Cited by 645Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesTheoretical and Computational Physics

Diseases of triangulated random surface models, and possible cures

Ambjørn, J., Durhuus, B., Fröhlich, J.·1985·Nuclear Physics B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90356-6

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ambjørn, J., Durhuus, B., & Fröhlich, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-01
Volume
257
Pages
433-449
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015469945
Cited by
645
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
random surfaces, Nambu-Goto string, string quantization, regularization, divergence problem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review