDC, one usually does not know when a pair is emitted; only a firing of photon detectors informs one that a spontaneous emission act happened.
“In the case of SPDC, one usually does not know when a pair is emitted.Only a firing of photon detectors informs one that a spontaneous emission act happened.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe described protocol is a linear-optical realization of the Duan-Raussendorf proposal and combines the advantages of the Browne-Rudolph scheme, whose overall efficiency is thereby demonstrated.
“The described protocol is a linear-optical realization of the Duan-Raussendorf proposal (2005), but combines the advantages of the Browne-Rudolph scheme, whose overall efficiency is thereby demonstrated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Duan-Raussendorf proposal (2005)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Browne-Rudolph scheme
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn the above linear-optical architecture, two-photon entangled pairs are the basic resources.
“In the above linear-optical architecture, two-photon entangled pairs are the basic resources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFault-tolerant thresholds are still well beyond what is achievable with today's technology.
“Despite the progress, the fault-tolerant thresholds are still well beyond what is achievable with today's technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe tested method is applicable in both the quantum circuit model and the one-way model.
“The tested method is applicable in both the quantum circuit model and in the one-way model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenQuantum computers will be very susceptible to noise which rapidly destroys fragile quantum information.
“Quantum computers will be very susceptible to noise which rapidly destroys the fragile quantum information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenWhen losses are high, the resource requirements become impractically high.
“Despite of the progress, one should note that when the losses are high, the resource requirements become impractically high.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe frequency of the photons reaching d(+) is better defined than the pumping pulse frequency, and it is the spread of the latter one that limits the frequency correlations of the idler-signal pair from one source.
“The frequency of the photons reaching d(+) is better defined than the pumping pulse frequency, and it is the spread of the latter one that limits the frequency correlations of the idler-signal pair from one source.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe axes of polarization are switched between the two processes, giving a symmetrization of the spectral properties.
“The axes of polarization are switched between the two processes.This gives a symmetrization of the spectral properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere was a controversy whether such a kind of experiment can constitute a true Bell test, and it was positively resolved in Popescu et al. (1997).
“There was a controversy whether such a kind of experiment can constitute a true Bell test.It was positively resolved inPopescu et al. (1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Popescu et al. (1997) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAs the atomic cell-r (cell-l) works as a quantum memory for single photons with right-circular (left-circular) polarization, via the adiabatic transfer method, the whole setup is therefore a quantum memory of any single-photon polarization states.
“As the atomic cell-r (cell-l) works as a quantum memory for single photons with right-circular (left-circular) polarization, via the adiabatic transfer method, the whole setup is therefore a quantum memory of any single-photon polarization states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn a properly performed Bell experiment, the measurement events have to be spatially separated in the relativistic meaning (space-time interval of spatial type), so they are simultaneous in a certain reference frame.
“As in a properly performed Bell experiment the measurement events have to be spatially separated, in the relativistic meaning of this word (space time interval between them has to be of the spatial type), they are simultaneous in a certain reference frame.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe original proposal for the realization of three-photon GHZ states in Zeilinger et al. (1997) makes use of a slightly different interferometric setup.
“The original proposal for the realization of three-photon GHZ states inZeilinger et al. (1997) makes use of a slightly different interferometric setup.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeilinger et al. (1997) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe time correlation of detections is defined by the resolution of the respective filters, while the events happen at times dictated by the pulse.
“Namely, the time correlation of the detections is defined by the resolution of the respective filters, while the events happen at times dictated by the pulse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The maxima of the filter-detector response functions agree with the frequencies given by the phase-matching conditions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe SPDC effect exists only for birefringent media having a nonzero value of χ(2).
“Thus, as we shall see, the SPDC effect exists only for birefringent media having a nonzero value of χ (2) .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFor any crystal with centro-symmetric structure the quadratic term of the polarizability vanishes.
“For any crystal with centro-symmetric structure the quadratic term of the polarizability vanishes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe method rests on two distinct processes for emission of a downconverted pair which are coherently overlapped.
“The method rest on two distinct processes for emission of a downconverted pair which are coherently overlapped.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe electric polarization p(x, t) of a medium is given by the mean dipole moment of the atoms or molecules per unit volume.
“Since the electric polarization, p(x, t), of a medium is given by the mean dipole moment of the atoms or molecules per unit volume”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Photons basically do not interact with each other.
“Since photons basically do not interact with each other this method is of special importance for schemes aimed at creating multi-photon entanglements.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A central source emits two photons in the entangled state |ψ12 = 1/√2(|a1|a2 + |b1|b2).
“We assume that a central source emits two photons in an entangled state”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In a simplified theory of beamsplitters, the beamsplitter acts identically for every relevant frequency.
“In a simplified theory of BS, one assumes identical action for every relevant frequency.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Creation and annihilation operators of photons with orthogonal wave packet profiles always commute.
“Finally, one assumes that [â n , âm ] = 0 and [â n , â † m ] = δ nm , that is, creation and annihilation operators of photons with orthogonal wave packet profiles always commute.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Two spectrally identical photons enter the Bell-state analyzer by modes a and b and arrive at PBS ab simultaneously, so their wavefunctions overlap behind it.
“Assume that they arrive at PBS ab simultaneously, so that their wavefunctions overlap behind it.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The interferometers have an identical arm-length difference ∆L much longer than the coherence length of the photons, but shorter than the coherence length of the pump laser.
“We assume that the interferometers have an identical arm-length difference, ∆L much longer than the coherence length of the photons, but shorter than the coherence length of the pump laser (see Fig. 9).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The sources of path entangled states in Fig. 14, A and B, each spontaneously emits a pair of identical particles in an entangled state at nearly the same moment of time.
“Assume that the sources of path entangled states in Fig. 14, A and B, each spontaneously emits a pair of particles in an entangled state (all particles are supposed to be identical) at nearly the same moment of time, and the states of the pairs are”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The time separation between two pulses is much larger than all other time scales of the experiment.
“Assume that the time separation between two pulses is much larger than all other time scales of the experiment, i.e., we study the radiation generated in each crystal by a single pulse.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Retardation effects are omitted by assuming equal optical paths.
“We omit retardation effects by assuming equal optical paths.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
We pick the SPDC radiation with frequencies close to 1/2 ω_o^p, where ω_o^p is the central frequency of the pump pulse.
“We assume that we pick the SPDC radiation with frequencies close to 1 2 ω o p , where ω o p is the central frequency of the pump pulse.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The filter functions in all beams are of identical Gaussian form: F_f(t)=e^{-i/2 ω_o^p t}|F_f(t)|, and the pump beam is described by G(t)=e^{-iω_o^p t}|G(t)|.
“Assume that the filter functions in all beams are of identical Gaussian form: F f (t) = e -i 2 ω o p t |F f (t)|, whereas the pump beam is described by G(t) = e -iω o p t |G(t)|.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Sources A and B simultaneously emit a photon pair each.
“Assume that sources A and B simultaneously emit a photon pair each.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Pairs in beams x, y (1, 3, and 2, 4) are in identical polarization states 1/√2(|Hx,Hy> + |Vx,Vy>).
“Pairs in beams x, y (1, 3, and 2, 4) are in identical polarization states”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The photons are indistinguishable.
“provided the photons are indistinguishable”
The authors state this as an assumption.
We have a perfect situation in which the detectors never fail to register a photon.
“We assume, that we have a perfect situation in which the detectors never fail to register a photon.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Realism allows one to introduce and compare values of results of all possible experiments that can be performed on an individual system.
“Assuming realism allows one to introduce, and compare values of results of all possible experiments that can be performed on an individual system”
The authors state this as an assumption.
According to locality, random choices and consecutive observations made by Alice and Bob cannot influence each other.
“According to locality, random choices and the consecutive observations made by Alice and Bob, which can be simultaneous in certain reference frames, cannot influence each other”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The assumption of local realism allows one to treat A_j1 and A_j2 on equal footing as two numbers.
“The assumption of local realism allows one to treat A j 1 and A j 2 on equal footing as two numbers”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For the actual experiment, choices of actual observables are random and independent from all other processes in the experiment.
“For the actual experiment, we assume that choices of actual observables are random and independent from all other processes in the experiment.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Efficiency of all detectors is independent of the locally measured observable and equal for all detectors.
“All these results are derived under the usual assumption that efficiency of all detectors is independent of the locally measured observable, and equal for all detectors.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Fair sampling: whether a detector registers a particle or not is statistically independent of all other processes in the experiment.
“the so-called fair sampling assumption, which states that one expects that the fact whether a detector registers a particle or not is statistically independent of all other processes in the experiment.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Locality assumption forces X_n(φ) to depend solely on the local phase.
“Locality assumption forces one to assume that X n (φ) depends solely on the local phase.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A click at local detector D_x1 is described as +1, whereas clicks at D_x2 are ascribed -1.
“Assume that a click at the local detector D x1 , where x = d, e, f is described as a result of value +1, whereas clicks at D x2 are ascribed -1.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
“The following assumptions are made: (L 1 ) realism, (L 2 ) physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations, (L 3 ) local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
“The following assumptions are made: (L 1 ) realism, (L 2 ) physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations, (L 3 ) local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
“The following assumptions are made: (L 1 ) realism, (L 2 ) physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations, (L 3 ) local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In Hardy-type experiments, the fair sampling assumption is made.
“as in the GHZ-type experiments, the results of the experiments were fed into specific inequalities, specially derived to take into account experimental imperfections (under the fair sampling assumption, of course).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the electron-positron Hardy gedankenexperiment, annihilation is assumed to happen with probability one when both particles are in the overlapping arms.
“This is related to both particles being in the overlapping arms of the interferometers (within the story, in such a case the annihilation is assumed to happen with probability one).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The freedom assumption of randomness and independence of setting choices holds.
“Violation of local realism implies that either locality, or realism, or both, cannot provide a foundational basis for quantum theory (provided the freedom assumption of randomness and independence of setting choices holds).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the teleportation theory, the original polarization state of particle 1 is assumed to be |χ1 = α|H1 + β|V1.
“We shall assume that |χ 1 = α|H 1 + β|V 1 is the original polarization state of particle 1.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In an ideal arrangement, each source emits only a single pair of entangled photons.
“Given an ideal arrangement with sources that emit only a single pair of entangled photons each, the process of entanglement swapping also gives a means to generate event-ready entanglement.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Each EPR source emits a pair of entangled photons in the state |ψ-, so the total state of four photons is |Ψ1234 = |ψ-12|ψ-34.
“Assume that each source emits a pair of entangled photons in a state, say, |ψ -so that the total state of the four photons is |Ψ 1234 = |ψ - 12 |ψ - 34 .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The initial state for the linear-optical purification example is ρ_ab = F|φ+><φ+| + (1-F)|ψ-><ψ-|.
“Let our initial state be ρ ab = F |φ + ab φ + | + (1 -F )|ψ - ab ψ -|,(82)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The probabilistic nature of SPDC causes two photon pairs to be emitted into one mode pair with a probability of the same order of magnitude.
“Owing to the probabilistic nature of SPDC, with a probability of the same order of magnitude, two photon pairs can be emitted into a one mode pair.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible.
“Since the effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while the outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The nonlinear crystal is a cube of side L, and for L → ∞ the phase-matching function approaches a delta function.
“If we assume that our crystal is a cube L × L × L, then for L → ∞, ∆ ± approaches δ(±k 0 -kk ).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The detectors see only photons of a specified direction of propagation, which is a good assumption if the detectors are far from the crystal and the apertures are narrow.
