Loop space representation of quantum fermions and gravity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The gravitational connection is real only when fermions are represented by half-density variables; using scalar variables makes the connection complex.
“As we will see in the appendix, the connection is real only if we use the quantities ξ with density weight 1 2 , if we would use the scalar variables η as in [9] then the gravitational connection becomes by the argument given in [18] A”
From Quantum spin dynamics (QSD): V. Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of the Hamiltonian constraint of matter quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [9]
The fermionic excitations produced by this regularization differ greatly from those in the cited earlier work, because the reality conditions are faithfully implemented.
“Quite surprisingly, these fermionic excitations are very different from those discussed in [8,9], the underlying reason being the faithful implementation of the reality conditions.”
From Quantum spin dynamics (QSD): V. Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of the Hamiltonian constraint of matter quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [9]
The strategy of working with ψ as advertised in prior work is not suitable for quantizing the Einstein-Dirac theory, so the framework developed in another prior work is forced.
“Therefore the strategy of working with ψ as advertised in [9] is not suitable for quantizing the Einstein-Dirac theory and we are forced to adapt the framework developed in [7].”
From Quantum spin dynamics (QSD): V. Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of the Hamiltonian constraint of matter quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [9]
The kinematical framework developed in this paper is applied in [22], which extends the dynamical framework of [16,17,18,19,20] to the standard model coupled to gravity and other kind of matter.
“The kinematical framework developed in this paper is applied in [22] which extends the dynamical framework of [16, 17, 18, 19, 20] to the standard model coupled to gravity and other kind of matter.”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [20]
The same techniques can be employed to quantize Euclidean 2+1 gravity in the real-valued Ashtekar formulation, giving expected results, and the ADM energy.
“Moreover, the same techniques can be employed to quantize a) Euclidean 2+1 gravity in the real-valued Ashtekar- (rather than Witten-) formulation [19] giving the expected results and b) the ADM energy [20].”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Lectures on Non-Perturbative Canonical Gravity
Ashtekar, A. (1991) · Advanced Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology · doi:10.1142/1321 · Cited by 872 · see citing works
Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis
Rovelli, C. (1991) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.442 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial infinity as a boundary of spacetime
Ashtekar, A., & Romano, J. D. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/4/019 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Morales-Técotl, H. A., & Rovelli, C. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3642 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity
Perez, A. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-3 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/5/012 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/6/006 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morales-Técotl, H. A., & Rovelli, C.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 451
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 325-361
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975844479
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- loop representation, Ashtekar variables, loop quantum gravity, non-perturbative quantum gravity, Hamiltonian constraint, shift operator, open curves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review