Cited by 1,418Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry

Open access
Pan, Jian-Wei, Chen, Zeng-Bing, Lu, Chao-Yang, Weinfurter, Harald, Zeilinger, Anton, Żukowski, Marek·2012·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Multiphoton interference reveals strictly nonclassical phenomena. Its applications range from fundamental tests of quantum mechanics to photonic quantum information processing, where a significant fraction of key experiments achieved so far comes from multiphoton state manipulation. The progress, both theoretical and experimental, of this rapidly advancing research is reviewed. The emphasis is given to the creation of photonic entanglement of various forms, tests of the completeness of quantum mechanics (in particular, violations of local realism), quantum information protocols for quantum communication (e.g., quantum teleportation, entanglement purification, and quantum repeater), and quantum computation with linear optics. The scope of the review is limited to ``few-photon'' phenomena involving measurements of discrete observables.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review surveys theoretical and experimental progress in multi-photon entanglement and interferometry, focusing on few-photon discrete-variable photonic systems. It covers entanglement generation, foundational tests of local realism, and applications in quantum communication and linear-optics quantum computing.

Key findings

  • Multi-photon interference produces non-classical effects beyond classical wave or particle descriptions; three-photon GHZ tests reached visibility of 71 ± 4%, above the 50% threshold, and later work observed up to eight entangled photons and ten qubits using multiple degrees of freedom.
  • Quantum communication milestones include teleportation with average fidelity 0.81(1), above the 2/3 classical threshold; entanglement swapping visibilities of 0.65(2) and later about 0.84; purification improving fidelity from 0.75 to 0.92 ± 0.01 and from 0.80 to 0.94 ± 0.01; and 144-km free-space CHSH violation by more than 5 standard deviations.
  • Linear-optics quantum computing demonstrations include cluster states up to six photons, Shor factoring of 15 with success probability about 0.99, dense coding reaching 1.630(6) bits per photon and beating the 1.58-bit linear-optics limit, and a six-photon singlet visibility of 85%.
  • Spontaneous parametric down-conversion remains the main photon-pair source, but higher-order emission and partial distinguishability limit fidelity; newer sources such as quantum dots, atomic ensembles, and photonic crystal fibers are discussed as alternatives.

Methods

  • Review article synthesizing theoretical and experimental literature over roughly two decades, limited to few-photon regimes with discrete-variable measurements.
  • Draws on experiments and proposals involving SPDC, linear optics, Bell and GHZ tests, teleportation, entanglement swapping, purification, quantum memory, and cluster-state computing.
  • Analysis is narrative and technical rather than a systematic meta-analysis or new primary data collection.

Limitations

  • Stated: the review excludes continuous-variable experiments and concentrates on few-photon discrete observables.
  • Stated experimental limitations include probabilistic SPDC pair creation, unwanted multi-pair emission, partial photon indistinguishability, low collection and detection efficiency, and phase-stabilization challenges, all of which constrain scalability and fidelity.
  • Evident: as a review, it presents no new experimental data, and its coverage reflects literature available up to its 2012 publication.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.84.777

Cites

556 of 556 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

99 of 499 cited sources checked · 65 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Optical quantum computing proposals based on the one-way model reduce the computational resource overhead by three orders of magnitude compared to the KLM scheme.

    “Optical quantum computing proposals (Browne and Rudolph, 2005) based on the one-way model reduce the computational resource overhead by three orders of magnitudes compared to the KLM scheme.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Browne and Rudolph, 2005 source

      The Introduction (p. 1) describes a cluster-state optical computing scheme and estimates resource savings of “many orders of magnitude over KLM.” It does not specify three orders of magnitude for resource overhead; its explicit three-orders figure concerns reduced sensitivity to phase instability, not computational resources. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Together with additional phase shifters in the input and output ports, a Mach-Zehnder interferometer can perform an arbitrary SU(2) unitary transformation on a qubit encoded in two spatial modes.

    “Together with additional phase shifters in the input and output ports, the Mach-Zehnder interferometer can perform an arbitrary SU(2) unitary transformation on a qubit encoded in the two spatial modes (see, e.g., Englert et al. (2001)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Englert et al. (2001) source
  • Premisecitation

    A linear optical Bell-state analyzer suggested by Weinfurter and by Braunstein and Mann is based on two-photon interference at a 50:50 beamsplitter and via coincidence analysis can distinguish two of the four Bell states.

    “A linear optical Bell-state analyzer was suggested by Weinfurter (1994) and by Braunstein and Mann (1995).It is based on the two-photon interference effect at a 50:50 BS and via a coincidence analysis can distinguish two of the four Bell states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Weinfurter (1994) source
    • cites Braunstein and Mann (1995) source
  • Interpretationcitation

    Because photons are produced coherently along the entire length of the crystal, one can completely compensate for the longitudinal walk-off.

    “Fortunately, because the photons are produced coherently along the entire length of the crystal, one can completely compensate for the longitudinal walk-off (Rubin et al., 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rubin et al., 1994 source
  • Premisecitation

    The standard method to produce polarization-entangled photons is the noncollinear type-II SPDC process.

    “Currentlythe standard method to produce polarization-entangled photons is the noncollinear type-II SPDC process (Kwiat et al., 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kwiat et al., 1995 source

      The paper describes producing polarization-entangled photon pairs by noncollinear type-II parametric down-conversion (Abstract; page not given). It presents the technique as novel, however, and does not establish that it is currently the standard method. It says that, at the time of publication, most down-conversion experiments had used type-I phase matching. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 212
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 105
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In the Pan et al. (2003a) scheme, the entangled ancillary pair was provided much more frequently than the photon to be teleported, so when a qubit arrived the teleportation machinery was almost always ready.

    “The basic idea of this experimental method is that the entangled ancillary pair was provided much more frequently than the photon to be teleported [a similar idea was also used in the teleportation experiment using time-bin entanglement carried out by Marcikic et al. (2003)].Thus, when a qubit which was to be teleported arrived the teleportation machinery was almost always ready.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marcikic et al. (2003) source

      The Experimental Realization section (p. 4) says the experiment decreased the probability of creating entangled qubits relative to the probability of creating the qubit to be teleported. That is the opposite of providing the ancillary pair much more frequently so it would almost always be ready when a qubit arrived. (LLM, conf=0.94)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The phase-stability problem can be overcome by interfering two photons, one coming from each remote ion or atom in a cavity (Bose et al., 1999; Browne et al., 2003; Feng et al., 2003; Simon and Irvine, 2003), which was experimentally implemented by Moehring et al., (2007) and Maunz et al., (2007).

    “The phase-stability problem can be overcome by interfering two photons, one coming from each remote ion or atom in a cavity (Bose et al., 1999;Browne et al., 2003;Feng et al., 2003;Simon and Irvine, 2003), which was experimentally implemented by Moehring et al., (2007) and Maunz et al., (2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bose et al., 1999 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Browne et al., 2003 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Feng et al., 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Nielsen and Dawson (2005) have shown that the thresholds are respectively <3×10^-3 and <10^-4 for photon loss and depolarizing noise.

    “Nielsen and Dawson (2005) have shown that the thresholds are respectively < 3 × 10 -3 and < 10 -4 for photon loss and depolarizing noise (see also Dawson et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Nielsen and Dawson (2005) source

      The noise-model discussion (p. 22) explicitly says photon loss is omitted and that the results apply only to noise without leakage. The conclusion (p. 26) says the paper proves that finite thresholds exist, rather than providing precise numerical evaluations; it does not establish the two thresholds attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Dawson et al. 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Using primary two-photon entanglement, by entanglement swapping, one can entangle particles that were independent of each other without any direct interaction, or construct entanglement of higher order.

    “It turned out that using the primary two-photon entanglement, by a procedure which is called entanglement swapping, one can entangle without any direct interaction particles which were independent of each other, or what is more important for us, construct entanglement of higher order ( Żukowski et al, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Żukowski et al, 1993 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Practical versions of entanglement swapping are the basis of all experiments with three or more entangled photons, as well as of many realizations of quantum information protocols, up to measurement-based quantum computation.

    “Practical versions of this technique (Zukowski et al, 1995;Rarity, 1995;Zeilinger et al, 1997) are thus the basis of all experiments with three or more entangled photons, as well as of many realizations of quantum information protocols, up to measurement based quantum computation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Zukowski et al, 1995 source

      The Introduction and Concluding Remarks describe entanglement-swapping methods for producing three-photon GHZ states and discuss their application to quantum teleportation. They do not establish that these methods underpin all experiments with three or more entangled photons, many realizations of quantum information protocols, or measurement-based quantum computation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Rarity, 1995 source
    • cites Zeilinger et al, 1997 source
    • Rests on an assumption: Photons basically do not interact with each other.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Quantum teleportation enables a faithful transfer of an unknown quantum state from one location to another, using entangled states as a quantum channel.

    “Quantum teleportation (Bennett et al., 1993) enables a faithful transfer of an unknown quantum state from one location to another, using entangled states as a quantum channel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bennett et al., 1993 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In SPDC, photons from a pump laser beam within a nonlinear crystal can spontaneously be converted into pairs that are momentum and frequency entangled, and in the type-II process can also be polarization entangled.

    “In SPDC photons from a pump laser beam, within a nonlinear crystal, can spontaneously be converted into pairs that are momentum and frequency entangled, and in the so-called type-II process can be also polarization entangled (Kwiat et al., 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kwiat et al., 1995 source

      The paper’s Abstract describes spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a nonlinear crystal and says noncollinear type-II phase matching produces polarization-entangled photon pairs. It also discusses momentum correlations, but does not establish that the pairs described are momentum-entangled; it treats momentum-entangled states as distinct states into which its polarization-entangled states can be transformed. No passage found establishes the claimed frequency entanglement. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    A hermitian operator W is an entanglement witness if for all separable states Tr(W sep) ≥ 0, whereas there exists an entangled state for which Tr(W ent) < 0; thus via measurement of a suitably chosen witness operator one can detect entanglement.

    “A hermitian operator Ŵ is an entanglement witness if for all separable states one has Tr( Ŵ sep ) ≥ 0, whereas there exists an entangled state for which one has Tr( Ŵ ent ) < 0. Thus, via measurement of a suitably chosen witness operator one can detect entanglement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Horodecki et al., 1996 source
    • cites Terhal, 2000 source
    • cites Lewenstein et al., 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The full set of separable mixed states is a bounded convex set in a multidimensional real space of hermitian operators, and any entangled state is separated from the set of separable states by a hyperplane.

    “The full set of separable mixed states is a bounded convex set in a multidimensional real space of hermitian operators.Thus, any entangled state is separated from the set of separable states by a hyperplane.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horodecki et al., 1996 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    For two three-dimensional systems, or more complicated ones, one can find states which are entangled but from which no maximally entangled state can be distilled (bound entangled).

    “An interesting feature of the theory of entanglement of mixed states is that for two three dimensional systems, or for more complicated ones, one can find states which are entangled, but from which no maximally entangled state can be distilled 10 (Horodecki, Horodecki and Horodecki, 1998).Such states are called bound entangled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horodecki, Horodecki and Horodecki, 1998 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Horodecki family extended PPT to a fully general necessary and sufficient condition for separability, namely that a density matrix after any positive map on one subsystem should remain a density operator.

    “This was extended by Horodecki Family to a fully general necessary and sufficient condition for separability, which is that a density matrix after any positive transformation (map) on one of the subsystems should remain a density operator 9 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horodecki et al. (1996) source

      Theorem 2 (p. 7) gives the fully general necessary and sufficient condition: applying any positive map to one subsystem must leave the operator positive. But the paper defines a density operator (state) as also having trace one (p. 3); Theorem 2 does not require the transformed operator to retain that normalization. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Basic structural criteria for deciding whether a density operator represents an entangled state were first given by Peres and in full form by Horodecki et al.

    “Basic structural criteria, which decide whether a given density operator represents an entangled state, were first given by Peres (1996) and in the full form by Horodecki et al. (1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Peres (1996) source
    • cites Horodecki et al. (1996) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The projection of two photons into a Bell state lies at the heart of many quantum information processing protocols, such as quantum dense coding, quantum teleportation, and entanglement swapping.

    “The projection of two photons into a Bell state lies at the heart for many quantum information processing protocols, such as quantum dense coding (Bennett and Wiesner, 1992), quantum teleportation (Bennett et al., 1993), and entanglement swapping ( Żukowski et al., 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bennett and Wiesner, 1992 source
    • cites Bennett et al., 1993 source
    • cites Żukowski et al., 1993 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Interference of indistinguishable photons enables entanglement swapping and teleportation.

    “The interference of indistinguishable photons enables a process called entanglement swapping and teleportation (Zukowski et al. 1993, see Section VI.C), which in turns opens up prospects of distributing of entanglement between distant matter qubits such as ions (Moehring et al. 2007) and atoms (Yuan et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Zukowski et al. 1993 source

      The discussion of entanglement swapping (page unavailable in our copy) explains that coincident detection of idler photons entangles previously independent signal photons; its discussion of distinguishability links path information to reduced interference. The paper mentions subcoherence-time coincidence as a requirement for quantum teleportation, but does not say that its proposed interference process enables teleportation. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Moehring et al. 2007 source
    • cites Yuan et al. 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In atomic-cascade sources, the entanglement is only perfect for photons that are emitted back to back, a loophole that could allow local hidden-variable models to explain experimental data.

    “Moreover, the entanglement is only perfect for photons that are emitted back to back, a loophole that could allow local hidden-variable model to explain the experimental data (Santos, 1991(Santos, , 1992)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Santos, 1991 source
    • cites Santos, 1992 source

      In the indexed Abstract (page not specified), Santos says poor angular correlation makes atomic-cascade experiments unsuitable for distinguishing local hidden-variable theories from quantum mechanics, and describes a local hidden-variable model agreeing with measurable predictions. The copy does not say that entanglement is perfect only for photons emitted back to back. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Polarization entanglement in type-II SPDC was discovered by Kwiat et al. (1995).

    “Polarization entanglement in type-II process was discovered by Kwiat et al. (1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kwiat et al. (1995) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Examples of Hong-Ou-Mandel interference include single photons from independent trapped atoms, remote cold atomic ensembles, and independent tunable quantum dots.

    “Other examples include single photons from independent trapped atoms (Beugnon et al. 2006;Maunz et al. 2007), and from remote cold atomic ensembles (Yuan et al. 2007) or independent, tunable quantum dots (Patel et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beugnon et al. 2006 source
    • cites Maunz et al. 2007 source

      The paper reports single-photon generation and two-photon interference from trapped atomic ions (p. 1). But its account of the interference experiment says the two ions were in the same trap (p. 2), so it does not support describing its example as photons from independently trapped atoms. The other examples in the citing sentence have separate citations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Yuan et al. 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A general method for making such interference observable, and also to swap entanglement, was given by Żukowski et al. (1993), Żukowski et al. (1995), Rarity (1995) and Zeilinger et al. (1997).

    “A general method for making such an interference observable, and also to swap entanglement, was given by Żukowski et al. (1993), Żukowski et al. (1995), Rarity (1995) and Zeilinger et al. (1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Żukowski et al. (1993) source
    • cites Żukowski et al. (1995) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rarity (1995) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The NOON state was experimentally realized for N=3 and N=4.