“we assume that the detectors see only the photons of a specified direction of propagation, a good assumption if the detectors are far from the crystal, and the apertures are narrow”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The maxima of the filter-detector response functions agree with the frequencies given by the phase-matching conditions.
“We assume that the maxima of the functions agree with the frequencies given by the phase matching conditions.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The laser field can be treated as classical and its depletion can be neglected.
“Onecan neglect the depletion of the laser field and assume that the total field is E Laser (x, t) + E(x, t), where E Laser is a classical field.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
E(x, t) interacts with p(x, t) only at the point x.
“One can assume that E(x, t) interacts with p(x, t) only in the point x”
The authors state this as an assumption.
χ(2)ijk(x) has the same value for all points within the crystal.
“If one assumes that χ (2) ijk (x) has the same value for all points within the crystal”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The technique of coherently controlling multiple qubits and executing complex, multiple-gate quantum circuits presents an advance on linear optics quantum computation and allows testing other similar quantum algorithms such as solving differential equations and data fitting.
“The technique of coherently controlling multiple qubits and executing complex, multiple-gate quantum circuits presents an advance on linear optics quantum computation [21, 25] and allows to test other similar quantum algorithms such as solving differential equations [26, 27] and data fitting [28].”
From Experimental Quantum Computing to Solve Systems of Linear Equations (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
Most previous experiments either relied on nonresonant excitation of a QD microcavity that degraded photon purity and indistinguishability, or used resonant excitation of a QD in a planar cavity that limited extraction efficiency.
“The reason is that most previous experiments either relied on nonresonant excitation of a QD microcavity that degraded the photon purity and indistinguishability, or used resonant excitation of a QD in a planar cavity that limited the extraction efficiency.”
From On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
In nonresonant excitation experiments, single-photon generation efficiencies typically increased asymptotically with pump power, and a trade-off between efficiency and single-photon purity and/or indistinguishability was observed.
“In the nonresonant excitation experiments, single-photon generation efficiencies typically increased asymptotically with pump power, and a trade-off between efficiency and single-photon purity and/or indistinguishability were observed [5][6][7][8][9][10].”
From On-Demand Single Photons with High Extraction Efficiency and Near-Unity Indistinguishability from a Resonantly Driven Quantum Dot in a Micropillar (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
The Hong-Ou-Mandel interference visibility of 0.97(2) is comparable to that of trapped atoms and ions.
“comparable to trapped atoms and ions.”
From On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability (2013) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Teleportation expansion changes photon 2's polarization
MinorEquation (75) fixes photon 2 in |V 2, whereas every term of the purported expansion in equation (77) contains |H 2. Expanding a state in a different basis for photon 1 cannot make that substitution.
“|Φ = 1 √ 2 (|a 1 1 |a 2 2 + |b 1 1 |b 2 2 ) |χ 1 |V 2 ,(75)”
“|Φ = 1 2 [ ψ+ 1 (β|a 2 2 + α|b 2 2 )|H 2 + ψ- 1 (α|a 2 2 + β|b 2 2 )|H 2 + φ+ 1 (α|a 2 2 -β|b 2 2 )|H 2 + φ- 1 (β|a 2 2 -α|b 2 2 )|H 2 ,(77)”
Bell-inequality expansion uses a different Alice factor
MinorEquation (51) repeats A j 1 in its first factor, while the stated inequality derived from it contains correlations involving A 2. The displayed expansion does not follow from that factor as written.
“S(s 1 , s 2 )(A j 1 +s 1 A j 1 )(B j 1 +s 2 B j 2 ) = ±4, (51”
“E(A 1 , B 1 ) + s 2 E(A 1 , B 2 ) +s 1 E(A 2 , B 1 ) + s 1 s 2 E(A 2 , B 2 )”
Two purported Bell-basis pairs are identical
MinorEquation (76) assigns identical states to ψ± and φ±. They therefore cannot constitute the four distinct outcomes required by the claimed Bell-state measurement.
“ψ± 1 = 1 √ 2 (|a 1 1 |V 1 ± |b 1 1 |H 1 ), φ± 1 = 1 √ 2 (|a 1 1 |V 1 ± |b 1 1 |H 1 ).(76)”
“The measurement of photon 1 with respect to this basis can in principle be achieved with 100% success rate”
Cites
<i>Quantum Computation and Quantum Information</i>
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895 · see citing works
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,449 · see citing works
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654 · see citing works
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703 · cited 5× · see citing works
“It can also be interpreted as teleportation of entanglement, i.e., teleportation of undefined states (Bennett et al., 1993).”
BackgroundInfluentialOn the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252 · cited 3× · see citing works
“24 The original Bell (1964) inequality, since it assumes perfect correlations of the singlet state, cannot be tested experimentally, as in such a case correlations are never perfect.”
BackgroundQuantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…applications are possible, especially in information transfer and processing.9 In quantum cryptography [Wiesner, 1983; Bennett and Brassard, 1984; Ekert, 1991; for a review see (Gisin et al., 2002)] the complementarity of different measurements on a quantum system is used to establish a secret…”
BackgroundHorodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For a detailed discussion on quantum entanglement, we refer to Alber et al. (2001) and Horodecki et al. (2007).”
BackgroundGisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515 · see citing works
Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics
Mandel, L., & Wolf, E. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644105 · Cited by 8,356 · see citing works
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290 · see citing works
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573 · see citing works
Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons
Kitaev, A. Y. (2003) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 · Cited by 7,238 · see citing works
Scully, M. O., & Zubairy, M. S. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813993 · Cited by 6,589 · see citing works
Kimble, H. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07127 · Cited by 6,023 · see citing works
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880 · cited 5× · see citing works
“After the discovery that some gates could be realized through teleportation (Gottesman and Chuang, 1999), an important breakthrough was the suggestion by Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn (2001) that even with linear optical elements, in principle, universal quantum computation could be realized.”
BackgroundInfluentialExperimental quantum teleportation
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37539 · Cited by 5,545 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…for many quantum information processing protocols, such as quantum dense coding (Bennett and Wiesner, 1992; Mattle et al., 1996), quantum teleportation (Bennett et al., 1993; Bouwmeester et al., 1997; Boschi et al., 1998), and entanglement swapping (Żukowski et al., 1993; Pan et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationCommunication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states
Bennett, C. H., & Wiesner, S. J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881 · Cited by 5,470 · cited 3× · see citing works
“By exploiting entanglement one can efficiently encoding classical messages (Bennett and Wiesner, 1992; section VII.”
BackgroundA single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While classical information can be repeatedly and precisely copied, an unknown quantum state cannot be perfectly cloned–a statement known as the no-cloning theorem (Dieks, 1982; Wootters and Zurek, 1982).”
BackgroundMixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272 · cited 10× · see citing works
“The main tool to overcome the noise in the quantum communication channel is entanglement purification, proposed by Bennett et al. (1996a, 1996b, 1996c) and Deutsch et al. (1996).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSeparability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Basic structural criteria, which decide whether the given density operator represents an entangled state, were first given by Peres (1996) and Horodecki et al. (1996).”
BackgroundElectromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media
Fleischhauer, M., Imamoglu, A., & Marangos, J. P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.633 · Cited by 5,189 · cited 1× · see citing works
“33 are both equal to ∆), the classical driving field can induce transparency for the quantized light field and a substantial group-velocity reduction, even the complete stop of the light (for reviews, see Lukin and Imamoǧlu, 2001; Lukin, 2003; Fleischhauer et al., 2005).”
BackgroundRaussendorf, R., & Briegel, H. J. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5188 · Cited by 4,477 · cited 4× · see citing works
“37 [For details on how this follows, we refer to (Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001; Raussendorf et al., 2003)].”
BackgroundInfluentialMeasurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369 · cited 3× · see citing works
“19 (1986), Shih and Alley (1988), and Hong, Ou, and Mandel (1987).”
BackgroundQuantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack
Grover, L. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.325 · Cited by 4,306 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Interestingly, Walther et al. also demonstrated a twoqubit implementation of Grover’s fast quantum search (Grover, 1997) using the cluster state model.”
BackgroundMethodDecoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
Zurek, W. H. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.715 · Cited by 4,295 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is primarily due to the unavoidable decoherence [For general aspects on decoherence, we refer to the excellent reviews (see, e.g., Zurek, 2003; Schlosshauer, 2004)] caused by the coupling between the quantum system and the environment.”
BackgroundThe Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence
Glauber, R. J. (1963) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.130.2529 · Cited by 4,077 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The quantum theory of optical coherence of Glauber (1963) gave theoretical clues to search for unambiguously quantum optical phenomena.”
BackgroundQuantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Otherwise, ρAB is entangled (Werner, 1989).”
Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1804 · Cited by 3,942 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The initial atomic-cascade experiments testing Bell’s inequalities (Freedman and Clauser, 1972; Aspect et al., 1982a, 1982b) falsified Bell’s inequalities as constraints on correlations of microsystems–thus a local realistic world-view was challenged.”
BackgroundMethodQuantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858 · see citing works
Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)00706-2 · Cited by 3,649 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In this case, the scheme only involves local filtering operations (Gisin, 1996; Horodecki et al., 1996) on single pairs.”
BackgroundMethodLong-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics
Duan, L.-M., Lukin, M. D., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35106500 · Cited by 3,576 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…line, theoretical ideas on quantum light memory has been proposed (Kozhekin et al., 2000; Lukin et al., 2000; Fleischhauer and Lukin, 2000, 2002; Duan et al., 2001; Duan, Cirac, and Zoller, 2002; Chen et al., 2007), and the relevant experimental advances (Kash et al., 1999; Phillips et al.,…”
BackgroundQuantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Entanglement swapping, together with entanglement purification, is a key element of the quantum repeater protocol (Briegel et al., 1998; Dür et al., 1999; see also section VII.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDie gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491891 · Cited by 3,392 · cited 3× · see citing works
“(24) defines only joint properties (Schrödinger, 1935): the two spins, if measured with respect to the same direction, will be found opposite.”
BackgroundEntanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons
Mair, A., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G., & Zeilinger, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35085529 · Cited by 3,321 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Meanwhile, quantum d-level (highdimensional) systems (“qudit”) can also be realized using, e.g., orbital angular momentum states of photons (Mair et al., 2001), or using simultaneously two or more degrees of freedom listed above.”
BackgroundSelf-citationQuantum information and computation
Bennett, C. H., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35005001 · Cited by 3,263 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For an introduction to quantum information and quantum computation, textbooks by Nielson and Chuang (2000), by Bouwmeester et al. (2001) and by Preskill (1998) are widely used; for a short survey, see Bennett and DiVincenzo (2000).”
MethodDiscussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems
Schrödinger, E. (1935) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554 · Cited by 3,124 · cited 3× · see citing works
“(24) defines only joint properties (Schrödinger, 1935): the two spins, if measured with respect to the same direction, will be found opposite.”
BackgroundNew High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The standard method to produce polarization-entangled photons in now the noncollinear type-II SPDC process (Kwiat et al., 1995) and its principle is desribed in (Fig.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationÜber einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt
Einstein, A. (1905) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19053220607 · Cited by 3,090 · see citing works
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,051 · cited 10× · see citing works
“The main tool to overcome the noise in the quantum communication channel is entanglement purification, proposed by Bennett et al. (1996a, 1996b, 1996c) and Deutsch et al. (1996).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialQuantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states
Bennett, C. H. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.3121 · Cited by 3,017 · see citing works
Unconditional Quantum Teleportation
Furusawa, A., Sørensen, J. L., Braunstein, S. L., Fuchs, C. A., Kimble, H. J., & Polzik, E. S. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.706 · Cited by 3,005 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Quantum teleportation of continuous-variable states (Furusawa et al., 1998) is hard to extend to the long-distance case, because of the unavoidable dispersion of squeezed-states during the distribution of entanglement.”
BackgroundSpeakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics
Bell, J. S., & Mermin, N. D. (1988) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811599 · Cited by 2,985 · cited 2× · see citing works
“., 1993). We would like to mention that one of the original motivations of entanglement swapping is the so called \event-ready detection" of the entangled particles, a concept suggested by Bell (Bell, 1987; Clauser and Shimony, 1978). Entanglement swapping, together with entanglement purication, is a key FIG. 26…”
BackgroundPurification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.722 · Cited by 2,961 · cited 10× · see citing works
“The main tool to overcome the noise in the quantum communication channel is entanglement purification, proposed by Bennett et al. (1996a, 1996b, 1996c) and Deutsch et al. (1996).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Feynman Lectures on Physics
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., Sands, M., & Treiman, S. B. (1964) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3051743 · Cited by 2,944 · see citing works
On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics
BELL, J. S. (1966) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.38.447 · Cited by 2,845 · cited 2× · see citing works
“As it was explained earlier the Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem (Bell, 1966; Kochen and Specker, 1967) states that noncontextual hidden-variable theories are incompatible with quantum mechanics.”
BackgroundEntanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823 · see citing works
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,803 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The linear optical quantum computing can be found in a recent review (Kok et al., 2007), which is a nice supplement to the optical quantum computing part of this review.”
BackgroundInfluentialQuantum dynamics of single trapped ions
Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.281 · Cited by 2,739 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Although certain quantum logic gates have been experimentally demonstrated for atoms and ions (Raimond et al., 2001; Leibfried et al., 2003; for optical CNOT gate, see section VIII.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.91 · Cited by 2,687 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The initial atomic-cascade experiments testing Bell’s inequalities (Freedman and Clauser, 1972; Aspect et al., 1982a, 1982b) falsified Bell’s inequalities as constraints on correlations of microsystems–thus a local realistic world-view was challenged.”
BackgroundMethodManipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity
Raimond, J. M., Brune, M., & Haroche, S. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.565 · Cited by 2,669 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Although certain quantum logic gates have been experimentally demonstrated for atoms and ions (Raimond et al., 2001; Leibfried et al., 2003; for optical CNOT gate, see section VIII.”
BackgroundCoffman, V., Kundu, J., & Wootters, W. K. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.052306 · Cited by 2,619 · see citing works
Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light
BROWN, R. H., & TWISS, R. Q. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/177027a0 · Cited by 2,573 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Modern quantum optics was effectively born in 1956 after the famous Hanbury-Brown and Twiss (1956) experiment on intensity interferometry.”
BackgroundOptical Coherence and Quantum Optics
Mandeļ, L., Wolf, E., & Meystre, P. (1996) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.18450 · Cited by 2,412 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The earlier stages of the research in photonic entanglement can be studied in Clauser and Shimony (1978) and Mandel and Wolf (1995).”
BackgroundMethodA Quantum Dot Single-Photon Turnstile Device
Michler, P., Kıraz, A., Becher, C., Schoenfeld, W. V., Petroff, P. M., Zhang, L., Hu, E. L., & İmamoğlu, A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2282 · Cited by 2,409 · cited 2× · see citing works
“So far, two groups reported experimental results (Michler et al., 2000a; Huang et al., 2003) pointing toward falsification of noncontextual hidden-variable theories.”
BackgroundResultBell’s theorem without inequalities
Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Zeilinger, A. (1990) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.16243 · Cited by 2,404 · cited 7× · see citing works
“Actually, An n-particle interferometer generalized along the above reasoning will only exhibit n-particle fringes, but no (n−1)-, (n− 2)-,..., single-particle fringes are observable (Greenberger et al., 1990).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationGühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401 · see citing works
O'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.229 · Cited by 2,388 · see citing works
Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution
Lo, H., Ma, X., & Chen, K. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.230504 · Cited by 2,343 · see citing works
The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation
Dirac, P. A. M. (1927) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0039 · Cited by 2,288 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…effect (Einstein, 1905).1 The final theory, in which photons are elementary excitations of the quantized electromagnetic field interacting with charges, was given by Dirac (1927), and its internal consistency was proved by Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger and Tonomaga around twenty years later.”
BackgroundMethod(1996) · Cited by 2,280 · see citing works
Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell's Theorem
Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1981) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.47.460 · Cited by 2,250 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It was refined in the famous experiments by Aspect et al. (1981, 1982a, 1982b) and followed by many others.3 The early experiments used polarization entangled photon pairs from atomic cascades (Clauser and Shimony, 1978).”
MethodObservation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses
Liu, C., Dutton, Z., Behroozi, C. H., & Hau, L. V. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35054017 · Cited by 2,217 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Long lifetimes for relevant coherence have been observed both in a room-temperature dilute atomic gas (Phillips et al., 2001) and in a sample of cold trapped atoms (Liu et al., 2001).”
BackgroundQuantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J., & Mabuchi, H. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3221 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The early proposal (Cirac et al., 1997; van Enk, Cirac, and Zoller, 1997) along this line uses strong coupling of photons and single atoms in high-finesse cavities.”
BackgroundWalls, D. F., & Milburn, G. J. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79504-6 · Cited by 2,197 · see citing works
James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J., & White, A. G. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052312 · Cited by 2,176 · see citing works
Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator
Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J., & Bertani, P. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.73.58 · Cited by 2,155 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Photonic entanglement in higher dimensions can in principle generated by SPDC process in a form of generalization of path-entanglement into more than two conjugate pairs of beams (Zeilinger et al., 1993), and analyzed with N -port BS (for a general theory of such devices see Reck et al., 1994).”
MethodSelf-citationSpeakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics
Whitaker, M. A. B. (1988) · Endeavour · doi:10.1016/0160-9327(88)90092-0 · Cited by 2,106 · see citing works
‘‘Event-ready-detectors’’ Bell experiment via entanglement swapping
Żukowski, M., Zeilinger, A., Horne, M. A., & Ekert, A. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.4287 · Cited by 2,045 · cited 9× · see citing works
“…not require pulsed pump, but extremely good detection time resolution, ∆T , by order of magnitute sharper that the coherence time of the filtered SPDC radiation, and rejection of all events at c(+) and d(+) which are detected with time difference higher than, say, 2∆T [see Żukowski et al. (1993)].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStorage of Light in Atomic Vapor
Phillips, D. F., Fleischhauer, A., Mair, A., Walsworth, R. L., & Lukin, M. D. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.783 · Cited by 2,042 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Long lifetimes for relevant coherence have been observed both in a room-temperature dilute atomic gas (Phillips et al., 2001) and in a sample of cold trapped atoms (Liu et al., 2001).”
BackgroundExperimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Freedman, S. J., & Clauser, J. F. (1972) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.28.938 · Cited by 1,999 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Bohm’s version of the EPR thought experiment (Bohm, 1951) used the singlet state of two spin- 1 2 particles, which is nowadays an icon and a yardstick of entanglement. ization entangled photons, was due to Freedman and Clauser (1972).”
BackgroundMethodThe Physics of Quantum Information
Bouwmeester, D., EKERT, A. K., & Zeilinger, A. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-04209-0 · Cited by 1,988 · cited 4× · see citing works
“According to the basic principle of universal quantum computation (section VIII; see also Nielson and Chuang, 2000; Bouwmeester et al., 2001; Preskill, 1999), with universal quantum logic gates, one can construct a suitable quantum circuit to produce and identify any of the maximally entangled…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPersistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles
Briegel, H. J., & Raussendorf, R. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.910 · Cited by 1,950 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…step is the discovery of “one-way quantum computing” (Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001; Raussendorf et al., 2003), which is based on the preparation of highly entangled multi-qubit states, the so-called “cluster states” (Briegel and Raussendorf, 2001) and on simple adaptive one-qubit measurements.”
BackgroundInfluentialObservation of Squeezed States Generated by Four-Wave Mixing in an Optical Cavity
Slusher, R. E., Hollberg, L. W., Yurke, B., Mertz, J. C., & Valley, J. F. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2409 · Cited by 1,909 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Squeezed states were experimentally generated by using four-wave mixing in atomic sodium (Slusher et al., 1985) and in optical fibers (Shelby et al., 1986), or by using an optical parametric oscillator (Wu et al., 1986).”
MethodGottesman, D., & Chuang, I. L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46503 · Cited by 1,860 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Quantum teleportation is indeed not only a critical ingredient for quantum computation (Gottesman and Chuang, 1999; Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn, 2001) and communication, its experimental realization allows new studies of the fundamentals of quantum theory.”
BackgroundQuantum Key Distribution with High Loss: Toward Global Secure Communication
Hwang, W.-Y. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.057901 · Cited by 1,814 · see citing works
Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality
Cirel'son, B. S. (1980) · Letters in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00417500 · Cited by 1,788 · see citing works
Boschi, D., Branca, S., De Martini, F., Hardy, L., & Popescu, S. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1121 · Cited by 1,777 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…for many quantum information processing protocols, such as quantum dense coding (Bennett and Wiesner, 1992; Mattle et al., 1996), quantum teleportation (Bennett et al., 1993; Bouwmeester et al., 1997; Boschi et al., 1998), and entanglement swapping (Żukowski et al., 1993; Pan et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPhoton Antibunching in Resonance Fluorescence
Kimble, H. J., Dagenais, M., & Mandeļ, L. (1977) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.39.691 · Cited by 1,762 · see citing works
Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance
Vandersypen, L. M. K., Steffen, M., Breyta, G., Yannoni, C. S., Sherwood, M. H., & Chuang, I. L. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414883a · Cited by 1,738 · see citing works
Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications
Hadfield, R. H. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.230 · Cited by 1,707 · see citing works
Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states
Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E., & Briegel, H. J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022312 · Cited by 1,655 · cited 4× · see citing works
“37 [For details on how this follows, we refer to (Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001; Raussendorf et al., 2003)].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGeneration of Squeezed States by Parametric Down Conversion
Wu, L.-A., Kimble, H. J., Hall, J. L., & Wu, H. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.2520 · Cited by 1,654 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Squeezed states were experimentally generated by using four-wave mixing in atomic sodium (Slusher et al., 1985) and in optical fibers (Shelby et al., 1986), or by using an optical parametric oscillator (Wu et al., 1986).”
MethodViolation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5039 · Cited by 1,643 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The above requirements were experimentally realized by Weihs et al. (1998) and Peng et al. (2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe
(1989) · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4 · Cited by 1,632 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Figure 4(b) shows how to prepare eight maximally entangled three-particle states, known as the GHZ states (Greenberger et al., 1989, 1990).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDark-State Polaritons in Electromagnetically Induced Transparency
Fleischhauer, M., & Lukin, M. D. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.5094 · Cited by 1,613 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Along this line, theoretical ideas on quantum light memory has been proposed (Kozhekin et al., 2000; Lukin et al., 2000; Fleischhauer and Lukin, 2000, 2002; Duan et al., 2001; Duan, Cirac, and Zoller, 2002; Chen et al., 2007), and the relevant experimental advances (Kash et al., 1999; Phillips et…”
BackgroundInfluentialIndistinguishable photons from a single-photon device
Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vučković, J., Solomon, G. S., & Yamamoto, Y. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01086 · Cited by 1,559 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Further contributions used photons generated by two mutually coherent time-separated pulses from the same mode-locked laser in one SPDC crystal (Keller et al., 1998) and, later, generated in one quantum dot (Santori et al., 2002).”
