Company–Community Logging Contracts in Amazonian Settlements: Impacts on Livelihoods and NTFP Harvests
Open accessAbstract
Menton, M. C. S., F. D. Merry, A. Lawrence, and N. Brown. 2009. Company–community logging contracts in Amazonian settlements: impacts on livelihoods and NTFP harvests. Ecology and Society 14(1): 39. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02831-140139
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Company–community logging contracts (CCPs) in Amazonian settlement communities delivered a one-time timber income roughly equivalent to more than 8 years of average household agricultural sales, without statistically significant reductions in non-timber forest product harvests. Households in CCP-logged and non-CCP communities had similar hunting and forest-fruit harvest rates, although community members often perceived declines.
Key findings
- Timber income was substantial: one-off income from timber sales was approximately R$8000, equal to more than 8 years of average household agricultural sales (R$964 ± 920, n = 46). Of households that sold timber from their entire forest reserve (n = 10), all used funds for general expenses, 70% for house construction, and 90% for agricultural investment.
- NTFP harvests did not differ significantly between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities: households caught 11.9 ± 13.6 vs. 9.5 ± 13.0 game animals/year and 74 ± 88 vs. 73 ± 172 kg meat/year; annual forest fruit harvests averaged 9.8 ± 13.2 kg vs. 13.5 ± 15.9 kg. Hunting success was 42% vs. 49%, and hunter effort was 10.2 ± 10 vs. 8.8 ± 9 hours/animal, none statistically different.
- The taxa caught differed significantly (Chi-square = 11.39, df = 3, p < 0.01): medium mammals and birds were caught more often in non-CCP communities, whereas reptiles were caught more often in CCP-logged communities.
- Perceptions were mixed: 96% (n = 35) of workshop participants in CCP-logged communities voted logging worthwhile, but 94% (n = 32) felt the timber price was unfair, and 50% reported little or no understanding of the logging process.
Methods
- The study examined five INCRA settlement communities in Moju I and II, Pará, Brazil: two CCP-logged and three non-CCP communities, chosen for comparable forest and infrastructure conditions.
- Three methods were combined: participatory workshops (two per community), resource-use diaries kept by households over 14 months (November 2003–December 2004; 50 households remained active; analysis used n = 22 CCP-logged and n = 26 non-CCP), and household questionnaires including 860 biweekly interviews with 57 households, a hunting/domestic-animal survey (n = 41), and a supplementary survey (n = 42).
- Main analyses compared CCP-logged and non-CCP households using statistical tests including Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and one-way ANOVA.
Limitations
- The authors state that high inter-household variability, sample size, and the study timeframe limit broader conclusions about CCP logging effects on hunting and fruit harvests; they also note that diary data may be affected by recall problems, underreporting, exaggeration, and literacy differences, and that workshop participants may not be representative.
- The authors state that long-term sustainability of the CCP project requires further study, including household retention, deforestation rates, household economies, and continued NTFP access.
- Evident in the text: only two CCP-logged communities and three non-CCP communities were compared, and the study is a short-term snapshot, so causal attribution and long-term outcomes cannot be established from these data.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Annual household income from the CCP logging is equivalent to more than 8 years of household gross income from agricultural production.
“Our results show that annual household income from the CCP logging is equivalent to more than 8 years of household gross income from agricultural production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Large-bodied animals (tapirs, peccaries, deer, and monkeys) are similarly important in CCP-logged and non-CCP communities (21% vs. 18% of animals caught).
“Large-bodied animals (tapirs (Tapirus sp.), peccaries (Tayassu sp.), deer, and monkeys (Cebidae) are similarly important in CCP-logged and non-CCP communities (21% vs. 18% of animals caught; Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
When asked whether they understood the logging process, 50% reported little or no understanding.
“When asked whether or not they understood the logging process, 50% reported little or no understanding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All respondents who had already received payment from the management area (average income from 80-ha plot = R$5900 ± 2600; n = 10) responded positively to CCP logging.
“When asked individually in questionnaires, all respondents who had already received payment from the management area (average income from 80-ha plot = R$5900 ± 2600; n = 10) responded positively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Although many fruiting trees were logged, only three species scored among the 10 most important for the participant communities were logged: piquiá (Caryocar villosum), jutaí (Hymanaea intermedia), and jatobá (Hymanaea courbaril).
“Although many fruiting trees were logged, only three species scored among the 10 most important for the participant communities (in a PRA scoring exercise, see Menton (2006)) were logged: piquiá (Caryocar villosum), jutaí (Hymanaea intermedia), and jatobá (Hymanaea courbaril).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Menton (2006)
- Findingown data
There was no statistical difference between non-CCP and CCP-logged communities in number of animals caught even when non-hunters and outliers (>2 sd above the mean) were removed from analysis.
“Although extensive inter-household variation in the number of animals caught (min = 0 animals; max = 48 animals) may influence the lack of statistical significance of the results, there was no statistical difference between non-CCP and CCP-logged communities even when non-hunters and outliers (>2 sd above the mean) were removed from analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
In communities without CCP, households caught 9.5 ± 13.0 game animals per year, totaling 73 ± 172 kg of game meat.
“In the communities without CCP, households caught 9.5 ± 13.0 game animals, totaling 73 ± 172 kg of game meat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
The one-off income from timber sales (approximately R$8000) equals more than 8 years of average household agricultural sales (R$964 ± 920, n = 46).
“The one-off income from timber sales (approximately R$8000) equals more than 8 years of average household agricultural sales (R$964 ± 920, n = 46).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When listing the costs and benefits of the CCP logging, three of the communities anticipated a decline in hunting success rates after logging.
“When listing the costs and benefits of the CCP logging (Table 3), three of the communities anticipated a decline in hunting success rates after logging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Negative impressions of the logging were largely in response to the opinion that they were receiving an unfair price for the timber (n = 32, 94% felt price was unfair).
“Negative impressions of the logging were, in large part, in response to the opinion that they were receiving an unfair price for the timber (n = 32, 94% felt price was unfair).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Fruit harvests in the study communities were most often opportunistic: a handful of fruits eaten while out on a hunt or a small harvest on return from the fields.
“Fruit harvests in the study communities were most often opportunistic: a handful of fruits eaten while out on a hunt or a small harvest on return from the fields.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Household income from harvests in the forest reserve varies from R$6000 to R$20 000.
“and varies from R$6000 to R$20 000 for harvests in the forest reserve (80% of their land).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences in NTFP harvests between households with CCP logging and those without.
“We also found that there were no significant differences in NTFP harvests between households with CCP logging and those without.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
Annual forest fruit harvests averaged 9.8 ± 13.2 kg in CCP-logging communities and 13.5 ± 15.9 kg in non-CCP communities.
