Cited by 149Logic, programming, and type systemsLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAdvanced Database Systems and Queries

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Deriving descriptions of possible values of program variables by means of abstract interpretation

Open access
Janssens, G., Bruynooghe, M.·1992·The Journal of Logic Programming

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0743-1066(92)90032-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Very few abstract interpretations of logic programs use infinite domains of infinite height, and to the authors' knowledge all of them have some a priori limitation of precision, at least in practice.

    “Very few abstract interpretations of logic programs use infinite domains of infinite height (some notable exceptions are Bruynooghe [1991], Janssens and Bruynooghe [1992], and Heintze [1992]), and to our knowledge all of them have some a priori limitation of the precision, at least in practice.”

    From Controlling generalization and polyvariance in partial deduction of normal logic programs (1998) · cites this paper as Janssens and Bruynooghe [1992]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Bansal, 1988, An Abstract Interpretation Scheme for Logic Programs Based on Type Expression, Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems, 422
  2. Bruynooghe, 1991, A Practical Framework for the Abstract Interpretation of Logic Programs, J. Logic Programming, 10, 91, 10.1016/0743-1066(91)80001-T · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bruynooghe, 1988, An Instance of Abstract Interpretation Integrating Type and Mode Inferencing, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming, 669
  4. Bruynooghe, 1987, Abstract Interpretation: Towards the Global Optimization of Prolog Programs, Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Logic Programming, 192
  5. Debray, 1986, Automatic Mode Inference for Prolog Programs, Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Logic Programming, 78
  6. Hanus, 1989, Polymorphic Higher-Order Programming in Prolog, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Logic Programming, 382
  7. Jacobs, 1989, Accurate and Efficient Approximation of Variable Aliasing in Logic Programs, North American Conference on Logic Programming, 154
  8. Kanamori, 1985, Type Inference in Prolog and Its Application, Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 704
  9. Kanamori, 1987, Analyzing Success Patterns of Logic Programs by Abstract Hybrid Interpretation, ICOT Technical Report TR 279
  10. Kluzniak, 1987, Type Synthesis for Ground Prolog, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Logic Programming, 788
  11. Manilla, 1987, Flow Analysis of Prolog Programs, Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Logic Programming, 205
  12. Manna, 1970, On the Termination of Markov Algorithms, Proceedings of the 3rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, 789
  13. Mariën, 1989, The Impact of Abstract Interpretation on Code Generation: An Experiment in Efficiency, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Logic Programming, 33
  14. Mishra, 1984, Towards a Theory of Types in Prolog, Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Logic Programming, 289
  15. Mulkers, 1990, Analysis of Shared Data Structures for Compile-Time Garbage Collection in Logic Programs, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Logic Programming, 747
  16. Muthukumar, 1989, Determination of Variable Dependence Information at Compile Time through Abstract Interpretation, North American Conference on Logic Programming, 166
  17. Mycroft, 1984, A Polymorphic Type System for Prolog, Artif. Intell., 23, 295, 10.1016/0004-3702(84)90017-1 · DOI
  18. Somogyi, 1987, A System of Precise Modes for Logic Programs, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Logic Programming, 769
  19. Sondergaard, 1986, An Application of Abstract Interpretation of Logic Programs: Occur Check Reduction, Proceedings of the European Symposium on Programming, 327
  20. Warren, 1988, On the Practicality of Global Flow Analysis of Logic Programs, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming, 684
  21. Winsborough, 1989, Path-Dependent Reachability Analysis for Multiple Specialization, North American Conference on Logic Programming, 133
  22. Winsborough, 1988, And-Parallelism in the Presence of Shared Free Variables, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming, 749
  23. Xu, 1988, A Type Inference System for Prolog, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming, 604
  24. Zobel, 1987, Derivation of Polymorphic Types for Prolog Programs, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Logic Programming, 817

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Janssens, G., & Bruynooghe, M.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Janssens, G.
Venue
The Journal of Logic Programming
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-07
Volume
13
Issue
2-3
Pages
205-258
ISSN
0743-1066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069076448
Cited by
149
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
17.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Logic Programming (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
Keywords
abstract interpretation, Prolog compiler, program specialization, unification, extended modes, type information, free variables, variable sharing, program optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review