BackgroundMethodBell's theorem. Experimental tests and implications
Clauser, J. F., & Shimony, A. (1978) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/002 · Cited by 1,551 · cited 5× · see citing works
“The earlier stages of the research in photonic entanglement can be studied in Clauser and Shimony (1978) and Mandel and Wolf (1995).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExperimental consequences of objective local theories
Clauser, J. F., & Horne, M. A. (1974) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.526 · Cited by 1,537 · see citing works
Wiesner, S. (1983) · ACM SIGACT News · doi:10.1145/1008908.1008920 · Cited by 1,520 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…a new set of phenomena, thus new practical applications are possible, especially in information transfer and processing.9 In quantum cryptography [Wiesner, 1983; Bennett and Brassard, 1984; Ekert, 1991; for a review see (Gisin et al., 2002)] the complementarity of different measurements on a…”
BackgroundQuantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit
Boto, A. N., Kok, P., Abrams, D. S., Braunstein, S. L., Williams, C. P., & Dowling, J. P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2733 · Cited by 1,515 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…has many interesting applications including tests of foundations of quantum theory (Howell et al., 2002), phase sensitive measurements (Holland and Burnett, 1993; Mitchell et al., 2004) and quantum photolithography beyond the classical diffraction limit (Boto et al., 2000; Kok et al., 2001).”
BackgroundGreenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A., & Zeilinger, A. (1989) · Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4_10 · Cited by 1,513 · see citing works
Self-citationBeating the Photon-Number-Splitting Attack in Practical Quantum Cryptography
Wang, X. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.230503 · Cited by 1,502 · see citing works
Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states
Mermin, N. D. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.1838 · Cited by 1,482 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Another class of theorems, which show the drastic difference between the classical and the quantum, are the no-go theorems for non-contextual hidden variables (NCHV) interpretations of quantum mechanics [Bell, 1966; Kochen and Specker, 1967; Mermin, 1990c; for a survey, see (Mermin, 1993)].”
BackgroundInfluentialStable Solid-State Source of Single Photons
Kurtsiefer, C., Mayer, S., Zarda, P., & Weinfurter, H. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.290 · Cited by 1,479 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…include quantum dots (Michler et al., 2000b; Santori et al., 2001, 2002; Pelton et al., 2002), nitrogen-vacancy color centers (Brouri et al., 2000; Kurtsiefer et al., 2000), neutral atoms (Kuhn et al., 2002; McKeever et al., 2004; Darquié et al., 2005), ions (Keller et al., 2004), and molecules…”
BackgroundSelf-citationExperimental Entanglement Swapping: Entangling Photons That Never Interacted
Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.3891 · Cited by 1,457 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Figure 28 is a schematic drawing of the Pan et al. (1998) experimental setup.”
BackgroundSelf-citationDense Coding in Experimental Quantum Communication
Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Kwiat, P. G., & Zeilinger, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.4656 · Cited by 1,342 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The first experimental realization of quantum dense coding was reported by the Innsbruck group (Mattle et al., 1996).”
BackgroundSelf-citationQuantum interface between light and atomic ensembles
Hammerer, K., Sørensen, A. S., & Polzik, E. S. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1041 · Cited by 1,290 · see citing works
Kash, M. M., Sautenkov, V. A., Zibrov, A. S., Hollberg, L. W., Welch, G. R., Lukin, M. D., Rostovtsev, Y. V., Fry, E. S., & Scully, M. O. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.5229 · Cited by 1,273 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Fleischhauer and Lukin, 2000, 2002; Duan et al., 2001; Duan, Cirac, and Zoller, 2002; Chen et al., 2007), and the relevant experimental advances (Kash et al., 1999; Phillips et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2001; Schori et al., 2002; Julsgaard et al., 2004; van der Wal et al., 2003; Bajcsy et al.,…”
BackgroundExperimental one-way quantum computing
Walther, P., Resch, K. J., Rudolph, T., Schenck, E., Weinfurter, H., Vedral, V., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03347 · Cited by 1,273 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Few-qubit cluster states of photons were created in several recent experiments (Zhang et al., 2006a; Walther et al., 2005b; Kiesel et al., 2005; Schmid et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationQuantum Privacy Amplification and the Security of Quantum Cryptography over Noisy Channels
Deutsch, D., Ekert, A., Jozsa, R., Macchiavello, C., Popescu, S., & Sanpera, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2818 · Cited by 1,268 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The main tool to overcome the noise in the quantum communication channel is entanglement purification, proposed by Bennett et al. (1996a, 1996b, 1996c) and Deutsch et al. (1996).”
InfluentialO'Brien, J. L. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1142892 · Cited by 1,221 · see citing works
Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144 km
Ursin, R., Tiefenbacher, F., Schmitt-Manderbach, T., Weier, H., Scheidl, T., Lindenthal, M., Blauensteiner, B., Jennewein, T., Perdigues, J., Trojek, P., et al. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys629 · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement
Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35000514 · Cited by 1,209 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The laboratory realization of the GHZ paradox was done by Pan et al. (2000).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationMixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a ‘bound’ entanglement in nature?
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5239 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works
Cavity quantum electrodynamics
WALTHER, H., Varcoe, B. T. H., Englert, B., & Becker, T. (2006) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/5/r02 · Cited by 1,191 · see citing works
Bell inequality for position and time
Franson, J. D. (1989) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.2205 · Cited by 1,168 · cited 2× · see citing works
“As it was shown by Franson (1989) the coincidence count rates at the outputs of both interferometers show a sinusoidal interfernce pattern, which depends on the sum of the local phase shifts.”
Background<i>Colloquium</i>: Trapping and manipulating photon states in atomic ensembles
Lukin, M. D. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.457 · Cited by 1,141 · cited 1× · see citing works
“33 are both equal to ∆), the classical driving field can induce transparency for the quantized light field and a substantial group-velocity reduction, even the complete stop of the light (for reviews, see Lukin and Imamoǧlu, 2001; Lukin, 2003; Fleischhauer et al., 2005).”
BackgroundObservation of Simultaneity in Parametric Production of Optical Photon Pairs
Burnham, D. C., & Weinberg, D. L. (1970) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.25.84 · Cited by 1,111 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The standard source of entangled photon pairs is nowadays the nonlinear optical process of spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC; see Burnham and Weinberg, 1970), the inverse of frequency up-conversion.”
BackgroundMeasurement-based quantum computation
Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R., & Van den Nest, M. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1157 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits
Politi, A., Cryan, M. J., Rarity, J. G., Yu, S., & O'Brien, J. L. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155441 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell
Mermin, N. D. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.803 · Cited by 1,078 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another class of theorems, which show the drastic difference between the classical and the quantum, are the no-go theorems for non-contextual hidden variables (NCHV) interpretations of quantum mechanics [Bell, 1966; Kochen and Specker, 1967; Mermin, 1990c; for a survey, see (Mermin, 1993)].”
BackgroundObservation of Three-Photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger Entanglement
Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1345 · Cited by 1,061 · cited 4× · see citing works
“37 3 -f o ld c o in c id e n c e s p e r 2 0 0 0 se c o n d s Generally speaking, the basic criteria (Bouwmeester et al., 1999b) to constitute a bona fide teleportation should be: (1) the experimental scheme is capable of teleporting any state that is designed to teleport, (2) a fidelity better…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationExperimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection
Rowe, M. A., Kielpinski, D., Meyer, V., Sackett, C. A., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057215 · Cited by 1,043 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The detection loophole was closed in an ion-trap experiment by Rowe et al. (2001).”
MethodQuantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
(2002) · doi:10.1007/0-306-47120-5 · Cited by 1,029 · see citing works
Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Branning, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02054 · Cited by 992 · see citing works
Grangier, P., Roger, G., & Aspect, A. (1986) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/1/4/004 · Cited by 984 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The first experiment aimed at that was performed by Grangier, Roger, and Aspect (1986).”
MethodDeterministic quantum teleportation of atomic qubits
Barrett, M. D., Chiaverini, J., Schaetz, T., Britton, J., Itano, W. M., Jost, J. D., Knill, E., Langer, C., Leibfried, D., Ozeri, R., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02608 · Cited by 975 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Complete Bell-state measurement was realized for ions (Riebe et al., 2004; Barrett et al., 2004), and for photons (Kim, Kulik, and Shih, 2001) using nonlinearity and can also be performed prababilistically with linear optics, as realized by Zhao et al. (2005b), and by Walther and Zeilinger (2005).”
MethodViolation of Bell Inequalities by Photons More Than 10 km Apart
Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Zbinden, H., & Gisin, N. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3563 · Cited by 963 · see citing works
Quantum teleportation using three-particle entanglement
Karlsson, A., & Bourennane, M. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.58.4394 · Cited by 949 · cited 1× · see citing works
“a. Open-destination quantum teleportation A more involved scheme in multi-party quantum communication is the so-called open-destination teleportation (Karlsson and Bourennane, 1998).”
BackgroundQuantum Walks of Correlated Photons
Peruzzo, A., Lobino, M., Matthews, J. C. F., Matsuda, N., Politi, A., Poulios, K., Zhou, X.-Q., Lahini, Y., Ismail, N., Wörhoff, K., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1193515 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Shih, Y. H., & Alley, C. O. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.2921 · Cited by 917 · cited 2× · see citing works
“19 (1986), Shih and Alley (1988), and Hong, Ou, and Mandel (1987).”
MethodA semiconductor source of triggered entangled photon pairs
Stevenson, R. M., Young, R. J., Atkinson, P., Cooper, K., Ritchie, D. A., & Shields, A. J. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04446 · Cited by 914 · cited 1× · see citing works
“4 (Stevenson et al., 2006; Young et al., 2006; Akopian et al., 2006), also emerge.”
Lounis, B., & Orrit, M. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/5/r04 · Cited by 908 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We shall not discuss the above mentioned aspects of quantum optics, as an interested reader can find excellent presentations in, e.g., Walls and Milburn (1994), Mandel and Wolf (1995), Scully and Zubairy (1997), and Lounis and Orrit (2005).”
BackgroundSemiconductor quantum light sources
Shields, A. J. (2007) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.46 · Cited by 900 · see citing works
Entangled Photon Pairs from Semiconductor Quantum Dots
Akopian, N., Lindner, N. H., Poem, E., Berlatzky, Y., Avron, J. E., Gershoni, D., Gerardot, B. D., & Petroff, P. M. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.130501 · Cited by 897 · cited 1× · see citing works
“4 (Stevenson et al., 2006; Young et al., 2006; Akopian et al., 2006), also emerge.”
Violating Bell inequality by mixed states: necessary and sufficient condition
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, M. (1995) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(95)00214-n · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Violation of Bell's Inequality and Classical Probability in a Two-Photon Correlation Experiment
Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.50 · Cited by 879 · cited 2× · see citing works
“First obsevations of Bell-type quantum interference for photon pairs generated by type-I SPDC were made by Shih and Alley (Alley and Shih, 1986; Shih and Alley, 1988), and Ou and Mandel (1988a).”
BackgroundMethodBeating the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding
Barreiro, J. T., Wei, T.-C., & Kwiat, P. G. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys919 · Cited by 870 · see citing works
Quantum optical tests of complementarity
Scully, M. O., Englert, B., & WALTHER, H. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/351111a0 · Cited by 861 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally we would like to note that in all these schemes the principle of quantum erasure (Scully et al., 1991) has been used in a way that, behind the Bell- and GHZ-state analyzer, at least some of the photons registered cannot be identified anymore as to which source they came from.”
