Timber harvesting and long-term productivity: weathering processes and soil disturbance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FR removal has been found to reduce subsequent forest growth.
“Although FR removal has been found to reduce subsequent forest growth (Zabowski et al., 1994;Helmisaari et al., 2011)”
From The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy (2013) · cites this paper as Zabowski et al., 1994
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Zabowski, D., Skinner, M. F., & Rygiewicz, P. T.
- Affiliations
- Pacific Northwest Research Station (US)
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zabowski, D.
- Venue
- Forest Ecology and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 55-68
- ISSN
- 0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086803225
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and biological studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Plant Ecology and Soil Science
- Keywords
- logging, soil disturbance, soil weathering, soil nutrient availability, soil compaction, nutrient cycling, fine roots, mycorrhizal fungi, long-term productivity, New Zealand forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
