Uncertainty of determining mode and cause of death without autopsy: an autopsy study of medically unattended non-medicolegal deaths
Abstract
Eighty-seven cases of medically unattended deaths were autopsied and investigated for alcohol and barbiturate after the general practitioner had certified the death. A detailed survey was made by comparing the mode and cause of death before and after autopsy. After autopsy and chemical analysis, two suicides, one accidental death and two unknown modes of death were found (5%). The high proportion of unknown mode of death was due to the fact that police investigations were not made. The cause of death differed in 30%. It was mostly due to overestimation of ischaemic heart disease, especially acute myocardial infarction, cerebral haemorrhage and because the unknown cause of death could be placed in a definite group after autopsy. Estimated acute myocardial infarciton could only be confirmed in 50% of the cases. Neoplastic disorders as the cause of death was seldom found to be erroneous, but malignancy was undiagnosed in 4% of all cases. It is concluded that doctors should not use acute myocardial infarction as a cause of death unless there is reasonable clinical evidence for the diagnosis, that obscure cases of death should be left to medicolegal investigation, and that the reliability of mortality statistics still has to be improved. The autopsy is still valuable to ensure this extra security.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Myocardial infarction and cancer as a primary diagnosis or underlying cause of death has been shown to have high diagnostic validity.
“Further, myocardial infarction and cancer as a primary diagnosis or underlying cause of death has been shown to have high diagnostic validity.77,78”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rasmussen, K. L., Tybjærg-Hansen, A., Nordestgaard, B. G., & Frikke-Schmidt, R. (2019) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz402 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Asnaes, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Asnaes, Stig
- Venue
- Forensic Science International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-196
- ISSN
- 0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071927911
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forensic Science International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
- Keywords
- autopsy, causes of death, mode of death, death certification, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, cerebral hemorrhage, suicide, accidental death, undetermined cause of death, mortality statistics, medico-legal investigation, alcohol, barbiturates
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Alcoholic Intoxication, Autopsy, Barbiturates, Coronary Disease, Female, Forensic Medicine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Suicide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review