MethodDeterministic Single-Photon Source for Distributed Quantum Networking
Kuhn, A., Hennrich, M., & Rempe, G. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.067901 · Cited by 859 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Santori et al., 2001, 2002; Pelton et al., 2002), nitrogen-vacancy color centers (Brouri et al., 2000; Kurtsiefer et al., 2000), neutral atoms (Kuhn et al., 2002; McKeever et al., 2004; Darquié et al., 2005), ions (Keller et al., 2004), and molecules (Brunel et al., 1999; Lounis and Moerner,…”
BackgroundQuantum Teleportation is a Universal Computational PrimitivePreprint
Gottesman, D., & Chuang, I. L. (1999) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9908010 · Cited by 846 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Quantum teleportation is indeed not only a critical ingredient for quantum computation (Gottesman and Chuang, 1999; Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn, 2001) and communication, its experimental realization allows new studies of the fundamentals of quantum theory.”
BackgroundExperimental demonstration of quantum memory for light
Julsgaard, B., Sherson, J. F., Cirac, J. I., Fiurášek, J., & Polzik, E. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03064 · Cited by 841 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2001; Duan, Cirac, and Zoller, 2002; Chen et al., 2007), and the relevant experimental advances (Kash et al., 1999; Phillips et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2001; Schori et al., 2002; Julsgaard et al., 2004; van der Wal et al., 2003; Bajcsy et al., 2003; Matsukevich and Kuzmich; 2004) are significant.”
BackgroundDie gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491987 · Cited by 832 · see citing works
Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state
Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S., & Steinberg, A. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02493 · Cited by 830 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…has many interesting applications including tests of foundations of quantum theory (Howell et al., 2002), phase sensitive measurements (Holland and Burnett, 1993; Mitchell et al., 2004) and quantum photolithography beyond the classical diffraction limit (Boto et al., 2000; Kok et al., 2001).”
BackgroundEntanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance
Moehring, D. L., Maunz, P., Olmschenk, S., Younge, K. C., Matsukevich, D. N., Duan, L.-M., & Monroe, C. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06118 · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Single photons on demand from a single molecule at room temperature
Lounis, B., & Moerner, W. E. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35035032 · Cited by 806 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…et al., 2001, 2002; Pelton et al., 2002), nitrogen-vacancy color centers (Brouri et al., 2000; Kurtsiefer et al., 2000), neutral atoms (Kuhn et al., 2002; McKeever et al., 2004; Darquié et al., 2005), ions (Keller et al., 2004), and molecules (Brunel et al., 1999; Lounis and Moerner, 2000).”
BackgroundBeating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons
Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O’Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K., & Takeuchi, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138007 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Experimental Demonstration of Free-Space Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution over 144 km
Schmitt-Manderbach, T., Weier, H., Fürst, M., Ursin, R., Tiefenbacher, F., Scheidl, T., Perdigués, J., Sodnik, Z., Kurtsiefer, C., Rarity, J., et al. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.010504 · Cited by 804 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Currently, quantum key distribution was realized for distances 144 km (Ursin et al, 2007; Schmitt-Manderbach et al., 2007) over a free space, and over more than 100 km in fiber (Rosenberg et at., 2007; Peng et al., 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationQuantum repeaters based on entanglement purification
Dür, W., Briegel, H. J., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.169 · Cited by 799 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Entanglement swapping, together with entanglement purification, is a key element of the quantum repeater protocol (Briegel et al., 1998; Dür et al., 1999; see also section VII.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialControlling photons using electromagnetically induced transparency
Lukin, M. D., & Imamoğlu, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35095000 · Cited by 799 · cited 1× · see citing works
“33 are both equal to ∆), the classical driving field can induce transparency for the quantized light field and a substantial group-velocity reduction, even the complete stop of the light (for reviews, see Lukin and Imamoǧlu, 2001; Lukin, 2003; Fleischhauer et al., 2005).”
BackgroundTowards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer
Lanyon, B. P., Whitfield, J. D., Gillett, G. G., Goggin, M. E., Almeida, M. P., Kassal, I., Biamonte, J. D., Mohseni, M., Powell, B. J., Barbieri, M., et al. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.483 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Resource-Efficient Linear Optical Quantum Computation
Browne, D. E., & Rudolph, T. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.010501 · Cited by 790 · cited 2× · see citing works
“By introducing two elementary linear-optical operations (the type-I/II “two-qubit fusion”), Browne and Rudolph (2005) suggested a robust scheme achieving a much greater degree of efficiency and a simpler implementation than previous proposals.”
ResultEntanglement purification for quantum communication
Pan, J.-W., Simon, C., Brukner, Č., & Zeilinger, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35074041 · Cited by 786 · cited 8× · see citing works
“The realization of a high intensity source of fourphoton GHZ entanglement (Pan et al., 2001a, see also a related experiment by Eibl et al., 2003), allowed Zhao et al. (2003a) to report the first four-photon GHZ-type laboratory falsification of local realism.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStorage and retrieval of single photons transmitted between remote quantum memories
Chanelière, T., Matsukevich, D. N., Jenkins, S. D., Lan, S.-Y., Kennedy, T. A. B., & Kuzmich, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04315 · Cited by 785 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Controllable generation, storage and retrieval of single photons with tunable frequency, timing and bandwidth have been demonstrated (Chou et al., 2004; Eisaman et al., 2004, 2005; Chanelière et al., 2005).”
BackgroundOptimal Extraction of Information from Finite Quantum Ensembles
Massar, S., & Popescu, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.1259 · Cited by 777 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…a bona fide teleportation should be: (1) the experimental scheme is capable of teleporting any state that is designed to teleport, (2) a fidelity better than 2/3 (Massar and Popescu, 1995), (3) for future applications, at least in principle, the scheme should be extendinble to long-distances.”
BackgroundBell inequalities and the separability criterion
Terhal, B. M. (2000) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(00)00401-1 · Cited by 775 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The equation of such a hyperplane is defined by an element of the space, namely, a hermitian operator Ŵ , which is called “entanglement witness” (Horodecki et al., 1996; Terhal, 2000; Lewenstein et al., 2000; Bruß et al., 2002).”
BackgroundNonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states
Hardy, L. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1665 · Cited by 772 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, for two-particle states, Hardy (1993) has found situations, where quantum mechanics predicts a specific result to occur sometimes, and local realism predicts the same result never to occur (for an experiment see Boschi et al., 1997).”
BackgroundQuantum memory for photons: Dark-state polaritons
Fleischhauer, M., & Lukin, M. D. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.022314 · Cited by 771 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Along this line, theoretical ideas on quantum light memory has been proposed (Kozhekin et al., 2000; Lukin et al., 2000; Fleischhauer and Lukin, 2000, 2002; Duan et al., 2001; Duan, Cirac, and Zoller, 2002; Chen et al., 2007), and the relevant experimental advances (Kash et al., 1999; Phillips et…”
BackgroundInfluentialSimple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems
Mermin, N. D. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.3373 · Cited by 753 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Another class of theorems, which show the drastic difference between the classical and the quantum, are the no-go theorems for non-contextual hidden variables (NCHV) interpretations of quantum mechanics [Bell, 1966; Kochen and Specker, 1967; Mermin, 1990c; for a survey, see (Mermin, 1993)].”
BackgroundInfluentialGeneration of Hyperentangled Photon Pairs
Barreiro, J. T., Langford, N. K., Peters, N. A., & Kwiat, P. G. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.260501 · Cited by 750 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In an experiment by Barreiro et al (2005), besides the entanglement in polarization and in energy, photon pairs from a single nonlinear crystal were also entangled in orbital angular momentum.”
Multiparticle generalization of entanglement swapping
Bose, S., Vedral, V., & Knight, P. L. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.822 · Cited by 749 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This ultimately leads to entanglement swapping (Żukowski et al., 1993; Bose et al., 1998).”
BackgroundQuantum key distribution over a 40-dB channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors
Takesue, H., Nam, S. W., Zhang, Q., Hadfield, R. H., Honjo, T., Tamaki, K., & Yamamoto, Y. (2007) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.75 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories
Hardy, L. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.2981 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces
Lanyon, B. P., Barbieri, M., de Almeida, M. P., Jennewein, T. D., Ralph, T. C., Resch, K. J., Pryde, G. J., O’Brien, J. L., Gilchrist, A., & White, A. G. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1150 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Electromagnetically induced transparency with tunable single-photon pulses
Eisaman, M. D., André, A., Massou, F., Fleischhauer, M., Zibrov, A. S., & Lukin, M. D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04327 · Cited by 738 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…such as active error corrections are required, which are currently hard to do with high enough precision. λ ∼ 1 µm, generated from atomic ensembles (Eisaman et al., 2005) requires the fine control of timing jitter at a sub-femtosecond level, which is almost an experimentally forbidden task…”
BackgroundCounting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency
Lita, A. E., Miller, A. J., & Nam, S. W. (2008) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.16.003032 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Deterministic Generation of Single Photons from One Atom Trapped in a Cavity
McKeever, J., Boca, A., Boozer, A. D., Miller, R., Buck, J. R., Kuzmich, A., & Kimble, H. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095232 · Cited by 692 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…et al., 2001, 2002; Pelton et al., 2002), nitrogen-vacancy color centers (Brouri et al., 2000; Kurtsiefer et al., 2000), neutral atoms (Kuhn et al., 2002; McKeever et al., 2004; Darquié et al., 2005), ions (Keller et al., 2004), and molecules (Brunel et al., 1999; Lounis and Moerner, 2000).”
BackgroundDie gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491914 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Optimization of entanglement witnesses
Lewenstein, M., Kraus, B., Cirac, J. I., & Horodecki, P. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.052310 · Cited by 684 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The equation of such a hyperplane is defined by an element of the space, namely, a hermitian operator Ŵ , which is called “entanglement witness” (Horodecki et al., 1996; Terhal, 2000; Lewenstein et al., 2000; Bruß et al., 2002).”
BackgroundExperimental entanglement of six photons in graph states
Lu, C.-Y., Zhou, X.-Q., Gühne, O., Gao, W.-B., Zhang, J., Yuan, Z.-S., Goebel, A., Yang, T., & Pan, J.-W. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys507 · Cited by 683 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Few-qubit cluster states of photons were created in several recent experiments (Zhang et al., 2006a; Walther et al., 2005b; Kiesel et al., 2005; Schmid et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationEfficient Source of Single Photons: A Single Quantum Dot in a Micropost Microcavity
Pelton, M. A., Santori, C., Jelena Vuckovic, A., Zhang, B., Solomon, G. S., Plant, J., & Yamamoto, Y. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.233602 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Pulsed Energy-Time Entangled Twin-Photon Source for Quantum Communication
Brendel, J., Gisin, N., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2594 · Cited by 679 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A pulsed-pump version of Franson-interferometry is called time-bin entanglement (Brendel et al., 1999; Marcikic et al., 2002; Gisin et al., 2002), and is good for practical applications (see Fig.”
BackgroundQuantum mechanical interaction-free measurements
Elitzur, A. C., & Vaidman, L. (1993) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00736012 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Observation of entanglement between a single trapped atom and a single photon
Blinov, B. B., Moehring, D. L., Duan, L., & Monroe, C. R. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02377 · Cited by 660 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The matterphoton entanglement was realized for, e.g., atom-photon interfaces (Blinov et al., 2004) and for atomic ensemble-photon (Matsukevich et al., 2006a) .”