“Annual forest fruit harvests averaged 9.8 ± 13.2 kg in CCP-logging communities and 13.5 ± 15.9 kg in non-CCP communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingreasoning
Two of the communities (Piranha (non-CCP) and Santo Antonio (CCP-logged)) spent a markedly longer time per animal (12.5 h) than the other three communities (6.7 h).
“Two of the communities (Piranha (non-CCP) and Santo Antonio (CCP-logged)) spent a markedly longer time per animal (12.5 h) than the other three communities (6.7 h).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
The average annual household hunting rate in CCP-logged and non-CCP communities are not statistically different.
“Results from diaries and questionnaires show that the average annual household hunting rate in CCPlogged and non-CCP communities are not statistically different (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
There was no significant difference in hunting between communities with and without CCP contracts.
“The lack of significant difference in hunting between communities with and without CCP contracts indicates that RIL may have limited impacts on game-animal populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CCP-logged forest, hunters walked an average of 2.0 ± 0.9 km whereas in non-CCP forest, they walked 1.3 ± 0.8 km.
“In CCP-logged forest, hunters walked an average of 2.0 ± 0.9 km whereas in non-CCP forest, they walked 1.3 ± 0.8 km.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
Among households that sold timber from their entire forest reserve, investment in black pepper (33%) and farinha processing (44%) were the most frequent investments cited.
“Investment in black pepper (33%) and “farinha” processing (44%) were the most frequent investments cited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, diaries estimate an average of annual hunts of 10 to 12 animals per household.
“In this study, diaries estimate an average of annual hunts of 10 to 12 animals per household.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Their use for purely subsistence purposes means they were often perceived as having little to no value.
“In addition, their use for purely subsistence purposes means they were often perceived as having little to no value.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The lack of significant difference for weight remains consistent when outliers are removed from the analysis.
“This lack of significant difference for weight also remains consistent when outliers are removed from the analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
In terms of the mass of meat caught annually, there is no significant difference between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities.
“In terms of the mass of meat caught annually, there is also no significant difference between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
Among respondents who had only received payment from timber harvested from agricultural clearings (average income per 3ha plot = R$1200 ± R$1100; n = 14), responses varied: 21% felt very positively, 36% felt positively, 29% felt it was of little value, and 14% felt it was not worthwhile.
“Those who had only received payment from timber harvested from agricultural clearings (average income per 3ha plot = R$1200 ± R$1100; n = 14), however, were more varied in their response: 21% felt very positively, 36% felt positively, 29% felt it was of little value, and 14% felt it was not worthwhile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CCP-logging communities, households caught 11.9 ± 13.6 game animals per year, totaling 74 ± 88 kg of game meat.
“In CCP-logging communities, households caught 11.9 ± 13.6 game animals, totaling 74 ± 88 kg of game meat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
There was no significant difference between reported frequencies or success rates in CCP-logged and non-CCP communities.
“There was no significant difference between reported frequencies or success rates in CCP-logged and non-CCP communities (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
In all study communities, key-informant interviews reported previous illegal logging activities such that they had all experienced some sporadic, low-intensity, highly selective logging before establishment of the settlement community.
“In all of the communities, key-informant interviews reported previous illegal logging activities in the communities' forests such that they had all experienced some sporadic, low-intensity, highly selective logging before establishment of the settlement community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Household income from harvests on clearings averages R$1000 a year (US$341).
“Household income from the harvests on clearings averages R$1000 a year (US$341; average exchange rates for 2004: £1.00 = R$5.36,US$1.00 = R$2.93,www.oanda.com)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No significant difference was found in recorded annual household forest fruit harvests between communities with CCP logging (9.8 ± 13.2kg) and without (13.5 ± 15.9kg) (M-W, Z = -0.908, p = 0.364).
“However, no significant difference was found in recorded annual household forest fruit harvests between communities with CCP logging (9.8 ± 13.2kg) and without (13.5 ± 15.9kg) (M-W, Z = -0.908,p = 0.364).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingown data
If the two wealthiest outliers (>2 sd above the mean) are excluded, the relationship between selling pepper and annual agricultural sales is no longer significant (K-S, Z = 1.162, p = 0.134).
“However, if the two wealthiest outliers (>2 sd above the mean) are excluded, the relationship is no longer significant (K-S, Z = 1.162, p = 0.134).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across communities, households that sold pepper recorded significantly higher annual agricultural sales (mean = R$1258 ± 1112, n = 21) than those who did not (mean = R$716 ± 657, n = 25) (K-S, Z = 1.364, p = 0.048).
“Across communities, households that sold pepper recorded significantly higher annual agricultural sales (mean = R$1258 ± 1112, n = 21) than those who did not (mean = R$716 ± 657, n =25) (K-S, Z = 1.364, p = 0.048).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both CCP-logged and non-CCP communities reported equivalent declines in hunting success rates since arrival in the community.
“Also, as stated in the results, both CCP-logged and non-CCP communities reported equivalent declines in hunting success rates since arrival in the community, which may indicate that the logging was not the key factor leading to hunting declines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The total number of animals caught each year per household showed no statistical difference between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities.
“The total number of animals caught each year per household (from diaries) showed no statistical difference between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
- Findingnone given
Some communities also noted reductions in hunting success rates and fruit harvests.
“Some communities also noted reductions in hunting success rates and fruit harvests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In workshops in the CCP-logged communities, 96% (n = 35) voted that the CCP logging had been worthwhile.
“During workshops in the CCP-logged communities, the overwhelming majority (96%, n = 35) voted that the CCP logging had been worthwhile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The study households harvested small quantities of NTFPs.
“The study households harvested small quantities of NTFPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Participants in the CCP logging earned timber harvest incomes equivalent to 8 years of agricultural production.
“Participants in the CCP logging earned timberharvest incomes equivalent to 8 years of agricultural production without significant differences in NTFP harvest rates from those who did not participate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences in NTFP harvest rates between CCP logging participants and non-participants.
“Participants in the CCP logging earned timberharvest incomes equivalent to 8 years of agricultural production without significant differences in NTFP harvest rates from those who did not participate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Reductions in alteration of forest structure due to RIL may make logging compatible with conservation of game-animal communities.
“As such, reductions in alteration of forest structure due to RIL may make logging compatible with conservation of gameanimal communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
As the households were asked to recall their activities over a 2-week period, it is likely that some smaller harvests were forgotten.
“As the households were asked to recall their activities over a 2-week period, it is likely that some smaller harvests were forgotten.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
CCP logging is unlikely to have caused large changes in harvest rates.