    “It was experimentally realized for N = 3 (Mitchell, Lundeen, and Steinberg, 2004) and N = 4 (Walther et al., 2004) (see also other related experiments, Rarity et al., 1990b;Edamatsu et al., 2002;Sun et al., 2006;Nagata et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mitchell, Lundeen, and Steinberg, 2004 source
    • cites Walther et al., 2004 source

      Only the N=4 attribution is at issue here; the N=3 experiment is cited to a different paper. Walther et al. demonstrate four-photon interference, but describe their nonlocal four-photon state as “similar to” a NOON state, not as a NOON state itself (p. 7). (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recently, several experiments were performed to identify and quantify experimental imperfections that contribute error to produced multi-photon states.

    “Recently, several experiments were performed to identify and quantify the experimental imperfections that contribute error to the produced multi-photon states (see Barbieri et al. 2009;Weinhold et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Barbieri et al. 2009 source
    • cites Weinhold et al. 2008 source

      The Error Model section (pp. 4–5) identifies and quantifies experimental imperfections, including higher-order photon terms, loss, and mode mismatch. This paper measures their effects on a photonic quantum-logic gate, however, rather than directly quantifying errors in produced multi-photon states. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Source indistinguishability can in principle also be achieved with an ultra-coincidence technique, which does not require a pulsed pump but an extremely good detection time resolution ∆T much sharper than the coherence time of filtered SPDC radiation, and rejection of events at c(+) and d(+) detected with time difference higher than 2∆T.

    “Note that source indistinguishability in principle can also be achieved with an ultra-coincidence technique, which does not require a pulsed pump, but an extremely good detection time resolution, ∆T , much sharper that the coherence time of the filtered SPDC radiation, and rejection of all events at c(+) and d(+) which are detected with time difference higher than, say, 2∆T [see Żukowski et al. (”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Żukowski et al. (1993) source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Quantum state tomography is a tool to fully reconstruct the density matrix of a quantum system.

    “It is a tool to fully reconstruct the density matrix of a quantum systemfoot_13 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites James et al. 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Initial experiments using photon pairs produced in an atomic cascade to test Bell's inequalities falsified Bell's inequalities and thus challenged the local realistic world-view.

    “The initial experiments using photon pairs produced in an atomic cascade to test Bell's inequalities (Freedman and Clauser, 1972;Aspect et al., 1982aAspect et al., , 1982b, see also Clauser and Shimony 1978 for more experiments) falsified Bell's inequalities, and thus challenged the local realistic world-view.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Freedman and Clauser, 1972 source
    • cites Aspect et al., 1982a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Aspect et al., 1982b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A toolbox for efficient witness operator construction has been created for some multi-particle states (GHZ, cluster, and W) and applied in a number of multi-photon experiments.

    “A toolbox for efficient witness operator construction has been created for some multi-particle states (such as GHZ, cluster, and W state, see e.g.Gühne et al. 2007), and applied in a number of multi-photon experiments (see e.g.Bourennane et al. 2004a;Kiesel et al. 2005a;Lu et al. 2007a;Wieczorek et al. 2009a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gühne et al. 2007 source
    • cites Bourennane et al. 2004a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kiesel et al. 2005a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Experimentally, quantum state tomography was used for two-, three-, four-photon polarization states and also hyperentangled photon pairs.

    “Experimentally, this technique was used for two-, three-, four-photon polarization states and also hyperentangled photon pairs (White et al. 1999;Resch et al. 2005;Walther et al. 2005b;Barreiro et al. 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites White et al. 1999 source
    • cites Resch et al. 2005 source
    • cites Walther et al. 2005b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The original Hardy proposal was experimentally demonstrated by Torgerson et al. (1995) and White et al. (1999), with results fed into inequalities derived for imperfections under the fair sampling assumption.

    “The original proposal was experimentally demonstrated by Torgerson et al. (1995) and White et al.(1999)); as in the GHZ-type experiments, the results of the experiments were fed into specific inequalities, specially derived to take into account experimental imperfections (under the fair sampling assumption, of course).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Torgerson et al. (1995) source
    • cites White et al. (1999) source

      On p. 3, White et al. describe an experimental test of Hardy’s proposal, give the inequality used, and report a Hardy fraction 122σ above the local-realistic bound. Footnote [16] on p. 4 says experimental realizations require inequalities because measurements have uncertainties. The copy does not specify the fair-sampling assumption or say that the inequality was specially derived to account for experimental imperfections. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • The authors state this as an assumption: In Hardy-type experiments, the fair sampling assumption is made.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By exploiting entanglement one can efficiently encode classical messages, transfer quantum information to a remote location, entangle remote particles with no common past, and purify less entangled ensembles.

    “By exploiting entanglement one can efficiently encode classical messages (Bennett and Wiesner, 1992; section VI.A), transfer quantum information to a remote location (Bennett et al., 1993; section VI.B), entangle two remote particles that have no common past ( Żukowski et al., 1993; section VI.C), and purify a large ensemble in a less entangled states into a smaller ensemble with higher”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bennett and Wiesner, 1992 source
    • cites Bennett et al., 1993 source
    • cites Żukowski et al., 1993 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Quantum teleportation was discovered by Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa, Peres, and Wootters (1993).

    “The fascinating possibility of quantum teleportation was discovered by Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa, Peres, and Wootters (1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa, Peres, and Wootters (1993) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Bob can convert the state of particle 3 into the original state of particle 1 by applying one of the unitary transformations, but only if he receives two bits of classical information.

    “In the other three cases, Bob can apply one of the unitary transformations of Eq. ( 72) to convert the state of particle 3 into the original one of particle 1.However, all this is possible only if he additionally receives via a classical communication channel a two-bit information on the (Bouwmeester et al., 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bouwmeester et al., 1997 source
    • The authors state this as an assumption: In the teleportation theory, the original polarization state of particle 1 is assumed to be |χ1 = α|H1 + β|V1.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Bell-state analysis relies on interference of two independently created photons, requiring that information about which photon came from which source is completely erased behind the beam splitter.

    “The Bell-state analysis relies on the interference of two independently created photons.Therefore, one has to guarantee that behind the BS the information which photon came from which source is completely erased.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Żukowski et al. 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A protocol of the emulation kind was proposed by Popescu (1995) and experimentally realized in Rome (Boschi et al., 1998) with a teleportation fidelity of 0.85(1).

    “A protocol of this kind has been proposed by Popescu (1995) and was experimentally realized in Rome (Boschi et al., 1998) with a teleportation fidelity of 0.85 (1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Popescu (1995) source
    • cites Boschi et al., 1998 source

      The main text (page unavailable) says the Rome experiment used a two-photon approach first suggested by Popescu and reports teleportation results that exceeded the classical limit. However, the measured value appears only in a formula that is not decoded in our copy, so the stated fidelity of 0.85(1) cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Procrustean method requires photon pairs all in a pure non-maximally entangled state with known amplitudes and involves only local filtering operations on single pairs.

    “The first is the so-called Procrustean method (Bennett et al., 1996a).It requires that the photon pairs are all in a pure non-maximally entangled state, say, |Ψ nonmax = α|H |V + β|V |H , where α and β are two known amplitudes.In this case, the scheme only in-volves local filtering operations (Gisin, 1996;Horodecki et al., 1996) on single pairs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bennett et al., 1996a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gisin, 1996 source
    • cites Horodecki et al., 1996 source

      The paper describes separability criteria for mixed states (p. 3), not the Procrustean method. Searches for local filtering, single-pair operations, and known amplitudes found no passage describing those features; the reference to Bennett et al. (References, p. 14) does not establish them. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A more feasible purification scheme proposed by Pan et al. (2001) showed that purification does not have to entirely rely on CNOT operations; in some cases a polarizing beam splitter suffices.

    “A more feasible purification scheme was proposed by Pan et al. (2001).They showed that purification does not have to entirely rely on CNOT operations.In some cases a simple linear optical element, a polarizing beam splitter, suffices (see Fig. 28b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al. (2001) source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hofmann and Takeuchi, (2002) and independently Ralph et al., (2002a, 2002b) developed quantum gates under the restriction of a two, or four-mode case, that is the successful operation of the gate can be verified if the two photons involved are detected in certain outputs.

    “Hofmann and Takeuchi, (2002) and independently Ralph et al., (2002aRalph et al., ( , 2002b) ) developed quantum gates under the restriction of what is here called a two, or four-mode case, that is the successful operation of the gate can be verified if the two photons involved are detected in certain outputs”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hofmann and Takeuchi, 2002 source
    • cites Ralph et al., 2002a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ralph et al., 2002b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    As suggested by Pittman et al., (2001), the success of the gate can be detected by measurement of ancilla photons and this information is classically feed-forwardable.

    “As suggested by Pittman et al., (2001), the success of the gate can be detected by measurement of ancilla photons and this information is classically feed-forwardable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pittman et al., 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent theoretical proposals combining the one-way model with linear optical quantum computing require much less resources and effectively replace the original KLM scheme.

    “By combing the one-way model with linear optical quantum computing, recent theoretical proposals require much less resources and effectively replace the original KLM scheme”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Nielsen, 2004 source

      The paper’s description of its approach (p. 1) says it combines cluster-state computation with KLM gates and is substantially simpler than the original KLM scheme; the Conclusion (p. 4) likewise calls it less demanding. It does not establish that the proposal effectively replaces KLM: it retains KLM components and presents an alternative scheme, not a replacement of KLM altogether. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Browne and Rudolph, 2005 source
    • cites Bodiya and Duan, 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    It was recently shown that an efficient preparation of cluster states is possible with probabilistic two-qubit controlled phase flip gates (Duan and Raussendorf, 2005; Chen et al., 2006a).

    “It was recently shown that an efficient preparation of cluster states is possible with probabilistic two-qubit controlled phase flip gates (Duan and Raussendorf, 2005;Chen et al., 2006a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Duan and Raussendorf, 2005 source
    • cites Chen et al., 2006a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Another significant step is the discovery of cluster-state quantum computing (Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001; Raussendorf et al., 2003; Briegel et al., 2009), which is based on the preparation of highly entangled multi-qubit states, the so-called cluster states (Briegel and Raussendorf, 2001) and adaptive one-qubit measurements.

    “Another significant step is the discovery of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001 source
    • cites Raussendorf et al., 2003 source
    • cites Briegel et al., 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By introducing two linear-optical fusion operations, Browne and Rudolph (2005) achieved greater efficiency (about 10^2) and a simpler scheme than previous proposals.

    “Furthermore, by introducing two linearoptical fusion operations, Browne and Rudolph (2005) achieved a greater degree of efficiency (∼ 10 2 ) and in a simpler scheme than the previous proposals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Browne and Rudolph, 2005 source

      The Introduction (p. 1) introduces two fusion mechanisms, and the opening summary (p. 1) says the scheme is more efficient and simpler than previous proposals. The specific figure of approximately 10² is not supported: the Introduction (p. 1) estimates efficiency gains of several orders of magnitude over Nielsen’s proposal and many orders over KLM. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Cluster states can be created by a controllable Ising-type interaction (Briegel and Raussendorf, 2001; Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001; Raussendorf et al., 2003).

    “Cluster states can be created by a controllable Ising-type interaction (Briegel and Raussendorf, 2001;Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001;Raussendorf et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Briegel and Raussendorf, 2001 source
    • cites Raussendorf and Briegel, 2001 source
    • cites Raussendorf et al., 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The resource overhead for a reliable entangling gate in Nielsen's scheme is about 10^3, about two orders of magnitude less than the original KLM protocol.

    “The resource overhead (Bell states, operations, etc.) for a reliable entangling gate in Nielsen's scheme is ∼ 10 3 , and thus about two orders of magnitude less than the original KLM protocol.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nielsen, 2004 source

      On pp. 1 and 4, Nielsen estimates about 24 successful CZ₄/₉ operations per entangling gate, versus about 300 CZ₉/₁₆ operations and tens of thousands of optical elements for KLM. The p. 3 component counts make an overhead on the order of 10³ plausible, but the paper does not establish the claimed two-orders-of-magnitude reduction; its stated gate and element comparisons imply a smaller ratio. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    An even simpler set-up becomes possible with polarization encoding (Kiesel et al., 2005b; Langford et al., 2005; Okamoto et al., 2005) which in turn could be already applied, e.g., to observe cluster states for one-way quantum computing (Kiesel et al., 2005a).

    “An even simpler set-up becomes possible with polarization encoding (Kiesel et al., 2005b;Langford et al., 2005;Okamoto et al., 2005) which in turn could be already applied, e.g., to observe cluster states for one-way quantum computing (see below, Kiesel et al., 2005a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kiesel et al., 2005b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Langford et al., 2005 source
    • cites Okamoto et al., 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Browne-Rudolph scheme requires stable interferometry only over the coherence length of the photons, with path length differences kept constant to within tens of microns, not fractions of a wavelength.

    “It requires stable interferometry over only the coherence length of the photons, i.e., the interferometer path lengths differences only need to be kept constant to within tens of microns, not fractions of a wavelength.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Browne and Rudolph, 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Browne and Rudolph showed that one can prepare a square-lattice cluster of N qubits with temporal overhead scaling logarithmically with N and operational overhead scaling as about N ln N.

    “Browne and Rudolph (2005) also showed that one can finally prepare a square-lattice cluster of N qubits with a temporal overhead scaling logarithmically with N , and with an operational overhead (i.e., number of fusion operations) scaling as ∼ N ln N (Chen et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Browne and Rudolph (2005) source

      The Introduction (pp. 3–4) describes building two-dimensional clusters by fusion, supporting that part of the attribution. But the paper says it concentrates on a more compact layout rather than the square lattice (p. 2), and its resource calculation gives Bell pairs and fusion attempts per L-shaped unit (p. 4), not logarithmic temporal overhead or approximately N ln N fusion operations. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Chen et al., 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In these optical experiments during the computation, genuine multi-particle entanglement and multi-path interference were observed, which did not appear in previous implementations using nuclear magnetic resonance.

    “It is notable that in these optical experiments during the computation genuine multi-particle entanglement and multi-path interference were observed, which did not appear in the previous implementations using nuclear magnetic resonance (Vandersypen et al. 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vandersypen et al. 2001 source

      The description of the NMR experiment (p. 3) says its effective pure state remained separable under unitary transformations, supporting the absence of genuine multi-particle entanglement. The Fig. 1 caption (p. 12) describes interference in Shor’s algorithm, but our copy does not establish whether multi-path interference was observed in this NMR experiment or compare it with the optical experiments. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Ralph et al. (2005) and Varnava et al. (2006, 2008) designed loss-tolerant quantum computer schemes within the circuit-model and one-way model; the latter scheme can tolerate an overall optical loss, including source inefficiency and collection loss, up to 33%.

    “For photon loss alone, Ralph et al. (2005) and Varnava et al. (2006) and(2008) have designed loss-tolerant quantum computer schemes within the circuit-model and one-way model; the latter scheme can tolerate an overall optical loss, including source inefficiency and collection loss, up to an impressive 33%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ralph et al. (2005) source
    • cites Varnava et al. (2006) source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Varnava et al. (2008) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The majority of experimental demonstrations so far have relied on SPDC photons, which suffer from undesired higher-order photon emission, large bandwidth, and probabilistic photon pair emission.