BackgroundQuantum Teleportation of a Polarization State with a Complete Bell State Measurement
Kim, Y.-H., Kulik, S. P., & Shih, Y. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.1370 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Heralded Generation of Ultrafast Single Photons in Pure Quantum States
Mosley, P. J., Lundeen, J. S., Smith, B. J., Wasylczyk, P., U’Ren, A. B., Silberhorn, C., & Walmsley, I. A. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.133601 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Experimental Two-Photon, Three-Dimensional Entanglement for Quantum Communication
Vaziri, A., Weihs, G., & Zeilinger, A. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.240401 · Cited by 638 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This approach has advantages in certain quantum communication protocols (Vaziri et al., 2002, Molina-Terriza et al., 2004; Gröblacher et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBroad-Band Parametric Deamplification of Quantum Noise in an Optical Fiber
Shelby, R. M., Levenson, M. D., Perlmutter, S. H., et al. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.691 · Cited by 635 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Squeezed states were experimentally generated by using four-wave mixing in atomic sodium (Slusher et al., 1985) and in optical fibers (Shelby et al., 1986), or by using an optical parametric oscillator (Wu et al., 1986).”
MethodContinuous generation of single photons with controlled waveform in an ion-trap cavity system
Keller, M., Lange, B., Hayasaka, K., Lange, W., & WALTHER, H. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02961 · Cited by 629 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…et al., 2001, 2002; Pelton et al., 2002), nitrogen-vacancy color centers (Brouri et al., 2000; Kurtsiefer et al., 2000), neutral atoms (Kuhn et al., 2002; McKeever et al., 2004; Darquié et al., 2005), ions (Keller et al., 2004), and molecules (Brunel et al., 1999; Lounis and Moerner, 2000).”
BackgroundUltrabright source of entangled photon pairs
Dousse, A., Suffczyński, J., Beveratos, A., Krebs, O., Lemaître, A., Sagnes, I., Bloch, J., Voisin, P., & Senellart, P. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09148 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Topological fault-tolerance in cluster state quantum computation
Raussendorf, R., Harrington, J., & Goyal, K. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/199 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Photon antibunching in the fluorescence of individual color centers in diamond
Brouri, R., Beveratos, A., Poizat, J.-P., & Grangier, P. (2000) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.25.001294 · Cited by 616 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…emitting mechanisms include quantum dots (Michler et al., 2000b; Santori et al., 2001, 2002; Pelton et al., 2002), nitrogen-vacancy color centers (Brouri et al., 2000; Kurtsiefer et al., 2000), neutral atoms (Kuhn et al., 2002; McKeever et al., 2004; Darquié et al., 2005), ions (Keller et al.,…”
BackgroundEfficient high-fidelity quantum computation using matter qubits and linear optics
Barrett, S. D., & Kok, P. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.060310 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Optical Quantum Computation Using Cluster States
Nielsen, M. A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.040503 · Cited by 614 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Moreover, when combined with single-qubit Hadamard rotations to perform a controlled-sign gate [so as to build the cluster states via Nielsen’s method (Nielsen, 2004)] this gate also satisfies the criterion that when it fails the qubits can be projected out in the computational basis.”
BackgroundMethodExperimental violation of Bell’s inequality based on phase and momentum
Rarity, J. G., & Tapster, P. R. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.2495 · Cited by 612 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The entanglement of |ψ〉12 is actually called momentum entanglement (Rarity and Tapster, 1990), whose creation will be described in section V.”
BackgroundExperimental demonstration of five-photon entanglement and open-destination teleportation
Zhao, Z., Chen, Y.-A., Zhang, A.-N., Yang, T., Briegel, H. J., & Pan, J.-W. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02643 · Cited by 602 · cited 6× · see citing works
“This is almost 5 times brighter than the source achieved in the fivephoton experiment (Zhao et al., 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationCreation of entangled states of distant atoms by interference
Cabrillo, C., Cirac, J. I., García-Fernández, P., & Zoller, P. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.1025 · Cited by 587 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The entanglement generation (as well as entanglement connection) in the DLCZ scheme is based on singlephoton interference at photodetectors,54 which was first proposed to entangle single atoms (Cabrillo et al., 1999; Bose et al., 1999).”
BackgroundStationary pulses of light in an atomic medium
Bajcsy, M., Zibrov, A. S., & Lukin, M. D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02176 · Cited by 587 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…2001; Duan, Cirac, and Zoller, 2002; Chen et al., 2007), and the relevant experimental advances (Kash et al., 1999; Phillips et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2001; Schori et al., 2002; Julsgaard et al., 2004; van der Wal et al., 2003; Bajcsy et al., 2003; Matsukevich and Kuzmich; 2004) are significant.”
BackgroundNonclassical radiation of a single stored ion
Diedrich, F., & Walther, H. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.203 · Cited by 587 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Later, Diedrich and Walther (1987) realized such experiments using single atoms in traps and observed photon antibunching as well as subPoissonian statistics in the system.”
BackgroundEberhard, P. H. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.r747 · Cited by 582 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…Bell test since in such a case for qubits one has three possible local outcomes, ±1 or no count; for efficiency lower than about 83% [see, e.g., (Garg and Mermin, 1987; Eberhard, 1993)] one can show that one cannot derive (generalized) CHSH-type inequality that is violated by quantum predictions.”
BackgroundExperimental demonstration of four-photon entanglement and high-fidelity teleportation
Pan, J.-W., Daniell, M., Gasparoni, S., Weihs, G., & Zeilinger, A. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4435 · Cited by 574 · cited 8× · see citing works
“The realization of a high intensity source of fourphoton GHZ entanglement (Pan et al., 2001a, see also a related experiment by Eibl et al., 2003), allowed Zhao et al. (2003a) to report the first four-photon GHZ-type laboratory falsification of local realism.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationFree-Space distribution of entanglement and single photons over 144 kmPreprint
Ursin, R., Tiefenbacher, F., Schmitt-Manderbach, T., Weier, H., Scheidl, T., Lindenthal, M., Blauensteiner, B., Jennewein, T. D., Perdigués, J., Trojek, P., et al. (2006) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0607182 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Self-citationDe Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state
Walther, P., Pan, J.-W., Aspelmeyer, M., Ursin, R., Gasparoni, S., & Zeilinger, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02552 · Cited by 555 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A slight modification of the purification setup can be used for testing two-photon GHZ-type theorem (Chen et al., 2003; Yang et al., 2005) and measuring de Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state (Walther et al., 2004), to mention a few.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationComplete quantum teleportation using nuclear magnetic resonance
Nielsen, M. A., Knill, E., & Laflamme, R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23891 · Cited by 548 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…photonic qubits include quantum teleportation of continuousvariable states (Furusawa et al., 1998), the complete quantum teleporation using nuclear magnetic resonance (Nielsen, Knill, and Laflamme, 1998), and deterministic quantum teleportation with atoms (Riebe et al., 2004; Barret et al., 2004).”
BackgroundBell measurements for teleportation
Lütkenhaus, N., Calsamiglia, J., & Suominen, K.-A. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.3295 · Cited by 538 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Actually, it is proved that the full Bell-state measurement is impossible with only linear optics (Vaidman and Yoran, 1999; Lütkenhaus et al., 1999).”
BackgroundSimple Test for Hidden Variables in Spin-1 Systems
Klyachko, A. A., Can, M. A., Binicioǧlu, S., & Shumovsky, A. S. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.020403 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Hidden quantum nonlocality revealed by local filters
Gisin, N. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)80001-6 · Cited by 531 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this case, the scheme only involves local filtering operations (Gisin, 1996; Horodecki et al., 1996) on single pairs.”
MethodMapping photonic entanglement into and out of a quantum memory
Choi, K. S., Deng, H., Laurat, J., & Kimble, H. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06670 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Long-distance teleportation of qubits at telecommunication wavelengths
Marcikic, I., de Riedmatten, H., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H., & Gisin, N. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01376 · Cited by 528 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Innsbruck teleportation technique with its later imprvements enables one to aim at a long-distance teleportation (Marcikic et al., 2003; Ursin et al., 2004) and more complicated schemes (Zhao et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2006c).”
MethodExperimental Detection of Multipartite Entanglement using Witness Operators
Bourennane, M., Eibl, M., Kurtsiefer, C., Gaertner, S., Weinfurter, H., Gühne, O., Hyllus, P., Bruß, D., Lewenstein, M., & Sanpera, A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.087902 · Cited by 522 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Experimental realization of decoherence-free subspaces with photons was reported by Kwiat et al. (2000), Altepeter et al. (2004), and Bourennane et al. (2004), and applications of decoherence-free subspace were demonstrated for an optical quantum-computing algorithm (Mohseni et al., 2003) and for…”
MethodSelf-citationExperimental Verification of Decoherence-Free Subspaces
Kwiat, P. G., Berglund, A. J., Altepeter, J. B., & White, A. G. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5491.498 · Cited by 519 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Experimental realization of decoherence-free subspaces with photons was reported by Kwiat et al. (2000), Altepeter et al. (2004), and Bourennane et al. (2004), and applications of decoherence-free subspace were demonstrated for an optical quantum-computing algorithm (Mohseni et al., 2003) and for…”
MethodRealization of quantum error correction
Chiaverini, J., Leibfried, D., Schaetz, T., Barrett, M. D., Blakestad, R. B., Britton, J., Itano, W. M., Jost, J. D., Knill, E., Langer, C., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03074 · Cited by 517 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several quantum error correction protocols have been experimentally demonstrated in the NMR (Cory et al., 1998; Knill et al., 2001) and ion-trap (Chiaverini et al., 2004) systems.”
BackgroundSpectral information and distinguishability in type-II down-conversion with a broadband pump
Grice, W. P., & Walmsley, I. A. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.56.1627 · Cited by 516 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…SPDC: (i) to use a thin nonlinear crystal (Sergienko et al., 1999), (ii) to use narrow-band spectral filters in front of detectors, as shown above (Grice and Walmsley, 1997; Grice et al., 1998; Di Giuseppe et al., 1997), or (iii) to use an interferometric technique (Branning et al., 1999, 2000)…”
MethodRealizable Universal Quantum Logic Gates
Sleator, T., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4087 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Self-citationNonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization
White, A. G., James, D. F. V., Eberhard, P. H., & Kwiat, P. G. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3103 · Cited by 511 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Using type-II SPDC, two-photon states of tunable purity and the degree of entanglement can be produced (White et al., 1999; Peters et al., 2004; Cinelli et al., 2004).”
Kaszlikowski, D., Gnaciński, P., Żukowski, M., Miklaszewski, W., & Zeilinger, A. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.4418 · Cited by 507 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As it was shown by Żukowski, Zeilinger and Horne (1997) such configuration can lead to new types of EPR correlations, and can be used as tests of local realism (which are more discriminating than two qubit tests, see [Kaszlikowski et al. (2000)].”
