Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation between chemosensitivity and the ventilatory response to exercise in chronic heart failure

Open access
Chua, Tuan Peng, Clark, Andrew I., Amadi, Aham A., Coats, Andrew J.S.·1996·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES This study sought to establish the chemosensitivity of patients with chronic heart failure. BACKGROUND The ventilatory response to exercise is often increased in patients with chronic heart failure, as characterized by the steeper regression slope relating minute ventilation to carbon dioxide output. We hypothesized that the sensitivity of chemoreceptors may be reset and may in part mediate the exercise hyperpnea seen in this condition. METHODS Hypoxic and peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity were studied in 38 patients with chronic heart failure (35 men, 3 women; mean [+/-SE] age 60.2 +/- 1.3 years; radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction 25.7 +/- 2.3%) and 15 healthy control subjects (11 men, 4 women; mean age 54.9 +/- 3.0 years) using transient inhalations of pure nitrogen and single breaths of 13% carbon dioxide, respectively. The change in chemosensitivity during mild exercise (25 W) was assessed in the first 15 patients and all control subjects. Central hypercapnic chemosensitivity was also characterized in 25 patients and 10 control subjects by the rebreathing of 7% carbon dioxide in 93% oxygen. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed in all subjects. RESULTS Maximal oxygen consumption was 16.6 +/- 0.9 versus 29.7 +/- 2.2 mol/kg per min (p < 0.0001), and the ventilation-carbon dioxide output regression slope was 37.2 +/- 1.5 versus 26.5 +/- 1.4 (p < 0.0001) in patients and control subjects, respectively. Hypoxic and central hypercapnic chemosensitivity were enhanced in patients (0.707 +/- 0.076 vs. 0.293 +/- 0.056 liters/min per % arterial oxygen saturation [SaO2], p = 0.0001 and 3.15 +/- 0.41 vs. 2.02 +/- 0.25 liters/min per mm Hg, p = 0.025, respectively) and correlated significantly with the ventilatory response to exercise. Hypoxic chemosensitivity was augmented during exercise in patients and in control subjects but remained higher in the former (1.530 +/- 0.27 vs. 0.685 +/- 0.12 liters/min per %SaO2, p = 0.01). The peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity of patients at rest and during exercise was similar to that in control subjects, consistent with its lesser contribution to overall carbon dioxide chemosensitivity. CONCLUSIONS Enhanced hypoxic and central hypercapnic chemosensitivity may play a role in mediating the increased ventilatory response to exercise in chronic heart failure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00523-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Chua, T. P., Clark, A. I., Amadi, A. A., & Coats, A. J. S.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
650-657
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020358342
Cited by
277
References
3
FWCI
33.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation between chemosensitivity and the ventilatory response to exercise in chronic heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0735-1097(95)00523-4
The paper
Chua, T. P., Clark, A. I., Amadi, A. A., & Coats, A. J. S. (1996). Relation between chemosensitivity and the ventilatory response to exercise in chronic heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(95)00523-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.