Cited by 4,536Psychometric Methodologies and TestingEducational Assessment and PedagogyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance

Meredith, William·1993·Psychometrika

Abstract

Several concepts are introduced and defined: measurement invariance, structural bias, weak measurement invariance, strong factorial invariance, and strict factorial invariance. It is shown that factorial invariance has implications for (weak) measurement invariance. Definitions of fairness in employment/admissions testing and salary equity are provided and it is argued that strict factorial invariance is required for fairness/equity to exist. Implications for item and test bias are developed and it is argued that item or test bias probably depends on the existence of latent variables that are irrelevant to the primary goal of test constructers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02294825

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that factorial invariance is tenable suggests that the tests are unbiased with respect to group.

    “The finding that factorial invariance is tenable suggests that the tests are unbiased with respect to group”
  • Factorial congruence, which concerns the hypothesis that Λb = Λw, is only one aspect of strict factorial invariance.

    “Factorial congruence, which concerns the hypothesis that ⌳ b = ⌳ w , is only one aspect of SFI (Meredith, 1993).”
  • The hypothesis of SFI is tested explicitly in MGCFA, whereas in Jensen's test it is not tested directly, rather some aspects are investigated piecemeal.

    “The hypothesis of SFI (Meredith, 1993), which we view as crucial to the meaningful interpretation of group differences within the factor model, is tested explicitly in MGCFA.In Jensen's test, this hypothesis is not tested directly, rather, some (but not all) aspects of SFI are investigated piecemeal in the prescribed procedure of Jensen's test (Jensen, 1992).”
  • The finding that SFI is tenable suggests that the tests are unbiased with respect to group.

    “As mentioned, this finding suggests that the tests are unbiased with respect to group (Millsap, 1997a(Millsap, , 1997b;;Mellenbergh, 1989;Meredith, 1993).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meredith, W.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Meredith, William
Venue
Psychometrika
Published
1993-12
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
525-543
ISSN
  • 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-0980
OpenAlex
W1963742443
Cited by
4,536
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 255 · 2025: 217 · 2024: 247 · 2023: 249 · 2022: 254 · 2021: 305 · 2020: 281 · 2019: 234 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 234 · 2016: 242 · 2015: 233 · 2014: 252 · 2013: 189 · 2012: 151
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychometrika (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
measurement invariance, structural bias, differential item functioning, test bias, admissions testing, salary equity, latent variables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review