“Although the sample size and high inter-household variation are likely to have contributed to the lack of statistically significant results, the means were within 20% of each other for hunting rates and 30% for fruit harvests, which indicates that the CCP logging is unlikely to have caused large changes in harvest rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Logging may not have been the key factor leading to hunting declines.
“Also, as stated in the results, both CCP-logged and non-CCP communities reported equivalent declines in hunting success rates since arrival in the community, which may indicate that the logging was not the key factor leading to hunting declines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
RIL may have limited impacts on game-animal populations.
“The lack of significant difference in hunting between communities with and without CCP contracts indicates that RIL may have limited impacts on game-animal populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lack of changes in fruit harvests is most likely due, in part, to the small-scale nature of harvests and low logging impacts.
“The lack of changes in fruit harvests is most likely due, in part, to the small-scale nature of harvests and low logging impacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The extent and direction of the impacts of logging on NTFP harvests are poorly understood.
“As a result, the extent and direction of these impacts are poorly understood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Literacy levels were not significantly different among the colonist communities (Kruskal-Wallis, X2 = 4.003, df = 4, p = 0.261).
“Literacy levels (which were not significantly different among the colonist communities-Kruskal-Wallis, Χ 2 = 4.003, df = 4, p = 0.261) may also influence recording practices as illiterate families were more likely to depend on the data-collection team and thus may have been more susceptible to problems with recall.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
NTFPs often form a critical part of rural household livelihood strategies.
“Nevertheless, NTFPs often form a critical part of rural household livelihood strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shanley 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wallace 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Forest structure in the study communities remained largely intact due to the sporadic nature of the illegal logging activities.
“Although potential harvest income from these forests is thus lower than that of a virgin forest due to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
On an individual basis, income from timber sales was sufficient for investment in agricultural production or household infrastructure.
“On an individual basis, income from timber sales was sufficient for investment in agricultural production (e.g., purchase of black pepper (Piper nigrum) seedlings, construction of a manioc-flourprocessing structure) or household infrastructure (see Table 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Few studies of CCP have included an assessment of the effect on the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs).
“Although the aforementioned studies have focused on the livelihood impacts of CCP, few include an assessment of the effect on the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs, which include both animal and plant-based products).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
At low NTFP-harvest rates, preservation of a small number of trees should be sufficient to meet the demands of the study households.
“At low NTFP-harvest rates, preservation of a small number of trees should be sufficient to meet the demands of the study households.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Studies of the potential role of forest management in settlement communities are rare.
“Yet, studies of the potential role of forest management in settlement communities are rare (but see D'Oliveira et al. 1998, Sá et al. 1998, Vosti et al. 2003, Bentes-Gama et al. 2006, D'Oliveira and Braz 2006, Humphries and Kainer 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites D'Oliveira et al. 1998
- cites Sá et al. 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vosti et al. 2003 source
- Premisecitation
Studies of the impacts of hunting pressure on game populations show significant decreases in populations of many species in community forests.
“Studies of the impacts of hunting pressure on game populations show significant decreases in populations of many species in community forests (Peres 2000, Peres andLake 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Peres 2000 source
- cites Peres andLake 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The potential changes in NTFP harvests after timber extraction have received little attention.
“Although several studies provide important information regarding the social, economic, and ecological effects of logging (e.g., Uhl et al. 1991, Watson 1996), the potential changes in NTFP harvests after timber extraction have received little attention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
At least in the short term, logging income was not widely used to invest in cattle.
“Only 20% of households raised cattle, with an average herd of 2 ± 1 animals, indicating that, at least in the short term, logging income was not widely used to invest in cattle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A parallel study in settlement forests found no difference in population densities of most game animals in RIL-logged vs. unlogged forests.
“A parallel study in the settlement forests (Menton 2006) found no difference in population densities of most game animals in RIL-logged vs. unlogged forests, which further supports the conviction of some community members that the logging was not responsible for any perceived declines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Menton 2006
- Premisecitation
The effects of hunting are likely to be greater than that of logging.
“The effects of hunting are likely to be greater than that of logging (Lopes andFerrari 2000, Peres andLake 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lopes andFerrari 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Peres andLake 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Most of the literature on NTFPs does not address both logging and NTFP extraction.
“With some notable exceptions (e.g., Laird 1995, Salick et al. 1995, Shanley 1999, Shanley et al. 2002, Menton 2003, Guariguata et al. 2008), most of the literature on NTFPs does not address both logging and NTFP extraction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Laird 1995
- cites Salick et al. 1995 source
- cites Shanley 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
The inter-household variability in resource use among study households creates limitations in forming more general conclusions regarding the effects of CCP logging on hunting rates and fruit harvests based on the timeframe and sample size of this study.
“The inter-household variability in resource use among study households creates limitations in forming more general conclusions regarding the effects of CCP logging on hunting rates and fruit harvests based on the timeframe and sample size of this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The presence of loggers often increases hunting pressure because of the construction of roads.
“As the presence of loggers often increases hunting pressure because of the construction of roads (Wilkie et al. 2000), it is important to begin to decouple the effects of hunting and logging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilkie et al. 2000 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Combined with the use of RIL techniques to minimize changes in forest structure, and thereby changes in resource abundance and access, the logging did not greatly affect harvest rates in the study communities.
“Combined with the use of RIL techniques to minimize changes in forest structure, and thereby changes in resource abundance and access, the logging did not greatly affect harvest rates in the study communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RIL techniques minimize changes in forest structure, resource abundance and access.
- Interpretationreasoning
RIL in communities that do not depend heavily on forest resources could bring livelihood benefits without significant costs in terms of the use of and access to NTFPs.
“As it stands, RIL in communities that do not depend heavily on forest resources could bring livelihood benefits without significant costs in terms of the use of and access to NTFPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lack of a significant change in resource use may also indicate that the changes in household wealth at the level of this project do not alter the opportunity costs of NTFP harvests.
“The lack of a significant change in resource use may also indicate that the changes in household wealth at the level of this project do not alter the opportunity costs of NTFP harvests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
- May combine two claims. 44
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOther important fruit trees included Brazil nut trees (Bertholletia excelsa), which are protected by law, and palms (e.g., açaí (Euterpe oleracea), bacaba (Oenocarpus bacaba)), which are not logged.
“Other important fruit trees included Brazil nut trees (Bertholletia excelsa), which are protected by law, and palms (e. g., açaí (Euterpe oleracea), bacaba (Oenocarpus bacaba)), which are not logged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRespondents reported hunting 6.4 ± 5.5 times a month with an average success of 3.4 ± 2.5 times for every 10 hunting trips.
