Cited by 42Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Ecology and ConservationForest Management and Policy

Company–Community Logging Contracts in Amazonian Settlements: Impacts on Livelihoods and NTFP Harvests

Open access
Menton, Mary C. S., Merry, Frank D., Lawrence, Anna, Brown, Nick·2009·Ecology and Society

Abstract

Menton, M. C. S., F. D. Merry, A. Lawrence, and N. Brown. 2009. Company–community logging contracts in Amazonian settlements: impacts on livelihoods and NTFP harvests. Ecology and Society 14(1): 39. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02831-140139

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Company–community logging contracts (CCPs) in Amazonian settlement communities delivered a one-time timber income roughly equivalent to more than 8 years of average household agricultural sales, without statistically significant reductions in non-timber forest product harvests. Households in CCP-logged and non-CCP communities had similar hunting and forest-fruit harvest rates, although community members often perceived declines.

Key findings

  • Timber income was substantial: one-off income from timber sales was approximately R$8000, equal to more than 8 years of average household agricultural sales (R$964 ± 920, n = 46). Of households that sold timber from their entire forest reserve (n = 10), all used funds for general expenses, 70% for house construction, and 90% for agricultural investment.
  • NTFP harvests did not differ significantly between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities: households caught 11.9 ± 13.6 vs. 9.5 ± 13.0 game animals/year and 74 ± 88 vs. 73 ± 172 kg meat/year; annual forest fruit harvests averaged 9.8 ± 13.2 kg vs. 13.5 ± 15.9 kg. Hunting success was 42% vs. 49%, and hunter effort was 10.2 ± 10 vs. 8.8 ± 9 hours/animal, none statistically different.
  • The taxa caught differed significantly (Chi-square = 11.39, df = 3, p < 0.01): medium mammals and birds were caught more often in non-CCP communities, whereas reptiles were caught more often in CCP-logged communities.
  • Perceptions were mixed: 96% (n = 35) of workshop participants in CCP-logged communities voted logging worthwhile, but 94% (n = 32) felt the timber price was unfair, and 50% reported little or no understanding of the logging process.

Methods

  • The study examined five INCRA settlement communities in Moju I and II, Pará, Brazil: two CCP-logged and three non-CCP communities, chosen for comparable forest and infrastructure conditions.
  • Three methods were combined: participatory workshops (two per community), resource-use diaries kept by households over 14 months (November 2003–December 2004; 50 households remained active; analysis used n = 22 CCP-logged and n = 26 non-CCP), and household questionnaires including 860 biweekly interviews with 57 households, a hunting/domestic-animal survey (n = 41), and a supplementary survey (n = 42).
  • Main analyses compared CCP-logged and non-CCP households using statistical tests including Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and one-way ANOVA.

Limitations

  • The authors state that high inter-household variability, sample size, and the study timeframe limit broader conclusions about CCP logging effects on hunting and fruit harvests; they also note that diary data may be affected by recall problems, underreporting, exaggeration, and literacy differences, and that workshop participants may not be representative.
  • The authors state that long-term sustainability of the CCP project requires further study, including household retention, deforestation rates, household economies, and continued NTFP access.
  • Evident in the text: only two CCP-logged communities and three non-CCP communities were compared, and the study is a short-term snapshot, so causal attribution and long-term outcomes cannot be established from these data.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5751/es-02831-140139

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Annual household income from the CCP logging is equivalent to more than 8 years of household gross income from agricultural production.

    “Our results show that annual household income from the CCP logging is equivalent to more than 8 years of household gross income from agricultural production.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Large-bodied animals (tapirs, peccaries, deer, and monkeys) are similarly important in CCP-logged and non-CCP communities (21% vs. 18% of animals caught).

    “Large-bodied animals (tapirs (Tapirus sp.), peccaries (Tayassu sp.), deer, and monkeys (Cebidae) are similarly important in CCP-logged and non-CCP communities (21% vs. 18% of animals caught; Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • Findingown data

    When asked whether they understood the logging process, 50% reported little or no understanding.

    “When asked whether or not they understood the logging process, 50% reported little or no understanding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    All respondents who had already received payment from the management area (average income from 80-ha plot = R$5900 ± 2600; n = 10) responded positively to CCP logging.

