Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neglected rural geographies: A review

Philo, Chris·1992·Journal of Rural Studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0743-0167(92)90077-j

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Issues connected to the aggressive organisation of rural space or the impacts connected to live, wooden, or steel fence alterations are nearly impossible to assess comprehensively within a GIS model of this scale.

    “In addition, there are the issues connected to the aggressive organisation of rural space or the impacts connected to live, wooden, or steel fence alterations (Philo 1992, p. 197; Prout & Howitt 2009, p. 397), but these are nearly impossible to assess comprehensively within a GIS model of this scale.”
  • There are issues connected to the aggressive organisation of rural space or the impacts connected to live, wooden, or steel fence alterations, but these are nearly impossible to assess comprehensively within a GIS model of this scale.

    “In addition, there are the issues connected to the aggressive organisation of rural space or the impacts connected to live, wooden, or steel fence alterations (Philo 1992, p. 197; Prout & Howitt 2009, p. 397), but these are nearly impossible to assess comprehensively within a GIS model of this scale.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bell, 1989, The changing relationship between the private and public sectors: privatisation and rural Britain, Journal of Rural Studies, 5, 1, 10.1016/0743-0167(89)90017-X · DOI
  2. Breitbart, 1975, Impressions of the anarchist landscape, Antipode, 7, 44, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1975.tb00620.x · DOI
  3. Breitbart, 1979, Introduction [to theme issue dealing with anarchism and the environment], Antipode, 10, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1978.tb00110.x · DOI
  4. Cloke, 1987, Intra-class conflict in rural areas, Journal of Rural Studies, 3, 321, 10.1016/0743-0167(87)90051-9 · DOI
  5. Crang, 1992, The politics of polyphony: on reconfigurations of geographical authority, Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 10, 10.1068/d100527 · DOI
  6. Crichton, 1990, Residents of Holly Mound prepare to move on, West Highland Free Press, 7
  7. Gant, 1988, Journey patterns of the elderly and the disabled in the Cotswolds: a spatial analysis, Social Science and Medicine, 27, 173, 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90326-7 · DOI
  8. Gilg, 1991, Review of Colin Ward's, The Child in the Country. Area, 23, 90
  9. Harper, 1987, A humanistic approach to the study of rural populations, Journal of Rural Studies, 3, 309, 10.1016/0743-0167(87)90050-7 · DOI
  10. Horner, 1979, Kropotkin and the city: the socialist ideal in urbanism, Antipode, 10, 33, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1978.tb00114.x · DOI
  11. Huyssen, 1984, Mapping the postmodern, German Critique, 5, 10.2307/488352 · DOI
  12. James, 1990, Is there a ‘place’ for children in geography?, Area, 22, 378
  13. James, 1991, Children and geography: a reply to David Sibley, Area, 23, 270
  14. Joseph, 1991, Elderly migration and its implications for service provision in rural communities: an Ontario perspective, Journal of Rural Studies, 7, 433, 10.1016/0743-0167(91)90007-F · DOI
  15. Kay, 1991, Landscapes of women and men: rethinking the regional historical geography of the United States and Canada, Journal of Historical Geography, 17, 435, 10.1016/0305-7488(91)90026-R · DOI
  16. Little, 1986, Feminist perspectives in rural geography: an introduction, Journal of Rural Studies, 2, 1, 10.1016/0743-0167(86)90068-9 · DOI
  17. Little, 1987, Gender relations in rural areas: the importance of women's domestic role, Journal of Rural Studies, 3, 335, 10.1016/0743-0167(87)90052-0 · DOI
  18. McLaughlin, 1986, The rhetoric and the reality of rural deprivation, Journal of Rural Studies, 3, 291, 10.1016/0743-0167(86)90028-8 · DOI
  19. Peet, 1975, For Kropotkin, Antipode, 7, 42, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1975.tb00619.x · DOI
  20. Peet, 1979, The geography of human liberation, Antipode, 10, 119, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1978.tb00121.x · DOI
  21. Sibley, 1978, Classification and control in local government: a case study of Gypsies in Hull, Town Planning Review, 49, 319, 10.3828/tpr.49.3.7424lh6173rl1127 · DOI
  22. Sibley, 1988, Purification of space, Environment & Planning D: Society & Space, 6, 409, 10.1068/d060409 · DOI
  23. Sibley, 1991, Children's geographies: some problems of representation, Area, 23, 269
  24. Sim, 1991, Review of Colin Ward's The Child in the City., Area, 23, 283
  25. Smith, 1991, Safety as a social value, Paper given to a seminar at St David's University College, Department of Geography, Lampeter, 14 March 1991
  26. Social and Cultural Geography Study Group Committee, 1991, De-limiting human geography: new social and cultural perspectives, New Words, New Worlds: Reconceptualising Social and Cultural Geography
  27. Williams, 1963, The social study of family farming, Geographical Journal, 129, 63, 10.2307/1794898 · DOI
  28. Winchester, 1991, The geography of children, Area, 23, 357
  29. Wolpert, 1964, The decision process in spatial context, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 54, 337, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1964.tb01783.x · DOI
  30. Woodward, 1991, Review of M.K. Stone's Report on Rural Childcare, Journal of Rural Studies, 7, 470, 10.1016/0743-0167(91)90014-J · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Philo, C.
Venue
Journal of Rural Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
193-207
ISSN
0743-0167
Cited by
298
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review