The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The proportion of revertant and mutant phage in a growing population, as a function of mutation and growth rate
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A principle of natural self-organization: Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle
Eigen, M., & Schuster, P. (1977) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00450633 · Cited by 1,752
RNA VIRUS MUTATIONS AND FITNESS FOR SURVIVAL
Domingo, E., & Holland, J. J. (1997) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.151 · Cited by 1,514
Self-citationMutation rates among RNA viruses
Drake, J. W., & Holland, J. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.24.13910 · Cited by 1,143
Domingo, E., Sheldon, J., & Perales, C. (2012) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.05023-11 · Cited by 1,009
Self-citationQuantitation of relative fitness and great adaptability of clonal populations of RNA viruses
Holland, J. J., de la Torre, J. C., Clarke, D. K., & Duarte, E. (1991) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.65.6.2960-2967.1991 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Batschelet, E., Domingo, E., & Weissmann, C.
- Venue
- Gene
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1976-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-32
- ISSN
- 0378-1119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042804809
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The proportion of revertant and mutant phage in a growing population, as a function of mutation and growth rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0378-1119(76)90004-4
- The paper
- Batschelet, E., Domingo, E., & Weissmann, C. (1976). The proportion of revertant and mutant phage in a growing population, as a function of mutation and growth rate. Gene. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(76)90004-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