    “When asked individually in questionnaires, all respondents who had already received payment from the management area (average income from 80-ha plot = R$5900 ± 2600; n = 10) responded positively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Although many fruiting trees were logged, only three species scored among the 10 most important for the participant communities were logged: piquiá (Caryocar villosum), jutaí (Hymanaea intermedia), and jatobá (Hymanaea courbaril).

    “Although many fruiting trees were logged, only three species scored among the 10 most important for the participant communities (in a PRA scoring exercise, see Menton (2006)) were logged: piquiá (Caryocar villosum), jutaí (Hymanaea intermedia), and jatobá (Hymanaea courbaril).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Menton (2006)
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
  • May combine two claims. 44
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Other important fruit trees included Brazil nut trees (Bertholletia excelsa), which are protected by law, and palms (e.g., açaí (Euterpe oleracea), bacaba (Oenocarpus bacaba)), which are not logged.

    “Other important fruit trees included Brazil nut trees (Bertholletia excelsa), which are protected by law, and palms (e. g., açaí (Euterpe oleracea), bacaba (Oenocarpus bacaba)), which are not logged.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Respondents reported hunting 6.4 ± 5.5 times a month with an average success of 3.4 ± 2.5 times for every 10 hunting trips.

    “In response to a one-time questionnaire on hunting behaviors, respondents reported hunting 6.4 ± 5.5 times a month with an average success of 3.4 ± 2.5 times for every 10 hunting trips.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Some illegal logging was also reported to be happening within the Moju I and II settlements at the time of the study.

    “Some illegal logging was also reported to be happening within the Moju I and II settlements at the time of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Almost all households that had sold timber from agricultural clearings (n = 28) used the funds for general expenses (86%), and some used the funds for house construction (32%) and medicine or doctor's fees (32%).

    “Almost all households that had sold timber from agricultural clearings (n = 28) used the funds for general expenses (86%) and some used the funds for house construction (32%) and medicine or doctor's fees (32%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only 20% of households raised cattle, with an average herd of 2 ± 1 animals.

    “Only 20% of households raised cattle, with an average herd of 2 ± 1 animals, indicating that, at least in the short term, logging income was not widely used to invest in cattle.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Less than half (39%) of households that sold timber from agricultural clearings invested the funds in agricultural production, with black pepper (45%) and farinha (18%) as the most commonly cited investments.

    “Less than half (39%) invested the funds in agricultural production, with black pepper (45%) and farinha (18%) as the most commonly cited investments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of households interviewed that had sold timber from their entire forest reserve (n = 10), all used the funds for general expenses, 70% also used the money for house construction, and 90% for investment in agricultural production.

    “Of the households interviewed that had sold timber from their entire forest reserve (n = 10), all households used the funds for general expenses and the vast majority also used the money for house construction (70%) and investment in agricultural production (90%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although the numbers of animals and total amount of meat caught do not differ between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities, the taxa caught differ significantly (Chi-square = 11.39, df = 3, p < 0.01).

    “Although the numbers of animals and total amount of meat caught do not differ between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities, the taxa caught differ significantly (Chi-square = 11.39,df = 3, p < 0.01).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During participatory workshops, community members outlined the overall impacts of the logging, highlighting both primary benefits (e.g., income, roads) and secondary perks (e.g., help with community infrastructure, advances on payment, and land demarcation).

    “During participatory workshops, community members outlined the overall impacts of the logging (Table 3), highlighting both the more obvious primary benefits (e.g., income, roads) and secondary perks (e.g., help with community infrastructure (wells, halls), advances on payment, and land demarcation).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Bi-weekly questionnaires showed hunting success for 42% of trips in CCP-logged communities and 49% in non-CCP, but they are not statistically different.

    “Bi-weekly questionnaires of hunting success rates showed hunting success for 42% of trips in CCP-logged communities and 49% in non-CCP, but they are not statistically different.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The number of animals caught in non-CCP communities averaged 9.5 ± 13.0, and in CCP-logged communities averaged 11.9 ± 13.6.

