Cited by 76Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Towards a typology of relapse: A preliminary report

Litman, Gloria K., Eiser, J.Richard, Rawson, Nigel S.B., Oppenheim, A.N.·1977·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

This paper outlines an empirical investigation into alcoholic relapse. The model underlying this work hypothesized that relapse in alcoholics is an interaction between (1) situations seen as dangerous in precipitating relapse, (2) the behaviours available within the individuals' repertoire to cope with these situations, (3) the perceived effectiveness of these "coping" behaviours and (4) the degree of alcohol dependence. The results of a "principal components" analysis indicated that "dangerous situations" or relapse precipitants could be categorized as (1) an unpleasant affect, (2) external events and euphoric feelings, (3) social anxiety and (4) lessened cognitive vigilance. Except for "external events", these relapse precipitants seemed to be associated with certain styles of coping, with varying degrees of effectiveness. The therapeutic implications of these findings are discussed in the context of designing treatment regimes geared towards more effective coping behaviours given specific types of situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0376-8716(77)90023-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Litman and colleagues' survey of alcoholics derived four primary high-risk situations through factor analysis: negative mood states, external situations previously associated with drinking, social-interpersonal anxiety, and decreased cognitive vigilance with rationalizations.

    “In this study, Litman's group conducted a survey of alcoholics to assess those situations which were most likely to precipitate relapse; four primary high-risk situations were derived through factor analysis. These included negative mood states such as depression and anxiety, external situations previously associated with drinking, social± interpersonal anxiety and decreased cognitive vigilance”

Authors
Litman, G. K., Eiser, J. R., Rawson, N. S. B., & Oppenheim, A. N.
Affiliations
Maudsley Hospital (GB)
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-05
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
157-162
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039328891
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol relapse, coping behaviour, alcoholism, social anxiety, cognitive vigilance, euphoria, alcoholism treatment
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Behavior, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Models, Psychological, Rationalization, Recurrence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review