    “The majority of experimental demonstrations so far have relied on the SPDC photons, which suffers from undesired higherorder photon emission (Weinhold et al. 2008, this has been considered as the major source of error for most experiments reviewed here, see Section IV.D.1), large bandwidth, and the probabilistic manner of photon pair emission.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weinhold et al. 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Parametric down-conversion has been serving as the main workhorse for the multiphoton experiments reviewed here; up to eight entangled photons have been observed.

    “Parametric down-conversion (Kwiat et al. 1995;White et al. 1999) has been serving as the main workhorse for the multiphoton experiments reviewed here; up to eight entangled photons have been observed (Yao et al. 2007a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kwiat et al. 1995 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites White et al. 1999 source
    • cites Yao et al. 2007a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Chip-scale waveguide quantum circuits have been created recently and used to demonstrate high-visibility Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, CNOT gates, an instance of Shor's algorithm, and quantum walk.

    “Finally, it is worth mentioning that chip-scale waveguide quantum circuits have been created recently, and used to demonstrate high-visibility Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, CNOT gates, an instance of Shor's algorithm (Politi et al. 2008(Politi et al. , 2009)), and quantum walk (Peruzzo et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Politi et al. 2008 source

      The paper reports silica-on-silicon waveguide circuits and high-visibility two-photon interference (p. 2), as well as a CNOT gate (pp. 1, 3). It does not report an instance of Shor’s algorithm; the citing sentence also cites a separate 2009 paper for that claim. Quantum walk is attributed to Peruzzo et al. (2010), not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Politi et al. 2009 source
    • cites Peruzzo et al., 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A similar technique, called quantum process tomography, has been used to fully characterize the quantum controlled-NOT gates (O'Brien et al. 2004).

    “A similar technique, called quantum process tomography, has been used to fully characterize the quantum controlled-NOT gates (O'Brien et al. 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O'Brien et al. 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    For any single detector in the two-photon EPR interferometer, the count rate shows no interference; p1c = 1/2 independent of φ1 and φ2.

    “In contrast, for any single detector the count rate shows no interference at all.For example, p 1c = p 1c,2c (φ 1 , φ 2 ) + p 1c,2d (φ 1 , φ 2 ) = 1 2 , independent of φ 1 andφ 2 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A central source emits two photons in the entangled state |ψ12 = 1/√2(|a1|a2 + |b1|b2).
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    If two photons incident onto a PBS have identical polarization, they always go out along different directions, so there is one photon in each output mode.

    “If the two photons incident onto the PBS have identical polarization, then they will always go out along different directions, so there will be one photon in each of the two output modes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pan and Zeilinger, 1998 source
    • cites Pan et al., 2001b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    If |β|=1 (photons fully distinguishable), the coincidence probability is 1/2; if β=0 (photons indistinguishable), it vanishes.

    “Thus, if |β| = 1 (the photons â and b are fully distinguishable), this probability reads 1/2; if β = 0 (the photons are indistinguishable), it vanishes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Hong-Ou-Mandel interference is sensitive to path length changes on the order of the coherence length of the photons, while a Mach-Zehnder interferometer has sub-wavelength sensitivity.

    “A characteristic feature of the Hong-Ou-Mandel interference is that it is sensitive to path length changes on the order of the coherence length of the photons, while in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer one has a sub-wavelength sensitivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The state |Ψ+ can be distinguished from the other two by the fact that the emerging photons have different polarizations, resulting in coincidence counts at DH1 and DV1 or at DH2 and DV2.

    “The state |Ψ + can be distinguished from the other two by the fact that the emerging photons have different polarizations 20 .This results in a coincidence counts at detectors DH1 and DV1 or at DH2 and DV2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The visibility of polarization interference is reduced once the photons are partially distinguishable; the full effect occurs for perfect overlap.

    “As in the case of the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, the visibility of this polarization interference is reduced once the photons are partially distinguishable.E.g., by varying the relative optical paths before the photons reach the BS the overlap of the photon wave packets behind the beam splitter may be controlled, up to a total distinguishability.The full effect occurs for perfect overlap.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The states |Φ+ and |Φ− both lead to a two-photon event at a single detector, and thus cannot be distinguished.

    “states |Φ + and |Φ -both lead to a two-photon event at a single detector, and thus cannot be distinguished.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Altepeter, Jeffrey, and Kwiat (2005) reported an entangled photon pair source with a count rate of over one million per second and a fidelity of 97.7%.

    “For instance, Altepeter, Jeffrey, and Kwiat (2005) have reported an entangled photon pair source with an impressive count rate of over one million per second and a fidelity of 97.7%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Altepeter, Jeffrey, and Kwiat (2005) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    High dimensional entangled qudits have been created by transverse spatial correlations of two SPDC photons, or using transverse momentum and position entanglement in pixel entanglement.

    “High dimensional entangled qudits have also been created by transverse spatial correlations of two SPDC photons (Neves et al., 2005), or using transverse momentum and position entanglement of photons emitted in SPDC, in a form called pixel entanglement (O'Sullivan-Hale et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Neves et al., 2005 source
    • cites O'Sullivan-Hale et al., 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In time-bin entanglement, a short UV pump pulse sent through an unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer creates two mutually coherent pump pulses, and after SPDC in BBO the pair is in state α|short1|short2 + β|long1|long2.

    “A short, ultraviolet pump pulse is sent first through an unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer (the pump interferometer) creating two mutually coherent pump pulses α|short p + β|long p , and next through a BBO crystal.Then, if via SPDC a pump photon is converted into a pair, the latter is in the state α|short 1 |short 2 + β|long 1 |long 2 .(38)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The polarization of each beam is completely undetermined, but the polarizations of the two beams are always anti-correlated.

    “The polarization of each beam is completely undetermined, but the polarizations of the two beams are always anti-correlated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Nagata et al. measured the reduced de Broglie wavelength of four-entangled photons and showed a visibility that exceeds the threshold to beat the standard quantum limit.

    “Nagata et al. have not only measured the reduced de Broglie wavelength of four-entangled photons, but also shown a visibility that exceeds the threshold to beat the standard quantum limit (see the original paper for details).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nagata et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    After interaction time t, the resulting photon state is |ψ = e^{-itH0}|0, and in number state representation reads Eq. (42).

    “After the interaction time t the resulting photon state is given by |ψ = e -itH0 |0 (Kok and Braunstein, 2000;Lamas-Linares et al., 2001;Simon and Bouwmeester, 2003), and in the number state representation reads |ψ = 1 cosh 2 τ ∞ n=0 √ n + 1 tanh n τ |ψ - n , |ψ - n = n m=0 (-1) m √ n + 1 |n -m, m; m, n -m .(42)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kok and Braunstein, 2000 source
    • cites Lamas-Linares et al., 2001 source
    • cites Simon and Bouwmeester, 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The consistency with the prediction holds only within a short interval of delay between the photons, while for path length differences larger than the coherence length of the detected photons the coherence between the two GHZ terms vanishes.

    “This is so only within a short interval of delay between the photons, while for path length differences larger than the coherence length of the detected photons the coherence between the two GHZ-terms vanishes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The probability per pulse to create a single pair in the desired modes was on the order of a few 10^-4, with a correspondingly smaller probability to create four photons and negligible probability for three pair events.

    “The probability per pulse to create a single pair in the desired modes was on the order of a few 10 -4 with a correspondingly smaller probability to create four photons and negligible for three pair events.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The observers Alice and Bob were spatially separated by 400 m across the Innsbruck university science campus.

    “The observers “Alice” and “Bob” were spatially separated by 400 m across the Innsbruck university science campus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In that ion-trap experiment, the two entangled ions were separated by approximately 3 μm, so the locality loophole was left widely open.

    “However, as the two entangled ions were separated by approximately 3µm, the locality loophole was left widely open.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Still the experiment had a detection efficiency well below the required minimum allowing avoidance of the fair sampling assumption.

    “Still the experiment had a detection efficiency well below the required minimum allowing to avoid the fair sampling assumption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Fair sampling: whether a detector registers a particle or not is statistically independent of all other processes in the experiment.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Four-photon entanglement was demonstrated by Pan et al. (2001a) and Eibl et al. (2003) and used for multi-photon falsification of local realism.

    “Four-photon entanglement was later demonstrated by Pan et al., 2001a, andEibl et al., 2003), and used for a corresponding multi-photon falsification of local realism (see also Zhao et al. (2003a)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al., 2001a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Eibl et al., 2003 source
    • cites Zhao et al. (2003a)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Hardy's scheme was scaled up so that (50 - h)% of photon pairs lead to coincidence events prohibited by local realism, demonstrated by Boschi et al. 1997.

    “Hardy's scheme was later scaled up, so that (50 -h)% of photon pairs lead to coincidence events prohibited by local realism (where h is any small finite number).The effect was demonstrated in an experiment by Boschi et al. 1997.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boschi et al. 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Theories based on assumptions (L1)-(L3) are in conflict with quantum predictions, as shown theoretically by Leggett (2003) and experimentally by Gröblacher et al. (2007).

    “Nevertheless, they are in conflict with quantum predictions as shown theoretically by Leggett (2003), and experimentally by Göblacher et all (2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Leggett (2003) source
    • cites Göblacher et all (2007)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The same experiment gave S_Bell = 2.178 ± 0.0199, violating the CHSH inequality by ∼9 standard deviations.

    “At the same time measurements gave S Bell = 2.178 ± 0.0199, which violates the CHSH inequality by ∼9 standard deviations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gröblacher et al. (2007) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Free-space distribution of entangled photon pairs over 10 km was achieved in 2005, and over 144 km more recently.

    “In section VI.E we discuss steps on the road toward satellite-based quantum communication and its first step, i.e., free-space distribution of entangled photon pairs over a distance of 10 km achieved in 2005 (Resch et al., 2005;Peng et al., 2005) and, more recently, over 144 km (Ursin et al., 2007;Fedrizzi et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Resch et al., 2005 source
    • cites Peng et al., 2005 source
    • cites Ursin et al., 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    With this ability, dense coding was implemented for all four Bell states in polarization, achieving overall channel capacity of 1.18(3) bits per photon.

    “With this ability, the dense coding protocol was implemented for all four Bell-states in the polarization degree-of-freedom, achieving an overall channel capacity of 1.18(3) bits per photon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schuck et al. (2006) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Barreiro et al. (2008) achieved a channel capacity of 1.630(6) bits using photons entangled in spin and orbital angular momentum, beating the 1.58-bit limit of conventional linear-optics implementations.

    “Barreiro et al. (2008) exploited pairs of photons simultaneously entangled in spin and orbital angular momentum and achieved a channel capacity of 1.630(6) bits, finally beating the channel capacity limit of 1.58 bits of the conventional linear-optics implementations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barreiro et al. (2008) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In the Innsbruck experiment, three different messages could be operationally encoded by manipulating a single qubit, giving an increase of channel capacity to log2 3 ≈ 1.58 bits, but observed signal-to-noise reduced actual capacity to on average 1.13 bit for successful transfers.

    “Thus three different messages could be operationally encoded by manipulating a single qubit only.53 Thus an increase of channel capacity to log 2 3 1.58 bits was possible-the highest value achievable using linear optics and classical communications, see Vaidman et al. (1999) andLutkenhaus et al. (1999).However, the observed signal-to-noise ratio reduced the actual channel capacity to on average 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mattle et al., 1996 source
    • cites Vaidman et al. (1999) source
    • cites Lutkenhaus et al. (1999) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The actual success probability in the experiment (Pan et al. 2003b) was much lower than 1/4 because it relied on SPDC to probabilistically create two pairs of entangled photons, so only a small fraction of photons went through the purification system.

    “the actual success probability in the experiment (Pan et al. 2003b) was much lower as it relied on the SPDC to probabilistically create two pairs of entangled photons, thus only a small fraction of photons actually went through the purification system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al. 2003b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: The probabilistic nature of SPDC causes two photon pairs to be emitted into one mode pair with a probability of the same order of magnitude.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The two-photon interference visibility of the original mixed states was 50% and 60%, and in a single purification step it increased to 84% and 88%.

    “The two-photon interference visibility of the original mixed states was 50% and 60%, respectively.In a single purification step it was increased to 84% and 88%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al. (2003b)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In a second experiment, initial F=0.80 and after purification observed entanglement fidelity about 0.94±0.01.

    “In a second experiment entanglement purification was performed for a mixed state with F = 0.80.After purification, the observed entanglement fidelity for the sub-ensemble in the modes a3 and b3 was about 0.94 ± 0.01.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al. (2003b)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In a subsequent Bell experiment with purified states (Walther et al. 2005a), S_Bell = 2.29 ± 0.13 was measured, violating the Bell-CHSH inequality by 2.2 standard deviations.

    “After a purification, S Bell = 2.29 ± 0.13 was measured.This violates the inequality by 2.2 standard deviations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Walther et al. (2005a)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Experimental progress has been made in free-space distribution of entangled photon pairs over 600 m (Aspelmeyer et al., 2003a), over 7.8 km (Resch et al., 2005), over 13 km (Peng et al., 2005), and over 144 km (Ursin et al., 2007; Fedrizzi et al., 2009).

    “and of entangled photon pairs [over 600 m, see (Aspelmeyer et al., 2003a); over 7.8 km, see (Resch et al., 2005); over 13 km, see (Peng et al., 2005); and over 144 km, see (Ursin et al., 2007;Fedrizzi et al., 2009), see table I for a summary].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Aspelmeyer et al., 2003a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Resch et al., 2005 source
    • cites Peng et al., 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A 144-km free-space link was built between two Canary Islands and used for distribution of one photon of an entangled pair (Ursin et al., 2007), and later, both photons (Fedrizzi et al., 2009).

    “More recently, a 144-km free-space link was built between two Canary Islands and used for distribution of one photon of an entangled pair (Ursin et al., 2007), and later, both photons (Fedrizzi et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ursin et al., 2007 source
    • cites Fedrizzi et al., 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    So far, the majority of the reported multiphoton interferometry experiments face the problem of random arrivals of SPDC photon pairs.

    “So far, the majority of the reported multiphoton interferometry experiments face the problem of random arrivals of SPDC photon pairs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Long lifetimes for relevant coherences in atomic ensembles have been observed both in a room-temperature dilute atomic gas (Phillips et al., 2001) and in a sample of cold trapped atoms (Liu et al., 2001).

    “Long lifetimes for relevant coherences in such systems have been observed both in a room-temperature dilute atomic gas (Phillips et al., 2001), and in a sample of cold trapped atoms (Liu et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Phillips et al., 2001 source
    • cites Liu et al., 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Recent experiments achieved single quantum excitation memory times of 1 ms using cold atomic ensembles (Zhao et al., 2009a), 6 ms using atomic rubidium confined in a one-dimensional optical lattice (Zhao et al., 2009b), and 0.1 s using quantum memory confined in an optical lattice with laser compensation of the lattice light shifts (Radnaev et al. 2010).

    “Recent experiments achieved single quantum excitation memory times of 1 ms using cold atomic ensembles (Zhao et al., 2009a), 6 ms using atomic rubidium confined in a one-dimensional optical lattice (Zhao et al., 2009b), and 0.1s using quantum memory confined in an optical lattice with laser compensation of the lattice light shifts (Radnaev et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Zhao et al., 2009a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Zhao et al., 2009b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Radnaev et al. 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    These experiments are currently limited by the relatively short coherence time (~20 μs) of the memory qubits and the low conversion efficiency (~15%) between photonic and atomic states.