“In response to a one-time questionnaire on hunting behaviors, respondents reported hunting 6.4 ± 5.5 times a month with an average success of 3.4 ± 2.5 times for every 10 hunting trips.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome illegal logging was also reported to be happening within the Moju I and II settlements at the time of the study.
“Some illegal logging was also reported to be happening within the Moju I and II settlements at the time of the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlmost all households that had sold timber from agricultural clearings (n = 28) used the funds for general expenses (86%), and some used the funds for house construction (32%) and medicine or doctor's fees (32%).
“Almost all households that had sold timber from agricultural clearings (n = 28) used the funds for general expenses (86%) and some used the funds for house construction (32%) and medicine or doctor's fees (32%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly 20% of households raised cattle, with an average herd of 2 ± 1 animals.
“Only 20% of households raised cattle, with an average herd of 2 ± 1 animals, indicating that, at least in the short term, logging income was not widely used to invest in cattle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLess than half (39%) of households that sold timber from agricultural clearings invested the funds in agricultural production, with black pepper (45%) and farinha (18%) as the most commonly cited investments.
“Less than half (39%) invested the funds in agricultural production, with black pepper (45%) and farinha (18%) as the most commonly cited investments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf households interviewed that had sold timber from their entire forest reserve (n = 10), all used the funds for general expenses, 70% also used the money for house construction, and 90% for investment in agricultural production.
“Of the households interviewed that had sold timber from their entire forest reserve (n = 10), all households used the funds for general expenses and the vast majority also used the money for house construction (70%) and investment in agricultural production (90%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough the numbers of animals and total amount of meat caught do not differ between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities, the taxa caught differ significantly (Chi-square = 11.39, df = 3, p < 0.01).
“Although the numbers of animals and total amount of meat caught do not differ between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities, the taxa caught differ significantly (Chi-square = 11.39,df = 3, p < 0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring participatory workshops, community members outlined the overall impacts of the logging, highlighting both primary benefits (e.g., income, roads) and secondary perks (e.g., help with community infrastructure, advances on payment, and land demarcation).
“During participatory workshops, community members outlined the overall impacts of the logging (Table 3), highlighting both the more obvious primary benefits (e.g., income, roads) and secondary perks (e.g., help with community infrastructure (wells, halls), advances on payment, and land demarcation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBi-weekly questionnaires showed hunting success for 42% of trips in CCP-logged communities and 49% in non-CCP, but they are not statistically different.
“Bi-weekly questionnaires of hunting success rates showed hunting success for 42% of trips in CCP-logged communities and 49% in non-CCP, but they are not statistically different.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe number of animals caught in non-CCP communities averaged 9.5 ± 13.0, and in CCP-logged communities averaged 11.9 ± 13.6.
“The number of animals caught in non-CCP communities averaged 9.5 ± 13.0, and in CCP-logged communities averaged 11.9 ± 13.6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHunters in the CCP-logged forests were walking 1.5 times as far as their non-CCP counterparts but the difference was not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA, F = 3.195, p = 0.090).
“As such, hunters in the CCP-logged forests were walking 1.5 times as far as their non-CCP counterparts but the difference was not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA, F = 3.195, p = 0.090).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough PRA suggested declines in the number of animals caught after logging, diaries and questionnaires showed no statistical difference.
“Although PRA suggested declines in the number of animals caught after logging, diaries and questionnaires showed no statistical difference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDeer comprised 26% of the animals caught in Piranha and 13% in Santo Antonio whereas in the other communities they represented <6% of the total hunt.
“Results from diaries seem to support this theory: deer comprised 26% of the animals caught in Piranha and 13% in Santo Antonio whereas in the other communities they represented <6% of the total hunt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHunter effort was 10.2 ± 10 (n = 20) in CCP-logged communities and 8.8 ± 9 (n = 25) in non-CCP communities and not significantly different.
“Hunter effort (total hours spent hunting divided by total number animals caught, calculated for each hunter) was 10.2 ± 10 (n = 20) in CCP-logged communities and 8.8 ± 9 (n = 25) in non-CCP communities and not significantly different.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenParticipant households expressed great concern over the potential impacts of logging on game animals.
“Participant households expressed great concern over the potential impacts of logging on game animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAfter an active debate, most agreed that the presence of hunters in the area (due to creation of INCRA settlements) had a greater impact on game abundance than the logging itself.
“After an active debate, most agreed that the presence of hunters in the area (due to creation of INCRA settlements) had a greater impact on game abundance than the logging itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMedium mammals (large rodents and armadillos) and birds were caught more often in non-CCP communities whereas reptiles (specifically Geocheleone sp.) were caught more often in the CCP-logged communities.
“Medium mammals (large rodents and armadillos (Dasypus sp.) and birds were caught more often in non-CCP communities whereas reptiles (specifically Geocheleone sp.) were caught more often in the CCP-logged communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
- Rests on an assumption: The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn 2004, MAFLOPS paid R$16 per cubic meter.
“In 2004, MAFLOPS paid R$16 per cubic meter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThey asserted that certain animal species (e.g., deer (Mazama sp.)) might be more susceptible to declines in response to the increased noise and human presence in the area caused by the logging, but they expected that populations would return after logging activities subsided.
“They did, however, assert that certain animal species (e.g., deer (Mazama sp.) might be more susceptible to declines in response to the increased noise and human presence in the area caused by the logging, but they expected that populations would return after logging activities subsided.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNegative aspects of involvement in the logging contracts included concern about lost freedom, being bound both to the land (cannot sell their land during the contract period of 3 years) and the logging company, and objections regarding the price received for the timber.
“Negative aspects of involvement in the logging contracts included: concern about lost freedom, being bound both to the land (cannot sell their land during the contract period of 3 years) and the logging company; and objections regarding the price received for the timber.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA fourth community, Santo Antonio, had a mixed response-although many individuals cited a decline in hunting after the logging, others claimed that any perceived declines were due to overhunting by community members, independent of logging activities.
“A fourth, Santo Antonio, had a mixed response-although many individuals cited a decline in hunting after the logging, others claimed that any perceived declines were due to overhunting by community members, independent of logging activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIncome from the harvests has risen steadily each year.
“Income has risen steadily each year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe means for hunting rates were within 20% of each other and for fruit harvests within 30% between CCP and non-CCP communities.
“Although the sample size and high inter-household variation are likely to have contributed to the lack of statistically significant results, the means were within 20% of each other for hunting rates and 30% for fruit harvests, which indicates that the CCP logging is unlikely to have caused large changes in harvest rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataQuestionnaires that asked participants to estimate their hunting success rate yielded estimates of 34%, while bi-weekly questionnaires of hunting activities yielded success rates of 42%-49%.
