Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fuzzy AHP uses fuzzy numbers to model uncertainty and imprecision in expert judgments.
“For this reason, Fuzzy AHP was developed, which uses fuzzy numbers to model uncertainty and imprecision in expert judgments [44].”
From An Integrated AHP–Fuzzy AHP Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Software Engineering Education (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 5 · Cited by 4,874
- Authors
- Chang, D.-Y.
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Da-Yong
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 649-655
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059536960
- Cited by
- 4,874
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 277 · 2025: 287 · 2024: 284 · 2023: 359 · 2022: 361 · 2021: 446 · 2020: 398 · 2019: 314 · 2018: 306 · 2017: 282 · 2016: 225 · 2015: 221 · 2014: 237 · 2013: 179 · 2012: 164
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Operational Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Evaluation Methods in Various Fields
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Optimization and Mathematical Programming
- Keywords
- fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, triangular fuzzy numbers, fuzzy number comparison, weight vectors, multi-criteria decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