    “These experiments are currently limited by the relatively short coherence time (∼ 20 µs ) of the memory qubits and the low conversion efficiency (∼ 15%) between photonic and atomic states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The KLM scheme subsequently spurred new experiments demonstrating probabilistic controlled two-photon gates.

    “The KLM scheme subsequently spurred new experiments demonstrating probabilistic controlled two-photon gates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Laing et al. (2010) reported a two-photon quantum interference visibility of 99.5(4)%, a CNOT gate (the obtained average fidelity of logical basis was 96.9(2)%) and a path-entangled two-photon state (with fidelity of > 92%).

    “Laing et al. (2010) reported a two-photon quantum interference visibility of 99.5(4)%, a CNOT gate (the obtained average fidelity of logical basis was 96.9(2)%) and a path-entangled two-photon state (with fidelity of > 92%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Laing et al., 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The original proposal used dual-rail encoding and was first implemented by O'Brien et al., (2003).

    “The original proposal used dual-rail encoding and was first implemented by O'Brien et al., (2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O'Brien et al., 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Dousse et al. (2010) used a carefully fabricated cavity to increase collection efficiency and created a source of polarization entangled photon pairs with state fidelity 0.67 and rate 0.12 per excitation pulse.

    “Very recently, Dousse et al. (2010) used carefully fabricated cavity to increase the collection efficiency, and created a source of polarization entangled photon pairs with a state fidelity of 0.67 and a rate of 0.12 per an excitation pulse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dousse et al. (2010) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Mohseni et al. (2003) and Tame et al. (2007) demonstrated the two-qubit Deutsch-Josza algorithm in a circuit and a one-way model.

    “For example, Mohseni et al. (2003) and Tame et al. (2007) demonstrated the two-qubit Deutsch-Josza algorithm in a circuit and a one-way model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mohseni et al. (2003) source
    • cites Tame et al. (2007)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Using photonic graph states to simulate creation and braiding of anyons in the Kitaev model, a phase shift of π related to anyon braiding was observed, confirming predictions for fractional statistics of Abelian 1/2 anyons.

    “Using the photonic graph states to simulate the creation and braiding of the anyons in the Kitaev model, a phase shift of π related to the anyon braiding was observed, confirming the predictions for the fractional statistics of Abelian 1/2 anyons (Lu et al. 2009;Pachos et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lu et al. 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Pachos et al. 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Lanyon et al. (2010) employed a photonic quantum computer to solve a quantum chemistry problem, calculating the energies of the hydrogen molecule; the iterative phase estimation quantum algorithm was performed in full, and with classical computer assistance the complete energy spectrum was calculated up to 20 bits of precision.

    “Recently, Lanyon et al. (2010) employed a photonic quantum computer to solve a quantum chemistry problem: calculation of the energies of the hydrogen molecule.In their experiment, the iterative phase estimation quantum algorithm was performed in full.With an assistance of a classical computer, it was possible to calculate the complete energy spectrum, up to 20 bits of precision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lanyon et al. (2010) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Using the cluster state |Φc, a universal set of quantum logic operations, single-qubit rotations and non-trivial two-qubit gates were demonstrated.

    “Using the cluster state |Φ c , a universal set of quantum logic operations, single-qubit rotations and non-trivial two-qubit gates were demonstrated (see Fig. 37).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Walther et al., 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Wagenknecht et al. (2010) and Barz et al. (2010) demonstrated heralded generation of photon states that are maximally entangled in polarization.

    “Following this proposal, in two experiments, Wagenknecht et al. (2010) and Barz et al. (2010), have demonstrated heralded generation of photon states, that are maximally entangled in polarization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wagenknecht et al. (2010) source
    • cites Barz et al. (2010) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Walther et al. implemented a two-qubit Grover's quantum search algorithm using the box cluster |Φ4; the measured probability of determining the correct outcome was about 90%.

    “In addition, Walther et al. also implemented a two-qubit Grover's quantum search algorithm using the box cluster |Φ 4 .The measured probability of the quantum computer to determine the correct outcome was about 90%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Walther et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Prevedel et al. (2007b) incorporated active fast feed-forward so that earlier measurement outcomes could change the setting of a future measurement in real time; the feed-forward cycle could be operated in less than 150 ns using electrooptical modulators.

    “An improved experiment done by Prevedel et al. (2007b) incorporated active fast feed-forward, so that the earlier measurement outcomes could change the setting of a future measurement in real time.Particularly, the computational step (i.e., the individual feed-forward cycle) could be operated in less than 150 ns using electrooptical modulators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Prevedel et al. (2007b)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A quantum dot can emit a single pair of entangled photons on demand, with probability near close to one, but has very low extraction efficiency.

    “A quantum dot can emit a single pair of entangled photons on demand, with a probability near close to one.However, it has a very low extraction efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stevenson et al. (2006) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Ma et al. (2011) used polarization states of four photons to simulate a frustrated Heisenberg spin system: a spin-1/2 tetramer.

    “Ma et al. (2011) used polarization states of four photons to simulate a frustrated Heisenberg spin system: a spin-1/2 tetramer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ma et al. (2011)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A drawback of the Walther et al. experiment is that no feed-forward was used, reducing the success rate of the computation by a factor of two for every measurement.

    “A drawback of the experiment is that no feed-forward was used.This reduced the success rate of the computation by a factor of two, for every measurement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Walther et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Rudolph's scheme was experimentally simulated using four photons from SPDC by Zhang et al. (2008a).

    “This was experimentally simulated using four photons from SPDC by Zhang et al., (2008a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., (2008a)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Grover's search algorithm has been realized by Kwiat et al. (2000) by designing an optical implementation.

    “The Grover's search algorithm (Grover, 1997) has been realized by Kwiat et al. (2000) by designing an optical”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kwiat et al. (2000) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Decoherence-free subspaces have been experimentally realized using two photons by Kwiat et al. (2000) and four photons by Bourennane et al. (2004b).

    “Decoherence-free subspaces, a type of passive error-preventing codes, have been experimentally realized using two photons by Kwiat et al. (2000) and four photons by Bourennane et al. (2004b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kwiat et al. (2000) source
    • cites Bourennane et al. (2004b)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Currently mostly used room-temperature silicon single-photon detectors can be operated at 10 MHz with peak efficiency 65%, dark count rate about 100 Hz, and timing jitter typically 500 ps.

    “Currently, mostly used room temperature silicon single-photon detectors can be operated at 10MHz with a peak efficiency of 65%, a dark count rate of about 100 Hz, and a timing jitter of typically 500ps; work is in progress to improve these parameters (see e.g.Kardyna et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kardyna et al., 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The topological cluster-state quantum computing proposal achieved a high error threshold of 0.75×10^-3, the highest known for a local architecture.

    “The latter proposal achieved a high error threshold of 0.75 × 10 -3 , the highest known for a local architecture.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Raussendorf et al. 2006;2007;Raussendorf and Harrington, 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Significant progress has been made on superconducting detectors capable of resolving photon number, with ultra-low dark count rate (0.15 Hz at 1.3 μm) and high efficiency up to 95%.

    “Significant progress (Rosenberg et al., 2005;Lita, Miller and Nam, 2008;Divochiy et al., 2008) has been made on superconducting detectors capable of resolving photon-number, with an ultra low dark count rate (0.15 Hz at the wavelength of 1.3 µm), and high efficiency up to 95%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rosenberg et al., 2005 source
    • cites Lita, Miller and Nam, 2008 source
    • cites Divochiy et al., 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Loss-tolerant codes tend to amplify depolarizing errors; the tradeoff has been discussed and new schemes have been designed that tolerate both errors.

    “Moreover, unfortunately, these loss-tolerant codes tend to amplify the depolarizing errors (e.g.bit flips and phase flips); the tradeoff has been discussed and new schemes have been designed which tolerates both errors in Rohde et al. (2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rohde et al. (2007) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The decoherence-free subspace approach was applied in an optical demonstration of the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm and for reliable measurement-based one-way information transfer.

    “Furthermore, decoherence-free subspace approach was applied in an optical demonstration of the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm (Mohseni et al., 2003), and for reliable measurementbased one-way information transfer (Prevedel et al., 2007a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mohseni et al., 2003 source
    • cites Prevedel et al., 2007a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Current silica waveguide circuits have dimensions of about one centimeter per logic gate.

    “Current silica waveguide circuits have dimensions of about one centimeter per logic gate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Gong et al. (2010) proposed a new scheme where the efficiency threshold for loss tolerance requires the product of source and detector efficiencies to be >50%.

    “Gong et al. (2010) proposed a new scheme where the efficiency threshold for loss tolerance requires the product of source and detector efficiencies to be > 50%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gong et al. (2010) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Lu et al. (2008) demonstrated a four-qubit Grassl erasure correction code and a tree-shaped graph state.

    “To fight against the qubit-loss error, an especially serious problem for photonic qubits, Lu et al. (2008) demonstrated a four-qubit Grassl erasure correction code (for the theoretical proposals see Grassl (1997) and Ralph (2005)), and a tree-shaped graph state (Vanara et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lu et al. (2008)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Grassl (1997)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ralph (2005)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Multi-photon interference reveals strictly non-classical phenomena.

    “Multi-photon interference reveals strictly non-classical phenomena.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cluster states up to six entangled photons have been realized and applied to demonstrate elementary quantum gates and algorithms.

    “Cluster states up to six entangled photons have been realized (Walther et al., 2005b;Kiesel et al., 2005a;Lu et al., 2007), and applied to demonstrate elementary quantum gates and algorithms (Walther et al., 2005b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Walther et al., 2005b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kiesel et al., 2005a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lu et al., 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Quantum key distribution with photons has advanced beyond first few-meter laboratory demonstrations to free-space or fiber-based distributions over hundred kilometers, and is rapidly commercialized into real-life inter-city cryptographic networks.

    “Thanks to this property, quantum key distribution with photons has now went long beyond first few-meter laboratory demonstrations, to free-space or fiber-based distributions over hundred kilometers (see e.g.Ursin et al, 2007;Rosenberg et at., 2007), and is rapidly commercialized into real life inter-city cryptographic networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ursin et al, 2007 source
    • cites Rosenberg et at., 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The standard source of entangled photon pairs is spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC).

    “The standard source of entangled photon pairs is nowadays the nonlinear optical process of spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC; for a pioneering observation see Burnham and Weinberg, 1970), the inverse of frequency doubling and up-conversion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burnham and Weinberg, 1970 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Several ingredients of the quantum repeater scheme have already been demonstrated: entanglement swapping, purification, and quantum memory.

    “Several ingredients of this scheme have been already demonstrated: entanglement swapping (Pan et al. 1998), purification (Pan et al. 2003), quantum memory (e.g., Yuan et al. 2008), etc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al. 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Pan et al. 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Yuan et al. 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Photons are the fastest information carriers, have a very weak coupling to the environment, and are thus best suited for quantum communication tasks.

    “Photons are the fastest information carriers, have a very weak coupling to the environment, and are thus best suited for quantum communication tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In quantum cryptography, complementary measurements on quantum systems are used to establish a secret key shared by two partners, thus enabling provably secure communication.

    “In quantum cryptography [Wiesner, 1983;Bennett and Brassard, 1984;Ekert, 1991; for a review see (Gisin et al., 2002)] complementary measurements on quantum systems are used to establish a secret key shared by two partners, thus enabling for the first time a provably secure communication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wiesner, 1983 source
    • cites Bennett and Brassard, 1984

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ekert, 1991 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The joint property of the singlet is that the two spins, if measured with respect to the same direction, will be found opposite.

    “The joint property can be put as follows: the two spins, if measured with respect to the same direction, will be found opposite.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Positivity of a partial transposition (PPT) of a density matrix is a necessary condition for a state to be separable.

    “The original idea of Peres was the observation that positivity of a partial transposition (PPT) of a density matrix (i.e. its transposition for just one subsystem) is a necessary condition for a state to be separable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peres (1996) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The two reduced density matrices of the Schmidt decomposition are endowed with the same spectrum; this does not hold for three or more particle subsystems.

    “It is easy to show that the two reduced density matrices of Eq. ( 16) are endowed with the same spectrum.This does not hold for three or more particle subsystems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As soon as Alice measures the value of a spin projection along some axis, new information is gained, and for her the state of Bob's particle is a well-defined pure one, independent of the spatial separation between them.

    “As soon as Alice measures the value of a spin projection along some axis, new information is gained, and for her the state of Bob's particle is a well defined pure one.This is independent of the spatial separation between them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In two-particle quantum interference, if the phase relation between the two amplitudes is stable, one can have absolutely noiseless interference with 100% visibility, while there is no single-particle interference.

    “Thus, if the phase relation between the two amplitudes is stable one can have absolutely noiseless interference with 100% visibility, while there is no single particle interference:”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    All information contained in the singlet state defines only joint properties.

    “All information contained in the state in Eq. ( 15) defines only joint properties (Schrödinger, 1935).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schrödinger, 1935 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The singlet state describes a coherent superposition of the two product states, and there is no information in the whole Universe on which of the two possibilities will be detected at the measurement stage.

    “The state describes a coherent superposition of the two product states: there is no information in the whole Universe on which of the two possibilities will be detected at the measurement stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Every pure state of two spins 1/2 can be put into the form cos α |↑1|↑2 + sin α |↓1|↓2.

    “Every pure state of two spins 1/2 can be put into the following form: cos α |↑ 1 |↑ 2 + sin α |↓ 1 |↓ 2 ,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Entanglement can manifest itself in strictly quantum interference phenomena that can neither be explained by a classical wave nor by a classical particle picture.

    “Entanglement can manifest itself in strictly quantum interference phenomena, that is, these phenomena can neither be explained by a classical wave nor by a classical particle picture.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    For any pure state of a pair of subsystems, one can find preferred bases such that the state is a sum of biorthogonal terms (Schmidt decomposition).

    “For any pure state, |Ψ , of a pair of subsystems, one described by a Hilbert space of dimension N , the other by a space of dimension M , say N ≤ M , one can find preferred bases, one for the first system, the other one for the second, such that the state is a sum of biorthogonal terms”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peres (2002) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Quantum d-level systems can be realized using orbital angular momentum states of photons or using simultaneously two or more degrees of freedom.

    “Quantum d-level (high-dimensional) systems (”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mair et al., 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Keller et al. used photons generated by two mutually coherent but time-separated pulses from the same mode-locked laser.

    “With a similar method of triggering, Keller et al., (1998) used photons generated by two mutually coherent but timeseparated pulses from the same mode-locked laser (Keller et al., 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Keller et al., (1998) source
    • cites Keller et al., 1998 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Weihs et al. realized an all-fiber three-path Mach-Zehnder interferometer based on symmetric unbiased multiport beamsplitters.

    “Weihs et al. (1996) realized an all-fiber three-path Mach-Zehnder interferometer, which is based on the idea of symmetric unbiased multiport BSs (Zeilinger et al., 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Weihs et al. (1996) source
    • cites Zeilinger et al., 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Polarization qubits can easily be created and manipulated with high precision by simple linear-optical elements such as polarizing beam splitters, polarizers and wave plates.

