Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 594

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The variational approach to shape from shading

Open access
Horn, Berthold K.P, Brooks, Michael J·1986·Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing

Abstract

Abstract We develop a systematic approach to the discovery of parallel iterative schemes for solving the shape-from-shading problem on a grid. A standard procedure for finding such schemes is outlined, and subsequently used to derive several new ones. The shape-from-shading problem is known to be mathematically equivalent to a nonlinear first-order partial differential equation in surface elevation. To avoid the problems inherent in methods used to solve such equations, we follow previous work in reformulating the problem as one of finding a surface orientation field that minimizes the integral of the brightness error. The calculus of variations is then employed to derive the appropriate Euler equations on which iterative schemes can be based. The problem of minimizing the integral of the brightness error term is ill posed, since it has an infinite number of solutions in terms of surface orientation fields. A previous method used a regularization technique to overcome this difficulty. An extra term was added to the integral to obtain an approximation to a solution that was as smooth as possible. We point out here that surface orientation has to obey an integrability constraint if it is to correspond to an underlying smooth surface. Regularization methods do not guarantee that the surface orientation recovered satisfies this constraint. Consequently, we attempt to develop a method that enforces integrability, but fail to find a convergent iterative scheme based on the resulting Euler equations. We show, however, that such a scheme can be derived if, instead of strictly enforcing the constraint, a penalty term derived from the constraint is adopted. This new scheme, while it can be expressed simply and elegantly using the surface gradient, unfortunately cannot deal with constraints imposed by occluding boundaries. These constraints are crucial if ambiguities in the solution of the shape-from-shading problem are to be avoided. Differrent schemes result if one uses different parameters to describe surface orientation. We derive two new schemes, using unit surface normals, that facilitate the incorporation of the occluding boundary information. These schemes, while more complex, have several advantages over previous ones.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0734-189x(86)90114-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 594

Metadata

Authors
Horn, B. K. P., & Brooks, M. J.
Venue
Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-02
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
174-208
ISSN
0734-189X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079877940
Cited by
594
References
0
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The variational approach to shape from shading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0734-189x(86)90114-3
The paper
Horn, B. K. P., & Brooks, M. J. (1986). The variational approach to shape from shading. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-189x(86)90114-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.