    “The number of animals caught in non-CCP communities averaged 9.5 ± 13.0, and in CCP-logged communities averaged 11.9 ± 13.6.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Hunters in the CCP-logged forests were walking 1.5 times as far as their non-CCP counterparts but the difference was not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA, F = 3.195, p = 0.090).

    “As such, hunters in the CCP-logged forests were walking 1.5 times as far as their non-CCP counterparts but the difference was not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA, F = 3.195, p = 0.090).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although PRA suggested declines in the number of animals caught after logging, diaries and questionnaires showed no statistical difference.

    “Although PRA suggested declines in the number of animals caught after logging, diaries and questionnaires showed no statistical difference.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Deer comprised 26% of the animals caught in Piranha and 13% in Santo Antonio whereas in the other communities they represented <6% of the total hunt.

    “Results from diaries seem to support this theory: deer comprised 26% of the animals caught in Piranha and 13% in Santo Antonio whereas in the other communities they represented <6% of the total hunt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Hunter effort was 10.2 ± 10 (n = 20) in CCP-logged communities and 8.8 ± 9 (n = 25) in non-CCP communities and not significantly different.

    “Hunter effort (total hours spent hunting divided by total number animals caught, calculated for each hunter) was 10.2 ± 10 (n = 20) in CCP-logged communities and 8.8 ± 9 (n = 25) in non-CCP communities and not significantly different.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Participant households expressed great concern over the potential impacts of logging on game animals.

    “Participant households expressed great concern over the potential impacts of logging on game animals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    After an active debate, most agreed that the presence of hunters in the area (due to creation of INCRA settlements) had a greater impact on game abundance than the logging itself.

    “After an active debate, most agreed that the presence of hunters in the area (due to creation of INCRA settlements) had a greater impact on game abundance than the logging itself.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Medium mammals (large rodents and armadillos) and birds were caught more often in non-CCP communities whereas reptiles (specifically Geocheleone sp.) were caught more often in the CCP-logged communities.

    “Medium mammals (large rodents and armadillos (Dasypus sp.) and birds were caught more often in non-CCP communities whereas reptiles (specifically Geocheleone sp.) were caught more often in the CCP-logged communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    In 2004, MAFLOPS paid R$16 per cubic meter.

    “In 2004, MAFLOPS paid R$16 per cubic meter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    They asserted that certain animal species (e.g., deer (Mazama sp.)) might be more susceptible to declines in response to the increased noise and human presence in the area caused by the logging, but they expected that populations would return after logging activities subsided.

    “They did, however, assert that certain animal species (e.g., deer (Mazama sp.) might be more susceptible to declines in response to the increased noise and human presence in the area caused by the logging, but they expected that populations would return after logging activities subsided.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Negative aspects of involvement in the logging contracts included concern about lost freedom, being bound both to the land (cannot sell their land during the contract period of 3 years) and the logging company, and objections regarding the price received for the timber.

    “Negative aspects of involvement in the logging contracts included: concern about lost freedom, being bound both to the land (cannot sell their land during the contract period of 3 years) and the logging company; and objections regarding the price received for the timber.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A fourth community, Santo Antonio, had a mixed response-although many individuals cited a decline in hunting after the logging, others claimed that any perceived declines were due to overhunting by community members, independent of logging activities.

    “A fourth, Santo Antonio, had a mixed response-although many individuals cited a decline in hunting after the logging, others claimed that any perceived declines were due to overhunting by community members, independent of logging activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Income from the harvests has risen steadily each year.

    “Income has risen steadily each year.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The means for hunting rates were within 20% of each other and for fruit harvests within 30% between CCP and non-CCP communities.

    “Although the sample size and high inter-household variation are likely to have contributed to the lack of statistically significant results, the means were within 20% of each other for hunting rates and 30% for fruit harvests, which indicates that the CCP logging is unlikely to have caused large changes in harvest rates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Questionnaires that asked participants to estimate their hunting success rate yielded estimates of 34%, while bi-weekly questionnaires of hunting activities yielded success rates of 42%-49%.