    “The advantage of using polarization qubits stems from the fact that they can easily be created and manipulated with high precision by simple linear-optical elements such as polarizing beam splitters (PBS), polarizers and wave plates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The factor i in the 50:50 beamsplitter transformation is a consequence of unitarity and describes a phase jump upon reflection.

    “The factor i in Eq. ( 28) is a consequence of unitarity.It describes a phase jump upon reflection (Zeilinger, 1981).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeilinger, 1981 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The coherence between spatial qubit states |a and |b is sensitive to the relative phase between paths a and b, and this is difficult to control in long-distance cases.

    “A disadvantage of using spatial qubits is that the coherence between |a and |b is sensitive to the relative phase between the paths a and b, and this is difficult to control in long-distance cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    An N-port interferometer proposed by Reck et al. can realize any U(N) transformation for N optical spatial modes using beamsplitters, phase shifters and mirrors.

    “an N -port interferometer was proposed by Reck et al. (1994), which can realize any U (N ) transformation for N optical spatial modes by using an arrangement of BS, phase shifters and mirrors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reck et al. (1994) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Photons have only two eigenvalues of their spin along the direction of propagation, ±, corresponding to right-handed and left-handed circular polarization.

    “Photons, massless spin 1 particles, have only two eigenvalues of their spin along the direction of their propagation (wave vector), ± .These two spin values correspond to righthanded and left-handed circular polarization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Similar interference effects can be observed using any of the photon's degrees of freedom, e.g. polarization.

    “However, similar interference effects can be observed using any of the photon's degrees of freedom, e.g.polarization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Two single photons successively emitted from a single quantum dot were overlapped on a beamsplitter and the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect was observed.

    “For instance, two single photons successively emitted from a single quantum dot were overlapped on a BS and the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect was observed (Santori et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Santori et al. 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    An n-particle interferometer generalized along the above reasoning will only exhibit n-particle fringes, but no (n−1)-, (n−2)-, ..., single-particle fringes.

    “Actually, an n-particle interferometer generalized along the above reasoning will only exhibit nparticle fringes, but no (n-1)-, (n-2)-,..., single-particle fringes (Greenberger et al., 1990).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Greenberger et al., 1990 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The two photons exit the beamsplitter paired via only one random output port; this is a bunching effect due to the bosonic character of photons.

    “The two photons exit the BS paired via only one (random) output port.This is a bunching effect due to the bosonic character of photons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The original Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment used the two photons of the same signal-idler pair from parametric down-conversion.

    “The original Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment used the two photons of the same signal-idler pair from parametric down-conversion (see Section IV.A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hong, Ou and Mandel, 1987 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Entangled states such as Bell states serve as a central physical resource in various quantum information protocols like quantum cryptography, quantum teleportation, entanglement swapping and tests aimed at excluding hidden variable models.

    “As we shall see in the following chapters, such entangled states serve as a central physical resource in various quantum information protocols like quantum cryptography, quantum teleportation, entanglement swapping and in tests aimed at excluding hidden variable models of quantum mechanics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The photon's coherence length can range from a few hundred micrometers in pulsed parametric down-conversion to a few meters for trapped ions.

    “The photon's coherence length can range from a few hundred micrometers, in pulsed parametric down-conversion, to a few meters for trapped ions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The state |Ψ− can be encoded with any degree of freedom and can be pinpointed by a two-channel coincidence behind a beamsplitter.

    “In fact, the state |Ψ - can be encoded with any degree of freedom (e.g., color encoding, see Moehring et al. 2007) and can be pinpointed by a two-channel coincidence behind a BS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moehring et al. 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In a PBS setup, a coincidence detection between the two outputs can originate only if either both photons are transmitted (|HH) or both are reflected (|VV); the two cases are quantum mechanically indistinguishable if the photons are indistinguishable, so an entangled state |φ−cd can be generated using postselection.

    “As a PBS customarily transmits H and reflects V polarization, a coincidence detection between the two outputs can originate only if either both photons are transmitted (resulting in a |HH case) or both are reflected (|V V case).The two cases are quantum mechanically indistinguishable, if the photons are indistinguishable.Thus again, an entangled state |φ - cd can be generated using postselection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pittman et al. performed a postponed compensation two-photon Shih-Alley type experiment; interference was observed even though the photons arrived at the beamsplitter at different times.

    “To dispel a misconception that the photons must arrive at the BS at the same time for some type of classical local”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pittman et al. (1996) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A complete Bell-state analysis scheme was experimentally realized and used to beat the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding.

    “Such a scheme was experimentally realized (Schuck et al., 2006) and was used to beat the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding (Barreiro, Wei, and Kwiat, 2008, see Section VI.A for more details on dense coding).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schuck et al., 2006 source
    • cites Barreiro, Wei, and Kwiat, 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the coherence time τ_c of the down-converted light is shorter than δT, the terms in Eq. (36) become distinguishable, and no two-photon polarization interference, and thus no entanglement, is observable.

    “If the coherence time, τ c , of the down-converted light is shorter than δT , the terms in Eq. ( 36) become, in principle, distinguishable, and no two-photon polarization interference, and thus no entanglement is observable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In temporal entanglement, when the crystal is pumped by a CW laser with coherence time ∆L_c, the time at which pair emission happens is undefined and phase stable within ∆L_c.

    “Temporal entanglement.-Whenthe crystal is pumped by a CW laser with a coherence time of ∆L c , the time at which pair emission happens is undefined and phase stable within ∆L c .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Periodic poling of nonlinear crystals greatly relaxes the phase-matching conditions for SPDC and allows more efficient exploitation of the material's nonlinear properties compared to bulk crystals.

    “Periodic poling of nonlinear crystals greatly relaxes the phase-matching conditions for SPDC and thus allows to exploit the material's nonlinear properties more efficiently compared to bulk crystals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    In SPDC, shining strong laser light on a nonlinear crystal gives pump photons some probability to split into correlated pairs of lower energy.

    “If one shines strong laser light on a nonlinear crystal, the pump photons have some probability to split into correlated pairs of lower energy.This is called spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Fulconis et al. (2007) developed a bright, pulsed source of photon pairs via four-wave mixing in a photonic crystal fiber.

    “In a further development, via four-wave mixing in a photonic crystal fiber Fulconis et al. (2007) have developed a bright, pulsed source of photon pairs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fulconis et al. (2007) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Today, essentially all entangled photon sources employ the second order optical nonlinearity leading to SPDC or more recently also the third order Kerr nonlinearity in four-wave mixing in optical fibers.

    “Today, essentially all entangled photon sources employ the second order optical nonlinearity leading to SPDC or more recently also the third order Kerr nonlinearity in four-wave mixing (FWM) in optical fibers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Phase matching governs the directional correlations of the emissions and implies the emerging photon pairs have entangled frequencies and linear momenta.

    “It governs the directional correlations of the emissions.It also implies the emerging photon pairs have entangled frequencies and linear momenta.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    There are two types of SPDC: type I where signal and idler photons share the same polarization, and type II where they have perpendicular polarizations.

    “There are two different types of the process: either signal and idler photons share the same polarization (type I) or they have perpendicular polarizations (type II).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The predicted strong quantum correlations between photon pairs created in SPDC were first experimentally observed by Burnham and Weinberg (1970).

    “The predicted strong quantum correlations between the photon pairs created in SPDC were first experimentally observed by Burnham and Weinberg (1970).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burnham and Weinberg (1970) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Birefringence of the nonlinear crystal causes ordinary and extraordinary photons to have different velocities and propagate along different directions, resulting in longitudinal and transverse walk-offs between the two terms in the state.

    “The birefringence of the nonlinear crystal introduces complications.Since the ordinary and extraordinary photons have different velocities, and propagate along different directions, the resulting longitudinal and transverse walk-offs between the two terms in the state (36) are maximal for pair creation near the entrance face.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    By using an additional birefringent phase shifter or rotating the down-conversion crystal, α can be set to 0 or π, allowing production of any of the four Bell states.

    “Using an additional birefringent phase shifter (or even slightly rotating the down-conversion crystal itself), the value of α can be set as desired, e.g., to 0 or π.A net phase shift of π may be obtained by a 90 • rotation of a quarter wave plate in one of the paths.A half wave plate in one path can be used to change horizontal polarization to vertical and vice versa.One can thus produce any of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mattle et al. 1996 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Ideal compensation for longitudinal walk-off is to use two crystals, one in each path, identical with the down-conversion crystal but half as long; if polarizations are rotated by 90°, temporal indistinguishability is restored.

    “The ideal compensation is therefore to use two crystals, one in each path, which are identical with the down-conversion crystal, but only half as long.If the polarizations are rotated by 90 • (e.g., with a half wave plate), the retardations of the o and e components are exchanged and temporal indistinguishability is restored.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Quantum interference of type-I SPDC photons was used to violate Bell's inequality first by Shih and Alley (1988), and Hong, Ou, and Mandel (1987).

    “Quantum interference of (type-I) SPDC photons was used to violate Bell's inequality first by Shih andAlley (1988), andHong, Ou, andMandel (1987).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Shih and Alley (1988) source
    • cites Hong, Ou, and Mandel (1987) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    SPDC allows pairs of entangled photons to be collected in clearly specified directions, with reasonable intensity and with very high purity.

    “Meanwhile it was discovered that the process of spontaneous parametric down-conversion allows pairs of entangled photons to be collected in clearly specified directions, with reasonable intensity and with very high purity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SPDC was shown to be a ready source of path entangled pairs by Horne, Shimony and Zeilinger (1989), and this was demonstrated independently by Rarity and Tapster (1990a).

    “The process was shown to be a ready source of (path) entangled pairs by Horne, Shimony and Zeilinger (1989).This was demonstrated independently by Rarity and Tapster (1990a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Horne, Shimony and Zeilinger (1989) source
    • cites Rarity and Tapster (1990a)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Photonic entanglement in higher dimensions can in principle be generated by SPDC processes as a generalization of path or temporal entanglement into more than two conjugate pairs of beams or time-bins, and analyzed with N-port beamsplitters.

    “Photonic entanglement in higher dimensions can in principle be generated by SPDC processes in a form of generalization of path or temporal entanglement into more than two conjugate pairs of beams or time-bins, respectively (Zeilinger et al., 1993), and analyzed with Nport beamsplitters (Reck et al., 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Zeilinger et al., 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Reck et al., 1994 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Orbital angular momentum eigenstates of photons are states of the electromagnetic field with phase singularities and can be utilized for observation of higher dimensional entanglement.

    “Orbital angular momentum eigenstates of photons are states of the electromagnetic field with phase singularities.They can be utilized for observation of higher dimensional entanglement (Mair et al., 2001;Vaziri et al., 2002Vaziri et al., , 2003)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mair et al., 2001 source
    • cites Vaziri et al., 2002 source
    • cites Vaziri et al., 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    By varying the parameters of the beamsplitters and phases in the pump interferometer, all two-qubit entangled time-bin states can be generated.

    “By varying the parameters of the beamsplitters and phases in the pump interferometer, all two-qubit entangled time-bin states can be generated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Behind the beamsplitters, upper and lower paths cannot be distinguished, leading to two-photon interference depending on the difference of relative phase shifts in a and b modes.

    “Behind the BSs upper and lower paths cannot be distinguished, leading to two-photon interference, which depends on the difference of the relative phase shifts in a and b modes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This polarization-path entanglement was independently realized by Barbieri et al. (2005) using type-I nonlinear crystals, and by Yang et al. (2005) using a type-II nonlinear crystal.

    “It was independently realized by Barbieri et al (2005) using type-I nonlinear crystals, and by Yang et al (2005) using a type-II nonlinear crystal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Barbieri et al (2005) source
    • cites Yang et al (2005) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Żukowski, Zeilinger and Horne (1997) showed such configuration can lead to new types of EPR correlations and can be used for tests of local realism more discriminating than two-qubit tests.

    “As it was shown by Żukowski, Zeilinger and Horne (1997) such configuration can lead to new types of EPR correlations, and can be used for tests of local realism (which are more discriminating than two qubit tests, see [Kaszlikowski et al. (2000)]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Żukowski, Zeilinger and Horne (1997)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kaszlikowski et al. (2000) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The technique of erasing which-source information can be applied in many other configurations and works even for totally independent emissions provided they are synchronized.

    “The technique of essentially erasing which-source information, can be applied in many other configurations, e.g., in the case of a double pair emission from a single source, etc.It works even for totally independent emissions (provided they are synchronized).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This threshold is at quite high pump powers and puts a strong limitation on how many particles can be entangled using such methods.

    “This threshold is at quite high pump powers.Nevertheless, this puts a strong limitation as how many particles can be entangled using such methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Once one is able to entangle two photons that never interacted, one can construct very many types of entanglement, which in turn can be utilized in many ways.

    “Once one is able to entangle two photons that never interacted, one can construct very many types of entanglement (Zeilinger et al., 1997), which in turn can be utilized in many ways (Bose et al., 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Zeilinger et al., 1997 source
    • cites Bose et al., 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The other two photons are, due to this event, in state 1/√2(|b|a + e^{-i(φc+φd)}|b'|a'). This process is called entanglement swapping.

    “The other two photons are, due to this event, in state: 1 √ 2 |b |a + e -i(φc+φ d ) |b |a . This process is called en- tanglement swapping.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Filtering is necessary only in modes c and d, while no filtering is required in front of detectors a(±) and b(±).

    “Note that filtering is necessary only in modes c and d, while no filtering is required in front of the detectors a(±) and b(±).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    In 1989 no ready sources of three or more particle entanglement were available.

    “However, in 1989 no ready sources of three or more particle entanglement were available.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Narrow filters in paths a, a' and b, b' are not necessary to obtain high visibility; the other filters, for detectors which observe radiation from both sources, should always be sufficiently narrow.

    “Namely, narrow filters in paths a, a and b, b are not necessary to obtain high visibility.The other filters, for detectors which observe radiation from both sources, should be always sufficiently narrow.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The statistics of a single beam of a down converter is thermal-like.

    “The statistics of a single beam of a down converter is thermal-like.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    To avoid multi-pair emission events, most SPDC experiments are restricted to τ ≤ 0.1.

    “To avoid multi-pair emission events most SPDC experiments are restricted to τ 0.1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Each |ψ^-_n is an analog of a singlet state of two spin-n/2 particles, thus |ψ is invariant under joint rotations of the polarization bases of both modes.

    “Each |ψ - n is an analog of a singlet state of two spin-n/2 particles, thus |ψ is invariant under joint rotations of the polarization bases of both modes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The first two methods reduce the intensity of entangled photon pairs significantly and cannot achieve perfect overlap of the two-photon amplitudes.

    “The first two methods reduce the intensity of the entangled photon pairs significantly and cannot achieve perfect overlap of the two-photon amplitudes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Yao et al. 2011, the collection efficiency was reported to be about twice as high as in measurements using 3 nm filters.

    “where the collection efficiency was reported to be about twice as high than in measurements using 3nm filters”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yao et al. 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Methods used to increase quantum interference visibility include: (i) a thin nonlinear crystal, (ii) narrow-band spectral filters in front of detectors, or (iii) an interferometric technique without spectral and amplitude post-selection.

