The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Item bias and item response theory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As mentioned, this finding suggests that the tests are unbiased with respect to group (Millsap, 1997a(Millsap, , 1997b;;Mellenbergh, 1989;Meredith, 1993).”
From Investigating Spearman's Hypothesis by Means of Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Mellenbergh, 1989
Citations
Cites
Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests
Psychology, M. (1961) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(61)80061-2 · Cited by 6,936
Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
Lord, F. M. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203056615 · Cited by 5,009
Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,779
BILOG 3 : item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models
Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 541
Item response theory : application to psychological measurement
Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Parsons, C. K. (1983) · Dow Jones-Irwin eBooks · Cited by 361
Discrete Statistical Models With Social Science Applications.
Clogg, C. C., & Andersen, E. B. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288158 · Cited by 324
Beyond group-mean differences: The concept of item bias.
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Gerrard, M. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.118 · Cited by 291
Contingency Table Models for Assessing Item Bias
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1982) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986007002105 · Cited by 231
Self-citationHuman Assessment and Cultural Factors
(1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2151-2 · Cited by 210
Applications of Item Response Theory
de Gruijter, D. N. M., & van der Kamp, L. J. T. (2007) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781584889595-13 · Cited by 204
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Mellenbergh, 1985, Vraag-onzuiverheid: definitie, detectie en onderzoek, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 40, 425
- Van der Flier, 1984, Een onderzoek naar de effectiviteit van de iteratieve item bias detectie methode bij groepen met een verschillend treknivo, Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 9, 61
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance
Meredith, W. (1993) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294825 · Cited by 4,536
Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models.
Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.10.1.21 · Cited by 1,189
“Measurement invariance (MI) as defined by Mellenbergh (1989) and Meredith (1993) implies that, given a certain score on the underlying factor, an observed score does not depend on subpopulation membership.”
BackgroundAssessing Factorial Invariance in Ordered-Categorical Measures
Millsap, R. E., & Tein, J. Y. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3903_4 · Cited by 864
“This approach is consistent with general definitions of measurement invariance that rely on conditional probability (Mellenbergh, 1989; Meredith, 1993; Meredith & Millsap, 1992).”
Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137 · Cited by 845
An Essay on Measurement and Factorial Invariance
Meredith, W., & Teresi, J. A. (2006) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Authors
- Mellenbergh, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Mellenbergh, Gideon J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-143
- ISSN
- 0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032579538
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Keywords
- differential item functioning, item response theory, conditional dependence, item characteristic curves, latent trait distribution, test score distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