“Although questionnaires that asked participants to estimate their hunting success rate yielded estimates of 34%, bi-weekly questionnaires of hunting activities yielded success rates of 42%-49%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong respondents who had yet to sell any timber (n = 9), 89% responded positively and only one respondent responded that it was not worthwhile.
“Those who had yet to sell any timber (n = 9) were optimistic, with 89% responding positively and only one respondent responding that it was not worthwhile.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWhen presented with the results of the questionnaires and diaries, all of the communities showed general agreement with the overall conclusions, engaging in discussions about other reasons behind their perceptions of hunting declines.
“When presented with the results of the questionnaires and diaries, all of the communities showed general agreement with the overall conclusions, engaging in discussions about other reasons behind their perceptions of hunting declines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAlthough MAFLOPs initiated a project to pay households to harvest and process Carapa guianensis oil (andiroba), at the time of the study, few households were benefiting from this potential source of income.
“Although MAFLOPs initiated a project to pay households to harvest and process Carapa guianensis oil (andiroba), at the time of the study, few households were benefiting from this potential source of income.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe households currently underutilize the NTFP base available in their forests.
“Third, the households currently underutilize the NTFP base available in their forests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough community members perceived a decline in hunting success rates and fruit harvests, diaries and questionnaire data show no difference between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities.
“Although community members perceived a decline in hunting success rates and fruit harvests, diaries and questionnaire data show no difference between CCP-logged and non-CCP communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataLoss of diary households was due largely to family absence from the community (n = 2 moved, n = 6 resided almost exclusively in the city) and two dropped out because of disinterest in the study.
“Loss was due largely to family absence from the community (either because they moved (n = 2) or resided almost exclusively in the city but had indicated otherwise upon joining the research project (n = 6)), but two dropped out because of disinterest in the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataOriginally, 60 households were given diaries; by the end of over a year of data collection, 50 remained actively involved in the survey.
“Originally, 60 households were given diaries.By the end of over a year of data collection, 50 remained actively involved in the survey.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWorkshop participants may not be a truly representative cross-section of the community as the more active households are more likely to attend, but a truly representative sample would be nearly impossible under voluntary participation.
“Although participants in the workshops may not be a truly representative cross-section of the community as the more active households are more likely to attend, a truly representative sample would be nearly impossible under voluntary participation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIt is possible that some records were underreported, especially for illegal activities, whereas others may represent exaggerations about the size of harvests.
“As such, it is possible that some records were underreported, especially for illegal activities, whereas others may represent exaggerations about the size of harvests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThis study is unique in that it links logging, NTFPs, and colonist livelihoods.
“Although other studies have looked at logging in settlements (see above), this study is unique in that it links logging, NTFPs, and colonist livelihoods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningFruit harvests are likely to be underreported in resource diaries, making accurate assessment of total harvests difficult.
“As a result, they are likely to be underreported in resource diaries, making accurate assessment of total harvests difficult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnother study found that NTFPs accounted for 33% of annual income.
“whereas another study found that they accounted for 33% (Wallace 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wallace 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnother study of hunting rates in the Amazon using diaries found an average of 12 animals per household, and PRA estimates in one community in the region also estimated 12 animals per household.
“Another study of hunting rates in the Amazon using diaries found an average of 12 animals per household (Shanley 1999) and PRA estimates in one community in the region also estimated 12 animals per household (Menton 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shanley 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Menton 2003 source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenA large percentage of the households were illiterate or semi-literate and independent recording of resource use was difficult.
“A large percentage of the households were illiterate or semi-literate and independent recording of resource use was difficult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningDiary records may have been influenced by the collection process.
“Diary records may have been influenced by the collection process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA total of 860 biweekly interviews were held with 57 different households.
“A total of 860 biweekly interviews were held with 57 different households.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAll but three of the respondents (n = 41) were male as hunting was a predominantly male activity.
“All but three of the respondents (n = 41) were male as hunting was a predominantly male activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA study of the short-term effects of RIL on fauna in eastern Pará found overall effects on populations to be minor, with no changes in richness, abundance, or composition of mammals.
“A study of the short-term effects of RIL on fauna in eastern Pará found overall effects on populations to be minor, with no changes in richness, abundance, or composition of mammals (Azevedo-Ramos et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Azevedo-Ramos et al. 2006 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOverall, the CCPs brought improvements in household income without compromising NTFP harvests.
“Overall, the CCPs brought improvements in household income without compromising NTFP harvests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Family Forests (FF) project is representative of company-community logging contracts in Amazonian settlements.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenAs in any measurement of resource use, results depend on the honesty of respondents in their reporting.
“In addition, as in any measurement of resource use, results depend on the honesty of respondents in their reporting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataMonthly visits were too infrequent-many items were forgotten and some families assumed the team was not coming back and stopped data collection altogether.
“We found, however, that monthly visits were too infrequent-many items were forgotten and some families assumed we”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOne study of rural households in the Brazilian Amazon found that NTFPs accounted for 25% of annual income.
“One study of rural households in the Brazilian Amazon found that NTFPs accounted for 25% of annual income (Shanley 2000)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shanley 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOn average, 40% of the workshop participants were female.
“On average, 40% of the participants were female.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough the data may not reflect a precise estimate of hunting rates, they show similarities with results from other studies in the region.
“As such, although the data may not reflect a precise estimate of hunting rates, they show similarities with results from other studies in the region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough felling damage and changes in microclimate may have indirect effects on non-timber fruit trees, the impacts are likely to be minimal, especially as palm fruit trees tend to concentrate along stream beds, which are exempt from logging activities.
“Although felling damage and changes in microclimate may have indirect effects on non-timber fruit trees, the impacts are likely to be minimal, especially as the palm fruit trees tend to concentrate along stream beds, which are exempt from logging activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIn practice, few households chose to have an individual present during the logging or to make demands regarding particular trees.
“In practice, however, few households chose to have an individual present during the logging or to make demands regarding particular trees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAlthough honesty issues in hunting-rate reporting exist, these issues are consistent across communities such that participation in the CCP logging project should not bias diary reporting in any one direction.
“Although studies of hunting rates can be plagued by issues of honesty in reporting, both in terms of underreporting due to fear of reporting illegal activities or overreporting to impress others, these issues are consistent across communities such that participation in the CCP logging project should not bias diary reporting in any one direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome respondents fail to record all resource use, whereas others may exaggerate, especially regarding socially desirable activities.
“Some respondents fail to record all resource use (Hill and Davies 2001) whereas others may exaggerate, especially regarding socially desirable activities (Bernard et al. 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFruit harvests showed high inter-household variability and were on such a small scale (average annual household harvest across communities = 11.8 ± 14.7kg) that any changes would be difficult to detect.