MethodSelf-citationExperimental entanglement purification of arbitrary unknown states
Pan, J.-W., Gasparoni, S., Ursin, R., Weihs, G., & Zeilinger, A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01623 · Cited by 505 · cited 7× · see citing works
“In the Vienna teleportation experiment (Pan et al., 2003a), a freely propagating teleported quantum state was achieved [see Fig.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationQuantum Process Tomography of a Controlled-NOT Gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., Gilchrist, A., James, D. F. V., Langford, N. K., Ralph, T. C., & White, A. G. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.080502 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
All-multipartite Bell-correlation inequalities for two dichotomic observables per site
Werner, R. F., & Wolf, M. M. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.032112 · Cited by 497 · cited 28× · see citing works
“In 1990’s many proposals were made for observations of multi-photon entanglement (Żukowski et al., 1993; Żukowski, Zeilinger and Weinfurter (1995); Zeilinger et al., 1997; Pan and Zeilinger, 1998; see also section V.F.2), achieved this using single-photon detectors of a time resolution ˜70 ps, which is much shorter…”
BackgroundInfluentialTheory of two-photon entanglement in type-II optical parametric down-conversion
Rubin, M. H., Klyshko, D. N., Shih, Y. H., & Sergienko, A. V. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.5122 · Cited by 478 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fortunaely, because the photons are produced coherently along the entire length of the crystal, one can completely compensate for the longitudinal walk-off (Rubin et al., 1994).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1126/science.1085593 · DOI
- Bennett, C., 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers and Systems and Singal Proceeding and Bangalore and India (IEEE and New York)
- Bohm, D., 1951, Quantum Theory
- Holevo, A., 1973, Probl. Inf. Transm., 9, 177
- Klyshko, D., 1967, JETP Lett., 6, 23
- Kochen, S., 1967, J. Math. Mech., 17, 59
- Lo, H.-K., 2004, Proceedings of IEEE ISIT
- Taylor, G., 1909, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. Math. Phys. Sci., 15, 114
- Zel’dovich, Y., 1969, JETP Lett., 9, 40
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 · Cited by 2,688 · see citing works
Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401 · see citing works
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,571 · see citing works
“…uncertainty relation (Diamanti and Leverrier, 2015; Laudenbach et al., 2018; Weedbrook et al., 2012) Continuous-variable QKD (Munro et al., 2015; Pan et al., 2012; Sangouard et al., 2011) Quantum repeaters (Kimble, 2008; Wehner et al., 2018) Quantum internet (Brunner et al., 2014) Bell…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHigh-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources
Senellart, P., Solomon, G. S., & White, A. G. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.218 · Cited by 1,275 · see citing works
Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state
Somaschi, N., Giesz, V., Santis, L. D., Loredo, J. C., de Almeida, M. P., Hornecker, G., Portalupi, S. L., Grange, T., Antón, C., Demory, J., et al. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.23 · Cited by 1,239 · see citing works
Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system
Islam, R., Ma, R., Preiss, P. M., Tai, M. E., Lukin, A., Rispoli, M., & Greiner, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15750 · Cited by 1,142 · see citing works
“systems of photonic qubits [30] and trapped ion spins [31], but there is no known scheme to perform tomography for systems involving itinerant delocalized particles.”
BackgroundCarolan, J., Harrold, C., Sparrow, C., Martín-López, E., Russell, N. J., Silverstone, J. W., Shadbolt, P. J., Matsuda, N., Oguma, M., Itoh, M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3642 · Cited by 1,093 · see citing works
Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons
Reiserer, A., & Rempe, G. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.1379 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
“When the emitted photons are indistinguishable, one can implement probabilistic photonphoton gates using the techniques of linear optical quantum computing (O’Brien, 2007; Pan et al., 2012).”
BackgroundMethodGround-to-satellite quantum teleportation
Ren, J.-G., Xu, P., Yong, H.-L., Zhang, L., Liao, S., Yin, J., Liu, W.-Y., Cai, W., Yang, M., Li, L., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23675 · Cited by 967 · see citing works
Self-citationDing, X., He, Y., Duan, Z.-C., Gregersen, N., Chen, M.-C., Unsleber, S., Maier, S., Schneider, C., Kamp, M., Höfling, S., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.020401 · Cited by 908 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum nonlinear optics — photon by photon
Chang, D. E., Vuletić, V., & Lukin, M. D. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.192 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon
Wang, X., Cai, X.-D., Su, Z.-E., Chen, M.-C., Wu, D., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14246 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-referencing embedded strings (SELFIES): A 100% robust molecular string representation
Krenn, M., Häse, F., Nigam, A., Friederich, P., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2020) · Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) · doi:10.5445/ir/1000128111 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.001.0001 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
Twisted photons: new quantum perspectives in high dimensions
Erhard, M., Fickler, R., Krenn, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2017) · Light Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.146 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
“Readers interested in the theoretical foundations of quantum information may look into [17–20], and to get an overview of photonic quantum information one may look into [21].”
Self-citationBroadband waveguide quantum memory for entangled photons
Sağlamyürek, E., Sinclair, N. E., Jin, J., Slater, J. A., Oblak, D., Bussières, F., George, M., Ricken, R., Sohler, W., & Tittel, W. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09719 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability
He, Y.-M., He, Y., Wei, Y.-J., Wu, D., Atatüre, M., Schneider, C., Höfling, S., Kamp, M., Lu, C.-Y., & Pan, J.-W. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.262 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental Ten-Photon Entanglement
Wang, X., Chen, L.-K., Li, W.-Y., Huang, H.-L., Liu, C., Chen, C., Luo, Y.-H., Su, Z.-E., Wu, D., Li, Z.-D., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.210502 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Self-citationOn-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources
Silverstone, J. W., Bonneau, D., Ohira, K., Suzuki, N., Yoshida, H., Iizuka, N., Ezaki, M., Natarajan, C. M., Tanner, M. G., Hadfield, R. H., et al. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.339 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
The potential and global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies
Pelucchi, E., Fagas, G., Aharonovich, I., Englund, D. R., Figueroa, E. V., Gong, Q., Hübel, H., Liu, J., Lu, C., Matsuda, N., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00398-z · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Limits in Optical Interferometry
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Jarzyna, M., & Kołodyński, J. (2015) · Progress in optics · doi:10.1016/bs.po.2015.02.003 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
“States with an exact photon number are extensively used in other fields of quantum information processing, including quantum communication and quantum computing (Kok et al., 2007; Pan et al., 2012).”
BackgroundWang, H., Qin, J., Ding, X., Chen, M.-C., Chen, S., You, X., He, Y., Jiang, X. Q., You, L., Wang, Z., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.250503 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities
Wang, H., He, Y.-M., Chung, T.-H., Hu, H., Yu, Y., Chen, S., Ding, X., Chen, M.-C., Qin, J., Yang, X., et al. (2019) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0494-3 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
“0 (1) ps, respectively, measured using a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with a time resolution of 20 ps.”
MethodSelf-citationOn-demand generation of indistinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs
Müller, M. A., Bounouar, S., Jöns, K. D., Glässl, M., & Michler, P. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.377 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Metasurfaces for quantum photonics
Solntsev, A. S., Agarwal, G. S., & Kivshar, Y. S. (2021) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-021-00793-z · Cited by 477 · see citing works
18-Qubit Entanglement with Six Photons’ Three Degrees of Freedom
Wang, X., Luo, Y.-H., Huang, H.-L., Chen, M.-C., Su, Z.-E., Liu, C., Chen, C., Li, W., Fang, Y., Jiang, X. Q., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.260502 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental demonstration of a heralded entanglement source
Wagenknecht, C., Li, C.-M., Reingruber, A., Bao, X.-H., Goebel, A., Chen, Y.-A., Zhang, Q., Chen, K., & Pan, J.-W. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.123 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Self-citationFisher information and entanglement of non-Gaussian spin states
Strobel, H., Muessel, W., Linnemann, D., Zibold, T., Hume, D. B., Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., & Oberthaler, M. K. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1250147 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
“Various types have been achieved in experimental settings ranging from ion traps [2], photonic systems [3] and solid state circuits [4] to Bose-Einstein condensates.”
BackgroundZhong, H.-S., Li, Y., Li, W., Peng, L.-C., Su, Z.-E., Hu, Y., He, Y., Ding, X., Zhang, W., Li, H., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.250505 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Self-citationHigh-efficiency multiphoton boson sampling
Wang, H., He, Y., Li, Y.-H., Su, Z.-E., Li, B., Huang, H.-L., Ding, X., Chen, M.-C., Liu, C., Qin, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.63 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Self-citationPolino, E., Valeri, M., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0007577 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Entanglement distillation between solid-state quantum network nodes
Kalb, N., Reiserer, A., Humphreys, P. C., Bakermans, J. J. W., Kamerling, S. J., Nickerson, N. H., Benjamin, S. C., Twitchen, D. J., Markham, M., & Hanson, R. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan0070 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Towards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities
Wang, H., He, Y., Chung, T. H., Hu, H. R., Yu, Y., Chen, S., Ding, X., Chen, M.-C., Qin, J., Yang, X., et al. (2019) · Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Self-citationNonlinear optical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light
Dorfman, K. E., Schlawin, F., & Mukamel, S. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.045008 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
“Using a suitable setup, this allows for the preparation of Bell states of the form (Pan et al., 2012) |Bell〉 = 1√ 2 (|H〉1|V 〉2 ± |V 〉1|H〉2) , (67) where (|H〉, |V 〉) denote the horizontal (vertical) polarization, respectively.”
BackgroundMethodPerfect optics with imperfect components
Miller, D. A. B. (2015) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.2.000747 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Wang, H., Hu, H. R., Chung, T.-H., Qin, J., Yang, X., Li, J., Liu, R., Zhong, H.-S., He, Y.-M., Ding, X., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.113602 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Self-citationParametric down-conversion photon-pair source on a nanophotonic chip
Guo, X., Zou, C., Schuck, C., Jung, H., Cheng, R., & Tang, H. X. (2016) · Light Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/lsa.2016.249 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Witnessing Quantum Coherence: from solid-state to biological systems
Li, C., Lambert, N., Chen, Y.-N., Chen, G.-Y., & Nori, F. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00885 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
“It is also thought to be the power behind several “quantum tools”, including quantum information processing[3], metrology [4], transport [5], and recently, some functions in biological organisms [6] (e.”