    “The following methods are used to increase the quantum interference visibility: (i) a thin nonlinear crystal (Sergienko et al., 1999), (ii) narrow-band spectral filters in front of detectors, as shown above (Grice and Walmsley, 1997;Grice et al., 1998;Di Giuseppe et al., 1997), or (iii) an interferometric technique (Branning et al., 1999(Branning et al., , 2000) ) without spectral and amplitude”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sergienko et al., 1999 source
    • cites Grice and Walmsley, 1997 source
    • cites Branning et al., 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The methods described above require a femtosecond pulsed laser pump.

    “The methods described above require a femtosecond pulsed laser pump.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The scheme works only with photon-number discriminating detectors, and if both EPR sources emit only a pair each without double pair (or more) emission events.

    “However, the scheme works only with photon-number discriminating detectors, and if both EPR sources emit only a pair each without double pair (or more) emission events.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Four-photon GHZ state was first observed by Pan et al. (2001a), and its genuine entanglement was confirmed by Zhao et al. (2003a).

    “Four-photon GHZ state was first observed by Pan et al., (2001a) and its genuine entanglement was confirmed by Zhao et al., (2003a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al., (2001a)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Zhao et al., (2003a)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because narrowband filtering is unnecessary for such sources, one can achieve a higher collection efficiency than with passive filtering.

    “Since narrowband filtering is unnecessary in case of such sources, one can achieve a higher collection efficiency than in the case of using passive filtering”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2001 source
    • cites Yao et al. 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Creation of entanglement for many particles requires more and more initial entangled pairs, thus one pumps stronger; however, strong pump leads to lower visibility of quantum interference, which may prohibit observing correlations due to desired multi-photon entanglement.

    “Simply, creation of entanglement for many particles requires more and more initial entangled pairs, thus one pumps stronger.However, strong pump leads to lower visibility of quantum interference, which may prohibit to observe the correlations due to the desired multi-photon entanglement (Laskowski et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Laskowski et al. 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The GHZ theorem pertains to three or more particle systems and reveals a contradiction between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories, even for definite predictions.

    “An important line of research was opened with the discovery of the GHZ theorem, which pertains to three or more particle systems, and reveals a contradiction between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories, even for definite predictions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Emission of two photons into each of two modes gives a highly entangled state and is significantly different from simply emitting two pairs.

    “Emission of two photons into each of two modes gives already a highly entangled state and is significantly different from simply emitting two pairs (Weinfurter and Żukowski 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weinfurter and Żukowski 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This state, first observed by Eibl et al. (2003), is the extension of the singlet state |Ψ-> to four photons and is invariant under equal unitary transformations in the four output modes.

    “This state, first observed by Eibl et al. (2003), is the extension of the singlet state |Ψ -to four photons and is thus invariant under equal unitary transformations in the four output modes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eibl et al. (2003) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A disadvantage of quantum state tomography is that the number of measurements grows exponentially with the number of photons, so reconstruction of an n-photon state necessitates 4^n n-fold coincidence measurements.

    “A disadvantage of such method, however, is that the number of measurements grows exponentially with the number of photons, thus the reconstruction of a n-photon state necessitates 4 n n-fold coincidence measurements which is experimentally demanding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By splitting the two emission modes into three output modes, the six-photon singlet was observed by Radmark et al. (2009), with visibility of the six-photon interference as high as 85%.

    “By splitting the two emission modes into three output modes also the six-photon singlet was observed recently by Radmark et al. (2009), with visibility of the six photon interference as high as 85%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Radmark et al. (2009) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The high visibility is possible because the scheme does not involve interferometric overlaps; only beamsplitting is necessary.

    “The high visibility is possible because the distinctive feature of this scheme is that it does not involve interferometric overlaps; only beamsplitting is necessary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Any test of local realism based on GHZ correlations must use Bell-type inequalities because perfect correlations cannot be expected in a laboratory and any finite sample has non-zero uncertainty.

    “In a laboratory one cannot expect perfect correlations, and even if they were possible any necessarily finite sample would be endowed with a finite, non-zero uncertainty.Thus, any test of local realism based on the GHZ correlations has to resort to some Bell-type inequalities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Entanglement has been distributed over long distances: over 10.5 km free space in Hefei by Peng et al. (2005), and in an asymmetric arrangement one photon was sent over 144 km between the islands of La Palma and Teneriffe by Ursin et al. (2007).

    “For example, over 10.5 km free space in Hefei by Peng et al. (2005), or in an asymmetric arrangement, in the case of which one photon is sent over 144 km between the islands of La Palma and Teneriffe (Ursin et al 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Peng et al. (2005) source
    • cites Ursin et al 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These Bell tests in relativistic configurations stress the oddness of quantum correlations.

    “These Bell tests in “relativistic configurations” stress the oddness of quantum correlations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    We have a Bell theorem without inequalities, which thrashes any hopes to derive realism from locality and perfect correlations of the EPR type.

    “We have a “Bell theorem without inequalities” (Greenberger et al., 1990), which thrashes any hopes to derive realism from locality and perfect correlations of the EPR type”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Greenberger et al., 1990 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Aspect's experiments were the first to use fast but periodic switching of the local polarization analyzers.

    “Aspect's experiments were the firs to use fast but periodic switching of the local polarization analyzers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent experiment by Matsukevich et al. (2008) involved two separate ion traps (one meter distance) and an entanglement-swapping procedure involving photons emitted by the ions; the detection loophole was again perfectly closed.

    “A recent experiment by Matsukevich et al. (2008) involved two separate ion traps (one meter distance) and an entanglement-swapping procedure involving the photons emitted by the ions.The detection loophole was again perfectly closed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Matsukevich et al. (2008) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The locality loophole is present in experiments that do not have independent, space-time separated measurement settings.

    “The locality loophole is present in experiments which do not have independent, i.e. space-time separated measurement settings, as can be guaranteed only with random and fast switching of the local measurement settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Photons are the fastest information carrier and, due to weak environmental coupling, are an obvious choice for quantum communication, especially long-distance.

    “Photons are the fastest information carrier, and due to their very weak coupling to the environment, are an obvious choice for quantum communication, especially for long-distances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Theories based on assumptions (L1)-(L3) can explain some features of two-particle entangled states: they do not allow faster-than-light information, reproduce perfect anti-correlations, and model all Bell-type experiments violating CHSH.

    “It can be shown that such theories can explain some important features of entangled states of two particles: first, by assumption (L 3 ), they do not allow information to be transmitted faster than at the speed of light; second, they are capable to reproduce perfect anti-correlations, a fundamental feature of the Bell singlet state; and third, they provide a model for all Bell type experiments in”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For the polarization singlet state, the quantum correlation function E_kl = -cos φ, and the left-hand side of inequality (68) reads |2(cos φ + 1)|.

    “The quantum correlation function for the local measurements defined by a k and b l depends only on the relative angles between the vectors: E kl = -a k • b l = -cos ϕ.Thus, the left hand side of inequality (68), for quantum predictions, reads |2(cos ϕ + 1)|.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Bohm's theory, non-local correlations are a consequence of the nonlocal quantum potential, which exerts torque on particles leading to results compliant with quantum mechanics.

    “There the non-local correlations are a consequence of the nonlocal quantum potential, which exerts suitable torque on the particles leading to experimental results compliant with quantum mechanics (Dewdney et al., 1987).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bohm, 1951

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Dewdney et al., 1987 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The maximal violation of inequality (68) occurs at φ_max = 18.8°, where the bound is 3.792 and the quantum value is 3.893.

    “The maximal violation of inequality (68) is for ϕ max = 18.8 • : the bound given by inequality (68) equals 3.792 whereas the quantum value is 3.893.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The discrepancy between the ideal quantum value 6 and the observed value was due to imperfections in the interferometers and effective observables deviating from the ideal ones.

    “The discrepancy between the ideal quantum value 6 was due to imperfections in the complicated interferometers (note, each one had eight exit ports), and the effective observables were slightly deviating from the ideal ones considered in the theoretical reasoning of Cabello.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In the Leggett-type model, there exist subensembles of definite polarizations independent of measurements, and predictions for the subensembles agree with Malus' law.

    “It is a very important trait of this model that there exist subensembles of definite polarizations (independent of measurements) and that the predictions for the subensembles agree with Malus' law.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Quantum dense coding doubles the information capacity of the transmission channel, sending only one qubit.

    “The quantum dense coding doubles the information capacity of the transmission channel: what is actually sent is only one qubit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Quantum teleportation is a critical ingredient for many quantum communication protocols and quantum computation, and its experimental realization allows new studies of fundamentals.

    “Quantum teleportation is indeed not only a critical ingredient for many more quantum communication protocols and for quantum computation (Gottesman and Chuang, 1999;Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn, 2001)-its experimental realization allows new studies of the fundamentals of quantum theory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gottesman and Chuang, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn, 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The projection postulate makes it impossible to fully determine the state of a single quantum system, and the no-cloning principle excludes creating additional high-fidelity replicas.

    “The projection postulate makes it impossible to fully determine the state of a single quantum system, or, from another point of view, the no-cloning principle (Wootters and Zurek, 1982) excludes the possibility to create additional high-fidelity replicas of the original state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wootters and Zurek, 1982 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    An experiment on a qubit can give only one bit of information, insufficient to reconstruct the actual state; infinitely many measurements on identical copies would be needed.

    “The trivial idea, i.e., that Alice performs certain measurements on |χ 1 by which she would obtain all the information necessary for Bob to reconstruct the state is ruled out: an experiment on a qubit can give only one bit of information.This only suffice to determine which state can be ruled out, but is insufficient to reconstruct the actual state.To this end we need infinitely many measurements”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Quantum dense coding allows encoding two bits of classical information by manipulating only one of two particles in a Bell state.

    “The idea of quantum dense coding, introduced by Bennett and Wiesner (1992) is that, by manipulating only one of the two particles in a Bell state, one can also encode two bits of information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bennett and Wiesner (1992) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Entanglement allows circumventing the Holevo theorem and encoding information entirely in the correlations of a pair of qubits.

    “Entanglement, a property of pairs of qubits, allows to circumvent this theorem and to encode information entirely in the relative properties of the pair, i.e. in their correlations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holevo theorem (1973)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Quantum teleportation circumvents the no-cloning theorem because the Bell-state measurement irrecoverably erases the original state and reveals no information about the particles prior to the measurement.

    “The original state of Alice's particle 1 is irrecoverably erased by the Bell-state measurement, as the Bell-state measurement does not reveal any information on the properties of any of the particles prior to the measurement.This is why quantum teleportation circumvents the no-cloning theorem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    In the Innsbruck experiment, because of probabilistic SPDC, a pf1f2 coincidence could occur due to unwanted two-pair emission with no photon propagating to Bob, so successful teleportation had to be confirmed by a detection event at Bob's side.

    “In the Innsbruck experiment, however, owing to the probabilistic nature of SPDC, there was also the chance to register a pf1f2 coincidence (Fig. 21b), seemingly indicating the preparation of a single photon and the identification of a |ψ - 12 , which could occur unfortunately due to an unwanted event of two-pair emission during the second passage of the UV-pulse, with no emission in the first pass”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Quantum teleportation works equally well for mixed states or entangled states because it is a linear operation applied to |χ1; the initial state can be completely unknown to anyone.

    “Furthermore, as quantum teleportation is a linear operation applied to |χ 1 , it works for mixed states, or entangled states, equally well; the initial state |χ 1 can be completely unknown not only to Alice but to anyone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    It is not necessary for Alice to know where Bob is, although they need to share some reference frame information for the protocol to work.

    “It is not necessary for Alice to know where Bob is (although they do need to share some reference frame information in order for the protocol to work).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Quantum teleportation does not violate causality because a transfer of two bits of classical information is absolutely necessary to conclude the process.

    “Quantum teleportation does not violate causality: a transfer of two bits of classical information is absolutely necessary to conclude the process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Open-destination teleportation allows transfer of a state to one of several potential recipients, and the recipient can be decided even after the initial to-be-teleported state is wiped out in a Bell-state measurement.

    “The so-called open-destination teleportation, of Karlsson and Bourennane (1998), is a protocol allowing to transfer a state to one of several potential recipients.It can be decided who gets the state even after the initial to-be-teleported state, |χ , is wiped out in a Bell-state measurement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Karlsson and Bourennane (1998) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the Pan et al. (2003a) experiment, the probability of successful teleportation conditioned on an f1-f2-p three-fold coincidence increases with decreasing filter transmission γ; observed probability was 0.138 ± 0.002 for γ = 0.05.

    “To demonstrate a non-conditional teleportation, a series of neutral filters were inserted in mode 1, showing that the probability of a successful teleportation conditioned on an f1-f2-p three-fold coincidence increases with decreasing filter transmission γ (e.g., the observed probability of success was 0.138 ± 0.002 for γ = 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al., 2003a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If a photon carries two qubits, any two-qubit measurement can be performed, including a Bell state measurement involving states of two different photon degrees of freedom.

    “Thus if the photon carries two qubits, any two qubit measurement can be performed, including a Bell state measurement, involving states of two different photon”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Quantum teleportation using nuclear magnetic resonance or trapped atoms has the advantage that the input quantum state can be teleported with 100% efficiency, but it is difficult if not impossible to implement over long distances.

    “Quantum teleportation using nuclear magnetic resonance (Nielsen et al., 1998) or trapped atoms (Riebe et al., 2004;Barrett et al., 2004) has an obvious advantage in that the input quantum state can be teleported with an efficiency of 100%.Yet, it is difficult (if not impossible) to implement it over long distances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Nielsen et al., 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Riebe et al., 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Barrett et al., 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Emulating one particle by using two degrees of freedom of a single photon does not allow teleportation of a qubit state of an independently arriving particle, and makes it difficult to imagine entanglement swapping leaving two spatially separated independently emitted qubits in a maximally entangled state.

    “However, the fact that one of the particles is emulated does not allow one to teleport a qubit state of an independently arriving particle, and it is difficult to imagine an entanglement swapping process which leaves as a result two spatially separated qubits, previously independently emitted, in a maximally entangled state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Quantum teleportation of continuous-variable states has the advantage that full Bell-state analysis is possible with linear optics within the experimental bandwidth, but it is hard to extend to long-distance because squeezed-state entanglement degrades during longer-distance transfers.

    “Quantum teleportation of continuous-variable states (Furusawa et al., 1998;Braunstein and van Loock, 2005) has the advantage that full Bell-state analysis is possible with linear optics (within the experimental bandwidth).Yet, it is hard to extend to a long-distance case.The unavoidable degradation of squeezed-states sets in during longer-distance transfers.This consequently leads to a rapid”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Furusawa et al., 1998 source
    • cites Braunstein and van Loock, 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Jin et al. (2010) emulated free-space quantum teleportation over 16 km.

    “Adopting Boschi et al.'s protocol, Jin et al. (2010) emulated free-space quantum teleportation over 16km.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jin et al. (2010) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Rome protocol avoids many difficulties because it does not involve interference of photons from two separate emissions and manipulates only one EPR pair; it needs just one SPDC source and works with just a one pair-emission process.

    “As the protocol does not involve interference of photons from two separate emissions, and as only one EPR pair is manipulated, it avoids many difficulties.Just one SPDC source is needed, and it works with just a one pair-emission process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the Pan et al. (2003a) scheme, attenuating beam 1 by factor γ while leaving modes 2-3 unchanged makes a three-fold coincidence f1-f2-p occur with probability γp^2 for successful teleportation and spurious coincidences with probability (γp)^2.