“Fruit harvests showed high inter-household variability and were on such a small scale (average annual household harvest across communities = 11.8 ± 14.7kg) that any changes would be difficult to detect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationParticipants in diary studies often claim to be recording their activities on a regular basis even though such consistency may not be the case.
“Participants in diary studies often claim to be recording their activities on a regular basis even though such consistency may not be the case (Stone et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stone et al. 2003 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningAlthough these factors may bias results, the bias should be relatively consistent across communities such that community participation in logging does not confound a respondent's tendency to report resource use accurately or honestly.
“Although these factors may bias results, the bias should be relatively consistent across communities such that community participation in logging does not confound a respondent's tendency to report resource use accurately or honestly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe lack of statistically significant differences between CCP-logged communities and non-CCP communities indicates that if logging does alter NTFP use, it is unlikely to do so at an order of magnitude that would significantly compromise livelihoods in the study communities.
“Nevertheless, the lack of statistically significant differences between CCP-logged communities and non-CCP communities indicates that if logging does alter NTFP use, it is unlikely to do so at an order of magnitude that would significantly compromise livelihoods in the study communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn many frontier areas, households reside only temporarily on their lands, moving on to new frontiers where they deforest new areas.
“In many frontier areas, households reside only temporarily on their lands, moving on to new frontiers where they deforest new areas (Schmink andWood 1992, Walker et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Schmink andWood 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Walker et al. 2002 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningImprovements in infrastructure and income from timber sales brought benefits without significantly altering household use of forest resources.
“Improvements in infrastructure and income from timber sales brought benefits without significantly altering household use of forest resources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationConventional logging, although sometimes legal, leads to significantly greater damage to the remnant forest and thus potentially greater ramifications for NTFP harvests.
“Conventional logging, although sometimes legal, leads to significantly greater damage to the remnant forest (Schulze and Zweede 2006) and thus potentially greater ramifications for NTFP harvests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schulze and Zweede 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThose who stay often turn to cattle ranching, a low-risk, highly liquidable alternative to perennial agriculture, which leads to increased deforestation.
“Those who stay often turn to cattle ranching, a low-risk, highly liquidable alternative to perennial agriculture, which leads to increased deforestation (Arima et al. 2006, Browder et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Arima et al. 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Browder et al. 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
80% of settlement land in the Brazilian Amazon must remain as standing forest by law.
“By law, 80% of this land must remain as standing forest.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The non-CCP communities have similar forests and infrastructural conditions to the CCP-logged communities.
“The non-CCP communities were chosen because of their location in relation to the CCP-logged communities such that they were far enough away so as to be unlikely to be affected by the logging but close enough so as to have similar forests and infrastructural conditions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The non-CCP communities were not affected by the logging.
“The non-CCP communities were chosen because of their location in relation to the CCP-logged communities such that they were far enough away so as to be unlikely to be affected by the logging but close enough so as to have similar forests and infrastructural conditions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Family Forests (FF) project is representative of company-community logging contracts in Amazonian settlements.
“One exception is the independent Family Forests (FF) project, a forest management project based on company-community logging contracts that has been advocated as a model for equitable sustainable development in settlement communities across the Amazon (Lima et al. 2003, Nepstad et al. 2004a, b, Merry et al. 2006).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 14 months of data are sufficient to capture annual NTFP harvests.
“data analysis is based on 14 months of data (November 2003-December 2004).”
The paper relies on this without support.
RIL techniques minimize changes in forest structure, resource abundance and access.
“Combined with the use of RIL techniques to minimize changes in forest structure, and thereby changes in resource abundance and access, the logging did not greatly affect harvest rates in the study communities.”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Not confirmedz = 0.805reported p = .537 · recomputed p = .421
“Z = 0.805, p = .537”
- Not confirmedz = 1.364reported p = .048 · recomputed p = .173
“Z = 1.364, p = .048”
- Not confirmedz = 1.162reported p = .134 · recomputed p = .245
“Z = 1.162, p = .134”
- Consistentz = -0.908reported p = .364 · recomputed p = .364
“Z = -0.908,p = .364”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
One-time logging payment described as annual income
MajorThe abstract says annual logging income exceeds eight years of agricultural income. The results instead identify that amount as a one-off timber payment, not an annual payment.
“Our results show that annual household income from the CCP logging is equivalent to more than 8 years of household gross income from agricultural production.”
“The one-off income from timber sales (approximately R$8000) equals more than 8 years of average household agricultural sales (R$964 ± 920, n = 46).”
Cites
(2001) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 4,566 · see citing works
Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries
Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Hufford, M. R. (2003) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00320-3 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data
Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailer, L. (1984) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002431 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Effects of Subsistence Hunting on Vertebrate Community Structure in Amazonian Forests
Peres, C. A. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98485.x · Cited by 660 · see citing works
The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique
Hill, R. J., & Davies, P. S. W. (2001) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn2000281 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Contested frontiers in Amazonia
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-2268 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Roads, Development, and Conservation in the Congo Basin
Wilkie, D., Shaw, E., Rotberg, F., Morelli, G., & Auzel, P. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99102.x · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Contested Frontiers in Amazonia.