    “Although questionnaires that asked participants to estimate their hunting success rate yielded estimates of 34%, bi-weekly questionnaires of hunting activities yielded success rates of 42%-49%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among respondents who had yet to sell any timber (n = 9), 89% responded positively and only one respondent responded that it was not worthwhile.

    “Those who had yet to sell any timber (n = 9) were optimistic, with 89% responding positively and only one respondent responding that it was not worthwhile.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    When presented with the results of the questionnaires and diaries, all of the communities showed general agreement with the overall conclusions, engaging in discussions about other reasons behind their perceptions of hunting declines.

    “When presented with the results of the questionnaires and diaries, all of the communities showed general agreement with the overall conclusions, engaging in discussions about other reasons behind their perceptions of hunting declines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Although MAFLOPs initiated a project to pay households to harvest and process Carapa guianensis oil (andiroba), at the time of the study, few households were benefiting from this potential source of income.

    “Although MAFLOPs initiated a project to pay households to harvest and process Carapa guianensis oil (andiroba), at the time of the study, few households were benefiting from this potential source of income.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The households currently underutilize the NTFP base available in their forests.

    “Third, the households currently underutilize the NTFP base available in their forests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although community members perceived a decline in hunting success rates and fruit harvests, diaries and questionnaire data show no difference between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities.

    “Although community members perceived a decline in hunting success rates and fruit harvests, diaries and questionnaire data show no difference between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Loss of diary households was due largely to family absence from the community (n = 2 moved, n = 6 resided almost exclusively in the city) and two dropped out because of disinterest in the study.

    “Loss was due largely to family absence from the community (either because they moved (n = 2) or resided almost exclusively in the city but had indicated otherwise upon joining the research project (n = 6)), but two dropped out because of disinterest in the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Originally, 60 households were given diaries; by the end of over a year of data collection, 50 remained actively involved in the survey.

    “Originally, 60 households were given diaries.By the end of over a year of data collection, 50 remained actively involved in the survey.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Workshop participants may not be a truly representative cross-section of the community as the more active households are more likely to attend, but a truly representative sample would be nearly impossible under voluntary participation.

    “Although participants in the workshops may not be a truly representative cross-section of the community as the more active households are more likely to attend, a truly representative sample would be nearly impossible under voluntary participation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    It is possible that some records were underreported, especially for illegal activities, whereas others may represent exaggerations about the size of harvests.

    “As such, it is possible that some records were underreported, especially for illegal activities, whereas others may represent exaggerations about the size of harvests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    This study is unique in that it links logging, NTFPs, and colonist livelihoods.

    “Although other studies have looked at logging in settlements (see above), this study is unique in that it links logging, NTFPs, and colonist livelihoods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Fruit harvests are likely to be underreported in resource diaries, making accurate assessment of total harvests difficult.

    “As a result, they are likely to be underreported in resource diaries, making accurate assessment of total harvests difficult.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Another study found that NTFPs accounted for 33% of annual income.

    “whereas another study found that they accounted for 33% (Wallace 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wallace 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Another study of hunting rates in the Amazon using diaries found an average of 12 animals per household, and PRA estimates in one community in the region also estimated 12 animals per household.

    “Another study of hunting rates in the Amazon using diaries found an average of 12 animals per household (Shanley 1999) and PRA estimates in one community in the region also estimated 12 animals per household (Menton 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Shanley 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Menton 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A large percentage of the households were illiterate or semi-literate and independent recording of resource use was difficult.

    “A large percentage of the households were illiterate or semi-literate and independent recording of resource use was difficult.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Diary records may have been influenced by the collection process.

    “Diary records may have been influenced by the collection process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A total of 860 biweekly interviews were held with 57 different households.

    “A total of 860 biweekly interviews were held with 57 different households.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All but three of the respondents (n = 41) were male as hunting was a predominantly male activity.

    “All but three of the respondents (n = 41) were male as hunting was a predominantly male activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A study of the short-term effects of RIL on fauna in eastern Pará found overall effects on populations to be minor, with no changes in richness, abundance, or composition of mammals.

    “A study of the short-term effects of RIL on fauna in eastern Pará found overall effects on populations to be minor, with no changes in richness, abundance, or composition of mammals (Azevedo-Ramos et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Azevedo-Ramos et al. 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Overall, the CCPs brought improvements in household income without compromising NTFP harvests.