BackgroundMethodActive learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments
Melnikov, A. A., Nautrup, H. P., Krenn, M., Dunjko, V., Tiersch, M., Zeilinger, A., & Briegel, H. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1714936115 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Self-citationMicius quantum experiments in space
Lu, C., Cao, Y. W., Peng, C.-Z., & Pan, J.-W. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.035001 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Self-citationDeterministic quantum teleportation of photonic quantum bits by a hybrid technique
Takeda, S., Mizuta, T., Fuwa, M., van Loock, P., & Furusawa, A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12366 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Progress in quantum teleportation
Hu, X., Guo, Y., Liu, B., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00588-x · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Toward large-scale fault-tolerant universal photonic quantum computing
Takeda, S., & Furusawa, A. (2019) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/1.5100160 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
High-efficiency single-photon generation via large-scale active time multiplexing
Kaneda, F., & Kwiat, P. G. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw8586 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations
Ma, X., Kofler, J., & Zeilinger, A. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015005 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
“Entanglement can be studied for multipartite systems, arbitrary high-dimensional state spaces, and for mixed states (Horodecki et al., 2009; Pan et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMacroscopic quantum states: Measures, fragility, and implementations
Fröwis, F., Sekatski, P., Dür, W., Gisin, N., & Sangouard, N. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.025004 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“42 Chekhova et al. (2015); De Martini and Sciarrino (2012); Jeong et al. (2015); and Pan et al. (2012) 43 Devoret and Schoelkopf (2013); Haroche (2013); Makhlin et al. (2001); Raimond et al. (2001); and Schoelkopf and Girvin (2008) 42 Type I down converters produce pairs with identical polarization…”
BackgroundQuantum-Enhanced Sensing Based on Time Reversal of Nonlinear Dynamics
Linnemann, D., Strobel, H., Muessel, W., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.013001 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Towards Real‐World Quantum Networks: A Review
Wei, S., Jing, B., Zhang, X., Liao, J., Yuan, C., Fan, B., Lyu, C., Zhou, D., Wang, Y., Deng, G., et al. (2022) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.202100219 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Entanglement-Based Machine Learning on a Quantum Computer
Cai, X., Wu, D., Su, Z.-E., Chen, M.-C., Wang, X., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.110504 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationRoadmap on all-optical processing
Minzioni, P., Lacava, C., Tanabe, T., Dong, J., Hu, X., Csaba, G., Porod, W., Singh, G. K., Willner, A. E., Almaiman, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8986/ab0e66 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Long-Distance Measurement-Device-Independent Multiparty Quantum Communication
Fu, Y., Yin, H., Chen, T., & Chen, Z. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.090501 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationMaterial platforms for defect qubits and single-photon emitters
Zhang, G., Cheng, Y., Chou, J., & Gali, Á. (2020) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0006075 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Boson Sampling with Single-Photon Fock States from a Bright Solid-State Source
Loredo, J. C., Broome, M. A., Hilaire, P., Gazzano, O., Sagnes, I., Lemaître, A., de Almeida, M. P., Senellart, P., & White, A. G. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.130503 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Observation of Laughlin states made of light
Clark, L. W., Schine, N., Baum, C., Jia, N., & Simon, J. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2318-5 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Near-Transform-Limited Single Photons from an Efficient Solid-State Quantum Emitter
Wang, H., Duan, Z.-C., Li, Y.-H., Chen, S., Li, J., He, Y.-M., Chen, M.-C., He, Y., Ding, X., Peng, C.-Z., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.213601 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationVery-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics
Bao, J., Fu, Z., Pramanik, T., Mao, J., Chi, Y., Cao, Y., Zhai, C., Mao, Y., Dai, T., Chen, X., et al. (2023) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-023-01187-z · Cited by 200 · see citing works
“This correspondence promises a type of versatile quantum photonic device based on graph theory, and could provide a fresh perspective on the existing ones 13–15 .”
BackgroundZhang, H., Jin, X., Yang, J. H., Dai, H.-N., Yang, S.-J., Zhao, T., Rui, J., He, Y., Jiang, X. Q., Yang, F., et al. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.213 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
“Preparing entangled photons in a pure spatiotemporal mode without spectral correlation can in principle be achieved by a spectral filte”
BackgroundSelf-citationTavakoli, A., Pozas-Kerstjens, A., Luo, M.-X., & Renou, M.-O. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac41bb · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Entanglement distillation between solid-state quantum network nodes
Kalb, N., Reiserer, A., Humphreys, P., Bakermans, J., Kamerling, S., Nickerson, N., Benjamin, S., Twitchen, D., Markham, M., & Hanson, R. (2017) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Quantum Image Processing and Its Application to Edge Detection: Theory and Experiment
Yao, X., Wang, H., Liao, Z., Chen, M.-C., Pan, J., Li, J., Zhang, K., Lin, X., Wang, ., Luo, Z., et al. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.031041 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Self-citationFrequency-domain Hong–Ou–Mandel interference
Kobayashi, T., Ikuta, R., Yasui, S., Miki, S., Yamashita, T., Terai, H., Yamamoto, T., Koashi, M., & Imoto, N. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.74 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
“Ĥ = ih − gâi âs − gâiâs ( ) (1) where âs(i) and â † s(i) are annihilation and creation operators of the upper (lower) frequency modes.”
BackgroundThree-photon bosonic coalescence in an integrated tritter
Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Aparo, L., Mataloni, P., Sciarrino, F., Crespi, A., Ramponi, R., & Osellame, R. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2616 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Highly-efficient extraction of entangled photons from quantum dots using a broadband optical antenna
Chen, Y., Zopf, M., Keil, R., Ding, F., & Schmidt, O. G. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05456-2 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Iles-Smith, J., McCutcheon, D. P. S., Nazir, A., & Mørk, J. (2017) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.101 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Direct generation of three-photon polarization entanglement
Hamel, D. R., Shalm, L. K., Hübel, H., Miller, A. J., Marsili, F., Verma, V. B., Mirin, R. P., Nam, S. W., Resch, K. J., & Jennewein, T. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.218 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Forbes, A., & Nape, I. M. (2019) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/1.5112027 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Universal photonic quantum computation via time-delayed feedback
Pichler, H., Choi, S., Zoller, P., & Lukin, M. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711003114 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Experimental Quantum Computing to Solve Systems of Linear Equations
Cai, X.-D., Weedbrook, C., Su, Z.-E., Chen, M.-C., Gu, M., Zhu, M.-J., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Lu, C.-Y., & Pan, J.-W. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.230501 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum dots for photonic quantum information technology
Heindel, T., Kim, J., Gregersen, N., Rastelli, A., & Reitzenstein, S. (2023) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.490091 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Luo, R., Jiang, H., Rogers, S. D., Liang, H., He, Y., & Lin, Q. (2017) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.25.024531 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Entangled mechanical oscillators
Jost, J. D., Home, J., Amini, J., Hanneke, D., Ozeri, R., Langer, C., Bollinger, J. J., Leibfried, D. G., & Wineland, D. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08006 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Experimental Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement beyond qubits
Erhard, M., Malik, M., Krenn, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0257-6 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationBroadband single-photon-level memory in a hollow-core photonic crystal fibre
Sprague, M., Michelberger, P., Champion, T. F. M., England, D. G., Nunn, J., Jin, X., Kolthammer, W. S., Abdolvand, A., Russell, P. S. J., & Walmsley, I. A. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.45 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Wei, Y.-J., He, Y.-M., Chen, M.-C., Hu, Y.-N., He, Y., Wu, D., Schneider, C., Kamp, M., Höfling, S., Lu, C.-Y., et al. (2014) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl503081n · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationSemiconductor devices for entangled photon pair generation: a review
Orieux, A., Versteegh, M. A. M., Jöns, K. D., & Ducci, S. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa6955 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“Mathematically, the HOM effect can be understood in a simple way [73].”
BackgroundDeterministic quantum teleportation through fiber channels
Huo, M., Qin, J., Cheng, J., Yan, Z., Qin, Z., Su, X., Jia, X., Xie, C., & Peng, K. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aas9401 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Nonseparable States of Light: From Quantum to Classical
Shen, Y., & Rosales‐Guzmán, C. (2022) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.202100533 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Experimental Machine Learning of Quantum States
Gao, J., Qiao, L., Jiao, Z., Ma, Y., Hu, C.-Q., Ren, R.-J., Yang, A.-L., Tang, H. L., Yung, M., & Jin, X. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.240501 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Quantum Conference Key Agreement: A Review
Murta, G., Grasselli, F., Kampermann, H., & Bruß, D. (2020) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202000025 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Time-multiplexed heralded single-photon source
Kaneda, F., Christensen, B., Wong, J. J., Park, H. S., McCusker, K. T., & Kwiat, P. G. (2015) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.2.001010 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“8(8)× 50 kHz∼8000 per second by using the multiplexing technique, while recent 8-photon experiments [4] with non-multiplexed SPDC sources generated only ∼1 per second.”
MethodLiang, F., Kang, L., Zhang, X., et al. (2017) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00677 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Observation of three-photon bound states in a quantum nonlinear medium
Liang, Q., Venkatramani, A. V., Cantu, S., Nicholson, T., Gullans, M. J., Gorshkov, A. V., Thompson, J. D., Chin, C., Lukin, M. D., & Vuletić, V. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao7293 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Quantifying Photonic High-Dimensional Entanglement
Martin, A., Guerreiro, T., Tiranov, A., Designolle, S., Fröwis, F., Brunner, N., Huber, M., & Gisin, N. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.110501 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Exceptional polarization purity in antiresonant hollow-core optical fibres
Taranta, A., Fokoua, E. N., Mousavi, S. M. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0633-x · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Entangled photon-pair sources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals
Anwar, A., Perumangatt, C., Steinlechner, F., Jennewein, T., & Ling, A. (2021) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/5.0023103 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Krenn, M., Hochrainer, A., Lahiri, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.080401 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
“We start by presenting different schemes to produce various multiphoton polarization-entangled states such as Greenberger-HorneZeilinger (GHZ) states [13] and W states [14,15], and contrast them with traditional methods of creating these states [16].”
MethodSelf-citationSecret sharing with a single d -level quantum system
Tavakoli, A., Herbauts, I., Żukowski, M., & Bourennane, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.030302 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhancement in the performance of a quantum battery by ordered and disordered interactions
Ghosh, S., Chanda, T., & Sen, A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032115 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Metasurface‐Enabled Generation of Circularly Polarized Single Photons
Kan, Y., Andersen, S. K. H., Ding, F., Kumar, S., Zhao, C., & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201907832 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Wavelength-tunable entangled photons from silicon-integrated III–V quantum dots
Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Zopf, M., Jung, K., Zhang, Y., Keil, R., Ding, F., & Schmidt, O. G. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10387 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Optomechanical Sensing of Spontaneous Wave-Function Collapse
Nimmrichter, S., Hornberger, K., & Hammerer, K. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.020405 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Experimental three-photon quantum nonlocality under strict locality conditions
Erven, C., Meyer-Scott, E., Bonsma-Fisher, K., Lavoie, J., Higgins, B. L., Yan, Z., Pugh, C. J., Bourgoin, J.-P., Prevedel, R., Shalm, L. K., et al. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.50 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“These results represent a significant advance towards definitive tests of the foundations of quantum mechanics[18] and practical multi-party quantum communications protocols[19].”
ResultCascaded emission of single photons from the biexciton in monolayered WSe2
He, Y., Iff, O., Lundt, N., Baumann, V., Davanço, M., Srinivasan, K. A., Höfling, S., & Schneider, C. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13409 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Pan, X., Yu, S., Zhou, Y., Zhang, K., Zhang, K., Lv, S., Li, S., Wang, W., & Jing, J. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.070506 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers
Cheng, B., Deng, X., Gu, X. Q., He, Y., Hu, G., Huang, P., Li, J., Lin, B., Lu, D., Lu, Y., et al. (2023) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-022-1249-z · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Quantum-dot single-photon sources for the quantum internet
Lu, C., & Pan, J.-W. (2021) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-021-01033-9 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationFast charging of a quantum battery assisted by noise
Ghosh, S., Chanda, T., Mal, S., & Sen, A. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.032207 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Quantum secure direct communication based on single-photon Bell-state measurement
Li, T., & Long, G. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab8ab5 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Quantum cloning machines and the applications
Fan, H., Wang, Y.-N., Jing, L., Yue, J.-D., Shi, H.-D., Zhang, Y.-L., & Mu, L.-Z. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.06.004 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
“A recent review about photonic quantum information processing can be found in (Martini and Sciarrino, 2012; Pan et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSubnatural-linewidth biphotons from a Doppler-broadened hot atomic vapour cell
Shu, C., Chen, P., Chow, T.-K. A., Zhu, L., Xiao, Y., Loy, M. M. T., & Du, S. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12783 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-05-11
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 777-838
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2015275764
- Semantic Scholar
- af26c7f219a3c81a4b537f9dfe61d1e79fd6a8a7
- Cited by
- 1,410
- References
- 555
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 140 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 81.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (2011CB921300)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (2011CB921300)
- Austrian Science Fund
- Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- multiphoton interference, photon entanglement, nonclassical light, completeness of quantum mechanics, local realism, quantum teleportation, entanglement distillation, quantum repeaters, linear optical quantum computation, quantum communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review