Ciccantell, P. S., Schmink, M. C., & Wood, C. H. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074888 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Pattanayak, S. K., & Sills, E. O. (2001) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146943 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Logging damage during planned and unplanned logging operations in the eastern Amazon
Johns, J. S., Barreto, P., & Uhl, C. (1996) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(96)03869-8 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Peres, C. A., & LAKE, I. R. (2003) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01413.x · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Land Use and Land Cover Change in Forest Frontiers: The Role of Household Life Cycles
Walker, R., Perz, S., Caldas, M., & Silva, L. G. T. (2002) · International Regional Science Review · doi:10.1177/016001760202500202 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Costs and benefits of forest management for timber production in eastern Amazonia
Barreto, P., Amaral, P., Vidal, E., & Uhl, C. (1998) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00251-x · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Current Issues in Non-Timber Forest Products Research
rez, M. R. P., & Arnold, J. E. M. (1996) · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Wollenberg, E., Ingles, A. W., & eds. (1998) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/000483 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Use and Misuse of Forest‐harvested Fruits in the Iquitos Area
Vásquez, R., & Gentry, A. H. (1989) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00241.x · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Quantitative methods for estimating the economic value of resource use to rural households
(2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781849773614-10 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Smith, N. J. H. (1982) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520314320 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Lopes, M. A., & Ferrari, S. F. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98402.x · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Uhl, C., Veríssimo, A., Mattos, M. M., Brandino, Z., & Guimarães Vieira, I. C. (1991) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(91)90235-n · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Creating Timber Harvest Guidelines for a Reduced-Impact Logging Project in Malaysia
Pinard, M. A., Putz, F. E., Tay, J., & Sullivan, T. E. (1995) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/93.10.41 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Browder, J. O., Pedlowski, M. A., Walker, R., Wynne, R. H., Summers, P. M., Abad, A., Becerra-Cordoba, N., & Mil-Homens, J. (2008) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.08.008 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Tapping the green market: certification and management of non-timber forest products
Shanley, P., Pierce, A. R., Laird, S. A., & Guillén, A. (2002) · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Mousedeer Densities in a Tropical Rainforest: The Impact of Selective Logging
Heydon, M., & Bulloh, P. (1997) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404892 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Caviglia‐Harris, J. L., & Sills, E. O. (2005) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00238.x · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Short-term effects of reduced-impact logging on eastern Amazon fauna
Azevedo-Ramos, C., de Carvalho, O., & do Amaral, B. D. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.025 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Tapping the Green Market: Certification and Management of Non-Timber Forest Products
Kiessel, A. (2003) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00159-9 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Smallholders, The Amazon's New Conservationists
Campos, M. T., & Nepstad, D. C. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00546.x · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Ros-Tonen, M. A. F., van Andel, T., Morsello, C., Otsuki, K., Rosendo, S., & Scholz, I. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.044 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Local perceptions of forest certification for community-based enterprises
Humphries, S., & Kainer, K. A. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.027 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Non‐Timber Forest Products Integrated with Natural Forest Management, Rio San Juan, Nicaragua
Salick, J., Mejia, A., & Anderson, T. (1995) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/2269339 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Is market-oriented forest conservation a contradiction in terms?
Crook, C., & Clapp, R. A. (1998) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892998000186 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Frutiferas e plantas uteis na vida Amazonica
Shanley, P., & Medina, G. (2005) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Who Is “Forest-Dependent”? Capturing Local Variation in Forest-Product Sale, Eastern Honduras
McSweeney, K. (2002) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00323 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Zarin, D. J., Schulze, M., Vidal, E., & Lentini, M. W. (2007) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00670.x · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Modernisation and technological dualism in the extractive economy in Amazonia
Homma, A. K. O. (1996) · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Canopy dynamics in unlogged and logged forest stands in the eastern Amazon
Schulze, M., & Zweede, J. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.333 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Lawrence, A. (2003) · The International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/ifor.5.2.87.17411 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationVosti, S. A., Braz, E. M., Carpentier, C. L., d’Oliveira, M. V. N., & Witcover, J. (2003) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.001 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Managing the Amazon Timber Industry
Nepstad, D. C., Azevedo-Ramos, C., Lima, E., McGRATH, D., Pereira, C. A., & Merry, F. D. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00551.x · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationA comparison of orang-utan density in a logged and unlogged forest on Sumatra
Knop, E., Ward, P. I., & Wich, S. A. (2004) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.02.010 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Norton, B. G. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613821.001 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Lambert, T. D., Malcolm, J. R., & Zimmerman, B. L. (2004) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.11.012 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The compatibility of timber and non-timber forest product extraction and management
Guariguata, M. R., Cronkleton, P., Shanley, P., & Taylor, P. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.038 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Assies, W. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 36 · see citing works
A view from the forest floor: the impact of logging on indigenous peoples in Brazil
WATSON, F. (1996) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1996.tb02064.x · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Menton, M. C. (2003) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/ifor.5.2.97.17419 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationDovie, D. B. K. (2003) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/s1389-9341(02)00066-7 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Shanley, P. (2022) · Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · doi:10.22024/unikent/01.02.86145 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Forest degradation and food security.
Lipper, L. (2000) · Unasylva (English ed.) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Big trees, small favors: loggers and communities in Amazonia
Medina, G., & Shanley, P. (2004) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Giving back: making research results relevant to local groups and conservation
Shanley, P., & Laird, S. (2002) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
22. Governing the Amazon Timber Industry
Nepstad, D. C., Alencar, A. A. C., Barros, A. C., Lima, E., Mendoza, E., Ramos, C. A., & Lefebvre, P. (2004) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/zari12906-024 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Merry, F. D., Amacher, G. S., Macqeen, D., Santos, M. G. D., Lima, E., & Nepstad, D. C. (2006) · The International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/ifor.8.2.211 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationRainforest Corridors: The Transamazon Colonization Scheme.
Fearnside, P. M., & Smith, N. J. H. (1983) · Hispanic American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2514817 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Animal indicators: a tool to assess biotic integrity after logging tropical forests?
Azevedo-Ramos, C., de Carvalho, O., & Nasi, R. (2005) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
(1995) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
van Solinge, T. B. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394847-2.00021-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
(1998) · Americanae (AECID Library) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Rainforest corridors the Transamazon colonization scheme
Smith, N. J. H. (1982) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
(2006) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Rival, L. M. (2005) · Brill | Nijhoff eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789047407300_012 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Local Perspectives on Forest Values in Papua New Guinea : the Scope for Participatory Methods
Grieg-Gan, M., Guijt, I., & Peutalo, B. (2002) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Watkinson, A. R. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.011 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Grieg‐Gran, M., Guijt, I., & Peutalo, B. (2002) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
d'Oliveira, M. V. N., & Braz, E. M. (2006) · Acta Amazonica · doi:10.1590/s0044-59672006000200007
Lopes, M. A., & Ferrari, S. F. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.98402.x
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Barreto, P., C. Souza, Jr., A. Anderson, R. Salomão, J. Wiles, and R. Noguerón. 2005. Human pressure in the Brazilian Amazon. Instituto Ecology and Society 14(1): 39 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art39/ do Homen et Meio Ambiente da Amazõnia (IMAZON) -State of the Amazon 3. IMAZON, Belém, Brazil.
- Laird, S. A., and D. A. Posey. 2002. Professional society standards for biodiversity research: codes of ethics and research guidelines. Pages 16-38 in S. A. Laird, editor. Biodiversity and traditional knowledge: equitable partnerships in practice. Earthscan, London, UK.
- Mayers, J., S. Vermeulen, and International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). 2002. Company-community forestry partnerships: from raw deals to mutual gains?: an international review with proposals for improving forests, enterprise and livelihoods. Earthprint, Stevenage, UK.
- Ochoa, J. 2000. Effects of logging on small- mammal diversity in the lowland forests of the Venezuelan Guyana region. Biotropica 32(1):146- 164.
