Cited by 117Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionSurface Roughness and Optical MeasurementsOptical measurement and interference techniques

Image acquisition techniques for automatic visual inspection of metallic surfaces

Pernkopf, Franz, O'Leary, Paul·2003·NDT & E International

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0963-8695(03)00081-1

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pernkopf, F., & O'Leary, P.
Affiliations
  • Graz University of Technology (AT)
  • Montanuniversität Leoben (AT)
Corresponding author
Pernkopf, Franz
Venue
NDT & E International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
609-617
ISSN
0963-8695 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116419385
Cited by
117
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
NDT & E International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Optical measurement and interference techniques
Keywords
automated visual inspection, metal surfaces, image acquisition, lighting techniques, range imaging, light sectioning, photometric stereo, surface defects, cavities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review