Cited by 140Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and PolicyForest Ecology and Conservation

Social, economic, and ecological consequences of selective logging in an Amazon frontier: the case of Tailândia

Uhl, Christopher, Veríssimo, Adalberto, Mattos, Marli Maria, Brandino, Zeni, Guimarães Vieira, Ima Célia·1991·Forest Ecology and Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90235-n

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uhl, C., Veríssimo, A., Mattos, M. M., Brandino, Z., & Guimarães Vieira, I. C.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-12
Volume
46
Issue
3-4
Pages
243-273
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975031053
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
selective logging, logging damage, logging roads, secondary roads, sawmills, logging concessions, forest regeneration, canopy opening, Amazon frontier, deforestation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review