CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 549Complex Systems and Decision MakingOrganizational Learning and LeadershipSystems Engineering Methodologies and Applications

Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future

Senge, Peter M., Sterman, John D.·1992·European Journal of Operational Research
DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90011-w
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90011-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The more profound the change in strategy, the deeper must be the change in thinking.

    “In writing about prevailing mental models, Peter once said the more profound the change in strategy, the deeper must be the change in thinking (Senge and Sterman, 1992, p. 137).”

    From Relational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother (2021) · cites this paper as Senge and Sterman, 1992

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Senge, P. M., & Sterman, J. D.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
ORCID
Sterman, John D.
Venue
European Journal of Operational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-05
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
137-150
ISSN
0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0377-2217(92)90011-w
OpenAlex
W2075704808
Cited by
549
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
16.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • European Journal of Operational Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Keywords
systems thinking, organizational learning, local decision-making, organizational complexity, individual autonomy, collaborative action research, simulation, learning laboratory, organizational change, insurance industry, quality improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review