    “This was accomplished by attenuating the beam 1 by a factor of γ, while leaving the intensity in modes 2-3 unchanged.With such an arrangement a three-fold coincidence f1-f2-p occurs with probability γp 2 for a successful teleportation (p is the probability of having a single pair creation during a SPDC process).With a significantly lower probability (γp) 2 one has a spurious coincidences without a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In open-destination teleportation, after the encoding operation the destination is left open until a polarization measurement on two of the remaining three photons, so one can choose which particle finally carries the teleported state even if photons 3, 4 and 5 are far apart, and no prior agreement on the final destination is necessary.

    “In contrast to the original teleportation scheme, after the encoding operation the destination of teleportation is left open until we perform a polarization measurement (”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the Pan et al. (1998) experiment, the observed sinusoidal behavior of coincidence rates had a visibility of 0.65(2), clearly surpassing the 0.5 limit for classical interference.

    “The observed sinusoidal behavior (the interference pattern) of the coincidence rates had a visibility of 0.65(2), which clearly surpasses the 0.5 limit for a classical interference for coincidence measurements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al. (1998)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the Zhang et al. (2006b) two-qubit teleportation experiment, measured fidelities for |X_A, |X_B, and |X_C were 0.86(3), 0.75(2), and 0.65(3), respectively, all well beyond the state estimation limit of 0.40 for a two-qubit system.

    “The measured fidelity for |X A , |X B , and |X C was 0.86(3), 0.75(2) and 0.65(3), respectively.All the measured fidelities were well beyond the state estimation limit of 0.40 for a two-qubit system (for a derivation of the limit see Hayashi et al. (2005)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al. (2006b)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hayashi et al. (2005) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In entanglement swapping, a Bell-state measurement on photons 2 and 3 always projects photons 1 and 4 onto a Bell state; for example, if the result is |ψ-, the resulting state for photons 1 and 4 is also |ψ-.

    “this measurement always projects photons 1 and 4 also onto a Bell state.For example, if the result of the Bellstate measurement of photons 2 and 3 is |ψ -, then the resulting state for photons 1 and 4 is also |ψ -.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Each EPR source emits a pair of entangled photons in the state |ψ-, so the total state of four photons is |Ψ1234 = |ψ-12|ψ-34.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A later experiment by Pan et al. (2001a) achieved a visibility of ∼0.84, sufficient for violating a Bell inequality (threshold 0.71) for photons 1 and 4.

    “A later experiment (Pan et al., 2001a) achieved a visibility of ∼ 0.84, which is sufficient for violating a Bell inequality (the threshold is 0.71) for photons 1 and 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al. (2001a)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the Zhao et al. (2004) experiment, five-fold coincidence was detected at a rate of 12 per hour and teleportation fidelities from photon 1 to photon 5 and from photon 1 to photon 4 for +/- linear and R/L circular polarization states were ∼0.80(4).

    “The authors detected five-fold coincidence with a rate of 12 per hour and measured fidelities of teleportation from photon 1 to photon 5 and from photon 1 to photon 4. For +/-linear and R/L circular polarization states these were ∼ 0.80(4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhao et al. (2004) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Moehring et al. (2007) entangled two trapped atomic ions separated one meter apart using entanglement swapping exploiting interference of photons emitted by the ions, and Yuan et al. (2008) did so in atomic ensembles.

    “Proof-of-principle experiments have been performed by Moehring et al. (2007) who entangled two trapped atomic ions separated one meter apart using entanglement swapping exploiting interference of photons emitted by the ions, and by Yuan et al. (2008) in atomic ensembles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moehring et al. (2007) source
    • cites Yuan et al. (2008) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These matter-qubit entanglement experiments still suffer from low success probability and imperfect state fidelity; Moehring et al. (2007) had success probability 3.6×10^-9 and fidelity 0.63(3), and Matsukevich et al. (2008) improved ion-ion entanglement fidelity to 0.81.

    “These experiments still suffer from low success probability and imperfect state fidelity.For instance, the Moehring et al. (2007) experiment had a success probability of 3.6 × 10 -9 and the fidelity of the states of the entangled ions was 0.63(3).The ion-ion entanglement fidelity was improved to be 0.81 in a later experiment by Matsukevich et al. (2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moehring et al. (2007) source
    • cites Matsukevich et al. (2008) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Kwiat et al. (2001) used the Procrustean method to demonstrate experimentally distillation of maximally entangled states from non-maximally entangled inputs, using partial polarizers to maximize entanglement of pure polarization-entangled photon pairs generated by SPDC; after filtering, distilled states violate Bell's inequality while initial states do not.

    “Kwiat et al., (2001) used the Procrustean method to demonstrate experimentally distillation of maximally entangled states from non-maximally entangled inputs.Using partial polarizers, they performed a filtering process to maximize the entanglement of pure polarizationentangled photon pairs generated by SPDC.The method was also applied to initial states that were partially mixed.After filtering, t”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kwiat et al., 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Halder et al. (2007) achieved entanglement swapping by precise time measurement using a niobium nitride superconducting single photon detector with time resolution 74 ps and 10 pm-bandwidth filters corresponding to coherence time 350 ps, well above temporal resolution.

    “Halder et al. (2007) took a different approach to achieve entanglement swapping by a precise time measurement.The photon detector used in the experiment was a niobium nitride superconducting single photon detector with a time resolution of 74ps 62 .The photons were filtered using 10pm-bandwidth filters, which corresponds to a coherence time of 350ps well above the temporal resolution of the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Halder et al. (2007) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Significant experimental progress has been achieved in small-scale realizations of quantum information processing, but bringing it to technologically useful scales faces challenges primarily due to unavoidable decoherence from coupling between the quantum system and the environment.

    “So far, significant experimental progress has been achieved in small-scale realizations of quantum information processing.However, interesting challenges arise in bringing quantum information processing to technologically useful scales.This is primarily due to the unavoidable decoherencefoot_19 caused by a coupling between the quantum system and the environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Jennewein et al. (2002) implemented a 2-state Bell-analyzer, obtained ideal spatial mode-overlap using a fiber coupler, and violated a Bell inequality for measurements on photons 1 and 4 by the factor 1.211(45), i.e., by 4.6 standard deviations.

    “Further advancements were achieved by Jennewein et al. (2002) by implementing a 2-state Bell-analyzer.Using a fiber coupler an ideal spatial mode-overlap was obtained.A Bell-inequality, for measurements on photons 1 and 4, was violated by the factor of 1.211(45), i.e., by 4.6 standard deviations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jennewein et al. (2002)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The underlying idea of entanglement purification is to use LOCC only to extract from multiple copies of imperfect states fewer copies of entangled state asymptotically to near-unity fidelity.

    “The underlying idea of entanglement purification is that, by using local operations and classical communication (LOCC) only, to extract from multiple copies of imperfect states (arbitrary mixed states) fewer copies of entangled state asymptotically to near-unity fidelity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The entanglement purification scheme produces a new ensemble with fidelity F' = F^2/[F^2+(1-F)^2] for F>1/2, larger than before purification.

    “with a larger fidelity F = F 2 /[F 2 + (1 -F ) 2 ] (for F > 1/2) of pairs in the desired state than before the purification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Phase errors can be transformed into bit-flip errors by a 45° polarization rotation and treated in a subsequent purification step.

    “phase errors can then be easily transformed into bit-flip errors by a 45 • polarization rotation and treated in a subsequent purification step.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If one estimates the accuracy of local operations at the used PBSs, theoretical values of fidelity better than 98% for the process itself are obtained, equivalently an error probability of at most 2%.

    “used PBSs, one obtains theoretical values of fidelity better than 98% for the process itself, or equivalently an error probability of at most 2%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    For quantum key distribution, the rate for dark counts etc. for a given photon detector is constant, while the key rate decreases with increasing fiber length.

    “For quantum key distribution, the rate for dark counts etc. for a given photon detector is constant, while the key rate decreases with increasing fiber length.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since the effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while the outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible, with the help of satellites one can achieve global free-space quantum communication, provided the quantum states survive the passage through the aerosphere.

    “Since the effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while the outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible, with the help of satellites one can achieve global free-space quantum communication, provided the quantum states survive the passage through the aerosphere.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This underlines the necessity of developing quantum repeaters.

    “This underlines the necessity of developing quantum repeaters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Quantum memories have applications not only in long-distance quantum communication, but they also provide a route to a more efficient multi-photon entanglement or linear optics quantum computing.

    “We emphasize that quantum memories have applications not only in long-distance quantum communica- tion, but they also provide a route to a more efficient multi-photon entanglement (see Sec.IV.D) or linear optics quantum computing (see Sec.VII).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    For each round the probability for getting a click is given by p_c; thus, we need to repeat the process about 1/p_c times to warrant a successful preparation of entanglement.

    “For each round the probability for getting a click is given by p c .thus, we need to repeat the process about 1/p c times to warrant a successful preparation of entanglement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given a quantum repeater, ideally with long storage time, high writing and retrieval efficiencies, the randomly generated SPDC photon pairs can be stored and synchronized with the arrival of other photon pairs.

    “Given a quantum repeater, ideally with long storage time, high writing and retrieval efficiencies 66 , the randomly generated SPDC photon pairs can be stored and synchronized with the arrival of other photon pairs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The entanglement generation (as well as entanglement connection) in the DLCZ scheme is based on single-photon interference at photodetectors, which requires a stable long-distance interferometric stability.

    “The entanglement generation (as well as entanglement connection) in the DLCZ scheme is based on singlephoton interference at photodetectors 68 , which requires a stable long-distance interferometric stability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    In classical communication, the problem of exponential attenuation can be overcome by using repeaters at certain points in the channel.

    “In classical communication, the problem of exponential attenuation can be overcome by using repeaters at certain points in the channel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This would enable efficient generation of multiphoton states in a time which increases only polynomially with number of involved qubits.

    “This would, for instance, enable efficient generation of multiphoton states in a time which increase only polynomially with number of involved qubits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The quantum repeater protocol comprises a protocol for which the time needed for entanglement creation scales polynomially, whereas the required material resources per connection point grow only logarithmically with the distance.

    “A protocol for which the time needed for entanglement creation scales polynomially, whereas the required material resources per connection point grow only logarithmically with the distance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Briegel et al., 1998 source
    • cites Dür et al., 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The quantum repeater protocol comprises a method for creation of entanglement between particles at distant nodes, which uses auxiliary particles at intermediate connection points and a nested purification protocol.

    “A method for creation of entanglement between particles at distant nodes, which uses auxiliary particles at intermediate”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Briegel et al., 1998 source
    • cites Dür et al., 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A similar conclusion has been independently obtained by Koashi et al., (2001) using entangled ancilla photons.

    “A similar conclusion has been independently obtained by Koashi et al., (2001) using entangled ancilla photons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Koashi et al., 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    In such applications the matter itself should be endowed with a long storage time.

    “In such applications the matter itself should be endowed with a long storage time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Such excitations can be stored for a reasonably long time in metastable states of the atoms.

    “Such excitations can be stored for a reasonably long time in metastable states (the so-called ground-state manifold) of the atoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The emitted single-photon pulse is directed forward; the emission time is controllable by the repumping time; and the pulse shape is controllable by varying the time dependence of the Rabi frequency of the repumping pulse.

    “This is with fully controllable properties: the emitted single-photon pulse is directed forward; the emission time is controllable by the repumping time; and the pulse shape is controllable by varying the time dependence of the Rabi frequency of the repumping pulse.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Though the DLCZ scheme does not meet all the criteria for long-distance quantum communication, it provides a promising approach to a fully controllable single-photon source based on atomic ensembles, which seems to be much easier for experimental demonstrations.

    “Though the DLCZ scheme does not meet all the criteria for long-distance quantum communication, it provides a promising approach to a fully controllable singlephoton source based on atomic ensembles, which seems to be much easier for experimental demonstrations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Several improvements of this protocol, particularly those based on cluster states or error encoding, have dramatically reduced this worrying resource overhead, and started to bridge the gap between the theoretical scalability and practical implementations.

    “Several improvements of this protocol, particularly those based on cluster states or error encoding, have dramatically reduced this worrying resource overhead, and started to bridge the gap between the theoretical scalability and practical implementations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Under the two-photon resonance, the classical driving field can induce transparency for the quantized light field and a substantial group-velocity reduction, and even the complete stopping of the light.

    “Under the two-photon resonance (i.e., the two detunings for the two transitions shown in the inset of Fig. 33 are both equal to ∆), the classical driving field can induce transparency for the quantized light field and a substantial group-velocity reduction, and even the complete stopping of the light”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lukin and Imamoǧlu, 2001 source
    • cites Lukin, 2003 source
    • cites Fleischhauer et al., 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The technique of quantum state transfer between matter and photons is indispensable for both long-distance quantum communication and large-scale optical quantum computing.

    “The technique of quantum state transfer between matter and photons is indispensable for both long-distance quantum communication and large-scale optical quantum computing (see section VII).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The basic idea of quantum light memory is in transferring a photonic state to the excitations of atomic internal states, where it can be stored, and after some controllable time, transferring back the excitations to photons restoring the original quantum state.

    “The basic idea of quantum light memory is in transferring a photonic state to the excitations of atomic internal states.In such a way it can be stored.After some controllable time, it should be possible to transfer back the excitations to photons restoring the original quantum state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As there is no excited atomic state in the dark-state subspace, the storage time can be very long.

    “As there is no excited atomic state in the dark-state subspace, the storage time can be very long.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The atomic ensemble generates a correlated state in Eq. (84), which is an exact analog of the SPDC radiation.

    “The atomic ensemble generates a correlated state in Eq. ( 84), which is an exact analog of the SPDC radiation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The photon, thanks to its high transmittance through air and glass fibers and its extremely long decoherence time, has arguably been the best candidate for quantum communication.

    “As we have seen in the above section, the photon, thanks to its high transmittance through air and glass fibers and its extremely long decoherence time, has arguably been the best candidate for quantum communication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The restriction does not allow further operations on the two photons involved and thus limits the depth of calculations.

    “The restriction does not allow further operations on the two photons involved and thus limits the depth of calculations”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This is an important feature for both circuit-model, and one-way model of scalable optical quantum computing.

    “This is an important feature for both circuit-model, and one-way model of scalable optical quantum computing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    In scenarios in which quantum gates can be performed directly in, at best, a non-deterministic fashion, the one-way model is particularly useful.

    “In scenarios in which quantum gates can be performed directly in, at best, a non-deterministic fashion, the oneway model is particularly useful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Shor's quantum algorithm provides a way of factoring large integers in polynomial time, a task for which no efficient classical method is known.

    “Shor's quantum algorithm provides a way of factoring large integers in polynomial time, a task for which no efficient classical method is known.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In SPDC, one usually does not know when a pair is emitted; only a firing of photon detectors informs one that a spontaneous emission act happened.

    “In the case of SPDC, one usually does not know when a pair is emitted.Only a firing of photon detectors informs one that a spontaneous emission act happened.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The described protocol is a linear-optical realization of the Duan-Raussendorf proposal and combines the advantages of the Browne-Rudolph scheme, whose overall efficiency is thereby demonstrated.

