Driving cycle testing of electric vehicle batteries and systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared with FUDS, SFUDS is characterized by a similar average speed, the same proportion of stationary time, and the same maximum acceleration and braking, thus providing generally very similar results when used for simulating vehicle range.
“Compared with FUDS, it is characterized by a similar average speed, the same proportion of stationary time, and the same maximum acceleration and braking, thus providing generally very similar results when used for simulating vehicle range.”
From Effect of Ambient Temperature on Electric Vehicles’ Energy Consumption and Range: Model Definition and Sensitivity Analysis Based on Nissan Leaf Data (2019) · cites this paper as [43]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 3 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Brandt, D. D.
- Corresponding author
- Brandt, D.D.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 73-79
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091368778
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- electric vehicle batteries, battery life cycle, battery performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
