Carbon and nitrogen in coniferous forest soils after clear-felling and harvests of different intensity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When residues are left in the forest, significant levels of CO2 emissions occur from decomposition of residual biomass that remains in the harvesting pool and gradually oxidizes to the atmosphere.
“Clearly, when residues are left, there are also significant levels of emissions from the decomposition of residual biomass that remains in the harvesting pool that gradually oxidizes as CO 2 to the atmosphere.”
From The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy (2013) · cites this paper as Olsson et al., 1996
Regenerating forests after logging disturbance remain net sources of CO2 for at least one to two decades, largely due to heterotrophic decomposition of forest residues left on the forest floor.
“In fact, regenerating forests upon such a disturbance have been found to remain as net sources of CO 2 for at least one to two decades after logging and this is largely due to the heterotrophic decomposition of forest residues (FR) left upon the forest floor (Olsson et al., 1996;Yanai et al., 2003;Clark et al., 2004).”
From The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy (2013) · cites this paper as Olsson et al., 1996
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 215
- Authors
- Olsson, B. A., Staaf, H., Lundkvist, H., Bengtsson, J., & Kaj, R.
- Affiliations
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Olsson, Bengt A.
- Venue
- Forest Ecology and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 19-32
- ISSN
- 0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061223985
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Keywords
- soil carbon, soil nitrogen, clear-cutting, logging intensity, whole-tree harvesting, stem-only harvesting, coniferous forest soils, Pinus sylvestris, Norway spruce, humus layer, mineral soils, C/N ratio, nitrogen mineralization, post-logging regeneration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