- Shanley, P., L. Luz, and M. Cymerys. 2002. Subsistence issues: the interface of timber and non- timber resources: declining resources for subsistence livelihoods (Brazil). Pages 313-321 in
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guariguata, M. R., García-Fernández, C., Sheil, D., Nasi, R., Herrero‐Jáuregui, C., Cronkleton, P., & Ingram, V. J. (2009) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.013 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Dawson, I. K., Leakey, R. R. B., Clement, C. R., Weber, J. C., Cornelius, J., Roshetko, J. M., Vinceti, B., Kalinganiré, A., Tchoundjeu, Z., Masters, E. T., et al. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.021 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Sardeshpande, M., & Shackleton, C. M. (2019) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f10060467 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
The impacts of selective logging on non-timber forest products of livelihood importance
Rist, L., Shanley, P., Sunderland, T., Sheil, D., Ndoye, O., Liswanti, N., & Tieguhong, J. C. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.037 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Humphries, S., Holmes, T. P., de Andrade, D. F. C., McGrath, D., & Dantas, J. B. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.005 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Evolving Perspectives on Non-timber Forest Products
Sills, E. O., Shanley, P., Paumgarten, F., de Beer, J., & Pierce, A. R. (2011) · Tropical forestry · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17983-9_2 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Duchelle, A. E., Guariguata, M. R., Less, G., Albornoz, M. A., Chavez, A. B., & Melo, T. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.023 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
A combination of methods needed to assess the actual use of provisioning ecosystem services
Rasmussen, L. V., Mertz, O., Christensen, A. E., Danielsen, F., Dawson, N. M., & Xaydongvanh, P. (2015) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.005 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Pinho, P. F., Patenaude, G., Ometto, J. P., Meir, P., de Toledo, P. M., Coelho, A., & Young, C. E. F. (2014) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.002 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Klimas, C. A., Kainer, K. A., & Wadt, L. H. D. O. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.006 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Rockwell, C. A., Guariguata, M. R., Menton, M., Quispe, E. A., Quaedvlieg, J., Warren‐Thomas, E., Silva, H. F., Rojas, E. E. J., Arrunátegui, J. A. H. K., Vega, L. A. M., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135464 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationViability of combined timber and non-timber harvests for one species: A Carapa guianensis case study
Klimas, C. A., Cropper, W. P., Kainer, K. A., & Wadt, L. H. D. O. (2012) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.022 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Multiple use management of tropical production forests: How can we move from concept to reality?
Guariguata, M. R., Sist, P. L. J., & Nasi, R. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.032 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Rockwell, C. A., Kainer, K. A., d'Oliveira, M. V. N., Staudhammer, C. L., & Baraloto, C. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.022 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Levers for alleviating poverty in forests
Hajjar, R., Newton, P., Ihalainen, M., Agrawal, A., Alix‐Garcia, J., Castle, S., Erbaugh, J. T., Gabay, M., Hughes, K., Mawutor, S. M., et al. (2021) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102589 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Assessing the extent of “conflict of use” in multipurpose tropical forest trees: A regional view
Herrero‐Jáuregui, C., Guariguata, M. R., Cárdenas, D., Vilanova, E., Robles, M., Licona, J. C., & Nalvarte, W. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.044 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Cronkleton, P., Guariguata, M. R., & Albornoz, M. A. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.035 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Bousfield, C. G., Cerullo, G. R., Massam, M. R., & Edwards, D. P. (2020) · Advances in ecological research/Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.01.006 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Guariguata, M. R., Sist, P. L. J., & Nasi, R. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.047 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Overlapping land allocations reduce deforestation in Peru
Anderson, C. M., Asner, G. P., Llactayo, W., & Lambin, É. F. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.002 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Sist, P. L. J., Sablayrolles, P. J. L., Barthelon, S., Ota, L. S., Kibler, J.-F., Ruschel, A. R., Melo, M. S., & Ezzine‐de‐Blas, D. (2014) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f5071508 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Cooper, N. A., & Kainer, K. A. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09995-230204 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Advancing tropical forestry curricula through Non-Timber Forest Products
Guariguata, M. R., & Evans, K. (2010) · The International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/ifor.12.4.418 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Community forest management in the Peruvian Amazon: A literature review
Cossio, R. R., Menton, M., Cronkleton, P., & Larson, A. M. (2014) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/004426 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimating natural resource harvests: Conjectures?
Menton, M., Lawrence, A., Merry, F. D., & Brown, N. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.010 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationCummings, A. R., Read, J. M., & Fragoso, J. M. V. (2018) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-018-0614-3 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Guariguata, M. R., García-Fernández, C., Nasi, R., Sheil, D., Herrero‐Jáuregui, C., Cronkleton, P., Ndoye, O., & Ingram, V. J. (2011) · Tropical forestry · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17983-9_8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Lescuyer, G., Mvongo-Nkene, M. N., Monville, G., Elanga-Voundi, M. B., & Kakundika, T. M. (2015) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.013 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cummings, A. R. (2013) · Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Rockwell, C. A., & Kainer, K. A. (2015) · The International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554815814668945 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Ravikumar, A., Andersson, K. P., Mwangi, E., Guariguata, M. R., & Nasi, R. (2012) · The International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554812800923354 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Guariguata, M. R., Fernandez, C. G., Nasi, R., Sheil, D., Herrero‐Jáuregui, C., Cronkleton, P., Ndoye, O., & Ingram, V. J. (2009) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/002836 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Aguirre, G. A., Mamani, M. M., Canahuire-Robles, R., Zavaleta, T. V., Valdeiglesias, J. P., Revoredo, J. L. D., Rodríguez-Achata, L., Enciso, D. R., & Garate-Quispe, J. S. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15235438 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Stop disregarding tropical forest management as a conservation option
Putz, F. E. (2025) · Trees Forests and People · doi:10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101007 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Small-scale timber stand management techniques : a case study of woodlots in Isangati, Tanzania
Francis, P. D. (2012) · doi:10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/176 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Guariguata, M. R., & Evans, K. (2011) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bommel, P., Piketty, M.-G., Sist, P. L. J., Bendahan, A. B., & Barbosa, T. (2014) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
Klimas, C. A. (2010) · University of Florida Digital Collections (University of Florida)
Cost of Opportunity: Economic Competitiveness of Community Forest Management by Land Use
Silva, D. A. S., Ferreira, R. L. C., Guedes, M. C., Sousa, C. S. C., Lima, R. B., Almeida, A. S., & Silva, E. F. (2017) · Nativa · doi:10.5935/2318-7670.v05n04a09
Smith, N. (2023) · Ethnobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12803-5_14
- Authors
- Menton, M. C. S., Merry, F. D., Lawrence, A., & Brown, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131052759
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- United States Agency for International Development
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Keywords
- livelihoods, non-timber forest products, forest logging, indigenous peoples, community forestry, Amazon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review