    “Overall, the CCPs brought improvements in household income without compromising NTFP harvests.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Family Forests (FF) project is representative of company-community logging contracts in Amazonian settlements.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    As in any measurement of resource use, results depend on the honesty of respondents in their reporting.

    “In addition, as in any measurement of resource use, results depend on the honesty of respondents in their reporting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Monthly visits were too infrequent-many items were forgotten and some families assumed the team was not coming back and stopped data collection altogether.

    “We found, however, that monthly visits were too infrequent-many items were forgotten and some families assumed we”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    One study of rural households in the Brazilian Amazon found that NTFPs accounted for 25% of annual income.

    “One study of rural households in the Brazilian Amazon found that NTFPs accounted for 25% of annual income (Shanley 2000)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shanley 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    On average, 40% of the workshop participants were female.

    “On average, 40% of the participants were female.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the data may not reflect a precise estimate of hunting rates, they show similarities with results from other studies in the region.

    “As such, although the data may not reflect a precise estimate of hunting rates, they show similarities with results from other studies in the region.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although felling damage and changes in microclimate may have indirect effects on non-timber fruit trees, the impacts are likely to be minimal, especially as palm fruit trees tend to concentrate along stream beds, which are exempt from logging activities.

    “Although felling damage and changes in microclimate may have indirect effects on non-timber fruit trees, the impacts are likely to be minimal, especially as the palm fruit trees tend to concentrate along stream beds, which are exempt from logging activities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    In practice, few households chose to have an individual present during the logging or to make demands regarding particular trees.

    “In practice, however, few households chose to have an individual present during the logging or to make demands regarding particular trees.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Although honesty issues in hunting-rate reporting exist, these issues are consistent across communities such that participation in the CCP logging project should not bias diary reporting in any one direction.

    “Although studies of hunting rates can be plagued by issues of honesty in reporting, both in terms of underreporting due to fear of reporting illegal activities or overreporting to impress others, these issues are consistent across communities such that participation in the CCP logging project should not bias diary reporting in any one direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some respondents fail to record all resource use, whereas others may exaggerate, especially regarding socially desirable activities.

    “Some respondents fail to record all resource use (Hill and Davies 2001) whereas others may exaggerate, especially regarding socially desirable activities (Bernard et al. 1984).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hill and Davies 2001 source
    • cites Bernard et al. 1984 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Fruit harvests showed high inter-household variability and were on such a small scale (average annual household harvest across communities = 11.8 ± 14.7kg) that any changes would be difficult to detect.

    “Fruit harvests showed high inter-household variability and were on such a small scale (average annual household harvest across communities = 11.8 ± 14.7kg) that any changes would be difficult to detect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Participants in diary studies often claim to be recording their activities on a regular basis even though such consistency may not be the case.

    “Participants in diary studies often claim to be recording their activities on a regular basis even though such consistency may not be the case (Stone et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stone et al. 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Although these factors may bias results, the bias should be relatively consistent across communities such that community participation in logging does not confound a respondent's tendency to report resource use accurately or honestly.

    “Although these factors may bias results, the bias should be relatively consistent across communities such that community participation in logging does not confound a respondent's tendency to report resource use accurately or honestly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The lack of statistically significant differences between CCP-logged communities and non-CCP communities indicates that if logging does alter NTFP use, it is unlikely to do so at an order of magnitude that would significantly compromise livelihoods in the study communities.

    “Nevertheless, the lack of statistically significant differences between CCP-logged communities and non-CCP communities indicates that if logging does alter NTFP use, it is unlikely to do so at an order of magnitude that would significantly compromise livelihoods in the study communities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In many frontier areas, households reside only temporarily on their lands, moving on to new frontiers where they deforest new areas.

    “In many frontier areas, households reside only temporarily on their lands, moving on to new frontiers where they deforest new areas (Schmink andWood 1992, Walker et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schmink andWood 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Walker et al. 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Improvements in infrastructure and income from timber sales brought benefits without significantly altering household use of forest resources.

