Cited by 63Logic, programming, and type systemsModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniquessemigroups and automata theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple specialization using minimal-function graph semantics

Open access
Winsborough, Will·1992·The Journal of Logic Programming

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0743-1066(92)90033-y

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Winsborough, W.
Corresponding author
Winsborough, Will
Venue
The Journal of Logic Programming
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-07
Volume
13
Issue
2-3
Pages
259-290
ISSN
0743-1066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074516823
Cited by
63
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Journal of Logic Programming (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
Keywords
deterministic finite automata, interprocedural analysis, code expansion, optimizing compilers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review