The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A practical framework for theabstract interpretation of logic programs
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Very few abstract interpretations of logic programs use infinite domains of infinite height, and to the authors' knowledge all of them have some a priori limitation of precision, at least in practice.
“Very few abstract interpretations of logic programs use infinite domains of infinite height (some notable exceptions are Bruynooghe [1991], Janssens and Bruynooghe [1992], and Heintze [1992]), and to our knowledge all of them have some a priori limitation of the precision, at least in practice.”
From Controlling generalization and polyvariance in partial deduction of normal logic programs (1998) · cites this paper as Bruynooghe [1991]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Debray, 1988, J. Logic Programming, 5, 207, 10.1016/0743-1066(88)90010-6 · DOI
- Kanamori, 1987, Analyzing Success Patterns of Logic Programs by Abstract Hybrid Interpretation, ICOT Technical Report TR279
- Mellish, 1985, Some Global Optimizations for a Prolog Compiler, J. Logic Programming, 2, 43, 10.1016/0743-1066(85)90004-4 · DOI
- Naur, 1963, The Design of the Gier Algol Compiler, Part II, BIT, 3, 145, 10.1007/BF01939983 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Controlling generalization and polyvariance in partial deduction of normal logic programs
Leuschel, M., Martens, B., & De Schreye, D. (1998) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/271510.271525 · Cited by 88
Multiple specialization using minimal-function graph semantics
Winsborough, W. (1992) · The Journal of Logic Programming · doi:10.1016/0743-1066(92)90033-y · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruynooghe, M.
- Affiliations
- Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Bruynooghe, Maurice
- ORCID
- Bruynooghe, Maurice
- Venue
- The Journal of Logic Programming
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-124
- ISSN
- 0743-1066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W207722629
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 27.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Logic Programming (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
- Keywords
- abstract interpretation, logic programs, proof trees, type checking, type synthesis, parallel execution, correctness conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review