    “Improvements in infrastructure and income from timber sales brought benefits without significantly altering household use of forest resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Conventional logging, although sometimes legal, leads to significantly greater damage to the remnant forest and thus potentially greater ramifications for NTFP harvests.

    “Conventional logging, although sometimes legal, leads to significantly greater damage to the remnant forest (Schulze and Zweede 2006) and thus potentially greater ramifications for NTFP harvests.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schulze and Zweede 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Those who stay often turn to cattle ranching, a low-risk, highly liquidable alternative to perennial agriculture, which leads to increased deforestation.

    “Those who stay often turn to cattle ranching, a low-risk, highly liquidable alternative to perennial agriculture, which leads to increased deforestation (Arima et al. 2006, Browder et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Arima et al. 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Browder et al. 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

61 of 61
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    80% of settlement land in the Brazilian Amazon must remain as standing forest by law.

    “By law, 80% of this land must remain as standing forest.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.

    “The non-CCP communities were chosen because of their location in relation to the CCP-logged communities such that they were far enough away so as to be unlikely to be affected by the logging but close enough so as to have similar forests and infrastructural conditions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.

    “The non-CCP communities were chosen because of their location in relation to the CCP-logged communities such that they were far enough away so as to be unlikely to be affected by the logging but close enough so as to have similar forests and infrastructural conditions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Family Forests (FF) project is representative of company-community logging contracts in Amazonian settlements.

    “One exception is the independent Family Forests (FF) project, a forest management project based on company-community logging contracts that has been advocated as a model for equitable sustainable development in settlement communities across the Amazon (Lima et al. 2003, Nepstad et al. 2004a, b, Merry et al. 2006).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.

    “data analysis is based on 14 months of data (November 2003-December 2004).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    RIL techniques minimize changes in forest structure, resource abundance and access.

    “Combined with the use of RIL techniques to minimize changes in forest structure, and thereby changes in resource abundance and access, the logging did not greatly affect harvest rates in the study communities.”
6 of 6

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Not confirmedz = 0.805reported p = .537 · recomputed p = .421

    “Z = 0.805, p = .537”

  • Not confirmedz = 1.364reported p = .048 · recomputed p = .173

    “Z = 1.364, p = .048”

  • Not confirmedz = 1.162reported p = .134 · recomputed p = .245

    “Z = 1.162, p = .134”

  • Consistentz = -0.908reported p = .364 · recomputed p = .364

    “Z = -0.908,p = .364”

4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • One-time logging payment described as annual income

    Major

    The abstract says annual logging income exceeds eight years of agricultural income. The results instead identify that amount as a one-off timber payment, not an annual payment.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Barreto, P., C. Souza, Jr., A. Anderson, R. Salomão, J. Wiles, and R. Noguerón. 2005. Human pressure in the Brazilian Amazon. Instituto Ecology and Society 14(1): 39 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art39/ do Homen et Meio Ambiente da Amazõnia (IMAZON) -State of the Amazon 3. IMAZON, Belém, Brazil.
  2. Laird, S. A., and D. A. Posey. 2002. Professional society standards for biodiversity research: codes of ethics and research guidelines. Pages 16-38 in S. A. Laird, editor. Biodiversity and traditional knowledge: equitable partnerships in practice. Earthscan, London, UK.
  3. Mayers, J., S. Vermeulen, and International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). 2002. Company-community forestry partnerships: from raw deals to mutual gains?: an international review with proposals for improving forests, enterprise and livelihoods. Earthprint, Stevenage, UK.
  4. Ochoa, J. 2000. Effects of logging on small- mammal diversity in the lowland forests of the Venezuelan Guyana region. Biotropica 32(1):146- 164.
  5. Shanley, P., L. Luz, and M. Cymerys. 2002. Subsistence issues: the interface of timber and non- timber resources: declining resources for subsistence livelihoods (Brazil). Pages 313-321 in

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menton, M. C. S., Merry, F. D., Lawrence, A., & Brown, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Venue
Ecology and Society
Published
2009
Volume
14
Issue
1
ISSN
1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131052759
Cited by
42
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
livelihoods, non-timber forest products, forest logging, indigenous peoples, community forestry, Amazon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review