The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decision making with incomplete information
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122575 · Cited by 1,795
Self-citationBehavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making
Weber, M., & Borcherding, K. (1993) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)90318-h · Cited by 393
Self-citationInteractive group decision making procedure under incomplete information
Kim, S. H., & Ahn, B. S. (1999) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00040-x · Cited by 324
Alemi-Ardakani, M., Milani, A. S., Yannacopoulos, S., & Shokouhi, G. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.003 · Cited by 230
Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resources
Pape, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.052 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-57
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091333932
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision making with incomplete information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90168-8
- The paper
- Weber, M. (1987). Decision making with incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90168-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