    “The described protocol is a linear-optical realization of the Duan-Raussendorf proposal (2005), but combines the advantages of the Browne-Rudolph scheme, whose overall efficiency is thereby demonstrated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Duan-Raussendorf proposal (2005)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Browne-Rudolph scheme

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    In the above linear-optical architecture, two-photon entangled pairs are the basic resources.

    “In the above linear-optical architecture, two-photon entangled pairs are the basic resources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Fault-tolerant thresholds are still well beyond what is achievable with today's technology.

    “Despite the progress, the fault-tolerant thresholds are still well beyond what is achievable with today's technology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The tested method is applicable in both the quantum circuit model and the one-way model.

    “The tested method is applicable in both the quantum circuit model and in the one-way model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Quantum computers will be very susceptible to noise which rapidly destroys fragile quantum information.

    “Quantum computers will be very susceptible to noise which rapidly destroys the fragile quantum information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    When losses are high, the resource requirements become impractically high.

    “Despite of the progress, one should note that when the losses are high, the resource requirements become impractically high.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The frequency of the photons reaching d(+) is better defined than the pumping pulse frequency, and it is the spread of the latter one that limits the frequency correlations of the idler-signal pair from one source.

    “The frequency of the photons reaching d(+) is better defined than the pumping pulse frequency, and it is the spread of the latter one that limits the frequency correlations of the idler-signal pair from one source.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The axes of polarization are switched between the two processes, giving a symmetrization of the spectral properties.

    “The axes of polarization are switched between the two processes.This gives a symmetrization of the spectral properties.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There was a controversy whether such a kind of experiment can constitute a true Bell test, and it was positively resolved in Popescu et al. (1997).

    “There was a controversy whether such a kind of experiment can constitute a true Bell test.It was positively resolved inPopescu et al. (1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Popescu et al. (1997) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    As the atomic cell-r (cell-l) works as a quantum memory for single photons with right-circular (left-circular) polarization, via the adiabatic transfer method, the whole setup is therefore a quantum memory of any single-photon polarization states.

    “As the atomic cell-r (cell-l) works as a quantum memory for single photons with right-circular (left-circular) polarization, via the adiabatic transfer method, the whole setup is therefore a quantum memory of any single-photon polarization states.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In a properly performed Bell experiment, the measurement events have to be spatially separated in the relativistic meaning (space-time interval of spatial type), so they are simultaneous in a certain reference frame.

    “As in a properly performed Bell experiment the measurement events have to be spatially separated, in the relativistic meaning of this word (space time interval between them has to be of the spatial type), they are simultaneous in a certain reference frame.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The original proposal for the realization of three-photon GHZ states in Zeilinger et al. (1997) makes use of a slightly different interferometric setup.

    “The original proposal for the realization of three-photon GHZ states inZeilinger et al. (1997) makes use of a slightly different interferometric setup.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeilinger et al. (1997) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The time correlation of detections is defined by the resolution of the respective filters, while the events happen at times dictated by the pulse.

    “Namely, the time correlation of the detections is defined by the resolution of the respective filters, while the events happen at times dictated by the pulse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The maxima of the filter-detector response functions agree with the frequencies given by the phase-matching conditions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The SPDC effect exists only for birefringent media having a nonzero value of χ(2).

    “Thus, as we shall see, the SPDC effect exists only for birefringent media having a nonzero value of χ (2) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    For any crystal with centro-symmetric structure the quadratic term of the polarizability vanishes.

    “For any crystal with centro-symmetric structure the quadratic term of the polarizability vanishes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The method rests on two distinct processes for emission of a downconverted pair which are coherently overlapped.

    “The method rest on two distinct processes for emission of a downconverted pair which are coherently overlapped.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The electric polarization p(x, t) of a medium is given by the mean dipole moment of the atoms or molecules per unit volume.

    “Since the electric polarization, p(x, t), of a medium is given by the mean dipole moment of the atoms or molecules per unit volume”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
287 of 287
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Photons basically do not interact with each other.

    “Since photons basically do not interact with each other this method is of special importance for schemes aimed at creating multi-photon entanglements.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A central source emits two photons in the entangled state |ψ12 = 1/√2(|a1|a2 + |b1|b2).

    “We assume that a central source emits two photons in an entangled state”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In a simplified theory of beamsplitters, the beamsplitter acts identically for every relevant frequency.

    “In a simplified theory of BS, one assumes identical action for every relevant frequency.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Creation and annihilation operators of photons with orthogonal wave packet profiles always commute.

    “Finally, one assumes that [â n , âm ] = 0 and [â n , â † m ] = δ nm , that is, creation and annihilation operators of photons with orthogonal wave packet profiles always commute.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Two spectrally identical photons enter the Bell-state analyzer by modes a and b and arrive at PBS ab simultaneously, so their wavefunctions overlap behind it.

    “Assume that they arrive at PBS ab simultaneously, so that their wavefunctions overlap behind it.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The interferometers have an identical arm-length difference ∆L much longer than the coherence length of the photons, but shorter than the coherence length of the pump laser.

    “We assume that the interferometers have an identical arm-length difference, ∆L much longer than the coherence length of the photons, but shorter than the coherence length of the pump laser (see Fig. 9).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The sources of path entangled states in Fig. 14, A and B, each spontaneously emits a pair of identical particles in an entangled state at nearly the same moment of time.

    “Assume that the sources of path entangled states in Fig. 14, A and B, each spontaneously emits a pair of particles in an entangled state (all particles are supposed to be identical) at nearly the same moment of time, and the states of the pairs are”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The time separation between two pulses is much larger than all other time scales of the experiment.

    “Assume that the time separation between two pulses is much larger than all other time scales of the experiment, i.e., we study the radiation generated in each crystal by a single pulse.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Retardation effects are omitted by assuming equal optical paths.

    “We omit retardation effects by assuming equal optical paths.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    We pick the SPDC radiation with frequencies close to 1/2 ω_o^p, where ω_o^p is the central frequency of the pump pulse.

    “We assume that we pick the SPDC radiation with frequencies close to 1 2 ω o p , where ω o p is the central frequency of the pump pulse.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The filter functions in all beams are of identical Gaussian form: F_f(t)=e^{-i/2 ω_o^p t}|F_f(t)|, and the pump beam is described by G(t)=e^{-iω_o^p t}|G(t)|.

    “Assume that the filter functions in all beams are of identical Gaussian form: F f (t) = e -i 2 ω o p t |F f (t)|, whereas the pump beam is described by G(t) = e -iω o p t |G(t)|.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Sources A and B simultaneously emit a photon pair each.

    “Assume that sources A and B simultaneously emit a photon pair each.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Pairs in beams x, y (1, 3, and 2, 4) are in identical polarization states 1/√2(|Hx,Hy> + |Vx,Vy>).

    “Pairs in beams x, y (1, 3, and 2, 4) are in identical polarization states”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The photons are indistinguishable.

    “provided the photons are indistinguishable”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    We have a perfect situation in which the detectors never fail to register a photon.

    “We assume, that we have a perfect situation in which the detectors never fail to register a photon.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Realism allows one to introduce and compare values of results of all possible experiments that can be performed on an individual system.

    “Assuming realism allows one to introduce, and compare values of results of all possible experiments that can be performed on an individual system”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    According to locality, random choices and consecutive observations made by Alice and Bob cannot influence each other.

    “According to locality, random choices and the consecutive observations made by Alice and Bob, which can be simultaneous in certain reference frames, cannot influence each other”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The assumption of local realism allows one to treat A_j1 and A_j2 on equal footing as two numbers.

    “The assumption of local realism allows one to treat A j 1 and A j 2 on equal footing as two numbers”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    For the actual experiment, choices of actual observables are random and independent from all other processes in the experiment.

    “For the actual experiment, we assume that choices of actual observables are random and independent from all other processes in the experiment.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Efficiency of all detectors is independent of the locally measured observable and equal for all detectors.

    “All these results are derived under the usual assumption that efficiency of all detectors is independent of the locally measured observable, and equal for all detectors.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Fair sampling: whether a detector registers a particle or not is statistically independent of all other processes in the experiment.

    “the so-called fair sampling assumption, which states that one expects that the fact whether a detector registers a particle or not is statistically independent of all other processes in the experiment.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Locality assumption forces X_n(φ) to depend solely on the local phase.

    “Locality assumption forces one to assume that X n (φ) depends solely on the local phase.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A click at local detector D_x1 is described as +1, whereas clicks at D_x2 are ascribed -1.

    “Assume that a click at the local detector D x1 , where x = d, e, f is described as a result of value +1, whereas clicks at D x2 are ascribed -1.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Realism (L1) is assumed in the Leggett-type nonlocal hidden-variable theories.

    “The following assumptions are made: (L 1 ) realism, (L 2 ) physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations, (L 3 ) local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations (L2).

    “The following assumptions are made: (L 1 ) realism, (L 2 ) physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations, (L 3 ) local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law (L3).

    “The following assumptions are made: (L 1 ) realism, (L 2 ) physical states are statistical mixtures of subensembles with definite polarizations, (L 3 ) local expectation values for polarization measurements taken for each subensemble obey Malus' law.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In Hardy-type experiments, the fair sampling assumption is made.

    “as in the GHZ-type experiments, the results of the experiments were fed into specific inequalities, specially derived to take into account experimental imperfections (under the fair sampling assumption, of course).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In the electron-positron Hardy gedankenexperiment, annihilation is assumed to happen with probability one when both particles are in the overlapping arms.

    “This is related to both particles being in the overlapping arms of the interferometers (within the story, in such a case the annihilation is assumed to happen with probability one).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The freedom assumption of randomness and independence of setting choices holds.

    “Violation of local realism implies that either locality, or realism, or both, cannot provide a foundational basis for quantum theory (provided the freedom assumption of randomness and independence of setting choices holds).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In the teleportation theory, the original polarization state of particle 1 is assumed to be |χ1 = α|H1 + β|V1.

    “We shall assume that |χ 1 = α|H 1 + β|V 1 is the original polarization state of particle 1.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In an ideal arrangement, each source emits only a single pair of entangled photons.

    “Given an ideal arrangement with sources that emit only a single pair of entangled photons each, the process of entanglement swapping also gives a means to generate event-ready entanglement.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Each EPR source emits a pair of entangled photons in the state |ψ-, so the total state of four photons is |Ψ1234 = |ψ-12|ψ-34.

    “Assume that each source emits a pair of entangled photons in a state, say, |ψ -so that the total state of the four photons is |Ψ 1234 = |ψ - 12 |ψ - 34 .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The initial state for the linear-optical purification example is ρ_ab = F|φ+><φ+| + (1-F)|ψ-><ψ-|.

    “Let our initial state be ρ ab = F |φ + ab φ + | + (1 -F )|ψ - ab ψ -|,(82)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The probabilistic nature of SPDC causes two photon pairs to be emitted into one mode pair with a probability of the same order of magnitude.

    “Owing to the probabilistic nature of SPDC, with a probability of the same order of magnitude, two photon pairs can be emitted into a one mode pair.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible.

    “Since the effective thickness of the atmosphere is on the order of 5-10 km, while the outer space photon loss and decoherence is negligible”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The nonlinear crystal is a cube of side L, and for L → ∞ the phase-matching function approaches a delta function.

    “If we assume that our crystal is a cube L × L × L, then for L → ∞, ∆ ± approaches δ(±k 0 -kk ).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The detectors see only photons of a specified direction of propagation, which is a good assumption if the detectors are far from the crystal and the apertures are narrow.

    “we assume that the detectors see only the photons of a specified direction of propagation, a good assumption if the detectors are far from the crystal, and the apertures are narrow”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The maxima of the filter-detector response functions agree with the frequencies given by the phase-matching conditions.

    “We assume that the maxima of the functions agree with the frequencies given by the phase matching conditions.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The laser field can be treated as classical and its depletion can be neglected.

    “Onecan neglect the depletion of the laser field and assume that the total field is E Laser (x, t) + E(x, t), where E Laser is a classical field.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    E(x, t) interacts with p(x, t) only at the point x.

    “One can assume that E(x, t) interacts with p(x, t) only in the point x”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    χ(2)ijk(x) has the same value for all points within the crystal.

    “If one assumes that χ (2) ijk (x) has the same value for all points within the crystal”
41 of 41

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The technique of coherently controlling multiple qubits and executing complex, multiple-gate quantum circuits presents an advance on linear optics quantum computation and allows testing other similar quantum algorithms such as solving differential equations and data fitting.

    “The technique of coherently controlling multiple qubits and executing complex, multiple-gate quantum circuits presents an advance on linear optics quantum computation [21, 25] and allows to test other similar quantum algorithms such as solving differential equations [26, 27] and data fitting [28].”
  • Most previous experiments either relied on nonresonant excitation of a QD microcavity that degraded photon purity and indistinguishability, or used resonant excitation of a QD in a planar cavity that limited extraction efficiency.

    “The reason is that most previous experiments either relied on nonresonant excitation of a QD microcavity that degraded the photon purity and indistinguishability, or used resonant excitation of a QD in a planar cavity that limited the extraction efficiency.”
  • In nonresonant excitation experiments, single-photon generation efficiencies typically increased asymptotically with pump power, and a trade-off between efficiency and single-photon purity and/or indistinguishability was observed.

    “In the nonresonant excitation experiments, single-photon generation efficiencies typically increased asymptotically with pump power, and a trade-off between efficiency and single-photon purity and/or indistinguishability were observed [5][6][7][8][9][10].”
  • The Hong-Ou-Mandel interference visibility of 0.97(2) is comparable to that of trapped atoms and ions.

    “comparable to trapped atoms and ions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Teleportation expansion changes photon 2's polarization

    Minor

    Equation (75) fixes photon 2 in |V 2, whereas every term of the purported expansion in equation (77) contains |H 2. Expanding a state in a different basis for photon 1 cannot make that substitution.

  • Bell-inequality expansion uses a different Alice factor

    Minor

    Equation (51) repeats A j 1 in its first factor, while the stated inequality derived from it contains correlations involving A 2. The displayed expansion does not follow from that factor as written.

  • Two purported Bell-basis pairs are identical

    Minor

    Equation (76) assigns identical states to ψ± and φ±. They therefore cannot constitute the four distinct outcomes required by the claimed Bell-state measurement.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1126/science.1085593 · DOI
  2. Bennett, C., 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers and Systems and Singal Proceeding and Bangalore and India (IEEE and New York)
  3. Bohm, D., 1951, Quantum Theory
  4. Holevo, A., 1973, Probl. Inf. Transm., 9, 177
  5. Klyshko, D., 1967, JETP Lett., 6, 23
  6. Kochen, S., 1967, J. Math. Mech., 17, 59
  7. Lo, H.-K., 2004, Proceedings of IEEE ISIT
  8. Taylor, G., 1909, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. Math. Phys. Sci., 15, 114
  9. Zel’dovich, Y., 1969, JETP Lett., 9, 40

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
2012-05-11
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
777-838
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W2015275764
Cited by
1,410
References
555
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 140 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 14
FWCI
81.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2011CB921300)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (2011CB921300)
  • Austrian Science Fund
  • Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
multiphoton interference, photon entanglement, nonclassical light, completeness of quantum mechanics, local realism, quantum teleportation, entanglement distillation, quantum repeaters, linear optical quantum computation, quantum communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review