Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some research suggests that communicating uncertainty about science will instigate, perpetuate, or exacerbate more negative attitudes toward scientists and their claims.
“Some research suggests that communicating uncertainty about science will instigate, perpetuate, or exacerbate more negative attitudes toward scientists and their claims.”
From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Camerer and Weber, 1992
Humans tend to be ambiguity-averse.
“humans tend to be ambiguity-averse (Camerer and Weber, 1992;Keren and Gerritsen, 1999)”
From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Camerer and Weber, 1992
Cites
“Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.”
Ellsberg, D. (1961) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884324 · Cited by 7,891 · see citing works
Status quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897 · see citing works
Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity
Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960030404 · Cited by 854 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making
Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & Montague, P. R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2357 · Cited by 2,184 · see citing works
Self-citation“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000142 · Cited by 1,898 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making
Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Camerer, C. F. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1115327 · Cited by 1,411 · see citing works
Self-citationHumans use directed and random exploration to solve the explore–exploit dilemma.
Wilson, R. C., Geana, A., White, J. M., Ludvig, E. A., & Cohen, J. D. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0038199 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Differential effects of insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making
Clark, L., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Aitken, M. R. F., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awn066 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty
Platt, M. L., & Huettel, S. A. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2062 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
The Relationship Between Uncertainty and Affect
Anderson, E. C., Carleton, R. N., Diefenbach, M., & Han, P. K. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02504 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520942122 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Neuropsychological consequences of chronic opioid use: a quantitative review and meta-analysis.
Baldacchino, A., Balfour, D. J. K., Passetti, F., Humphris, G., & Matthews, K. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.06.006 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Brain correlates of risky decision-making
Polezzi, D., Sartori, G., Rumiati, R., Vidotto, G., & Daum, I. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.068 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Kliegr, T., Bahník, Š., & Fürnkranz, J. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103458 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Han, P. K. J., Klein, W. M. P., Lehman, T., Killam, B., Massett, H., & Freedman, A. N. (2011) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x10371830 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Decision-making under uncertainty in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Pushkarskaya, H., Tolin, D., Ruderman, L., Kirshenbaum, A., Kelly, J. M., Pittenger, C., & Levy, I. (2015) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.08.011 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Levy, I., & Schiller, D. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.007 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Cognitive deficits of executive functions and decision‐making in obsessive‐compulsive disorder
Dittrich, W. H., & Johansen, T. (2013) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12066 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Insolvent: How to Reorient Computing for Just Sustainability
Becker, C. (2023) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14668.001.0001 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Xu, Z., Song, T., & Lee, Y.-C. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103455 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Camerer, C., & Weber, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 325-370
- ISSN
- 0895-5646 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2004822008
- Cited by
- 1,795
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 102
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Keywords
- ambiguity aversion, subjective expected utility, decision weights, Ellsberg paradox, preference elicitation, subjective probability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
